Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:29:44.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Efficiency of the odds on English professional football matches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David Forrest
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Economics University of Salford
Robert Simmons
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Economics Lancaster University Management School
Leighton Vaughan Williams
Affiliation:
Nottingham Trent University
Get access

Summary

Motivation

This chapter considers two dimensions of efficiency that we suspect may be related. In the context of results betting on English professional football (soccer), we test for the presence of longshot bias and for the influence of ‘sentiment’ on the odds offered by bookmakers.

Positive longshot bias (such that superior returns accrue to bets on short-odds outcomes) is a well-documented feature of many horse-race betting markets. However, Woodland and Woodland (1994, 2001, 2003) present evidence of reverse or negative bias in the odds for two American team sports, (ice) hockey and baseball. It is potentially interesting to investigate whether their finding that it is financially more rewarding to bet on underdogs generalises to team sports in other countries. If it does, analysing differences in the betting markets between horse-racing and team sports is likely to be instructive since any convincing theory on the source of longshot bias needs to be able to account for cases of both positive and negative bias (Vaughan Williams and Paton, 1998).

One of the more obvious points of difference between horse-racing and team sports is that enthusiasts for the latter tend to pledge their allegiance to a particular club and have a long-term interest in and commitment to the success of ‘their’ team. This phenomenon of ‘the fan’ may then have a real impact in the betting market. Clubs attract thousands or even millions of supporters and profit from their loyalty by selling them high-priced souvenirs such as replica shirts.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, C. and Chevalier, J. (1999) ‘Identifying Investor Sentiment from Price Paths: The Case of Football Betting’, Journal of Business, 72, pp. 493–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, M., Law, D. and Peel, D. (2000) ‘The Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in UK Football Betting’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47 pp. 25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, L. (2004) ‘New Light on the Longshot Bias’, Applied Economics, 36 pp. 315–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M. and Pope, P. (2004) ‘The Value of Statistical Forecasts in the UK Association Football Betting Market’, International Journal of Forecasting, 20, pp. 697–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, S. and Goddard, J. (2001) The Economics of Football, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, D. and Simmons, R. (2002) ‘Outcome Uncertainty and Attendance Demand: The Case of English Soccer’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series D), The Statistician, 51, pp. 229–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, G., Sherony, K. and Haupert, M. (1992) ‘The Demand for Major League Baseball: A Test of the Uncertainty of Outcome Hypothesis’, American Economist, 36, pp. 72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuypers, T. (2000) ‘Informational Efficiency: An Empirical Study of a Fixed Odds Betting Market’, Applied Economics, 32, pp. 1353–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, D. A. and Thomas, D. A. (1988) ‘Outcome Uncertainty and the Demand for Football’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 35, pp. 242–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, D. A. and Thomas, D. A.(1992) ‘The Demand for Football: Some Evidence on Outcome Uncertainty’, Empirical Economics, 17, pp. 323–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rascher, D. (1999) ‘A Test of the Optimal Positive Production Network Externality in Major League Baseball’, in Fizel, J., Gustafson, E. and Hadley, L. (eds.), Sports Economics: Current Research, Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 27–45Google Scholar
Sauer, R. (1998) ‘The Economics of Wagering Markets’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 2021–64Google Scholar
Strumpf, K. (2003) ‘Illegal Sports Bookmakers’, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, mimeo
Vaughan Williams, L. and Paton, D. (1998) ‘Why are Some Favourite-Longshot Biases Positive and Some Negative?’, Applied Economics, 30, pp. 1505–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, L. and Woodland, B. (1994) ‘Market Efficiency and the Favourite-Longshot Bias: The Baseball Betting Market’, Journal of Finance, 49, pp. 269–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, L. and Woodland, B.(2001) ‘Market Efficiency and Profitable Wagering in the National Hockey League: Can Bettors Score on Longshots?’, Southern Economic Journal, 67, pp. 983–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, L. and Woodland, B.(2003) ‘The Reverse Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in Major League Baseball: An Update’, Bulletin of Economic Research, 55, pp. 113–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A. (1963) ‘Estimates for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equation: Some Exact Finite Sample Results’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, pp. 987–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×