Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:17:25.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Changes in the spatial distribution patterns of European regional activity: the enlargements of the mid-1980s and 2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Michael Artis
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Anindya Banerjee
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Massimiliano Marcellino
Affiliation:
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The deepening of the integration process and the continued expansion of the European Union (EU) over the last two decades have unavoidable consequences for both the spatial configuration of activity and the regional convergence process. As far as the convergence process is concerned, there is no consensus on whether integration is a positive phenomenon. Following a neo-classical view, the elimination of internal boundaries for the mobility of capital and labour will enhance the relative advantages of peripheral regions (that is, their lower salaries) inducing industry to spread to these regions. At the same time, integration may allow a better allocation of resources, leading to an increase in overall efficiency. Additionally, the enlargement of commercial links could promote convergence, at least between the regions most closely related in trade (Ben-David, 1994). Moreover, the small size of the companies in the South of Europe (unlike the North) means that they probably stand most to gain from the integration process (Neven, 1990). However, other authors do not share these optimistic views.

Thus, despite the lower salaries in the South, the core regions retain additional advantages: more accessibility to large markets, better infrastructure and human capital endowments, strong internal and external economies of scale, and so on. Furthermore, according to Krugman and Venables (1990) and Krugman (1991a, 1991b), insufficient integration (not enough reduction of the barriers) increases the concentration of the activity in the core and regional inequalities thus persist.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiginger, K., Bheim, M., Gugler, K., Peneder, M., Pfaffermayr, M. and Wolfmayr-Schnitzer, Y. 1999. ‘Specialisation (and Geographic) Concentration of European Manufacturing’. DG Enterprise Working Paper, No. 1.
Altomonte, C. and Bonassi, C. 2002. ‘Comparative Advantages or Economic Geography? An Assessment of EU Regional Disparities’. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics.
Altomonte, C. and Resmini, L. 1999. ‘The Geography of Transition: Agglomeration Versus Dispersion of Firms Activity in the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’. Paper presented at the European Workshop on ‘Regional Development and Policy in Europe’, Centre for European Integration Studies.
Amiti, M. 1999. ‘Specialization Patterns in Europe’. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 134, pp. 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. 2002. ‘Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Data and Explanations’. CESifo Working Paper, No. 881.
Ben-David, D. 1994. ‘Convergence Clubs and Diverging Economies’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 922.
Boldrin, M. and Canova, F. 2003. ‘Regional Policies and EU Enlargement’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 3744.
Brülhart, M. 1998. ‘Trading Places: Industrial Specialisation in the European Union’. Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 36, pp. 319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M. and Torstensson, J. 1996. ‘Regional Integration, Scale Economies and Industry Location’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1435.
Brülhart, M. and Traeger, R. 2003. ‘An Account of Geographic Concentration Patters in Europe’. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 35, pp. 597–624.
Davis, D. and Weinstein, D. 1998. ‘Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment’. Journal of International Economics, vol. 59, pp. 1–23.
Davis, D. and Weinstein, D., 1999. ‘Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation’. European Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2003. ‘European Competitiveness Report 2003’. Commission Staff Working Document SEC 1299, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
Giannetti, M. 2002. ‘The Effects of Integration on Regional Disparities: Convergence, Divergence or Both?’. European Economic Review, vol. 46, pp. 539–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haaland, J., Kind, H. and Midelfart-Knarvik, K. 1999. ‘What Determines the Economic Geography of Europe?’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2072.
Hallet, M. 2000. ‘Regional specialisation and Concentration in the European Union’ in Cuadrado-Roura, J. and Parellada, M. (eds.), Regional Convergence in the European Union, Berlin, Springer.
Hansen, N. 1990. ‘Do Producer Services Induce Regional Economic Development?’. Journal of Regional Science, vol. 30, pp. 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illeris, S. 1993. ‘An Inductive Theory of Regional Development’. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 72, pp. 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger-Boden, C. 2002. ‘European Integration and the Division of Labour Between European Regions’. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference of the European Trade Study Group.
Krugman, P. 1991a. ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, pp. 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P., 1991b. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P., 1998. ‘What's New About the New Economic Geography?’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 14, pp. 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1990. ‘Integration and the Competitiveness of Peripheral Industry’. In Bliss, C. and Macedo, Braga J. (eds.), Unity with Diversity in the European Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1995. ‘Globalization and the Inequality of Nations’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, pp. 857–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1996. ‘Integration, Specialization and Adjustment’. European Economic Review, vol. 40, pp. 959–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landesmann, M. 1995. ‘The Pattern of East–West European Integration: Catching Up or Falling Behind?’. In Dobrinsky, R. and Landesmann, M. (eds.), Transforming Economies and European Integration. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. 2003. ‘Structural Features of Economic Integration in an Enlarged Europe: Patterns of Catching-Up an Industrial Specialisation’. European Commission Economic Papers, No. 181.
Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P. and Traistaru, I. 2003. ‘Economic Integration and Manufacturing location in EU Accession Countries’. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 093/3.
López-Bazo, E., Vayá, E., Mora, T. and Suriñach, J. 1999. ‘Regional Economic Dynamics and Convergence in the European Union’. Annals of Regional Science, vol. 33, pp. 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magrini, S. 1999. ‘The Evolution of Income Disparities Among the Regions of the European Union’. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 29, pp. 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Ottaviano, P. 1999. ‘Growing Locations: Industry Location in a Model of Endogenous Growth’. European Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midelfart-Knarvik, K., Overman, H. and Venables, A. 2000. ‘Comparative Advantage and Economic Geography: Estimating the Location of Production in the EU’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2618.
Molle, W. 1996. ‘The Regional Economic Structure of the European Union: An Analysis of Long-Term Developments’. In Peschel, K. (ed.), Regional Growth and Regional Policy Within the Framework of European Integration. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molle, W.,. 1980. Regional Disparity and Economic Development in the European Community. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Mora, T., Vayá, E. and Suriñach, J. 2005. ‘Specialisation and Growth: The Detection of European Regional Convergence Clubs’. Economics Letters, vol. 86, pp. 181–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, P. 1948. ‘The Interpretation of Statistical Maps’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, vol. 10, pp. 243–51.Google Scholar
Neven, D. 1990. ‘EEC Integration Towards 1992: Some Distributional Aspects’. Economic Policy, vol. 10, pp. 14–62.Google Scholar
Ottaviano, G. and Puga, D. 1997. ‘Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the New Economic Geography’. World Economy, vol. 21, pp. 707–31.
Petrakos, G. 2000. ‘The Spatial Impact of East–West Integration’. In Petrakos, G., Maier, G. and Gorzelak, G. (eds.), Integration and Transition in Europe: The Economies Geography of Interaction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Puga, D. 1999. ‘The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequalities’. European Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 303–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puga, D. and Venables, A. 1996. ‘The Spread of Industry: Spatial Agglomeration in Economic Development’. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 10, pp. 440–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quah, D. 1997. ‘Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization and Convergence Clubs’. Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 2, pp. 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resmini, L. 2002. ‘Specialisation and Growth Prospects in Border Regions of Accession Countries’. Centre for European Integration Studies, ZEI Working Paper, B02-17.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. 1995. Reestructuración socioeconómica y desequilibrios regionales en la Unión Europea. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Económicos.Google Scholar
Suarez-Villa, L. and Cuadrado-Roura, J. 1993. ‘Regional Economic Integration and the evolution of Disparities’. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 72, pp. 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayá, E. and Suriñach, J. 2003. ‘The Spatial Distribution of Labour Productivity in the European Regions: A Study in Spatial Econometrics’. In Fingleton, B. (ed.), European Regional Growth. Aldershot: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. 1996. ‘Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries’. International Economic Review, vol. 37, pp. 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Schütz, U. and Stierle, M. 2003. ‘Convergence in an Enlarged EU? An Empirical Analysis of Regional Specialisation and Sectoral Concentration’. In Hausen, C., Resienk, M., Schürmann, N. and Stierle, M. (eds.), Determinants of Growth and Business Cycles: Theory, Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications. Berlin: Verlag Wissenschaft und Forschung.Google Scholar
Walz, U. 1999. Dynamics of Regional Integration. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×