Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:00:35.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2009

Lindley Darden
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reasoning in Biological Discoveries
Essays on Mechanisms, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution
, pp. 313 - 336
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ada, G. L. and Gustav, N. (1987), “The Clonal Selection Theory,” Scientific American 257: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberts, Bruce, Bray, Dennis, Lewis, Julian, Raff, Martin, Roberts, Keith, and Watson, James D. (1983), Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1992), “How Do You Falsify a Question?: Crucial Tests versus Crucial Demonstrations,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 74–88.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1997), “A Twentieth-Century Phlogiston: Constructing Error and Differentiating Domains,” Perspectives on Science 5: 81–127.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1999), “Negative Results as Positive Knowledge, and Zeroing in on Significant Problems,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 191: 301–305.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (2002), “Error Types,” Perspectives on Science 9: 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allemang, Dean (1990), Understanding Programs as Devices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Allen, Garland (1978), Thomas Hunt Morgan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, D. I., Slechta, E. S., and Roth, J. R. (1998), “Evidence that Gene Amplification Underlies Adaptive Mutability of the Bacterial lac Operon,” Science 282: 1133–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Anonymous (1970a), “Central Dogma Reversed,” News and Views, Nature 226: 1198–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Anonymous (1970b), “Cancer Viruses: More of the Same,” Nature 227: 887–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, GertrudeMargaret, Elizabeth ([1971] 1981), “Causality and Determination,” in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind, The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, v. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. J. and Fristrup, K. (1982), “The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion,” Paleobiology 8: 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.) (1974), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Jason M. (2005), “Adaptive Speciation: The Role of Natural Selection in Mechanisms of Geographic and Non-geographic Speciation,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 303–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltimore, David (1970), “Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase,” Nature 226: 1209–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltimore, David (1977), “Viruses, Polymerases and Cancer,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology, 1933–1975. [no editor] New York: Elsevier, pp. 495–508. Presented December 12, 1975.Google Scholar
Barinaga, M. (1999), “New Clues to How Neurons Strengthen Their Connections,” Science 284: 1755–1757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, Beatrice (1928), William Bateson, Naturalist. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, William (1902), Mendel's Principles of Heredity – A Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, William (1913), Problems of Genetics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, William, Saunders, E. R., and Punnett, R. C. (1905), “Further Experiments on Inheritance in Sweet Peas and Stocks: Preliminary Account,” Proceedings of the Royal Society 77, Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–141.Google Scholar
Bateson, William, Saunders, E. R., and Punnett, R. C. (1906), “Experimental Studies in the Physiology of Heredity,” Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society III. Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–161.Google Scholar
Bateson, William and Punnett, R. C. (1911), “On Gametic Series Involving Reduplication of Certain Terms,” Journal of Genetics 1. Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John (1980), “What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?” in Asquith, Peter D. and Giere, Ronald N. (eds.), PSA 1980, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 397–426.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1995), “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis,” in Lennox, James G. and Wolters, Gereon (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 45–81.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1997), “Why Do Biologists Argue Like They Do?Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S432–S443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1984), “Reconceptualizations and Interfield Connections: The Discovery of the Link Between Vitamins and Coenzymes,” Philosophy of Science 51: 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1986), “Introduction: The Nature of Scientific Integration,” in Bechtel, W. (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, pp. 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1988), Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Adele Abrahamsen (2005), “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative,” in Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 421–441.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Richardson, Robert C. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Belozersky, Andrei N. and Spirin, Alexander S. (1958), “A Correlation between the Compositions of Deoxyribonucleic and Ribonucleic Acids,” Nature 182: 111–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, Paul and Singer, Maxine (1992), Dealing with Genes: The Language of Heredity. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar
Blackwell, R. J. (1969), Discovery in the Physical Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bjedov, Ivana, Tenaillon, Olivier, Gerard, Benedicte, Souze, Valeria, Denamur, Erick, Radman, Miraslav, Taddei, Francois, and Matic, Ivan (2003), “Stress-Induced Mutagenesis in Bacteria,” Science 300: 1404–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogen, James (2004), “Analysing Causality: The Opposite of Counterfactual is Factual,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, James (2005), “Regularities and Causality; Generalizations and Causal Explanations,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogen, James and Woodward, James (1988), “Saving the Phenomena,” Philosophical Review 97: 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, S., Cohen, M., and Orgel, L. (1965), “Suppression of and Complementation among Mutants of the Regulatory Gene of the Lactose Operon of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Biology 14: 300–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boveri, Theodor ([1902] 1964), “On Multipolar Mitosis as a Means of Analysis of the Cell Nucleus,” in Willier, B. H. and Oppenheimer, J. (eds.), Foundations of Experimental Embryology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
Boveri, Theodor (1904), Ergebnisse über die Konstitution der chromatischen Substanz des Zellkerns. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1980), “A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Giere, Ronald N. (eds.), PSA 1980. v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 427–439.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1985), “Grene on Mechanism and Reductionism: More Than Just a Side Issue,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Kitcher, Philip (eds.), PSA 1984, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 345–353.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Sydney, Jacob, Francois, and Meselson, M. (1961), “An Unstable Intermediate Carrying Information from Genes to Ribosomes for Protein Synthesis,” Nature 190: 576–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, William F. and Clark A. Chinn (1994), “Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence from Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Burian, R. M. (eds.), PSA 1994, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 304–313.Google Scholar
Bridewell, Will (2004), Science as an Anomaly-Driven Enterprise: A Computational Approach to Generating Acceptable Theory Revisions in the Face of Anomalous Data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Bridges, Bryn A. (1995), “Sexual Potency and Adaptive Mutation in Bacteria,” Trends in Microbiology 3: 291–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, Calvin B. (1914), “Direct Proof Through Non-disjunction that the Sex-linked Genes of Drosophila are Borne by the X-chromosome,” Science, N. S., 40: 107–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, Calvin B. (1916), “Non-disjunction as Proof of the Chromosome Theory of Heredity,” Genetics 1: 1–52, 107–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Brisson, Dustin (2003), “The Directed Mutation Controversy in an Evolutionary Context,” Critical Reviews in Microbiology 29: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen (1978a), “Nettie M. Stevens and the Discovery of Sex Determination by Chromosomes,” Isis 69: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen (1978b), “A Geologist Among Astronomers: The Rise and Fall of the Chamberlin–Moulton Cosmogony,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce (1982), “Mechanizing the Search for Explanatory Hypotheses,” in Asquith, Peter and Nickles, Thomas (eds.), PSA 1982, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce (1985), “Steps Toward Mechanizing Discovery,” in Schaffner, K. (ed.), Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 94–114.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1983), “Adaptation,” in Grene, Marjorie (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1996a), “Underappreciated Pathways Toward Molecular Genetics as Illustrated by Jean Brachet's Cytochemical Embryology,” in Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1996b), “Some Epistemological Reflections on Polistes as a Model Organism,” in Turillazzi, S. and West-Eberhard, M. J. (eds.), Natural History and Evolution of an Animal Society: The Paper Wasp Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 318–337.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1957), “A Modification of Jerne's Theory of Antibody Production Using the Concept of Clonal Selection,” The Australian Journal of Science 20: 67–69.Google Scholar
Bylander, T. and Chandrasekaran, B. (1987), “Generic Tasks for Knowledge-Based Reasoning: The ‘Right’ Level of Abstraction for Knowledge Acquisition,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28: 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylander, T. and Mittal, Sanjay (1986), “CSRL: A Language for Classificatory Problem Solving and Uncertainty Handling,” AI Magazine 7(3): 66–77.Google Scholar
Cain, Joseph A. and Darden, Lindley (1988), “Hull and Selection,” Biology and Philosophy 3: 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, John (1995), “Response [to Bridges 1995] Cairns,” Trends in Microbiology 3: 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, John (1997), Matters of Life and Death: Perspectives on Public Health, Molecular Biology, Cancer, and the Prospects for the Human Race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, John (1998), “Mutation and Cancer: The Antecedents to Our Studies of Adaptive Mutation,” Genetics 148: 1433–1440.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairns, John and Foster, Patricia L. (1991), “Adaptive Reversion of a Frameshift Mutation in Escherichia coli,” Genetics 128: 695–701.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairns, John and Foster, Patricia L. (2003), “Letter to the Editor: The Risk of Lethals for Hypermutating Bacteria in Stationary Phase,” Genetics 165: 2317–2318.Google Scholar
Cairns, John, Overbaugh, Julie, and Miller, S. (1988), “The Origin of Mutants,” Nature 335: 142–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, E. A. (1971), “An Unacknowledged Founding of Molecular Biology: H. J. Muller's Contributions to Gene Theory, 1910–1936,” Journal of the History of Biology 4: 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, E. E. (1913), “The Mendelian Ratio in Relation to Certain Orthopteran Chromosomes,” The Journal of Morphology 24: 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2004), “Causation: One Word, Many Things,” Philosophy of Science 71: 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, W. E. and Little, C. C. (1910), “On a Modified Mendelian Ratio among Yellow Mice,” Science 32: 868–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cech, T. R. (2000), “The Ribosome is a Ribozyme,” Science 289: 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadarevian, Soraya (1996), “Sequences, Conformation, Information: Biochemists and Molecular Biologists in the 1950s,” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 361–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadarevian, Soraya (2002), Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chadarevian, Soraya and Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1996), “The Tools of the Discipline: Biochemists and Molecular Biologists,” Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of the History of Biology 29: 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, John, and Keuneke, Anne (1986), “Functional Representation as a Basis for Generating Explanations,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA, pp. 726–731.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, John, Keuneke, Anne, and Herman, David (1989), “Building Routine Planning Systems and Explaining Their Behaviour,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 30: 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changeux, J. P. (1985), Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind. New York: Pantheon, Random House.Google Scholar
Chapuis, N., Durup, M., and Thinus-Blanc, C. (1987), “The Role of Exploratory Experience in a Shortcut in Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus),” Animal Learning and Behavior 15: 174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charniak, Eugene and McDermott, Drew (1985), Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Coleman, William (1965), “Cell, Nucleus, and Inheritance: A Historical Study,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109: 124–158.Google Scholar
Coleman, William (1970), “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science,” Centaurus 15: 228–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, M. (1976), “Complementary Molecular Models of Learning and Memory,” BioSystems 8: 119–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correns, Carl ([1900] 1966), “G. Mendel's Law Concerning the Behavior of Progeny of Varietal Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 119–132.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (1998), Neural Mechanisms: On the Structure, Function, and Development of Theories in Neurobiology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2001), “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy,” Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2002a), “Structures of Scientific Theories,” in Machamer, Peter K. and Silberstein, M. (eds.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2002b), “Interlevel Experiments, Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience of Memory,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S83-S97.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2003), “The Making of a Memory Mechanism,” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 153–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, Carl F. (2005), “Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multifield Integration, and the Unity of Neuroscience,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 373–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, Carl F. and Lindley Darden (2001), “Discovering Mechanisms in Neurobiology: The Case of Spatial Memory,” in Machamer, Peter, Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 112–137.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley (2005), “Introduction: Mechanisms Then and Now,” in Special Issue, “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, Francis (unpublished MS of 1955), “On Degenerate Templates and the Adaptor Hypothesis: A Note for the RNA Tie Club.”
Crick, Francis (1957), “Discussion Note,” in Crook, E. M. (ed.), The Structure of Nucleic Acids and Their Role in Protein Synthesis: Biochemical Society Symposium 14 (February 18, 1956). London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis (1958), “On Protein Synthesis,” Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology 12: 138–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1959), “The Present Position of the Coding Problem,” Structure and Function of Genetic Elements: Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 12: 35–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1970), “Central Dogma of Molecular Biology,” Nature 227: 561–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1988), What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis (1996), “The Impact of Linus Pauling on Molecular Biology,” in Krishnamurthy, Ramesh S. (ed.), The Pauling Symposium: A Discourse on the Art of Biography. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Libraries Special Collections, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis, Barnett, Leslie, Brenner, Sydney, and Watts-Tobin, R. J. (1961), “General Nature of the Genetic Code for Proteins,” Nature 192: 1227–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis and Watson, James D. (1956), “Structure of Small Viruses,” Nature 177: 473–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis and Watson, James D. (1957), “Virus Structure: General Principles,” in Ciba Foundation Symposium on The Nature of Viruses. London: J. & A. Churchill, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
Cuénot, Lucien (1905), “Les Races Pures et Leurs Combinaisons Chez Les Souris,” Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 4 Serie, T. 111: 123–132.Google Scholar
Culotta, Elizabeth (1994), “A Boost for ‘Adaptive’ Mutation,” Science 265: 318–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culp, Sylvia (1997), “Establishing Genotype/Phenotype Relationships: Gene Targeting as an Experimental Approach,” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64: S268–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, James E. (1986), Perception with an Eye for Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1974), Reasoning in Scientific Change: The Field of Genetics at Its Beginnings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1976), “Reasoning in Scientific Change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries, and the Discovery of Segregation,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 7: 127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1977), “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism,” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darden, Lindley (1978), “Discoveries and the Emergence of New Fields in Science,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Hacking, Ian (eds.), PSA 1978, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1980), “Theory Construction in Genetics,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1982a), “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction,” in Nickles, Thomas and Asquith, Peter (eds.), PSA 1982, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1982b), “Aspects of Theory Construction in Biology,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Hanover: North Holland Publishing Co., pp. 463–477.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1983), “Reasoning by Analogy in Scientific Theory Construction,” in Michalski, R. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1983 International Machine Learning Workshop, Urbana, IL: Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1986), “Reasoning in Theory Construction: Analogies, Interfield Connections, and Levels of Organization,” in Weingartner, P. and Dorn, G. (eds.), Foundations of Biology. Vienna, Austria: Holder-Picher-Tempsky, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1987), “Viewing the History of Science As Compiled Hindsight,” AI Magazine 8 (2): 33–41.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1990), “Diagnosing and Fixing Faults in Theories,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 319–346.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1991), Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1992), “Strategies for Anomaly Resolution,” in Giere, Ronald (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 15. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1995), “Exemplars, Abstractions, and Anomalies: Representations and Theory Change in Mendelian and Molecular Genetics,” in Lennox, James G. and Wolters, Gereon (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1996), “Generalizations in Biology: Essay Review of K. Schaffner's Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 27: 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1998), “Anomaly-Driven Theory Redesign: Computational Philosophy of Science Experiments,” in Bynum, Terrell W. and Moor, James (eds.), The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (2001), “Discovering Mechanisms: A Computational Philosophy of Science Perspective,” in Jantke, Klaus P. and Shinohara, Ayumi (eds.), Discovery Science (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, DS2001). New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (2002), “Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S354–S365.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Cain, Joseph A. (1989), “Selection Type Theories,” Philosophy of Science 56: 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Michael Cook (1994), “Reasoning Strategies in Molecular Biology: Abstractions, Scans and Anomalies,” in Hull, David, Forbes, Micky, and Burian, Richard M. (eds.), PSA 1994, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 179–191.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Craver, Carl (2002), “Strategies in the Interfield Discovery of the Mechanism of Protein Synthesis,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Maull, Nancy (1977), “Interfield Theories,” Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley, Moberg, Dale, Nagarajan, Satish, and Josephson, John (1991), “Anomaly Driven Redesign of a Scientific Theory: The TRANSGENE.2 Experiments,” Technical Report 91-LD-TRANSGENE. Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Roy Rada (1988a), “Hypothesis Formation Using Part-Whole Interrelations,” in Helman, David (ed.), Analogical Reasoning. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 341–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Roy Rada (1988b), “Hypothesis Formation Via Interrelations,” in Prieditis, Armand (ed.), Analogica. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles ([1859] 1966), On the Origin of Species, A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1868), The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 vols. New York: Orange Judd & Co.Google Scholar
Davis, Bernard D. (1980), “Frontiers of the Biological Sciences,” Science 209: 78–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Randall and Walter C. Hamscher (1988), “Model-Based Reasoning: Troubleshooting,” in Shrobe, H. E. (ed.), Exploring Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 297–346.Google Scholar
Didion, David (2003), “Relevant Bounds on Hierarchical Levels in the Description of Mechanisms,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienert, F. (1900), “Sur la Fermentation du Galactose et sur l'Accoutamance des levures à ce Sucre,” Annales de l'Institute Pasteur 14: 138–189.Google Scholar
Dietterich, Thomas G., B. London, K. Clarkson, and G. Dromey (1982), “Learning and Inductive Inference,” in Cohen, Paul R. and Feigenbaum, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, v. 3. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 323–511.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937), Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Kevin (1995), “How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories,” in Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 365–395.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. C. (1965), A Short History of Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald and Mountcastle, V. (1978), The Mindful Brain: Cortical Organization and the Group Selective Theory of Higher Brain Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin (2004), “Error as Means to Discovery,” Philosophy of Science 71: 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engert, E. and Bonhoeffer, T. (1999), “Dendritic Spine Changes Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity,” Nature 399: 66–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, E. (1894), “Einfluss der Konfiguration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme,” Berichte der deutschen chemische Gesellschaft 27: 2985–2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogle, T. (2000), “The Dissolution of Protein Coding Genes in Molecular Biology,” in Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Patricia L. (1997), “Nonadaptive Mutations Occur on the F' Episome During Adaptive Mutation Conditions in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology 179: 1550–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. (2000), “Adaptive Mutation: Implications for Evolution,” BioEssays 22: 1067–1074.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. and Cairns, John (1992), “Mechanisms of Directed Mutation,” Genetics 131: 783–789.Google ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. and Trimarchi, Jeffrey M. (1994), “Adaptive Reversion of a Frameshift Mutation in Escherichia coli by Simple Base Deletions in Homopolymeric Runs,” Science 265: 407–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, Allan (1989), “The Epistemology of Experiment,” in Gooding, David, Pinch, Trevor, and Schaffer, Simon (eds.), The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 437–460.Google Scholar
Frey, U. and Morris, R. G. (1998), “Synaptic Tagging: Implications for Late Maintenance of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation,” Trends in Neuroscience 21: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedberg, Errol C. (1997), Correcting the Blueprint of Life: An Historical Account of the Discovery of DNA Repair Mechanisms. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Fruton, Joseph S. (1972), Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Galitski, T. and Roth, John R. (1996), “A Search for a General Phenomenon of Adaptive Mutability,” Genetics 143: 645–659.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallo, Robert (1991), Virus Hunting, Aids, Cancer, and the Human Retrovirus: A Story of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis (1871), “Experiments in Pangenesis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society (Biology) 19: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamow, George (1954), “Possible Relation between Deoxyribonucleic Acid and Protein Structures,” Nature 173: 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1993), “Molecular Biology in the French Tradition? Redefining Local Traditions and Disciplinary Patterns,” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 473–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1996), “Molecular Biologists, Biochemists, and Messenger RNA: The Birth of a Scientific Network,” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 417–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genesereth, Michael (1980), “Metaphors and Models,” Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 208–211.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre (1983), “Structure Mapping – A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, G. K. (1896), “The Origin of Hypotheses, Illustrated by the Discussion of a Topographic Problem,” Science, N. S., 3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, Scott F. and Bolker, Jessica A. (2001), “Homologies of Process and Modular Elements of Embryonic Construction,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 291: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, W. and Müller-Hill, B. (1966), “Isolation of the Lac Repressor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 56: 1891–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, W. and Müller-Hill, B. (1967), “The Lac Operator Is DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 58: 2415–2421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennan, Stuart S. (1992), Mechanisms, Models, and Causation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Glennan, Stuart S. (1996), “Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation,” Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (2002), “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S342–S353.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (2005), “Modeling Mechanisms,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 443–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glymour, Clark (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goel, Ashok and Chandrasekaran, B. (1989), “Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, MI, pp. 1388–1394.
Golub, E. (1981), The Cellular Basis of Immune Response, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. and Vrba, Elisabeth S. (1982), “Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form,” Paleobiology 8: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, Russell (1985), Learning by Understanding Analogies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Gros, Francois (1979), “The Messenger,” in Lwoff, Andre and Ullmann, Agnes (eds.), Origins of Molecular Biology: A Tribute to Jacque Monod. New York: Academic Press, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
Gros, Francois, Hiatt, Howard, Gilbert, Walter, Kurland, Chuck G., Risebrough, R. W., and Watson, James D. (1961), “Unstable Ribonucleic Acid Revealed by Pulse Labeling of E. coli,” Nature 190: 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1988), “On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences,” Journal of Philosophy 85: 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1992), “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences,” in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64.Google Scholar
Hall, Barry G. (1990), “Spontaneous Point Mutations That Occur More Often When Advantageous Than When Neutral,” Genetics 126: 5–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Barry G. (1997), “On the Specificity of Adaptive Mutations,” Genetics 145: 39–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Zach W. (ed.) (1992), An Introduction to Molecular Neurobiology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Hanson, Norwood Russell (1958), Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, Norwood Russell ([1961] 1970), “Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?” in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Reprinted in B. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 620–633.Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell (1963), The Concept of the Positron: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1986), Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1960), An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1970), The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom and Madden, E. H. (1975), Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Harris, Reuben S., Longerich, Simonne, and Rosenberg, Susan M. (1994), “Recombination in Adaptive Mutation,” Science 264: 258–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebb, D. O. (1949), The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, Heather, Slechta, E. Susan, Bergthorsson, Ulfar, Andersson, Dan I., and Roth, John R. (2002), “Amplification Mutagenesis: Evidence that ‘Directed’ Adaptive Mutation and General Hypermutability Result from Growth with a Selected Gene Amplification,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 2164–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary (1966), Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1955), “An Enzymic Mechanism for Amino Acid Activation in Animal Tissues,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 16: 288–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1990), Toward the Habit of Truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1996), “Biochemistry or Molecular Biology? The Discovery of ‘Soluble RNA’,” Trends in Biological Sciences Letters (TIBS) 21: 77–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoagland, Mahlon B., Paul Zamecnik, and Mary L. Stephenson (1959), “A Hypothesis Concerning the Roles of Particulate and Soluble Ribonucleic Acids in Protein Synthesis,” in Zirkle, R. E. (ed.), A Symposium on Molecular Biology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1989), “Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction,” Cognitive Science 13: 295–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1995), Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur (1959), A History of Cytology. New York: Abelard-Schuman.Google Scholar
Hull, David (1974), Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hull, David (1980), “Individuality and Selection,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David ([1981] 1984), “Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay,” in Jensen, U. L. and Harré, R. (eds.), The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 23–44. Reprinted in Robert N. Brandon and Richard M. Burian (eds.), Genes, Populations, and Organisms: Controversies over the Units of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 142–160.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J. (1995), Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Francois (1988), The Statue Within: An Autobiography. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jacob, Francois and Monod, Jacques (1961), “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 318–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, F. A. (1909), “La theorie de la chiasmatypie,” La Cellule 25: 389–411.Google Scholar
Jerne, Niels K. (1955), “The Natural-Selection Theory of Antibody Formation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 41: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerne, Niels K. (1966), “The Natural Selection Theory of Antibody Formation: Ten Years Later,” in Cairns, John, Stent, Gunther S., and Watson, James D. (eds.), Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory of Quantitative Biology, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Wilhelm (1909), Elemente der Exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Josephson, John R., Chandrasekaran, B., Smith, J., and Tanner, M. (1987), “A Mechanism for Forming Composite Explanatory Hypotheses,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC- 17: 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, John R. and Josephson, Susan G. (eds.) (1994), Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, Horace F. (1996), The Eighth Day of Creation: The Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Expanded Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Karp, Peter (1989), Hypothesis Formation and Qualitative Reasoning in Molecular Biology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (Available as a technical report from the Computer Science Department: STAN-CS-89–1263.)Google Scholar
Karp, Peter (1990), “Hypothesis Formation as Design,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 275–317.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1971), “Articulation of Parts Explanation in Biology and the Rational Search for Them,” in Roger C. Buck and Robert S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1970. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 257–272.
Kay, Lily E. (2000), Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Vernon (1908), Darwinism Today. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. and Oppenheim, P. (1956), “On Reduction,” Philosophical Studies 7: 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettler, Brian and Lindley Darden (1993), “Protein Sequencing Experiment Planning Using Analogy,” in Hunter, L., Searls, D., and Shavlik, J. (eds.), ISMB-93, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, pp. 216–224.Google Scholar
Keuneke, Anne (1989), Machine Understanding of Devices: Causal Explanation of Diagnostic Conclusions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Keyes, Martha (1999a), “The Prion Challenge to the “Central Dogma” of Molecular Biology, 1965–1991, Part I: Prelude to Prions,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Martha (1999b), “The Prion Challenge to the “Central Dogma” of Molecular Biology, 1965–1991, Part II: The Problem with Prions,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, W. B. (1919), “The Fate of Homozygous Yellow Mice,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 28: 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1981), “Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984), “1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences,” The Philosophical Review 93: 335–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1987), “Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the ‘Philosophers’ on the Ontological Status of Species,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 184–192.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World,” in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1999), “The Hegemony of Molecular Biology,” Biology & Philosophy 14: 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, Scott A. (1993), The Logic of Discovery: A Theory of the Rationality of Scientific Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. (1982), From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korf, R. E. (1985), “An Analysis of Abstraction in Problem Solving,” in Pottmyer, J. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Technical Symposium. Gaithersburg, MD: Washington, DC Chapter of the ACM, June 20, 1985, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Koshland, D. E. (1973), “Protein Shape and Biological Control,” Scientific American 229: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottler, Malcolm (1979), “Hugo de Vries and the Rediscovery of Mendel's Laws,” Annals of Science 36: 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1974), “Second Thoughts on Paradigms,” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 459–482.Google Scholar
Kuno, M. (1995), The Synapse: Function, Plasticity, and Neurotrophism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970), “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1976), Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Worrall, J. and Zahar, E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Otto E. (1991), “The Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics,” Annual Review of Genetics 25: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, Pat, Simon, Herbert, Bradshaw, Gary L., and Zytkow, Jan M. (1987), Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laudan, Larry (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Jill C. and Foster, Patricia L. (2003), “Error-prone DNA Polymerase IV Is Controlled by the Stress-response Sigma Factor, RpoS, in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Microbiology 50: 549–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leatherdale, W. H. (1974), The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lederberg, Joshua ([1959]1961), “Genes and Antibodies,” Science 129: 1649–1653. Reprinted with a postscript in Stanford Medical Bulletin 19: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederberg, Joshua (1965), “Signs of Life: Criterion-System of Exobiology,” Nature 207: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederberg, Joshua (1989), “Replica Plating and Indirect Selection of Bacterial Mutants: Isolation of Preadaptive Mutants in Bacteria by Sib Selection,” Genetics 121: 395–399.Google ScholarPubMed
Lederberg, Joshua (1995), “Notes on Systematic Hypothesis Generation and Application to Disciplined Brainstorming,” in Working Notes: Symposium: Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery. AAAI Spring Symposium Series. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 97–98.Google Scholar
Lenat, Douglas (1976), AM: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Discovery in Mathematics as Heuristic Search. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett (1975), “The Concept of an Ad Hoc Hypothesis,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 5: 309–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1970), “The Units of Selection,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth (1984), “A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics,” Philosophy of Science 51: 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth (1987), “Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter (1998), “Galileo's Machines, His Mathematics and His Experiments,” in Peter Machamer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Galileo. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter (2000), “The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description,” in Fernand Hallyn (ed.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter (2004), “Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000), “Thinking About Mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter and Woody, Andrea (1994), “A Model of Intelligibility in Science: Using Galileo's Balance as a Model for Understanding the Motion of Bodies,” Science and Education 3: 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, John Leslie (1974), The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R., and Svoboda, K. (1999), “Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity,” Science 283: 1923–1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malinow, R. (1998), “Silencing the Controversy in LTP?Neuron 21: 1226–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manier, Edward (1969), “The Experimental Method in Biology, T. H. Morgan and the Theory of the Gene,” Synthese 20: 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcum, James A. (2002), “From Heresy to Dogma in Accounts of Opposition to Howard Temen's DNA Provirus Hypothesis,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 165–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maull Roth, Nancy (1974), Progress in Modern Biology: An Alternative to Reduction. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Maull, Nancy (1977), “Unifying Science Without Reduction,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William (eds.) (1980), The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, T. J., Blum, K. I., Tsien, J. Z., Tonegawa, S., and Wilson, M. A. (1996), “Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDARI Knockout Mice,” Cell 87: 1339–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meheus, Joke and Nickles, Thomas (eds.) (1999), Scientific Discovery and Creativity: Case Studies and Computational Approaches. Special Issue of Foundations of Science 4 (4).
Mendel, Gregor ([1865] 1966), “Experiments on Plant Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, Curt and Sherwood, Eva (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Tom M. (1982), “Generalization as Search,” Artificial Intelligence 18: 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, John E. and Lenski, Richard E. (1990a), “New Data on Excisions of Mu from E. coli MCS2 Cast Doubt on Directed Mutation Hypothesis,” Nature 344: 173–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, John E. and Lenski, Richard E. (1990b), “Mittler and Lenski Reply,” Nature 345: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, Dale and John Josephson (1990), “Appendix A: An Implementation Note,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 347–353.Google Scholar
Monaghan, Floyd and Corcos, A. (1984), “On the Origins of the Mendelian Laws,” The Journal of Heredity 75: 67–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monod, J., Changeux, J-P., and Jacob, F. (1963), “Allosteric Proteins and Cellular Control Systems,” Journal of Molecular Biology 6: 306–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monod, J., Wyman, J., and Changeux, J-P. (1965), “On the Nature of Allosteric Transitions: A Plausible Model,” Journal of Molecular Biology 12: 88–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morange, Michel (1998), A History of Molecular Biology. Translated by Matthew Cobb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1909), “What are ‘Factors’ in Mendelian Explanations?American Breeder's Association Report 5: 365–368.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1910a), “Chromosomes and Heredity,” American Naturalist 44: 449–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1910b), “Sex-Limited Inheritance in Drosophila,” Science 32: 120–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1911a), “An Attempt to Analyze the Constitution of the Chromosomes on the Basis of Sex-Limited Inheritance in Drosophila,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 11: 365–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1911b), “Random Segregation versus Coupling in Mendelian Inheritance,” Science 34: 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1917), “The Theory of the Gene,” American Naturalist 51: 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1919), The Physical Basis of Heredity. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1926), The Theory of the Gene. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt and Lynch, Clara J. (1912), “The Linkage of Two Factors in Drosophila that Are Not Sex-Linked,” Biological Bulletin 23: 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MorganHunt, Thomas, Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., and Bridges, Calvin B. (1915), The Mechanism of Mendelian HeredityNew York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, Harold (1985), “Models for Biomedical Research: A New Perspective,” Report of the Committee on Models for Biomedical Research, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Morowitz, Harold and Smith, Temple (1987), “Report of the Matrix of Biological Knowledge Workshop, July 13–August 14, 1987,” Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., and O'Keefe, J. (1982), “Place Navigation Impaired in Rats with Hippocampal Lesions,” Nature 297: 681–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, Ernest (1961), The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy J. (1993), “In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 291–301.Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981), The Rationality of Science. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (ed.) (1980a), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (ed.) (1980b), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1980c), “Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1981), “What Is a Problem That We May Solve It?Synthese 47: 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1987), “Methodology, Heuristics, and Rationality,” in Pitt, J. C. and Pera, M. (eds.), Rational Changes in Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirenberg, M. W. and Matthaei, J. H. (1961), “The Dependence of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis in E. coli upon Naturally Occurring or Synthetic Polyribonucleotides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 47:1588–1602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, J. and Dostrovsky, J. (1971), “The Hippocampus as a Spatial Map: Preliminary Evidence from Unit Activity in the Freely Moving Rat,” Brain Research 34: 171–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olby, Robert (1970), “Francis Crick, DNA, and the Central Dogma,” in Holton, Gerald (ed.), The Twentieth Century Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 227–280.Google Scholar
Olby, Robert (1994), The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. Revised Edition. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Olton, D. S. and Samuelson, R. J. (1976), “Remembrances of Places Passed: Spatial Memory in Rats,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2: 97–116.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul and Hilary Putnam (1958), “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis,” in Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Parascandola, Mark (1995), “Philosophy in the Laboratory: The Debate over Evidence for E. J. Steele's Lamarckian Hypothesis,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26: 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardee, Arthur B., Jacob, Francois, and Monod, Jacques (1959), “The Genetic Control and Cytoplasmic Expression of ‘Inducibility’ in the Synthesis of β–galatosidase,” Journal of Molecular Biology 1: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, Linus (1939), The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pauling, Linus (1940), “A Theory of the Structure and Process of Formation of Antibodies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 62: 2643–2657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, Linus and Corey, Robert B. (1950), “Two Hydrogen-Bonded Spiral Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 72: 5349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1986), “The Rise of Selection Theories: A Case Study and Some Lessons from Immunology,” in Demopoulos, W. and Marras, A. (eds.), Language Learning and Concept Acquisition: Foundational Issues. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co., pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1965), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1968), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Provine, William (1971), The Origin of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2004), “A Glimpse of the Secret Connexion: Harmonizing Mechanisms with Counterfactuals,” Perspectives on Science 12: 288–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punnett, R. C. (ed.) (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1996), Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997), Experimental Systems: Towards a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Alexander and Watson, James D. (1954a), “Physical Studies on Ribonucleic Acid,” Nature 173: 995–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Alexander and Watson, James D. (1954b), “Some Relations Between DNA and RNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 40: 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll-Hansen, N. (1978), “Drosophila Genetics: A Reductionist Research Program,” Journal of the History of Biology 11: 159–210.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Susan M. (1994), “In Pursuit of a Molecular Mechanism for Adaptive Mutation,” Genome 37: 893–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, Susan M. and Hastings, P. J. (2003), “Modulating Mutation Rates in the Wild,” Science 300: 1382–1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, Susan M., Longerich, Simonne, Gee, Pauline, and Harris, Reuben S. (1994), “Adaptive Mutation by Deletions in Small Mononucleotide Repeats,” Science 265: 405–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, John R., Kofoid, Eric, Roth, Frederick P., Berg, Otto G., Seger, Jon, and Andersson, Dan I. (2003a), “Regulating General Mutation Rates: Examination of the Hypermutable State Model for Cairnsian Adaptive Mutation,” Genetics 163: 1483–1496.Google Scholar
Roth, John R., Kofoid, Eric, Roth, Frederick P., Berg, Otto G., Seger, Jon, and Andersson, Dan I. (2003b), “Letter to the Editor: Adaptive Mutation Requires No Mutagenesis – Only Growth Under Selection: A Response,” Genetics 165: 2319–2321.Google Scholar
Rottenberg, A., Mayford, M., Hawkins, R. D., Kandel, E. R., and Muller, R. U. (1996), “Mice Expressing Activated CaMKII Lack Low Frequency LTP and Do Not Form Stable Place Cells in the CA1 Region of the Hippocampus,” Cell 87: 1351–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roush, W. (1997), “New Knockout Mice Point to Molecular Basis of Memory,” Science 275: 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudge, David W. (1996), A Philosophical Analysis of the Role of Natural Selection Experiments in Evolutionary Biology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Rudge, David W. (1999), “Taking the Peppered Moth with a Grain of Salt,” Biology & Philosophy 14: 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, F. J. (1955), “Spontaneous Mutation in Non-dividing Bacteria,” Genetics 40: 726–738.Google ScholarPubMed
Salmon, Wesley (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1997), “Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques,” Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1998), Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra (1991), “Lamarck Contre Darwin, Reduction Versus Statistics: Conceptual Issues in the Controversy over Directed Mutagenesis in Bacteria,” in Alfred Tauber, I. (ed.), Organism and the Origins of Self. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra (1996), “Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology,” in Sarkar, S. (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 187–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974a), “Logic of Discovery and Justification in Regulatory Genetics,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 4: 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974b), “The Peripherality of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Genetics,” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974c), “The Unity of Science and Theory Construction in Molecular Biology,” in Seeger, R. J. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Science: Proceedings of Section L, AAAS 1969. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 11. Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishing, pp. 497–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1980), “Theory Structure in the Biomedical Sciences,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5: 57–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, Kenneth (1986a), “Computerized Implementation of Biomedical Theory Structures: An Artificial Intelligence Approach,” in Fine, Arthur and Machamer, Peter (eds.), PSA 1986, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1986b), “Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation Between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1993), Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. (1986), Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scoville, W. B. and Millner, B. (1957), “Loss of Recent Memory after Bilateral Hippocampal Lesions,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 20: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sembugamoorthy, V. and B. Chandrasekaran (1986), “Functional Representation of Devices and Compilation of Diagnostic Problem-solving Systems,” in Kolodner, J. and Reisbeck, C. (eds.), Experience, Memory, and Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1973), Unpublished MS. Presented at IUHPS-LMPS Conference on Relations Between History and Philosophy of Science. Jyväskylä, Finland.
Shapere, Dudley (1974a), “Scientific Theories and Their Domain” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–565.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1974b), “On the Relations Between Compositional and Evolutionary Theories,” in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1977), “Scientific Theories and Their Domains,” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–562.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1980), “The Character of Scientific Change,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, Dudley and Gerald Edelman (1974), “A Note on the Concept of Selection,” in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. London: Macmillan, pp. 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, James A. (1995), “Adaptive Mutation: Who's Really in the Garden?Science 268: 373–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, Gordon M. (1994), Neurobiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, D. and S. Healy (1998), “Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Representation,” in Healy, S. (ed.), Spatial Representation in Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 133–157.Google Scholar
Shi, S., Hayashi, Y., Petralia, R. S., Zaman, S. H., Wenthold, R. J., Svoboda, K., and Malinow, R. (1999), “Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors after Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation,” Science 284: 1811–1816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (1999), “Selection and the Extent of Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings): S196–S209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2000), The R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy in Philosophical Focus: Theory Evaluation in Population Genetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2001), “The Causal Crux of Selection,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 556.Google Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2002), “The Persistence of the R. A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy,” Biology and Philosophy 17: 341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. and Millstein, Roberta L. (2005), “Thinking about Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 327–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, F. W. (1988), “A Unicorn in the Garden,” Nature 335: 112–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, E. J. (1981), Somatic Selection and Adaptive Evolution: On the Inheritance of Acquired Characters. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steele, Edward J., Lindley, Robyn A., and Blanden, Robert B. (1998), Lamarck's Signature. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1964), “The Operon: On Its Third Anniversary,” Science 144: 816–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stent, Gunther (1969), The Coming of the Golden Age: A View of the End of Progress. Garden City, NY: American Museum of Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.) (1966), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. F. (1996), “Spatial Learning and Memory: The Beginning of a Dream,” Cell 87: 1147–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sticklen, J. (1987), MDX2: An Integrated Medical Diagnostic System. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Strickberger, Monroe (1985), Genetics. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Studer, Kenneth E. and Chubin, Daryl E. (1980), The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research. Sage Library of Social Research, v. 103. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H. (1913), “The Linear Arrangement of Six Sex-linked Factors in Drosophila, as Shown by Their Mode of Association,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 14: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1974), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1979), “Theory Structure,” in Asquith, Peter and Kyburg, H. (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 317–338.Google Scholar
Sutton, Walter ([1903] 1959), “The Chromosomes in Heredity,” Biological Bulletin 4: 231–251. Reprinted in Peters, J. A. (ed.), Classic Papers in Genetics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp 27–41.Google Scholar
Tabery, James G. (2004), “Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism,” Philosophy of Science 71: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmadge, D. W. (1957), “Allergy and Immunology,” Annual Review of Medicine 8: 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmadge, D. W. (1986), “The Acceptance and Rejection of Immunological Concepts,” Annual Review of Immunology 8: 239–256.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1963), “The Effects of Actinomycin D on Growth of Rous Sarcoma Virus in Vitro,” Virology 20: 577–582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temin, Howard M. (1964a), “The Participation of DNA in Rous Sarcoma Virus Production,” Virology 23: 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1964b), “Homology between RNA from Rous Sarcoma Virus and DNA from Rous Sarcoma Virus-infected Cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 52: 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1964c), “Nature of the Provirus in Rous Sarcoma,” National Cancer Institute Monograph 17: 557–570.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1971), “Guest Editorial. The Protovirus Hypothesis: Speculations on the Significance of RNA-directed DNA Synthesis for Normal Development and Carcinogenesis.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 46: III-VIII.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1977), “The DNA Provirus Hypothesis: The Establishment and Implications of RNA-directed DNA Synthesis,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology, 1933–1975. New York: Elsevier, pp. 509–529. Presented December 12, 1975.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. and Mizutani, Satoshi (1970), “RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in Virions of Rous Sarcoma Virus,” Nature 226: 1211–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thagard, Paul (1988), Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (1992), Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (2003), “Pathways to Biomedical Discovery,” Philosophy of Science 70: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, David S. (1994), “The Evolution of Genetic Intelligence,” Science 264: 224–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieffry, Denis and Burian, Richard M. (1996), “Jean Brachet's Alternative Scheme for Protein Synthesis,” Trends in the Biochemical Sciences 21 (3): 114–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Paul (1983), “The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. (1948), “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men,” Psychological Review 55: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolman, E. and Honzick, C. (1930), “Introduction and Removal of Reward and Maze Performance in Rats,” University of California Publications in Psychology 4: 257–275.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1972), Human Understanding. v. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsien, J. Z., Chen, D. E., Gerber, D., Tom, C., Mercer, E., Anderson, D., Mayford, M., and Kandel, E. R. (1996a), “Subregion- and Cell Type-Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain,” Cell 87: 1317–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsien, J. Z., Huerta, P. T., and Tonegawa, S. (1996b), “The Essential Role of Hippocampal CA1 NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Spatial Memory,” Cell 87: 1327–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorzimmer, Peter (1970), Charles Darwin, The Years of Controversy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Vrba, Elisabeth S. and Gould, Stephen J. (1986), “The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated,” Paleobiology 12: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Hugo ([1889] 1910), Intracellular Pangenesis. Translated by C. S. Gager. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Vries, Hugo de ([1900] 1966), “The Law of Segregation of Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
Vries, Hugo ([1903–04; 1909–1910] 1969), The Mutation Theory. 2 vols. Translated by J. B. Farmer and A. D. Darbishire. New York: Kraus Reprint Company.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1990), “Why the Anti-reductionist Consensus Won't Survive the Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics,” in Fine, Arthur, Forbes, Micky, and Wessels, Linda (eds.), PSA 1990, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 125–139.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1994), “Genes Made Molecular,” Philosophy of Science 61: 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D. ([1962] 1977), “The Involvement of RNA in the Synthesis of Proteins,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology 1933–1975. New York: Elsevier, pp. 179–203.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1965) Molecular Biology of the Gene. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1968), The Double Helix. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1970), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 2nd ed. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1977), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 3rd ed. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (2000), A Passion for DNA: Genes, Genomes, and Society. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. and Crick, Francis (1953a), “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid,” Nature 171: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D. and Crick, Francis (1953b), “Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid,” Nature 171: 964–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D., Hopkins, Nancy H., Roberts, Jeffrey W., Steitz, Joan Argetsinger, and Weiner, Alan M. (1988), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 4th ed. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Weber, Marcel (2005), Philosophy of Experimental Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1892), The Germ-Plasm, A Theory of Heredity. Translated by W. N. Parker and H. Röonfeldt. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1977), The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Abraham, Handler, Philip, Smith, Emil L., and Stetten, DeWitt Jr. (1954), Principles of Biochemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Williams, Mary (1970), “Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 29: 343–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Edmund B. (1900), The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. and McNaughton, B. (1993), “Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space,” Science 261: 1055–1058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimsatt, William (1972), “Complexity and Organization,” in Schaffner, Kenneth F. and Cohen, Robert S. (eds.), PSA 1972, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1976), “Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account,” in Cohen, Robert S. (ed.), PSA 1974. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 671–710. Reprinted in Elliott Sober (ed.) (1984), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. (1981), “Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination,” in Brewer, M. and Collins, B. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 124–163.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1987), “False Models as Means to Truer Theories,” in Matthew Nitecki and Antoni Hoffman (eds.), Natural Models in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2002), “What Is a Mechanism? A Counterfactual Account,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S366–S377.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2003), Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1953), “Incorporation of Radioactivity from DL-Leucine-1-C14 into Proteins of Rat Liver Homogenate,” Federation Proceedings 12: 295.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1958), “The Microsome,” Scientific American 198 (March): 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1962a), “History and Speculation on Protein Synthesis,” Proceedings of the Symposia on Mathematical Problems in the Biological Sciences 14: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1962b), “Unsettled Questions in the Field of Protein Synthesis,” Biochemical Journal 85: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1969), “An Historical Account of Protein Synthesis, with Current Overtones – A Personalized View,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 34: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1976), “Protein Synthesis – Early Waves and Recent Ripples,” in Kornberg, A., Horecker, B. L., Cornudella, L., and Oro, J. (eds.), Reflections in Biochemistry. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 303–308.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1979), “Historical Aspects of Protein Synthesis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 325: 269–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1984), “The Machinery of Protein Synthesis,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences (TIBS) 9: 464–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zola-Morgan, S. and Squire, L. (1993), “Neuroanatomy of Memory,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 16: 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ada, G. L. and Gustav, N. (1987), “The Clonal Selection Theory,” Scientific American 257: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alberts, Bruce, Bray, Dennis, Lewis, Julian, Raff, Martin, Roberts, Keith, and Watson, James D. (1983), Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1992), “How Do You Falsify a Question?: Crucial Tests versus Crucial Demonstrations,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 74–88.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1997), “A Twentieth-Century Phlogiston: Constructing Error and Differentiating Domains,” Perspectives on Science 5: 81–127.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (1999), “Negative Results as Positive Knowledge, and Zeroing in on Significant Problems,” Marine Ecology Progress Series 191: 301–305.Google Scholar
Allchin, Douglas (2002), “Error Types,” Perspectives on Science 9: 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allemang, Dean (1990), Understanding Programs as Devices. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Allen, Garland (1978), Thomas Hunt Morgan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, D. I., Slechta, E. S., and Roth, J. R. (1998), “Evidence that Gene Amplification Underlies Adaptive Mutability of the Bacterial lac Operon,” Science 282: 1133–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Anonymous (1970a), “Central Dogma Reversed,” News and Views, Nature 226: 1198–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Anonymous (1970b), “Cancer Viruses: More of the Same,” Nature 227: 887–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, GertrudeMargaret, Elizabeth ([1971] 1981), “Causality and Determination,” in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind, The Collected Philosophical Papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, v. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. J. and Fristrup, K. (1982), “The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion,” Paleobiology 8: 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.) (1974), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Jason M. (2005), “Adaptive Speciation: The Role of Natural Selection in Mechanisms of Geographic and Non-geographic Speciation,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 303–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltimore, David (1970), “Viral RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase,” Nature 226: 1209–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltimore, David (1977), “Viruses, Polymerases and Cancer,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology, 1933–1975. [no editor] New York: Elsevier, pp. 495–508. Presented December 12, 1975.Google Scholar
Barinaga, M. (1999), “New Clues to How Neurons Strengthen Their Connections,” Science 284: 1755–1757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, Beatrice (1928), William Bateson, Naturalist. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, William (1902), Mendel's Principles of Heredity – A Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, William (1913), Problems of Genetics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, William, Saunders, E. R., and Punnett, R. C. (1905), “Further Experiments on Inheritance in Sweet Peas and Stocks: Preliminary Account,” Proceedings of the Royal Society 77, Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–141.Google Scholar
Bateson, William, Saunders, E. R., and Punnett, R. C. (1906), “Experimental Studies in the Physiology of Heredity,” Reports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society III. Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–161.Google Scholar
Bateson, William and Punnett, R. C. (1911), “On Gametic Series Involving Reduplication of Certain Terms,” Journal of Genetics 1. Reprinted in R. C. Punnett (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson, v. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John (1980), “What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?” in Asquith, Peter D. and Giere, Ronald N. (eds.), PSA 1980, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 397–426.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1995), “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis,” in Lennox, James G. and Wolters, Gereon (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 45–81.Google Scholar
Beatty, John (1997), “Why Do Biologists Argue Like They Do?Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S432–S443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1984), “Reconceptualizations and Interfield Connections: The Discovery of the Link Between Vitamins and Coenzymes,” Philosophy of Science 51: 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1986), “Introduction: The Nature of Scientific Integration,” in Bechtel, W. (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, pp. 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William (1988), Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Adele Abrahamsen (2005), “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative,” in Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 421–441.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William and Richardson, Robert C. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Belozersky, Andrei N. and Spirin, Alexander S. (1958), “A Correlation between the Compositions of Deoxyribonucleic and Ribonucleic Acids,” Nature 182: 111–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, Paul and Singer, Maxine (1992), Dealing with Genes: The Language of Heredity. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar
Blackwell, R. J. (1969), Discovery in the Physical Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bjedov, Ivana, Tenaillon, Olivier, Gerard, Benedicte, Souze, Valeria, Denamur, Erick, Radman, Miraslav, Taddei, Francois, and Matic, Ivan (2003), “Stress-Induced Mutagenesis in Bacteria,” Science 300: 1404–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogen, James (2004), “Analysing Causality: The Opposite of Counterfactual is Factual,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, James (2005), “Regularities and Causality; Generalizations and Causal Explanations,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogen, James and Woodward, James (1988), “Saving the Phenomena,” Philosophical Review 97: 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, S., Cohen, M., and Orgel, L. (1965), “Suppression of and Complementation among Mutants of the Regulatory Gene of the Lactose Operon of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Molecular Biology 14: 300–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boveri, Theodor ([1902] 1964), “On Multipolar Mitosis as a Means of Analysis of the Cell Nucleus,” in Willier, B. H. and Oppenheimer, J. (eds.), Foundations of Experimental Embryology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
Boveri, Theodor (1904), Ergebnisse über die Konstitution der chromatischen Substanz des Zellkerns. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1980), “A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Giere, Ronald N. (eds.), PSA 1980. v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 427–439.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1985), “Grene on Mechanism and Reductionism: More Than Just a Side Issue,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Kitcher, Philip (eds.), PSA 1984, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 345–353.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert N. (1990), Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Sydney, Jacob, Francois, and Meselson, M. (1961), “An Unstable Intermediate Carrying Information from Genes to Ribosomes for Protein Synthesis,” Nature 190: 576–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, William F. and Clark A. Chinn (1994), “Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence from Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Burian, R. M. (eds.), PSA 1994, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 304–313.Google Scholar
Bridewell, Will (2004), Science as an Anomaly-Driven Enterprise: A Computational Approach to Generating Acceptable Theory Revisions in the Face of Anomalous Data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Bridges, Bryn A. (1995), “Sexual Potency and Adaptive Mutation in Bacteria,” Trends in Microbiology 3: 291–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, Calvin B. (1914), “Direct Proof Through Non-disjunction that the Sex-linked Genes of Drosophila are Borne by the X-chromosome,” Science, N. S., 40: 107–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridges, Calvin B. (1916), “Non-disjunction as Proof of the Chromosome Theory of Heredity,” Genetics 1: 1–52, 107–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Brisson, Dustin (2003), “The Directed Mutation Controversy in an Evolutionary Context,” Critical Reviews in Microbiology 29: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen (1978a), “Nettie M. Stevens and the Discovery of Sex Determination by Chromosomes,” Isis 69: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephen (1978b), “A Geologist Among Astronomers: The Rise and Fall of the Chamberlin–Moulton Cosmogony,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce (1982), “Mechanizing the Search for Explanatory Hypotheses,” in Asquith, Peter and Nickles, Thomas (eds.), PSA 1982, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Bruce (1985), “Steps Toward Mechanizing Discovery,” in Schaffner, K. (ed.), Logic of Discovery and Diagnosis in Medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 94–114.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1983), “Adaptation,” in Grene, Marjorie (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1996a), “Underappreciated Pathways Toward Molecular Genetics as Illustrated by Jean Brachet's Cytochemical Embryology,” in Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burian, Richard M. (1996b), “Some Epistemological Reflections on Polistes as a Model Organism,” in Turillazzi, S. and West-Eberhard, M. J. (eds.), Natural History and Evolution of an Animal Society: The Paper Wasp Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 318–337.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1957), “A Modification of Jerne's Theory of Antibody Production Using the Concept of Clonal Selection,” The Australian Journal of Science 20: 67–69.Google Scholar
Bylander, T. and Chandrasekaran, B. (1987), “Generic Tasks for Knowledge-Based Reasoning: The ‘Right’ Level of Abstraction for Knowledge Acquisition,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28: 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylander, T. and Mittal, Sanjay (1986), “CSRL: A Language for Classificatory Problem Solving and Uncertainty Handling,” AI Magazine 7(3): 66–77.Google Scholar
Cain, Joseph A. and Darden, Lindley (1988), “Hull and Selection,” Biology and Philosophy 3: 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, John (1995), “Response [to Bridges 1995] Cairns,” Trends in Microbiology 3: 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, John (1997), Matters of Life and Death: Perspectives on Public Health, Molecular Biology, Cancer, and the Prospects for the Human Race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, John (1998), “Mutation and Cancer: The Antecedents to Our Studies of Adaptive Mutation,” Genetics 148: 1433–1440.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairns, John and Foster, Patricia L. (1991), “Adaptive Reversion of a Frameshift Mutation in Escherichia coli,” Genetics 128: 695–701.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairns, John and Foster, Patricia L. (2003), “Letter to the Editor: The Risk of Lethals for Hypermutating Bacteria in Stationary Phase,” Genetics 165: 2317–2318.Google Scholar
Cairns, John, Overbaugh, Julie, and Miller, S. (1988), “The Origin of Mutants,” Nature 335: 142–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, E. A. (1971), “An Unacknowledged Founding of Molecular Biology: H. J. Muller's Contributions to Gene Theory, 1910–1936,” Journal of the History of Biology 4: 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, E. E. (1913), “The Mendelian Ratio in Relation to Certain Orthopteran Chromosomes,” The Journal of Morphology 24: 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (2004), “Causation: One Word, Many Things,” Philosophy of Science 71: 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, W. E. and Little, C. C. (1910), “On a Modified Mendelian Ratio among Yellow Mice,” Science 32: 868–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cech, T. R. (2000), “The Ribosome is a Ribozyme,” Science 289: 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadarevian, Soraya (1996), “Sequences, Conformation, Information: Biochemists and Molecular Biologists in the 1950s,” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 361–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadarevian, Soraya (2002), Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chadarevian, Soraya and Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1996), “The Tools of the Discipline: Biochemists and Molecular Biologists,” Introduction to Special Issue, Journal of the History of Biology 29: 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, John, and Keuneke, Anne (1986), “Functional Representation as a Basis for Generating Explanations,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA, pp. 726–731.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, John, Keuneke, Anne, and Herman, David (1989), “Building Routine Planning Systems and Explaining Their Behaviour,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 30: 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changeux, J. P. (1985), Neuronal Man: The Biology of Mind. New York: Pantheon, Random House.Google Scholar
Chapuis, N., Durup, M., and Thinus-Blanc, C. (1987), “The Role of Exploratory Experience in a Shortcut in Golden Hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus),” Animal Learning and Behavior 15: 174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charniak, Eugene and McDermott, Drew (1985), Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Coleman, William (1965), “Cell, Nucleus, and Inheritance: A Historical Study,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109: 124–158.Google Scholar
Coleman, William (1970), “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science,” Centaurus 15: 228–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, M. (1976), “Complementary Molecular Models of Learning and Memory,” BioSystems 8: 119–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correns, Carl ([1900] 1966), “G. Mendel's Law Concerning the Behavior of Progeny of Varietal Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 119–132.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (1998), Neural Mechanisms: On the Structure, Function, and Development of Theories in Neurobiology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2001), “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy,” Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2002a), “Structures of Scientific Theories,” in Machamer, Peter K. and Silberstein, M. (eds.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2002b), “Interlevel Experiments, Multilevel Mechanisms in the Neuroscience of Memory,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S83-S97.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. (2003), “The Making of a Memory Mechanism,” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 153–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, Carl F. (2005), “Beyond Reduction: Mechanisms, Multifield Integration, and the Unity of Neuroscience,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 373–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, Carl F. and Lindley Darden (2001), “Discovering Mechanisms in Neurobiology: The Case of Spatial Memory,” in Machamer, Peter, Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 112–137.Google Scholar
Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley (2005), “Introduction: Mechanisms Then and Now,” in Special Issue, “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, Francis (unpublished MS of 1955), “On Degenerate Templates and the Adaptor Hypothesis: A Note for the RNA Tie Club.”
Crick, Francis (1957), “Discussion Note,” in Crook, E. M. (ed.), The Structure of Nucleic Acids and Their Role in Protein Synthesis: Biochemical Society Symposium 14 (February 18, 1956). London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis (1958), “On Protein Synthesis,” Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology 12: 138–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1959), “The Present Position of the Coding Problem,” Structure and Function of Genetic Elements: Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 12: 35–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1970), “Central Dogma of Molecular Biology,” Nature 227: 561–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis (1988), What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis (1996), “The Impact of Linus Pauling on Molecular Biology,” in Krishnamurthy, Ramesh S. (ed.), The Pauling Symposium: A Discourse on the Art of Biography. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Libraries Special Collections, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis, Barnett, Leslie, Brenner, Sydney, and Watts-Tobin, R. J. (1961), “General Nature of the Genetic Code for Proteins,” Nature 192: 1227–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis and Watson, James D. (1956), “Structure of Small Viruses,” Nature 177: 473–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, Francis and Watson, James D. (1957), “Virus Structure: General Principles,” in Ciba Foundation Symposium on The Nature of Viruses. London: J. & A. Churchill, pp. 5–13.Google Scholar
Cuénot, Lucien (1905), “Les Races Pures et Leurs Combinaisons Chez Les Souris,” Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 4 Serie, T. 111: 123–132.Google Scholar
Culotta, Elizabeth (1994), “A Boost for ‘Adaptive’ Mutation,” Science 265: 318–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culp, Sylvia (1997), “Establishing Genotype/Phenotype Relationships: Gene Targeting as an Experimental Approach,” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64: S268–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutting, James E. (1986), Perception with an Eye for Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1974), Reasoning in Scientific Change: The Field of Genetics at Its Beginnings. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1976), “Reasoning in Scientific Change: Charles Darwin, Hugo de Vries, and the Discovery of Segregation,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 7: 127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1977), “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism,” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darden, Lindley (1978), “Discoveries and the Emergence of New Fields in Science,” in Asquith, Peter D. and Hacking, Ian (eds.), PSA 1978, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 149–160.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1980), “Theory Construction in Genetics,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1982a), “Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction,” in Nickles, Thomas and Asquith, Peter (eds.), PSA 1982, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1982b), “Aspects of Theory Construction in Biology,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Hanover: North Holland Publishing Co., pp. 463–477.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1983), “Reasoning by Analogy in Scientific Theory Construction,” in Michalski, R. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1983 International Machine Learning Workshop, Urbana, IL: Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1986), “Reasoning in Theory Construction: Analogies, Interfield Connections, and Levels of Organization,” in Weingartner, P. and Dorn, G. (eds.), Foundations of Biology. Vienna, Austria: Holder-Picher-Tempsky, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1987), “Viewing the History of Science As Compiled Hindsight,” AI Magazine 8 (2): 33–41.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1990), “Diagnosing and Fixing Faults in Theories,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 319–346.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1991), Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1992), “Strategies for Anomaly Resolution,” in Giere, Ronald (ed.), Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 15. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 251–273.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1995), “Exemplars, Abstractions, and Anomalies: Representations and Theory Change in Mendelian and Molecular Genetics,” in Lennox, James G. and Wolters, Gereon (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1996), “Generalizations in Biology: Essay Review of K. Schaffner's Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 27: 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (1998), “Anomaly-Driven Theory Redesign: Computational Philosophy of Science Experiments,” in Bynum, Terrell W. and Moor, James (eds.), The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 62–78.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley (2001), “Discovering Mechanisms: A Computational Philosophy of Science Perspective,” in Jantke, Klaus P. and Shinohara, Ayumi (eds.), Discovery Science (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, DS2001). New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley (2002), “Strategies for Discovering Mechanisms: Schema Instantiation, Modular Subassembly, Forward/Backward Chaining,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S354–S365.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Cain, Joseph A. (1989), “Selection Type Theories,” Philosophy of Science 56: 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Michael Cook (1994), “Reasoning Strategies in Molecular Biology: Abstractions, Scans and Anomalies,” in Hull, David, Forbes, Micky, and Burian, Richard M. (eds.), PSA 1994, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 179–191.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Craver, Carl (2002), “Strategies in the Interfield Discovery of the Mechanism of Protein Synthesis,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Maull, Nancy (1977), “Interfield Theories,” Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley, Moberg, Dale, Nagarajan, Satish, and Josephson, John (1991), “Anomaly Driven Redesign of a Scientific Theory: The TRANSGENE.2 Experiments,” Technical Report 91-LD-TRANSGENE. Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Roy Rada (1988a), “Hypothesis Formation Using Part-Whole Interrelations,” in Helman, David (ed.), Analogical Reasoning. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 341–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, Lindley and Roy Rada (1988b), “Hypothesis Formation Via Interrelations,” in Prieditis, Armand (ed.), Analogica. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles ([1859] 1966), On the Origin of Species, A Facsimile of the First Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1868), The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2 vols. New York: Orange Judd & Co.Google Scholar
Davis, Bernard D. (1980), “Frontiers of the Biological Sciences,” Science 209: 78–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Randall and Walter C. Hamscher (1988), “Model-Based Reasoning: Troubleshooting,” in Shrobe, H. E. (ed.), Exploring Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 297–346.Google Scholar
Didion, David (2003), “Relevant Bounds on Hierarchical Levels in the Description of Mechanisms,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienert, F. (1900), “Sur la Fermentation du Galactose et sur l'Accoutamance des levures à ce Sucre,” Annales de l'Institute Pasteur 14: 138–189.Google Scholar
Dietterich, Thomas G., B. London, K. Clarkson, and G. Dromey (1982), “Learning and Inductive Inference,” in Cohen, Paul R. and Feigenbaum, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, v. 3. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 323–511.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius (1937), Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, Kevin (1995), “How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories,” in Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 365–395.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. C. (1965), A Short History of Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald and Mountcastle, V. (1978), The Mindful Brain: Cortical Organization and the Group Selective Theory of Higher Brain Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kevin (2004), “Error as Means to Discovery,” Philosophy of Science 71: 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engert, E. and Bonhoeffer, T. (1999), “Dendritic Spine Changes Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity,” Nature 399: 66–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, E. (1894), “Einfluss der Konfiguration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme,” Berichte der deutschen chemische Gesellschaft 27: 2985–2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogle, T. (2000), “The Dissolution of Protein Coding Genes in Molecular Biology,” in Beurton, Peter, Falk, Raphael, and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Patricia L. (1997), “Nonadaptive Mutations Occur on the F' Episome During Adaptive Mutation Conditions in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology 179: 1550–1554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. (2000), “Adaptive Mutation: Implications for Evolution,” BioEssays 22: 1067–1074.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. and Cairns, John (1992), “Mechanisms of Directed Mutation,” Genetics 131: 783–789.Google ScholarPubMed
Foster, Patricia L. and Trimarchi, Jeffrey M. (1994), “Adaptive Reversion of a Frameshift Mutation in Escherichia coli by Simple Base Deletions in Homopolymeric Runs,” Science 265: 407–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, Allan (1989), “The Epistemology of Experiment,” in Gooding, David, Pinch, Trevor, and Schaffer, Simon (eds.), The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 437–460.Google Scholar
Frey, U. and Morris, R. G. (1998), “Synaptic Tagging: Implications for Late Maintenance of Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation,” Trends in Neuroscience 21: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedberg, Errol C. (1997), Correcting the Blueprint of Life: An Historical Account of the Discovery of DNA Repair Mechanisms. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Fruton, Joseph S. (1972), Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Galitski, T. and Roth, John R. (1996), “A Search for a General Phenomenon of Adaptive Mutability,” Genetics 143: 645–659.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallo, Robert (1991), Virus Hunting, Aids, Cancer, and the Human Retrovirus: A Story of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis (1871), “Experiments in Pangenesis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society (Biology) 19: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamow, George (1954), “Possible Relation between Deoxyribonucleic Acid and Protein Structures,” Nature 173: 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1993), “Molecular Biology in the French Tradition? Redefining Local Traditions and Disciplinary Patterns,” Journal of the History of Biology 26: 473–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaudilliere, Jean-Paul (1996), “Molecular Biologists, Biochemists, and Messenger RNA: The Birth of a Scientific Network,” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 417–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genesereth, Michael (1980), “Metaphors and Models,” Proceedings of the First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 208–211.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre (1983), “Structure Mapping – A Theoretical Framework for Analogy,” Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, G. K. (1896), “The Origin of Hypotheses, Illustrated by the Discussion of a Topographic Problem,” Science, N. S., 3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, Scott F. and Bolker, Jessica A. (2001), “Homologies of Process and Modular Elements of Embryonic Construction,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 291: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, W. and Müller-Hill, B. (1966), “Isolation of the Lac Repressor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 56: 1891–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, W. and Müller-Hill, B. (1967), “The Lac Operator Is DNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 58: 2415–2421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennan, Stuart S. (1992), Mechanisms, Models, and Causation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Glennan, Stuart S. (1996), “Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation,” Erkenntnis 44: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (2002), “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S342–S353.Google Scholar
Glennan, Stuart S. (2005), “Modeling Mechanisms,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 443–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glymour, Clark (1980), Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goel, Ashok and Chandrasekaran, B. (1989), “Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, MI, pp. 1388–1394.
Golub, E. (1981), The Cellular Basis of Immune Response, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. and Vrba, Elisabeth S. (1982), “Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form,” Paleobiology 8: 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, Russell (1985), Learning by Understanding Analogies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Gros, Francois (1979), “The Messenger,” in Lwoff, Andre and Ullmann, Agnes (eds.), Origins of Molecular Biology: A Tribute to Jacque Monod. New York: Academic Press, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
Gros, Francois, Hiatt, Howard, Gilbert, Walter, Kurland, Chuck G., Risebrough, R. W., and Watson, James D. (1961), “Unstable Ribonucleic Acid Revealed by Pulse Labeling of E. coli,” Nature 190: 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1988), “On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences,” Journal of Philosophy 85: 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1992), “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences,” in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64.Google Scholar
Hall, Barry G. (1990), “Spontaneous Point Mutations That Occur More Often When Advantageous Than When Neutral,” Genetics 126: 5–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Barry G. (1997), “On the Specificity of Adaptive Mutations,” Genetics 145: 39–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Zach W. (ed.) (1992), An Introduction to Molecular Neurobiology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Hanson, Norwood Russell (1958), Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, Norwood Russell ([1961] 1970), “Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?” in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Reprinted in B. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 620–633.Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell (1963), The Concept of the Positron: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1986), Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1960), An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1970), The Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom and Madden, E. H. (1975), Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Harris, Reuben S., Longerich, Simonne, and Rosenberg, Susan M. (1994), “Recombination in Adaptive Mutation,” Science 264: 258–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebb, D. O. (1949), The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, Heather, Slechta, E. Susan, Bergthorsson, Ulfar, Andersson, Dan I., and Roth, John R. (2002), “Amplification Mutagenesis: Evidence that ‘Directed’ Adaptive Mutation and General Hypermutability Result from Growth with a Selected Gene Amplification,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 2164–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary (1966), Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1955), “An Enzymic Mechanism for Amino Acid Activation in Animal Tissues,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 16: 288–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1990), Toward the Habit of Truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Mahlon B. (1996), “Biochemistry or Molecular Biology? The Discovery of ‘Soluble RNA’,” Trends in Biological Sciences Letters (TIBS) 21: 77–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoagland, Mahlon B., Paul Zamecnik, and Mary L. Stephenson (1959), “A Hypothesis Concerning the Roles of Particulate and Soluble Ribonucleic Acids in Protein Synthesis,” in Zirkle, R. E. (ed.), A Symposium on Molecular Biology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1989), “Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction,” Cognitive Science 13: 295–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1995), Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur (1959), A History of Cytology. New York: Abelard-Schuman.Google Scholar
Hull, David (1974), Philosophy of Biological Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hull, David (1980), “Individuality and Selection,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David ([1981] 1984), “Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay,” in Jensen, U. L. and Harré, R. (eds.), The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 23–44. Reprinted in Robert N. Brandon and Richard M. Burian (eds.), Genes, Populations, and Organisms: Controversies over the Units of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 142–160.Google Scholar
Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J. (1995), Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Francois (1988), The Statue Within: An Autobiography. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jacob, Francois and Monod, Jacques (1961), “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins,” Journal of Molecular Biology 3: 318–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, F. A. (1909), “La theorie de la chiasmatypie,” La Cellule 25: 389–411.Google Scholar
Jerne, Niels K. (1955), “The Natural-Selection Theory of Antibody Formation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 41: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerne, Niels K. (1966), “The Natural Selection Theory of Antibody Formation: Ten Years Later,” in Cairns, John, Stent, Gunther S., and Watson, James D. (eds.), Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory of Quantitative Biology, pp. 301–312.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Wilhelm (1909), Elemente der Exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Josephson, John R., Chandrasekaran, B., Smith, J., and Tanner, M. (1987), “A Mechanism for Forming Composite Explanatory Hypotheses,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC- 17: 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, John R. and Josephson, Susan G. (eds.) (1994), Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, Horace F. (1996), The Eighth Day of Creation: The Makers of the Revolution in Biology. Expanded Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Karp, Peter (1989), Hypothesis Formation and Qualitative Reasoning in Molecular Biology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (Available as a technical report from the Computer Science Department: STAN-CS-89–1263.)Google Scholar
Karp, Peter (1990), “Hypothesis Formation as Design,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 275–317.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. (1971), “Articulation of Parts Explanation in Biology and the Rational Search for Them,” in Roger C. Buck and Robert S. Cohen (eds.), PSA 1970. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 257–272.
Kay, Lily E. (2000), Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Vernon (1908), Darwinism Today. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. and Oppenheim, P. (1956), “On Reduction,” Philosophical Studies 7: 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettler, Brian and Lindley Darden (1993), “Protein Sequencing Experiment Planning Using Analogy,” in Hunter, L., Searls, D., and Shavlik, J. (eds.), ISMB-93, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, pp. 216–224.Google Scholar
Keuneke, Anne (1989), Machine Understanding of Devices: Causal Explanation of Diagnostic Conclusions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Keyes, Martha (1999a), “The Prion Challenge to the “Central Dogma” of Molecular Biology, 1965–1991, Part I: Prelude to Prions,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Martha (1999b), “The Prion Challenge to the “Central Dogma” of Molecular Biology, 1965–1991, Part II: The Problem with Prions,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30: 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkham, W. B. (1919), “The Fate of Homozygous Yellow Mice,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 28: 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1981), “Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1984), “1953 and All That: A Tale of Two Sciences,” The Philosophical Review 93: 335–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1987), “Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the ‘Philosophers’ on the Ontological Status of Species,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 184–192.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1989), “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World,” in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 13. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1999), “The Hegemony of Molecular Biology,” Biology & Philosophy 14: 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiner, Scott A. (1993), The Logic of Discovery: A Theory of the Rationality of Scientific Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Robert E. (1982), From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korf, R. E. (1985), “An Analysis of Abstraction in Problem Solving,” in Pottmyer, J. J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Technical Symposium. Gaithersburg, MD: Washington, DC Chapter of the ACM, June 20, 1985, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Koshland, D. E. (1973), “Protein Shape and Biological Control,” Scientific American 229: 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottler, Malcolm (1979), “Hugo de Vries and the Rediscovery of Mendel's Laws,” Annals of Science 36: 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1974), “Second Thoughts on Paradigms,” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 459–482.Google Scholar
Kuno, M. (1995), The Synapse: Function, Plasticity, and Neurotrophism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1970), “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre (1976), Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Worrall, J. and Zahar, E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, Otto E. (1991), “The Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics,” Annual Review of Genetics 25: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, Pat, Simon, Herbert, Bradshaw, Gary L., and Zytkow, Jan M. (1987), Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laudan, Larry (1977), Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Layton, Jill C. and Foster, Patricia L. (2003), “Error-prone DNA Polymerase IV Is Controlled by the Stress-response Sigma Factor, RpoS, in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Microbiology 50: 549–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leatherdale, W. H. (1974), The Role of Analogy, Model and Metaphor in Science. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lederberg, Joshua ([1959]1961), “Genes and Antibodies,” Science 129: 1649–1653. Reprinted with a postscript in Stanford Medical Bulletin 19: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederberg, Joshua (1965), “Signs of Life: Criterion-System of Exobiology,” Nature 207: 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederberg, Joshua (1989), “Replica Plating and Indirect Selection of Bacterial Mutants: Isolation of Preadaptive Mutants in Bacteria by Sib Selection,” Genetics 121: 395–399.Google ScholarPubMed
Lederberg, Joshua (1995), “Notes on Systematic Hypothesis Generation and Application to Disciplined Brainstorming,” in Working Notes: Symposium: Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery. AAAI Spring Symposium Series. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, pp. 97–98.Google Scholar
Lenat, Douglas (1976), AM: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Discovery in Mathematics as Heuristic Search. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett (1975), “The Concept of an Ad Hoc Hypothesis,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 5: 309–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard C. (1970), “The Units of Selection,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth (1984), “A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics,” Philosophy of Science 51: 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Elizabeth (1987), “Confirmation of Ecological and Evolutionary Models,” Biology and Philosophy 2: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter (1998), “Galileo's Machines, His Mathematics and His Experiments,” in Peter Machamer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Galileo. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter (2000), “The Nature of Metaphor and Scientific Description,” in Fernand Hallyn (ed.), Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter (2004), “Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000), “Thinking About Mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, Peter and Woody, Andrea (1994), “A Model of Intelligibility in Science: Using Galileo's Balance as a Model for Understanding the Motion of Bodies,” Science and Education 3: 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, John Leslie (1974), The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R., and Svoboda, K. (1999), “Rapid Dendritic Morphogenesis in CA1 Hippocampal Dendrites Induced by Synaptic Activity,” Science 283: 1923–1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malinow, R. (1998), “Silencing the Controversy in LTP?Neuron 21: 1226–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manier, Edward (1969), “The Experimental Method in Biology, T. H. Morgan and the Theory of the Gene,” Synthese 20: 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcum, James A. (2002), “From Heresy to Dogma in Accounts of Opposition to Howard Temen's DNA Provirus Hypothesis,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24: 165–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maull Roth, Nancy (1974), Progress in Modern Biology: An Alternative to Reduction. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Maull, Nancy (1977), “Unifying Science Without Reduction,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. (1996), Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Ernst (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William (eds.) (1980), The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, T. J., Blum, K. I., Tsien, J. Z., Tonegawa, S., and Wilson, M. A. (1996), “Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDARI Knockout Mice,” Cell 87: 1339–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meheus, Joke and Nickles, Thomas (eds.) (1999), Scientific Discovery and Creativity: Case Studies and Computational Approaches. Special Issue of Foundations of Science 4 (4).
Mendel, Gregor ([1865] 1966), “Experiments on Plant Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, Curt and Sherwood, Eva (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Tom M. (1982), “Generalization as Search,” Artificial Intelligence 18: 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, John E. and Lenski, Richard E. (1990a), “New Data on Excisions of Mu from E. coli MCS2 Cast Doubt on Directed Mutation Hypothesis,” Nature 344: 173–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittler, John E. and Lenski, Richard E. (1990b), “Mittler and Lenski Reply,” Nature 345: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, Dale and John Josephson (1990), “Appendix A: An Implementation Note,” in Shrager, J. and Langley, P. (eds.), Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 347–353.Google Scholar
Monaghan, Floyd and Corcos, A. (1984), “On the Origins of the Mendelian Laws,” The Journal of Heredity 75: 67–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monod, J., Changeux, J-P., and Jacob, F. (1963), “Allosteric Proteins and Cellular Control Systems,” Journal of Molecular Biology 6: 306–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monod, J., Wyman, J., and Changeux, J-P. (1965), “On the Nature of Allosteric Transitions: A Plausible Model,” Journal of Molecular Biology 12: 88–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morange, Michel (1998), A History of Molecular Biology. Translated by Matthew Cobb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1909), “What are ‘Factors’ in Mendelian Explanations?American Breeder's Association Report 5: 365–368.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1910a), “Chromosomes and Heredity,” American Naturalist 44: 449–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1910b), “Sex-Limited Inheritance in Drosophila,” Science 32: 120–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1911a), “An Attempt to Analyze the Constitution of the Chromosomes on the Basis of Sex-Limited Inheritance in Drosophila,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 11: 365–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1911b), “Random Segregation versus Coupling in Mendelian Inheritance,” Science 34: 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1917), “The Theory of the Gene,” American Naturalist 51: 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1919), The Physical Basis of Heredity. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt (1926), The Theory of the Gene. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas Hunt and Lynch, Clara J. (1912), “The Linkage of Two Factors in Drosophila that Are Not Sex-Linked,” Biological Bulletin 23: 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MorganHunt, Thomas, Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J., and Bridges, Calvin B. (1915), The Mechanism of Mendelian HeredityNew York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morowitz, Harold (1985), “Models for Biomedical Research: A New Perspective,” Report of the Committee on Models for Biomedical Research, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Morowitz, Harold and Smith, Temple (1987), “Report of the Matrix of Biological Knowledge Workshop, July 13–August 14, 1987,” Santa Fe, NM: Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., and O'Keefe, J. (1982), “Place Navigation Impaired in Rats with Hippocampal Lesions,” Nature 297: 681–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, Ernest (1961), The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Nancy J. (1993), “In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling,” in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Okruhlik, K. (eds.), PSA 1992, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 291–301.Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981), The Rationality of Science. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (ed.) (1980a), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (ed.) (1980b), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1980c), “Introductory Essay: Scientific Discovery and the Future of Philosophy of Science,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1981), “What Is a Problem That We May Solve It?Synthese 47: 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickles, Thomas (1987), “Methodology, Heuristics, and Rationality,” in Pitt, J. C. and Pera, M. (eds.), Rational Changes in Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirenberg, M. W. and Matthaei, J. H. (1961), “The Dependence of Cell-Free Protein Synthesis in E. coli upon Naturally Occurring or Synthetic Polyribonucleotides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 47:1588–1602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, J. and Dostrovsky, J. (1971), “The Hippocampus as a Spatial Map: Preliminary Evidence from Unit Activity in the Freely Moving Rat,” Brain Research 34: 171–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olby, Robert (1970), “Francis Crick, DNA, and the Central Dogma,” in Holton, Gerald (ed.), The Twentieth Century Sciences. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 227–280.Google Scholar
Olby, Robert (1994), The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. Revised Edition. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Olton, D. S. and Samuelson, R. J. (1976), “Remembrances of Places Passed: Spatial Memory in Rats,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2: 97–116.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul and Hilary Putnam (1958), “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis,” in Feigl, H., Scriven, M., and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
Parascandola, Mark (1995), “Philosophy in the Laboratory: The Debate over Evidence for E. J. Steele's Lamarckian Hypothesis,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26: 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardee, Arthur B., Jacob, Francois, and Monod, Jacques (1959), “The Genetic Control and Cytoplasmic Expression of ‘Inducibility’ in the Synthesis of β–galatosidase,” Journal of Molecular Biology 1: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, Linus (1939), The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pauling, Linus (1940), “A Theory of the Structure and Process of Formation of Antibodies,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 62: 2643–2657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauling, Linus and Corey, Robert B. (1950), “Two Hydrogen-Bonded Spiral Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 72: 5349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1986), “The Rise of Selection Theories: A Case Study and Some Lessons from Immunology,” in Demopoulos, W. and Marras, A. (eds.), Language Learning and Concept Acquisition: Foundational Issues. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co., pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. (1965), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1968), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Provine, William (1971), The Origin of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (2004), “A Glimpse of the Secret Connexion: Harmonizing Mechanisms with Counterfactuals,” Perspectives on Science 12: 288–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punnett, R. C. (ed.) (1928), Scientific Papers of William Bateson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2 vols.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas (1996), Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997), Experimental Systems: Towards a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Alexander and Watson, James D. (1954a), “Physical Studies on Ribonucleic Acid,” Nature 173: 995–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Alexander and Watson, James D. (1954b), “Some Relations Between DNA and RNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 40: 759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll-Hansen, N. (1978), “Drosophila Genetics: A Reductionist Research Program,” Journal of the History of Biology 11: 159–210.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Susan M. (1994), “In Pursuit of a Molecular Mechanism for Adaptive Mutation,” Genome 37: 893–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, Susan M. and Hastings, P. J. (2003), “Modulating Mutation Rates in the Wild,” Science 300: 1382–1384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, Susan M., Longerich, Simonne, Gee, Pauline, and Harris, Reuben S. (1994), “Adaptive Mutation by Deletions in Small Mononucleotide Repeats,” Science 265: 405–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, John R., Kofoid, Eric, Roth, Frederick P., Berg, Otto G., Seger, Jon, and Andersson, Dan I. (2003a), “Regulating General Mutation Rates: Examination of the Hypermutable State Model for Cairnsian Adaptive Mutation,” Genetics 163: 1483–1496.Google Scholar
Roth, John R., Kofoid, Eric, Roth, Frederick P., Berg, Otto G., Seger, Jon, and Andersson, Dan I. (2003b), “Letter to the Editor: Adaptive Mutation Requires No Mutagenesis – Only Growth Under Selection: A Response,” Genetics 165: 2319–2321.Google Scholar
Rottenberg, A., Mayford, M., Hawkins, R. D., Kandel, E. R., and Muller, R. U. (1996), “Mice Expressing Activated CaMKII Lack Low Frequency LTP and Do Not Form Stable Place Cells in the CA1 Region of the Hippocampus,” Cell 87: 1351–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roush, W. (1997), “New Knockout Mice Point to Molecular Basis of Memory,” Science 275: 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudge, David W. (1996), A Philosophical Analysis of the Role of Natural Selection Experiments in Evolutionary Biology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Rudge, David W. (1999), “Taking the Peppered Moth with a Grain of Salt,” Biology & Philosophy 14: 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, F. J. (1955), “Spontaneous Mutation in Non-dividing Bacteria,” Genetics 40: 726–738.Google ScholarPubMed
Salmon, Wesley (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1997), “Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques,” Philosophy of Science 64: 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Wesley (1998), Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra (1991), “Lamarck Contre Darwin, Reduction Versus Statistics: Conceptual Issues in the Controversy over Directed Mutagenesis in Bacteria,” in Alfred Tauber, I. (ed.), Organism and the Origins of Self. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 235–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra (1996), “Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology,” in Sarkar, S. (ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 187–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974a), “Logic of Discovery and Justification in Regulatory Genetics,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 4: 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974b), “The Peripherality of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Genetics,” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1974c), “The Unity of Science and Theory Construction in Molecular Biology,” in Seeger, R. J. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Science: Proceedings of Section L, AAAS 1969. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 11. Dordrecht: D Reidel Publishing, pp. 497–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1980), “Theory Structure in the Biomedical Sciences,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5: 57–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, Kenneth (1986a), “Computerized Implementation of Biomedical Theory Structures: An Artificial Intelligence Approach,” in Fine, Arthur and Machamer, Peter (eds.), PSA 1986, v. 2. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1986b), “Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation Between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science,” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth (1993), Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. (1986), Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scoville, W. B. and Millner, B. (1957), “Loss of Recent Memory after Bilateral Hippocampal Lesions,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 20: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sembugamoorthy, V. and B. Chandrasekaran (1986), “Functional Representation of Devices and Compilation of Diagnostic Problem-solving Systems,” in Kolodner, J. and Reisbeck, C. (eds.), Experience, Memory, and Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1973), Unpublished MS. Presented at IUHPS-LMPS Conference on Relations Between History and Philosophy of Science. Jyväskylä, Finland.
Shapere, Dudley (1974a), “Scientific Theories and Their Domain” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–565.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1974b), “On the Relations Between Compositional and Evolutionary Theories,” in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1977), “Scientific Theories and Their Domains,” in Suppe, Frederick (ed.), Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–562.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley (1980), “The Character of Scientific Change,” in Nickles, Thomas (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, Dudley and Gerald Edelman (1974), “A Note on the Concept of Selection,” in Ayala, F. J. and Dobzhansky, T. (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. London: Macmillan, pp. 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, James A. (1995), “Adaptive Mutation: Who's Really in the Garden?Science 268: 373–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, Gordon M. (1994), Neurobiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, D. and S. Healy (1998), “Neural Mechanisms of Spatial Representation,” in Healy, S. (ed.), Spatial Representation in Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 133–157.Google Scholar
Shi, S., Hayashi, Y., Petralia, R. S., Zaman, S. H., Wenthold, R. J., Svoboda, K., and Malinow, R. (1999), “Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors after Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation,” Science 284: 1811–1816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (1999), “Selection and the Extent of Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings): S196–S209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2000), The R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy in Philosophical Focus: Theory Evaluation in Population Genetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2001), “The Causal Crux of Selection,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 556.Google Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. (2002), “The Persistence of the R. A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy,” Biology and Philosophy 17: 341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert A. Jr. and Millstein, Roberta L. (2005), “Thinking about Evolutionary Mechanisms: Natural Selection,” in Carl F. Craver and Lindley Darden (eds.), Special Issue: “Mechanisms in Biology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 327–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, Elliott (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, F. W. (1988), “A Unicorn in the Garden,” Nature 335: 112–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, E. J. (1981), Somatic Selection and Adaptive Evolution: On the Inheritance of Acquired Characters. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steele, Edward J., Lindley, Robyn A., and Blanden, Robert B. (1998), Lamarck's Signature. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther (1964), “The Operon: On Its Third Anniversary,” Science 144: 816–820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stent, Gunther (1969), The Coming of the Golden Age: A View of the End of Progress. Garden City, NY: American Museum of Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.) (1966), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stevens, C. F. (1996), “Spatial Learning and Memory: The Beginning of a Dream,” Cell 87: 1147–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sticklen, J. (1987), MDX2: An Integrated Medical Diagnostic System. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Strickberger, Monroe (1985), Genetics. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Studer, Kenneth E. and Chubin, Daryl E. (1980), The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research. Sage Library of Social Research, v. 103. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, A. H. (1913), “The Linear Arrangement of Six Sex-linked Factors in Drosophila, as Shown by Their Mode of Association,” Journal of Experimental Zoology 14: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1974), The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick (1979), “Theory Structure,” in Asquith, Peter and Kyburg, H. (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 317–338.Google Scholar
Sutton, Walter ([1903] 1959), “The Chromosomes in Heredity,” Biological Bulletin 4: 231–251. Reprinted in Peters, J. A. (ed.), Classic Papers in Genetics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp 27–41.Google Scholar
Tabery, James G. (2004), “Synthesizing Activities and Interactions in the Concept of a Mechanism,” Philosophy of Science 71: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmadge, D. W. (1957), “Allergy and Immunology,” Annual Review of Medicine 8: 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmadge, D. W. (1986), “The Acceptance and Rejection of Immunological Concepts,” Annual Review of Immunology 8: 239–256.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1963), “The Effects of Actinomycin D on Growth of Rous Sarcoma Virus in Vitro,” Virology 20: 577–582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temin, Howard M. (1964a), “The Participation of DNA in Rous Sarcoma Virus Production,” Virology 23: 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1964b), “Homology between RNA from Rous Sarcoma Virus and DNA from Rous Sarcoma Virus-infected Cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 52: 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1964c), “Nature of the Provirus in Rous Sarcoma,” National Cancer Institute Monograph 17: 557–570.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1971), “Guest Editorial. The Protovirus Hypothesis: Speculations on the Significance of RNA-directed DNA Synthesis for Normal Development and Carcinogenesis.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 46: III-VIII.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. (1977), “The DNA Provirus Hypothesis: The Establishment and Implications of RNA-directed DNA Synthesis,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology, 1933–1975. New York: Elsevier, pp. 509–529. Presented December 12, 1975.Google Scholar
Temin, Howard M. and Mizutani, Satoshi (1970), “RNA-dependent DNA Polymerase in Virions of Rous Sarcoma Virus,” Nature 226: 1211–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thagard, Paul (1988), Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (1992), Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul (2003), “Pathways to Biomedical Discovery,” Philosophy of Science 70: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, David S. (1994), “The Evolution of Genetic Intelligence,” Science 264: 224–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thieffry, Denis and Burian, Richard M. (1996), “Jean Brachet's Alternative Scheme for Protein Synthesis,” Trends in the Biochemical Sciences 21 (3): 114–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Paul (1983), “The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: A Semantic Approach,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 14: 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, E. (1948), “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men,” Psychological Review 55: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolman, E. and Honzick, C. (1930), “Introduction and Removal of Reward and Maze Performance in Rats,” University of California Publications in Psychology 4: 257–275.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1972), Human Understanding. v. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tsien, J. Z., Chen, D. E., Gerber, D., Tom, C., Mercer, E., Anderson, D., Mayford, M., and Kandel, E. R. (1996a), “Subregion- and Cell Type-Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain,” Cell 87: 1317–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsien, J. Z., Huerta, P. T., and Tonegawa, S. (1996b), “The Essential Role of Hippocampal CA1 NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Spatial Memory,” Cell 87: 1327–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorzimmer, Peter (1970), Charles Darwin, The Years of Controversy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Vrba, Elisabeth S. and Gould, Stephen J. (1986), “The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated,” Paleobiology 12: 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Hugo ([1889] 1910), Intracellular Pangenesis. Translated by C. S. Gager. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Vries, Hugo de ([1900] 1966), “The Law of Segregation of Hybrids.” Translated from German and reprinted in Stern, C. and Sherwood, E. (eds.), The Origin of Genetics, A Mendel Source Book. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
Vries, Hugo ([1903–04; 1909–1910] 1969), The Mutation Theory. 2 vols. Translated by J. B. Farmer and A. D. Darbishire. New York: Kraus Reprint Company.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1990), “Why the Anti-reductionist Consensus Won't Survive the Case of Classical Mendelian Genetics,” in Fine, Arthur, Forbes, Micky, and Wessels, Linda (eds.), PSA 1990, v. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 125–139.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth (1994), “Genes Made Molecular,” Philosophy of Science 61: 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D. ([1962] 1977), “The Involvement of RNA in the Synthesis of Proteins,” in Nobel Lectures in Molecular Biology 1933–1975. New York: Elsevier, pp. 179–203.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1965) Molecular Biology of the Gene. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1968), The Double Helix. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1970), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 2nd ed. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (1977), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 3rd ed. New York: W. A. Benjamin.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. (2000), A Passion for DNA: Genes, Genomes, and Society. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. and Crick, Francis (1953a), “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid,” Nature 171: 737–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D. and Crick, Francis (1953b), “Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid,” Nature 171: 964–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D., Hopkins, Nancy H., Roberts, Jeffrey W., Steitz, Joan Argetsinger, and Weiner, Alan M. (1988), Molecular Biology of the Gene. 4th ed. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Weber, Marcel (2005), Philosophy of Experimental Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weismann, A. (1892), The Germ-Plasm, A Theory of Heredity. Translated by W. N. Parker and H. Röonfeldt. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. (1977), The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Abraham, Handler, Philip, Smith, Emil L., and Stetten, DeWitt Jr. (1954), Principles of Biochemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Williams, Mary (1970), “Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 29: 343–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Edmund B. (1900), The Cell in Development and Inheritance. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. A. and McNaughton, B. (1993), “Dynamics of the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space,” Science 261: 1055–1058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimsatt, William (1972), “Complexity and Organization,” in Schaffner, Kenneth F. and Cohen, Robert S. (eds.), PSA 1972, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1976), “Reductive Explanation: A Functional Account,” in Cohen, Robert S. (ed.), PSA 1974. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 671–710. Reprinted in Elliott Sober (ed.) (1984), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology: An Anthology. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. (1981), “Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination,” in Brewer, M. and Collins, B. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 124–163.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William (1987), “False Models as Means to Truer Theories,” in Matthew Nitecki and Antoni Hoffman (eds.), Natural Models in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2002), “What Is a Mechanism? A Counterfactual Account,” Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 69: S366–S377.Google Scholar
Woodward, James (2003), Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1953), “Incorporation of Radioactivity from DL-Leucine-1-C14 into Proteins of Rat Liver Homogenate,” Federation Proceedings 12: 295.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1958), “The Microsome,” Scientific American 198 (March): 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1962a), “History and Speculation on Protein Synthesis,” Proceedings of the Symposia on Mathematical Problems in the Biological Sciences 14: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1962b), “Unsettled Questions in the Field of Protein Synthesis,” Biochemical Journal 85: 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1969), “An Historical Account of Protein Synthesis, with Current Overtones – A Personalized View,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 34: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1976), “Protein Synthesis – Early Waves and Recent Ripples,” in Kornberg, A., Horecker, B. L., Cornudella, L., and Oro, J. (eds.), Reflections in Biochemistry. New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 303–308.Google Scholar
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1979), “Historical Aspects of Protein Synthesis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 325: 269–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamecnik, Paul C. (1984), “The Machinery of Protein Synthesis,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences (TIBS) 9: 464–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zola-Morgan, S. and Squire, L. (1993), “Neuroanatomy of Memory,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 16: 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lindley Darden, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Reasoning in Biological Discoveries
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498442.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lindley Darden, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Reasoning in Biological Discoveries
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498442.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lindley Darden, University of Maryland, College Park
  • Book: Reasoning in Biological Discoveries
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498442.015
Available formats
×