Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:31:35.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The cyclical experience of the new Member States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Michael Artis
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Anindya Banerjee
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Massimiliano Marcellino
Affiliation:
Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we study the business cycle in the new Member States, focusing on the degree of cyclical concordance both within this group of countries, which turns out to be in general lower than that between the existing EU countries, and with respect to the Euro area, which is also generally low when GDP data are used, slightly higher with industrial production. Traditional optimal currency area criteria would say that these results cast doubt on the wisdom of adopting the euro in the near future for most of these countries; but other criteria such as the extent of trade and the probable non-availability of a well-established stabilisation regime outside monetary union membership point in the opposite direction.

The structure of this chapter is as follows. In the next section, we discuss the relevance of the topic under examination, briefly referring to some previous studies. The novel contribution of the present chapter stems from its use, in combination with new filtering techniques, of a flexible algorithm for dating the business cycle. These are discussed in section 5.3 of the chapter, full technical detail on the dating algorithm being postponed to the Appendix to this chapter. In section 5.4, we present the results of applying these techniques to the data sets available for the new Member States. Three concepts of the cycle are distinguished – the classical cycle, the growth cycle and the deviation cycle – and results for each are presented in turn.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Barro, R. 2002. ‘Currency UnionsQuarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, pp. 409–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artis, M., Kontolemis, Z. and Osborn, D. 1997. ‘Business Cycles for the G-7 and European Countries’. Journal of Business, vol. 70, pp. 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artis, M., Marcellino, M. and Proietti, T. 2003. ‘Dating the Euro Area Business Cycle’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 3696.
Artis, M., Marcellino, M. and Proietti, T. 2004a. ‘Characterising the Business Cycle for the Accession Countries’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 4457.
Artis, M., Marcellino, M. and Proietti, T. 2004b. ‘Dating Business Cycles: A Methodological Contribution with an Application to the Euro Area’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 66, pp. 537–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babetskii, I. 2004. ‘EU Enlargement and Endogeneity of some OCA Criteria: Evidence from the CEECs’. Czech National Bank Working Paper, No. 2.
Baxter, M. and King, R. 1999. ‘Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series’. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 81, pp. 575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. 1993. ‘Shocking Aspects of European Monetary Integration’. In Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F. (eds.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and CEPR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Quah, D. 1989. ‘The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances’. American Economic Review, vol. 79, pp. 655–73.Google Scholar
Boone, L. and Maurel, M. 1998. ‘Economic Convergence of the CEECs with the EU’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2018.
Boone, L., and Maurel, M. 1999. ‘An Optimal Currency Area Perspective of the EU Enlargement of the CEECs’. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2119.
Bry, G. and Boschan, C. 1971. Cyclical Analysis of Time Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Buiter, B. and Grafe, C. 2001. ‘Central Banking and the Choice of Currency Regime in Accession Countries’. SUERF Studies, No. 11 (Vienna: Société Universitaire de Recherches Financières).
Burns, A. and Mitchell, W. 1946. Measuring Business Cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Cogley, T. and Nason, J. 1995. ‘Effects of the Hodrick–Prescott Filter on Trend and Difference Stationary Time Series: Implications for Business Cycle Research’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 19, pp. 253–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvas, Z. and Szapáry, G. 2004. ‘Business Cycle Synchronization in the Enlarged EU: Comovements in the (Soon-to-be) New and Old Members’. Magyar Nemzeti Bank Working Paper, No. 1.
De Grauwe, P. and Schnabel, F. 2005. ‘Exchange Rate Regimes and Macroeconomic Stability in Central and Eastern Europe’. In Schadler, S. (ed.), Euro Adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: Opportunities and Challenges. Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
Doornik, J. 2001. Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Programming Language. London: Timberlake Consultants Press.Google Scholar
Fidrmuc, J. 2004. ‘The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area: Criteria, IntraIndustry Trade, and EU Enlargement’. Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 22, pp. 1–12.
Frankel, J. and Rose, A. 1997. ‘Is EMU More Justifiable Ex Post than Ex Ante?.’ European Economic Review, vol. 41, pp. 753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, J. 2005. ‘Real Convergence and Euro Adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: Trade and Business Cycle Correlations as Endogenous Criteria for Joining EMU’. In Schadler, S. (ed.), Euro Adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: Opportunities and Challenges. Washington: IMF.Google Scholar
Gómez, V. 2001. ‘The Use of Butterworth Filters for Trend and Cycle Estimation in Economic Time Series’. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 19, pp. 365–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J. 2003. ‘Comment on “A Comparison of Two Business Cycle Dating Methods” ’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 27, pp. 1691–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, D. and Pagan, A. 2001. ‘Extracting, Analysing and Using Cyclical Information’. Mimeo.
Harding, D. and Pagan, A. 2003a. ‘A Comparison of Two Business Cycle Dating Methods’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 27, pp. 1681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, D. and Pagan, A. 2003b. ‘Rejoinder to James Hamilton’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 27, pp. 1695–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. and Jäger, A. 1993. ‘Detrending, Stylized Facts and the Business Cycle’. Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 8, pp. 231–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodrick, R. and Prescott, E. 1997. ‘Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation’. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 29, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. and Rebelo, S. 1993. ‘Low Frequency Filtering and Real Business Cycles’. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 17, pp. 207–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, I. 2001. ‘Some Empirical Tests on the Integration of Economic Activity Between the Euro Area and the Accession Countries’. BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 9.
Korhonen, I. 2003. ‘Some Empirical Tests on the Integration of Economic Activity Between the Euro Area and the Accession Countries: A Note’. Economics of Transition, vol. 11, pp. 177–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, A. and Moore, G. 1989. ‘Leading Indicators for the Service sector’. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, vol. 3, pp. 379–86.Google Scholar
Lundbergh, S. and Teräsvirta, T. 2002. ‘Forecasting with Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models’. In Clements, M. and Hendry, D. (eds.), A Companion to Economic Forecasting. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mundell, R. 1961. ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’. American Economic Review, vol. 51, pp. 657–65.Google Scholar
Pollock, D. 1999. Handbook of Time Series Analysis, Signal Processing and Dynamics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×