Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T22:07:02.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Modelling gambling demand in a laboratory casino: discovering the importance of individual-specific effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

W. David Walls
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics and Academic Director University of Calgary
Patrick J. Harvey
Affiliation:
Adjunct Associate Professor Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Leighton Vaughan Williams
Affiliation:
Nottingham Trent University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Gambling has become an important source of government revenue all around the globe at the local, regional and national levels. Governments seek to maintain, and where possible to increase, the inflow of gambling revenues. Gambling businesses operate with a profit maximisation objective and find increasing government taxation a serious threat to profitability. One way to approach the problem between firms and tax authorities is to first analyse how to increase the size of the aggregate pie to be divided between the two. The key variable of analysis is the aggregate house take-out percentage, since this is the essential element of the price of gambling from the perspective of potential consumers. Our analysis focuses on the question of how to set this take-out percentage so that the aggregate revenue collected from gamblers is maximised. However, the analysis presented in this chapter is useful for other policy purposes because it quantifies the demand curve.

Reduced consumption, in addition to the amount of revenue raised, is also of interest to certain government entities, particularly those concerned with social issues such as problem gambling, crime and other social ills that are sometimes seen to be negative externalities of legal gambling markets. For these other purposes, it is also worthwhile to have an estimate of the responsiveness of gambling demand to increases in the house take-out rate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (1999) ‘Why Experiment in Economics?’, Economic Journal, 109(453), pp. F16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. (1997) Econometric Analysis, 3rd edn., New York: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P. J. and Walls, W. D. (2003) ‘The Revealed Demand for Pirate Goods: Probit Analysis of Experimental Data’, International Journal of Management, 20(2), pp. 194–201Google Scholar
Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) (1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1999) ‘Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of Behavioural Economics’, Economic Journal, 109(453), pp. FM23–F34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. (1959) Individual Choice Behaviour: A Mathematical Analysis, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1982) ‘Industrial Organisation Theory and Experimental Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 20(4), pp. 1485–1527Google Scholar
Plott, C. R.(1989) ‘An Updated Review of Industrial Organisation: Applications of Experimental Methods’, in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organisation, Handbooks in Economics, 2, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1101–76.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1962) ‘An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behaviour’, Journal of Political Economy, 70, pp. 111–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.(1965) ‘Experimental Auction Markets and the Walrasian Hypothesis’, Journal of Political Economy, 75, pp. 387–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L.(1976) ‘Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory’, American Economic Review, 6(2), pp. 274–9Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.(1982) ‘Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science’, American Economic Review, 72(5), pp. 923–55Google Scholar
Smith, V. L.(1989) ‘Theory, Experiment and Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), pp. 151–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K. (1986) Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×