Abbruzzese, John E. 1997. ‘The Coherence of Omniscience: A Defense’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Adams, Robert Merrihew, ed. 1990. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Akins, Kathleen. 1993a. ‘A Bat Without Qualities?’ In Davies and Humphreys (1993), pp. 258–273.

Akins, Kathleen. 1993b. ‘What Is It Like To Be Boring and Myopic?’ In Dahlbom, Bo, ed., Dennett and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 124–160.Google Scholar

Alston, William. 1987. ‘Does God Have Beliefs?’ Religious Studies 22: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 1998. ‘A Limited Defence of the Knowledge Argument’. Philosophical Studies 90: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 1999. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/ka.html.Google Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2001. ‘Know-How, Ability, and the Ability Hypothesis’. Theoria 67: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2002a. ‘Nagel on Imagination and Physicalism’. Journal of Philosophical Research 27: 143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2002b. ‘On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes’. Faith and Philosophy 19: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2006. ‘The Knowledge Argument Against Physicalism’. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/know-arg.htm.Google Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2007. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In Velmans, Max and Schneider, Susan, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin, and Walter, Sven. 2006. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. Anthony. 1984. ‘Divine Omnipotence and Impossible Tasks: An Intensional Analysis’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1967 (originally 1265–1274). Summa theologiae, Thomas Gilby, trans. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1975 (originally 1258–1264). Summa contra gentiles, James F. Anderson trans. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Excerpt reprinted in Stump, Eleonore and Murray, Michael J., eds., Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 7–9. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1997 (originally the 13th century). Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Pegis, Anton C., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Balog, Katalin. 1999. ‘Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem’. Philosophical Review 108: 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bealer, George. 2002. ‘Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance’. In Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John, eds., Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 71–125.Google Scholar

Beall, J. C. 2000. ‘A Neglected Response to the Grim Result’. Analysis 60: 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, Michael, and Taliaferro, Charles. 1990. ‘God and Concept Empiricism’. Southwest Philosophy Review 6: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Jason A. 2004. ‘A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or How God Could Know What We Know’. Sophia 43: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Jason A. 2006. ‘Reply to Nagasawa’. Sophia 45: 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigelow, John, and Pargetter, Robert. 1990. ‘Acquaintance with Qualia’. Theoria 61: pp. 129–147. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 179–195.Google Scholar

Bishop, John. 1993. ‘Evil and the Concept of God’. Philosophical Papers 22: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, John. 1998. ‘Can There Be Alternative Concepts of God?’ NoÛs 98: 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. 1992. ‘Filling in Space’. Analysis 50: 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, Ned, and Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. ‘Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap’. Philosophical Review 108: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, Ned, Flanagan, Owen, and Güven Güzeldere, , eds. 1997. The Nature of Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, David. 1978. ‘On the Compossibility of the Divine Attributes’. Philosophical Studies 34: 91–103. Reprinted in Morris, Thomas V., ed., The Concept of God(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 201–215. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, David. 2003. ‘Qualia and Analytical Conditionals’. Journal of Philosophy 100: 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, David, and Jackson, Frank. 1996. Philosophy of Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bringsjord, Selmer. 1989. ‘Grim on Logic and Omniscience’. Analysis 49: 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Campbell, and Nagasawa, Yujin. 2005. ‘Anything You Can Do God Can Do Better’. American Philosophical Quarterly 42: 221–227.Google Scholar

Burke, Michael B. 1987. ‘Theodicy with a God of Limited Power: A Reply to McGrath’. Analysis 47: 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, James. 1989. ‘The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Logic of Relative Identity’. Religious Studies 25: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2005. Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Richard. 1987. ‘On the Logical Problem of the Trinity’. In Cartwright, Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1967. ‘Omniscience and Indexical Reference’. Journal of Philosophy 64: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1995. ‘The Puzzle of Conscious Experience’. Scientific American 237: 80–86. Reprinted in Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman, Dean W., eds., Metaphysics: The Big Questions (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 333–341. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1999. ‘Materialism and the Metaphysics of Modality’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Studies 59: 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2002a. ‘Consciousness and Its Place in Nature’. In Stich, Stephen and Warfield, Ted, eds., Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 102–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2002b. ‘Imagination, Indexicality and Intensions’. Http://www.u.arizona.edu/~chalmers/papers/perry.html.

Chalmers, David J. 2004. ‘Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 269–298.

Churchland, Paul M. 1985a. ‘Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States’. Journal of Philosophy 82: 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1985b. ‘Review of Robinson's Matter and Sense’. Philosophical Review 94: 117–120.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1989. ‘Knowing Qualia: A Reply to Jackson’. In Churchland, , A Neurocomputational Perspective (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 67–76. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997), pp. 571–577. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1996. Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Conee, Earl. 1991. ‘The Possibility of Power Beyond Possibility’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview).Google Scholar

Conee, Earl. 1994. ‘Phenomenal Knowledge’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 136–50. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Côté, Antoine. 1998. ‘God and the Principle of Non-Contradiction’. International Philosophical Quarterly 38: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Tim. 1993. ‘A Definition of Physicalism: Reply to Pettit’. Analysis 53: 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Tim, and Mellor, D. H.. 1990. ‘There Is No Question of Physicalism’. Mind 99: 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creel, Richard E. 1986. Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, Roger 1986. ‘The Avoidance of the Problem of Evil: A Reply to McGrath’. Analysis 46: 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, Chris. 1998. ‘Modality and Acquaintance with Properties’. The Monist 81: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1987. ‘Knowing One's Own Mind’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Martin, and Humphreys, Glyn W., eds. 1993. Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T. 1983. Logic and the Nature of God. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 2006. ‘What RoboMary Knows’. In Alter and Walter (2006).

Descartes, René. 1970 (originally the 17th century. Philosophical Letters, Kenny, Anthony, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Downey, James Patrick. 1993. ‘On Omniscience’. Faith and Philosophy 10: 230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dretske, Fred. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. C. 1985. ‘Mental Summation: The Timing of Voluntary Intentions by Cortical Activity’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 542–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eccles, J. C. 1994. How the Self Controls Its Brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endicott, Ronald P. 1995. ‘Refutation by Analogous Ectoqualia’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 33: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkorn, Gerald, and Kelly, Francis, eds. 1979. Ockham: Opera Theologica, vol. 4. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar

Fiddes, Paul S. 1992. The Creative Suffering of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, Owen. 1992. Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Flint, Thomas P., and Alfred J. Freddoso. 1983. ‘Maximal Power’. In Freddoso, Alfred J., ed., The Existence and Nature of God (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 81–113.Google Scholar

Forrest, Peter. 1994. ‘Inherited Responsibility, Karma and Original Sin’. Sophia 33: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrest, Peter. 2007. Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, Jeff E. 1989. ‘On the Logic of What It Is Like To Be a Conscious Subject’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, Jeff E. 1993. ‘Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Nagel on Consciousness’. Dialogue 32: 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, John. 1991. Immaterial Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Francks, Richard. 1979. ‘Omniscience, Omnipotence and Pantheism’. Philosophy 54: 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1964. ‘The Logic of Omnipotence’. Philosophical Review 73: 262–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1977. ‘Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths’. Philosophical Review 86: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fumerton, Richard. 2004. ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance vs. Description’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2004 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/knowledge-acquaindescrip.

Gale, Richard M. 1991. On the Nature of Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gale, Richard M. 2003. ‘A Response to My Critics’. Philo 6: 132–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1973. ‘Omnipotence’. Philosophy 48: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1977. Providence and Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabo, and Hawthorne, John, eds. 2002. Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gertler, Brie. 2003. ‘Self-Knowledge’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2003 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2003/entries/self-knowledge.

Goldstick, D. 1990. ‘Could God Make a Contradiction True?’ Religious Studies 26: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, Michael. 2005. ‘Nagasawa vs. Nagel: Omnipotence, Pseudo-Task, and a Recent Discussion of Nagel's Doubt About Physicalism’. Inquiry 48: 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1983. ‘Some Neglected Problems of Omniscience’. American Philosophical Quarterly 20: 265–276.Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1984. ‘There Is No Set of All Truths’. Analysis 44: 206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1985. ‘Against Omniscience: The Case from Essential Indexicals’. NoÛs 19: 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1986. ‘On Sets and Worlds: A Reply to Menzel’. Analysis 46: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1990. ‘On Omniscience and a “Set of All Truths”: A Reply to Bringsjord’. Analysis 50: 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1991. The Incomplete Universe: Totality, Knowledge and Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 2000. ‘The Being That Knew Too Much’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47: 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 2007. ‘Impossibility Arguments’. In Martin, M., eds., Cambridge Companion to Atheism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 199–214.Google Scholar

Groarke, Louis. 2001. ‘Reconsidering Absolute Omnipotence’. The Heythrop Journal 42: 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haksar, Vinit. 1981. ‘Nagel on Subjective and Objective’. Inquiry 24: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. 1969. ‘Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets’. In Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton, eds., Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel (New York: St. Martin's Press), pp. 179–199.Google Scholar

Hill, Daniel. 1998. ‘What's New in Philosophy of Religion?’ Philosophy Now 21: 30–33.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary. 1980. ‘What an Omnipotent Agent Can Do’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11: 1–19.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 1984. ‘Swinburne on Omnipotence’. Sophia 23: 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 1988. ‘Omnipotence Redux’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 2002. The Divine Attributes. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary S. Rosenkrantz. 2006. ‘Omnipotence’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2006 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/omnipotence.

Horgan, Terence. 1984. ‘Jackson on Physical Information and Qualia’. Philosophical Quarterly 34: 147–52. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, David. 2000. ‘Omniscience and Cognitive Power’. Unpublished manuscript.

Hutcheson, Peter. 1992. ‘Omniscience and the Problem of Evil’. Sophia 31: 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1982. ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1986. ‘What Mary Didn't Know’. Journal of Philosophy 83: 291–295. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1995. ‘Postscript’. In Moser, Paul K. and Trout, J. D., eds., Contemporary Materialism (London: Routledge), pp. 184–189. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1998a. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1998b. ‘Postscript on Qualia’. In Jackson, Mind, Method and Conditionals (London: Routledge), pp. 76–79. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 2003. ‘Mind and Illusion’. In O'Hear (2003), pp. 251–271.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 2004. ‘Looking Back on the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 421–442.

Johnston, Mark. 1992. ‘How to Speak of the Colors’. Philosophical Studies 68: 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Mark. 1996. ‘Mind-Body Problem at the Surface of Objects’. Philosophical Issues 7: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kekes, John. 1977. ‘Physicalism and Subjectivity’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37: 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1979. The God of the Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Khamara, E. J. 1978. ‘In Defense of Omnipotence’. Philosophical Quarterly 28: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, Robet. 2005. Zombies and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Gordon. 2005. ‘The Theological Significance of Subjectivity’. The Heythrop Journal 46: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. 1966. ‘Omniscience and Immutability’. Journal of Philosophy 63: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kvanvig, Jonathan. 1986. The Possibility of An All-Knowing God. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachs, John. 1963a. ‘Omniscience’. Dialogue 1: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachs, John. 1963b. ‘Professor Prior on Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1977. ‘The Hidden Assumption in the Paradox of Omnipotence’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38: 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1978. ‘Failing to Define “Omnipotence”. Philosophical Studies 34: 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1984. ‘Descartes on God's Ability to Do the Logically Impossible’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14: 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Langton, Rae. 2004. ‘Elusive Knowledge of Things in Themselves’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried. 1966 (originally 1710). Theodicy, E. M. Huggard, trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Levine, Joseph. 2001. Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 1979. ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’. Philosophical Review 88: 513–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 1983. ‘Postscript to “Mad Pain and Martian Pain”’. In Lewis, , Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1988. ‘What Experience Teaches’. In Copley-Coltherart, J., ed., Proceedings of the Russellian Society (Sydney: University of Sydney). Reprinted in Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 447–461. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1997. ‘Finkish Dispositions’. Philosophical Quarterly 47: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 2001. ‘Ramseyan Humility’. Preprint Series 1/01. Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C. 1970. ‘Non-Discursive Thought: An Enigma of Greek Philosophy’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loar, Brian. 1990. ‘Phenomenal States’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 4: Action Theory and the Philosophy of Mind (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview), pp. 81–108.Google Scholar

Loar, Brian. 1997. ‘Phenomenal States (Revised Version)’. In Block et al. (1997), pp. 597–616. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 219–239.

Lockwood, Michael. 1989. Mind, Brain, and the Quantum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 1995. ‘Indexical Knowledge and the Possibility of an Omniscient Being’. In Stewart, M. and Clandenon, D., eds., Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Religion (Moscow: Progress Press).Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. 2004. There's Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 1996. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 2003. ‘Perspectival Representation and the Knowledge Argument’. In Smith, Quentin and Jokic, Aleksandar, eds., Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 384–395.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1955. ‘Evil and Omnipotence’. Mind 64: 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Macnamara, John, Reyes, Marie, and Reyes, Gonzalo. 1994. ‘Logic and the Trinity’. Faith and Philosophy 11: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mander, William J. 2002. ‘Does God Know What It Is Like to Be Me?’ The Heythrop Journal 43: 430–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, William E. 1975. ‘The Divine Attributes’. American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 151–159.Google Scholar

Mar, Gary. 1993. ‘Why ‘Cantorian’ Arguments Against the Existence of God Do Not Work’. International Philosophical Quarterly 33: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Michael. 1970. ‘A Disproof of God's Existence’. Darshana 10: 22–26.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. 1974. ‘A Disproof of the God of the Common Man’. Question 7: 115–124. Reprinted in Martin and Monnier (2003), pp. 232–241. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Martin Michael. 1990. ‘Conflicts Between the Divine Attributes’. In Martin, , Atheism: A Philosophical Justification (Philadelphia: Temple University Press). Reprinted in Martin and Monnier (2003), pp. 242–257. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. 2000. ‘Omniscience and Incoherency’. In Holmstrom-Hintikka, Ghita, ed., Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Michael, and Monnier, Ricki, eds. 2003. The Impossibility of God. Amherst and New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1963. ‘Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence’. Philosophical Review 72: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1977. ‘Defining Omnipotence’. Philosophical Studies 32: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1988. ‘How Does God Know the Things He Knows’. In Morris, Thomas V., ed., Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism (Ithaca, N. Y., Cornell University Press), pp. 345–361.Google Scholar

Mawson, T. J. 2002. ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Are Compatible: A Reply to Morriston’. Religious Studies 38: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, Grover. 1979. ‘Rigid Designators and Mind-Brain Identity’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: 365–403.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1989. ‘Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?’ Mind 98: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1991. The Problem of Consciousness: Essays Toward a Resolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1999. Mysterious Flame. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 2004. Consciousness and Its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, P. J. 1986. ‘Evil and the Existence of a Finite God’. Analysis 46: 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, P. J. 1987. ‘Children of a Lesser God?: A Reply to Burke and Crisp’. Analysis 47: 236–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, Carolyn. 1985. ‘“Knowing What It's Like” and the Essential Indexical’. Philosophical Studies 48: 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McTaggart, John Ellis. 1906. Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 1993. ‘Nothing Like Experience’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menzel, Christopher. 1986. ‘On Set Theoretic Possible Worlds’. Analysis 46: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Leonard G. 1957. ‘Descartes, Mathematics, and God’. Philosophical Review 66. 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montero, Barbara. 2006. ‘Physicalism in an Infinitely Decomposable World’. Erkenntnis 64: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, A. W. 1997. Points of View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. 2003. ‘The Knowledge Argument Revisited’. International Journal for Philosophical Quarterly 43: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1986a. The Logic of God Incarnate. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1986b. ‘Reduplication and Representational Christology’. Modern Theology 2: 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1991. Our Idea of God: An Introduction to Christian Theology. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2001a. ‘Omnipotence and the Anselmian God’. Philo 4: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2001b. ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection: Are They Compatible?’ Religious Studies 37: 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2002. ‘Omnipotence and the Power to Choose: A Reply to Wielenberg’. Faith and Philosophy 19: 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2003. ‘Are Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Compatible?: Reply to Mawson: Are They Compatible?’ Religious Studies 39: 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mozley, J. K. 1926. The Impassibility of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Nancy. 2006. Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2002. ‘The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism’. Theoria 68: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003a. ‘Divine Omniscience and Experience: A Reply to Alter’. Ars Disputandi 3. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000098/index.html.Google Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003b. ‘Divine Omniscience and Knowledge De Se’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003c. ‘God's Point of View: A Reply to Mander’. The Heythrop Journal 44: 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003d. ‘Thomas vs. Thomas: A New Approach to Nagel's Bat Argument’. Inquiry 46: 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2006. ‘Physicalism and Omniscience: A Reply to Beyer’. Sophia 44: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2007a. ‘A Further Reply to Beyer on Omniscience’. Sophia 46: 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2007b. ‘The “Most Powerful” Response to the Knowledge Argument’. Unpublished manuscript, University of Birmingham.

Nagasawa, Yujin. Forthcoming. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans, and Patrick Wilken, eds., The Oxford Companion to Consciousness.

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat’. Philosophical Review 83: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nemirow, Lawrence. 1980. ‘Review of Nagel's Mortal Questions’. Philosophical Review 89: 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemirow, Lawrence. 1990. ‘Physicalism and the Cognitive Role of Acquaintance’. In Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Ngien, Dennis. 1997. ‘The God Who Suffers’. Christian Today, February 3.Google Scholar

O'Hear, Anthony, ed. 2003. Mind and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papineau, David. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pereboom, Derek. 1994. ‘Bats, Brain Scientists, and the Limitation of Introspection’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, John. 1979. ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’. NoÛs 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, John. 2001. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Peterson, Michael L., ed. 1992. The Problem of Evil: Selected Readings. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. 1993. ‘A Definition of Physicalism’. Analysis 53: 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip. 2004. ‘Motion Blindness and the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 105–142.

Pike, Nelson. 1969. ‘Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin’. American Philosophical Quarterly 6: 208–216.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1967. God and Other Minds. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1980a. Does God Have a Nature?Milwaukee, Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1980b. God, Freedom and Evil. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1989. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin, and Grim, Patrick. 1993. Philosophical Studies 71: 267–306.CrossRef

Post, John F.. 2003. ‘Omniscience, Weak PSR and Method’. Philo 6: pp. 33–48. Http://www.vanderbilt.edu/~postjf/OmWpsrMeth7.02nc.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Post, John F. 2004. ‘Reply to Gale and Pruss’. Philo 7: 114–121. Http://www.vanderbilt.edu/~postjf/gale&pruss.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1962. ‘The Formalities of Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1963. ‘Rejoinder to Professor Lachs on Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pruss, Alexander R. 2003. ‘Post's Critiques of Omniscience and of Talk of “All True Propositions”’. Philo 6: pp. 49–58. Http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85/papers/QuantifyingOverAllTruths.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1980. ‘Mavrodes on Omnipotence’. Philosophical Studies 37: 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Howard. 1982. Matter and Sense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Howard. 1993. ‘The Anti-Materialist Strategy and the “Knowledge Argument”’. In Robinson, , ed., Objections to Physicalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 159–183.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A. 2000. Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, James F. 1969. Philosophical Theology. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Rowe, William L., ed. 2001. God and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel. 1992. God, Passibility, and Corporeality. Kampen, The Netherlands: Kok Pharos Publishing.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel. 2001. ‘Does God Suffer?: A Critical Discussion of Thomas G. Weinandy's Does God Suffer?’. Ars Disputandi 1. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000018/index.html.Google Scholar

Savage, C. Wade. 1967. ‘The Paradox of the Stone’. Philosophical Review 76: 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan. 2003. ‘Is There a Fundamental Level?’ NoÛs 37: 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shestov, Leon. 1962. ‘In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl’, George L. Kline, trans. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Keith. 1993. ‘On an Argument Against Omniscience’. NoÛs 44: 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, Jordan Howard. 2004. Logic and Theism: Arguments for and Against Beliefs in God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommers, Tamler. 2002. ‘Of Zombies, Color Scientists, and Floating Iron Bars’. Psyche 8. Http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8–22-sommers.html.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1983. Time, Creation, and the Continuum. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason, and Williamson, Timothy. 2001. ‘Knowing How’. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2000. ‘Physicalism and Necessary A Posteriori’. Journal of Philosophy 97: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001a. ‘The Conceivability Argument and Two Conceptions of the Physical’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 15: Metaphysics (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Publishing), pp. 393–413.Google Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001b. ‘Physicalism’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2001 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/physicalism.

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001c. ‘Two Conceptions of the Physical’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 253–281. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2005. ‘Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts’. Mind and Language 20: 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2006. Ignorance and Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel, and Yujin Nagasawa. 2004. ‘Introduction’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 1–36.

Strawson, Galen. 1994. Mental Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas D. 1991. ‘Omniscience, Immutability, and the Divine Mode of Knowing’. Faith and Philosophy 8: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. 1973. ‘Omnipotence’. American Philosophical Quarterly 10: 231–237.Google Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. 1977. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taliaferro, Charles. 1985. ‘Divine Cognitive Power’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Textor, Mark. 2001. ‘“Portraying” a Proposition’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 137–161.Google Scholar

Tilghman, B. R. 1991. ‘What Is It Like to Be an Aardvark?’ Philosophy 66: 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomberlin, James E., and McGuinness, Frank. 1977. ‘God, Evil and the Free Will Defense’. Religious Studies 13: 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trakakis, Nick. 1997. ‘The Absolute Theory of Omnipotence’. Sophia 36: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tye, Michael. 1999. ‘Phenomenal Consciousness: The Explanatory Gap as Cognitive Illusion’. Mind 108: 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tye, Michael. 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tye, Michael. 2003. ‘A Theory of Phenomenal Concepts’. In O'Hear (2003), pp. 91–105.

Unger, Peter. 1966. ‘On Experience and the Development of the Understanding’. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 1–9.Google Scholar

Ujvári, Márta. 1997. ‘Omniscience and Essential Indexicals’. In Meggle, Georg, ed., Proceedings of the 2nd Conference ‘Perspectives in Analytic Philosophy’, vol. 1, Philosophy of Language and Metaphysics (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 466–473.Google Scholar

Gulick, Robert. 1985. ‘Physicalism and the Subjectivity of the Mental’. Philosophical Topics 13: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Gulick, Robert. 1993. ‘Understanding the Phenomenal Mind: Are We All Just Armadillos?’ In Davies, and Humphreys, (1993). Reprinted in Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 447–461. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Van Gulick, Robert. 2004. ‘So Many Ways of Saying No to Mary’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 365–405.

Inwagen, Peter. 1978. ‘The Possibility of Resurrection’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9: 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vierkant, Tillmann. 2002. ‘Zombie-Mary and the Blue Banana: On the Compatibility of the “Knowledge Argument” with the Argument from Modality’. Psyche 8. Http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8–19-vierkant.html.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G. 2000. Does God Suffer?Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G. 2002. ‘Does God Suffer?’ Ars Disputandi 2. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000023/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Alan R. 1982. The Nature of Knowledge. Totowa, N.J.: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Wielenberg, Erik J. 2000. ‘Omnipotence Again’. Faith and Philosophy 17: 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierenga, Edward R. 1983. ‘Omnipotence Defined’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43: 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierenga, Edward R. 1988. ‘Omniscience and Knowledge De Se Et De Praesenti’. In Austin, David F., ed., Philosophical Analysis: A Defence by Example (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).Google Scholar

Wierenga, Edward. 1989. The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Yandell, Keith E. 1994. ‘A Gross and Palpable Contradiction?: Incarnation and Consistency’. Sophia 33: 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeis, John. 1993. ‘A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity’. Sophia 32: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbruzzese, John E. 1997. ‘The Coherence of Omniscience: A Defense’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord, and Adams, Robert Merrihew, ed. 1990. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Akins, Kathleen. 1993a. ‘A Bat Without Qualities?’ In Davies and Humphreys (1993), pp. 258–273.

Akins, Kathleen. 1993b. ‘What Is It Like To Be Boring and Myopic?’ In Dahlbom, Bo, ed., Dennett and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 124–160.Google Scholar

Alston, William. 1987. ‘Does God Have Beliefs?’ Religious Studies 22: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 1998. ‘A Limited Defence of the Knowledge Argument’. Philosophical Studies 90: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 1999. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/ka.html.Google Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2001. ‘Know-How, Ability, and the Ability Hypothesis’. Theoria 67: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2002a. ‘Nagel on Imagination and Physicalism’. Journal of Philosophical Research 27: 143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2002b. ‘On Two Alleged Conflicts Between Divine Attributes’. Faith and Philosophy 19: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2006. ‘The Knowledge Argument Against Physicalism’. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/know-arg.htm.Google Scholar

Alter, Torin. 2007. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In Velmans, Max and Schneider, Susan, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Torin, and Walter, Sven. 2006. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. Anthony. 1984. ‘Divine Omnipotence and Impossible Tasks: An Intensional Analysis’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15: 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1967 (originally 1265–1274). Summa theologiae, Thomas Gilby, trans. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1975 (originally 1258–1264). Summa contra gentiles, James F. Anderson trans. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Excerpt reprinted in Stump, Eleonore and Murray, Michael J., eds., Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 7–9. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1997 (originally the 13th century). Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Pegis, Anton C., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Balog, Katalin. 1999. ‘Conceivability, Possibility, and the Mind-Body Problem’. Philosophical Review 108: 497–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bealer, George. 2002. ‘Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance’. In Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John, eds., Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 71–125.Google Scholar

Beall, J. C. 2000. ‘A Neglected Response to the Grim Result’. Analysis 60: 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, Michael, and Taliaferro, Charles. 1990. ‘God and Concept Empiricism’. Southwest Philosophy Review 6: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Jason A. 2004. ‘A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or How God Could Know What We Know’. Sophia 43: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Jason A. 2006. ‘Reply to Nagasawa’. Sophia 45: 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigelow, John, and Pargetter, Robert. 1990. ‘Acquaintance with Qualia’. Theoria 61: pp. 129–147. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 179–195.Google Scholar

Bishop, John. 1993. ‘Evil and the Concept of God’. Philosophical Papers 22: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, John. 1998. ‘Can There Be Alternative Concepts of God?’ NoÛs 98: 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. 1992. ‘Filling in Space’. Analysis 50: 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, Ned, and Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. ‘Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap’. Philosophical Review 108: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Block, Ned, Flanagan, Owen, and Güven Güzeldere, , eds. 1997. The Nature of Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, David. 1978. ‘On the Compossibility of the Divine Attributes’. Philosophical Studies 34: 91–103. Reprinted in Morris, Thomas V., ed., The Concept of God(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 201–215. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, David. 2003. ‘Qualia and Analytical Conditionals’. Journal of Philosophy 100: 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, David, and Jackson, Frank. 1996. Philosophy of Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bringsjord, Selmer. 1989. ‘Grim on Logic and Omniscience’. Analysis 49: 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Campbell, and Nagasawa, Yujin. 2005. ‘Anything You Can Do God Can Do Better’. American Philosophical Quarterly 42: 221–227.Google Scholar

Burke, Michael B. 1987. ‘Theodicy with a God of Limited Power: A Reply to McGrath’. Analysis 47: 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, James. 1989. ‘The Doctrine of the Trinity and the Logic of Relative Identity’. Religious Studies 25: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2005. Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Richard. 1987. ‘On the Logical Problem of the Trinity’. In Cartwright, Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar

Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1967. ‘Omniscience and Indexical Reference’. Journal of Philosophy 64: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1995. ‘The Puzzle of Conscious Experience’. Scientific American 237: 80–86. Reprinted in Inwagen, Peter and Zimmerman, Dean W., eds., Metaphysics: The Big Questions (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 333–341. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 1999. ‘Materialism and the Metaphysics of Modality’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Studies 59: 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2002a. ‘Consciousness and Its Place in Nature’. In Stich, Stephen and Warfield, Ted, eds., Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 102–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2002b. ‘Imagination, Indexicality and Intensions’. Http://www.u.arizona.edu/~chalmers/papers/perry.html.

Chalmers, David J. 2004. ‘Phenomenal Concepts and the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 269–298.

Churchland, Paul M. 1985a. ‘Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States’. Journal of Philosophy 82: 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1985b. ‘Review of Robinson's Matter and Sense’. Philosophical Review 94: 117–120.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1989. ‘Knowing Qualia: A Reply to Jackson’. In Churchland, , A Neurocomputational Perspective (Cambridge: MIT Press), pp. 67–76. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997), pp. 571–577. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Churchland, Paul M. 1996. Matter and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Conee, Earl. 1991. ‘The Possibility of Power Beyond Possibility’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 5: Philosophy of Religion (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview).Google Scholar

Conee, Earl. 1994. ‘Phenomenal Knowledge’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 136–50. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Côté, Antoine. 1998. ‘God and the Principle of Non-Contradiction’. International Philosophical Quarterly 38: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Tim. 1993. ‘A Definition of Physicalism: Reply to Pettit’. Analysis 53: 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Tim, and Mellor, D. H.. 1990. ‘There Is No Question of Physicalism’. Mind 99: 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creel, Richard E. 1986. Divine Impassibility: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crisp, Roger 1986. ‘The Avoidance of the Problem of Evil: A Reply to McGrath’. Analysis 46: 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, Chris. 1998. ‘Modality and Acquaintance with Properties’. The Monist 81: 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1987. ‘Knowing One's Own Mind’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60: 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Martin, and Humphreys, Glyn W., eds. 1993. Consciousness: Psychological and Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen T. 1983. Logic and the Nature of God. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 2006. ‘What RoboMary Knows’. In Alter and Walter (2006).

Descartes, René. 1970 (originally the 17th century. Philosophical Letters, Kenny, Anthony, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Downey, James Patrick. 1993. ‘On Omniscience’. Faith and Philosophy 10: 230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dretske, Fred. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. C. 1985. ‘Mental Summation: The Timing of Voluntary Intentions by Cortical Activity’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 542–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eccles, J. C. 1994. How the Self Controls Its Brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endicott, Ronald P. 1995. ‘Refutation by Analogous Ectoqualia’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 33: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Etzkorn, Gerald, and Kelly, Francis, eds. 1979. Ockham: Opera Theologica, vol. 4. St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar

Fiddes, Paul S. 1992. The Creative Suffering of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanagan, Owen. 1992. Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Flint, Thomas P., and Alfred J. Freddoso. 1983. ‘Maximal Power’. In Freddoso, Alfred J., ed., The Existence and Nature of God (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 81–113.Google Scholar

Forrest, Peter. 1994. ‘Inherited Responsibility, Karma and Original Sin’. Sophia 33: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forrest, Peter. 2007. Developmental Theism: From Pure Will to Unbounded Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, Jeff E. 1989. ‘On the Logic of What It Is Like To Be a Conscious Subject’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67: 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foss, Jeff E. 1993. ‘Subjectivity, Objectivity, and Nagel on Consciousness’. Dialogue 32: 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foster, John. 1991. Immaterial Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Francks, Richard. 1979. ‘Omniscience, Omnipotence and Pantheism’. Philosophy 54: 395–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1964. ‘The Logic of Omnipotence’. Philosophical Review 73: 262–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1977. ‘Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths’. Philosophical Review 86: 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fumerton, Richard. 2004. ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance vs. Description’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2004 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/knowledge-acquaindescrip.

Gale, Richard M. 1991. On the Nature of Existence of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gale, Richard M. 2003. ‘A Response to My Critics’. Philo 6: 132–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1973. ‘Omnipotence’. Philosophy 48: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1977. Providence and Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar Szabo, and Hawthorne, John, eds. 2002. Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gertler, Brie. 2003. ‘Self-Knowledge’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2003 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2003/entries/self-knowledge.

Goldstick, D. 1990. ‘Could God Make a Contradiction True?’ Religious Studies 26: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, Michael. 2005. ‘Nagasawa vs. Nagel: Omnipotence, Pseudo-Task, and a Recent Discussion of Nagel's Doubt About Physicalism’. Inquiry 48: 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1983. ‘Some Neglected Problems of Omniscience’. American Philosophical Quarterly 20: 265–276.Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1984. ‘There Is No Set of All Truths’. Analysis 44: 206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1985. ‘Against Omniscience: The Case from Essential Indexicals’. NoÛs 19: 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1986. ‘On Sets and Worlds: A Reply to Menzel’. Analysis 46: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1990. ‘On Omniscience and a “Set of All Truths”: A Reply to Bringsjord’. Analysis 50: 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 1991. The Incomplete Universe: Totality, Knowledge and Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 2000. ‘The Being That Knew Too Much’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47: 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grim, Patrick. 2007. ‘Impossibility Arguments’. In Martin, M., eds., Cambridge Companion to Atheism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 199–214.Google Scholar

Groarke, Louis. 2001. ‘Reconsidering Absolute Omnipotence’. The Heythrop Journal 42: 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haksar, Vinit. 1981. ‘Nagel on Subjective and Objective’. Inquiry 24: 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. 1969. ‘Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets’. In Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton, eds., Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel (New York: St. Martin's Press), pp. 179–199.Google Scholar

Hill, Daniel. 1998. ‘What's New in Philosophy of Religion?’ Philosophy Now 21: 30–33.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary. 1980. ‘What an Omnipotent Agent Can Do’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11: 1–19.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 1984. ‘Swinburne on Omnipotence’. Sophia 23: 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 1988. ‘Omnipotence Redux’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 2002. The Divine Attributes. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary S. Rosenkrantz. 2006. ‘Omnipotence’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2006 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/omnipotence.

Horgan, Terence. 1984. ‘Jackson on Physical Information and Qualia’. Philosophical Quarterly 34: 147–52. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, David. 2000. ‘Omniscience and Cognitive Power’. Unpublished manuscript.

Hutcheson, Peter. 1992. ‘Omniscience and the Problem of Evil’. Sophia 31: 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1982. ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’. Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1986. ‘What Mary Didn't Know’. Journal of Philosophy 83: 291–295. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1995. ‘Postscript’. In Moser, Paul K. and Trout, J. D., eds., Contemporary Materialism (London: Routledge), pp. 184–189. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1998a. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1998b. ‘Postscript on Qualia’. In Jackson, Mind, Method and Conditionals (London: Routledge), pp. 76–79. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 2003. ‘Mind and Illusion’. In O'Hear (2003), pp. 251–271.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 2004. ‘Looking Back on the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 421–442.

Johnston, Mark. 1992. ‘How to Speak of the Colors’. Philosophical Studies 68: 221–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Mark. 1996. ‘Mind-Body Problem at the Surface of Objects’. Philosophical Issues 7: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kekes, John. 1977. ‘Physicalism and Subjectivity’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37: 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1979. The God of the Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Khamara, E. J. 1978. ‘In Defense of Omnipotence’. Philosophical Quarterly 28: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, Robet. 2005. Zombies and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Gordon. 2005. ‘The Theological Significance of Subjectivity’. The Heythrop Journal 46: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. 1966. ‘Omniscience and Immutability’. Journal of Philosophy 63: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kvanvig, Jonathan. 1986. The Possibility of An All-Knowing God. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachs, John. 1963a. ‘Omniscience’. Dialogue 1: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lachs, John. 1963b. ‘Professor Prior on Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1977. ‘The Hidden Assumption in the Paradox of Omnipotence’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38: 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1978. ‘Failing to Define “Omnipotence”. Philosophical Studies 34: 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croix, Richard R. 1984. ‘Descartes on God's Ability to Do the Logically Impossible’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14: 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Langton, Rae. 2004. ‘Elusive Knowledge of Things in Themselves’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried. 1966 (originally 1710). Theodicy, E. M. Huggard, trans. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Levine, Joseph. 2001. Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 1979. ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’. Philosophical Review 88: 513–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 1983. ‘Postscript to “Mad Pain and Martian Pain”’. In Lewis, , Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1988. ‘What Experience Teaches’. In Copley-Coltherart, J., ed., Proceedings of the Russellian Society (Sydney: University of Sydney). Reprinted in Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 447–461. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1997. ‘Finkish Dispositions’. Philosophical Quarterly 47: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. 2001. ‘Ramseyan Humility’. Preprint Series 1/01. Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C. 1970. ‘Non-Discursive Thought: An Enigma of Greek Philosophy’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loar, Brian. 1990. ‘Phenomenal States’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 4: Action Theory and the Philosophy of Mind (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview), pp. 81–108.Google Scholar

Loar, Brian. 1997. ‘Phenomenal States (Revised Version)’. In Block et al. (1997), pp. 597–616. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 219–239.

Lockwood, Michael. 1989. Mind, Brain, and the Quantum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter. 1995. ‘Indexical Knowledge and the Possibility of an Omniscient Being’. In Stewart, M. and Clandenon, D., eds., Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Religion (Moscow: Progress Press).Google Scholar

Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. 2004. There's Something About Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 1996. Consciousness and Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 2003. ‘Perspectival Representation and the Knowledge Argument’. In Smith, Quentin and Jokic, Aleksandar, eds., Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 384–395.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1955. ‘Evil and Omnipotence’. Mind 64: 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Macnamara, John, Reyes, Marie, and Reyes, Gonzalo. 1994. ‘Logic and the Trinity’. Faith and Philosophy 11: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mander, William J. 2002. ‘Does God Know What It Is Like to Be Me?’ The Heythrop Journal 43: 430–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, William E. 1975. ‘The Divine Attributes’. American Philosophical Quarterly 12: 151–159.Google Scholar

Mar, Gary. 1993. ‘Why ‘Cantorian’ Arguments Against the Existence of God Do Not Work’. International Philosophical Quarterly 33: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Michael. 1970. ‘A Disproof of God's Existence’. Darshana 10: 22–26.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. 1974. ‘A Disproof of the God of the Common Man’. Question 7: 115–124. Reprinted in Martin and Monnier (2003), pp. 232–241. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Martin Michael. 1990. ‘Conflicts Between the Divine Attributes’. In Martin, , Atheism: A Philosophical Justification (Philadelphia: Temple University Press). Reprinted in Martin and Monnier (2003), pp. 242–257. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Martin, Michael. 2000. ‘Omniscience and Incoherency’. In Holmstrom-Hintikka, Ghita, ed., Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic), pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Michael, and Monnier, Ricki, eds. 2003. The Impossibility of God. Amherst and New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1963. ‘Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence’. Philosophical Review 72: 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1977. ‘Defining Omnipotence’. Philosophical Studies 32: 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavrodes, George I. 1988. ‘How Does God Know the Things He Knows’. In Morris, Thomas V., ed., Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism (Ithaca, N. Y., Cornell University Press), pp. 345–361.Google Scholar

Mawson, T. J. 2002. ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Are Compatible: A Reply to Morriston’. Religious Studies 38: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, Grover. 1979. ‘Rigid Designators and Mind-Brain Identity’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: 365–403.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1989. ‘Can We Solve the Mind-Body Problem?’ Mind 98: 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1991. The Problem of Consciousness: Essays Toward a Resolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 1999. Mysterious Flame. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

McGinn, Colin. 2004. Consciousness and Its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, P. J. 1986. ‘Evil and the Existence of a Finite God’. Analysis 46: 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, P. J. 1987. ‘Children of a Lesser God?: A Reply to Burke and Crisp’. Analysis 47: 236–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, Carolyn. 1985. ‘“Knowing What It's Like” and the Essential Indexical’. Philosophical Studies 48: 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McTaggart, John Ellis. 1906. Some Dogmas of Religion. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 1993. ‘Nothing Like Experience’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menzel, Christopher. 1986. ‘On Set Theoretic Possible Worlds’. Analysis 46: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Leonard G. 1957. ‘Descartes, Mathematics, and God’. Philosophical Review 66. 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montero, Barbara. 2006. ‘Physicalism in an Infinitely Decomposable World’. Erkenntnis 64: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, A. W. 1997. Points of View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. 2003. ‘The Knowledge Argument Revisited’. International Journal for Philosophical Quarterly 43: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1986a. The Logic of God Incarnate. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1986b. ‘Reduplication and Representational Christology’. Modern Theology 2: 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, Thomas V. 1991. Our Idea of God: An Introduction to Christian Theology. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2001a. ‘Omnipotence and the Anselmian God’. Philo 4: 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2001b. ‘Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection: Are They Compatible?’ Religious Studies 37: 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2002. ‘Omnipotence and the Power to Choose: A Reply to Wielenberg’. Faith and Philosophy 19: 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morriston, Wes. 2003. ‘Are Omnipotence and Necessary Moral Perfection Compatible?: Reply to Mawson: Are They Compatible?’ Religious Studies 39: 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mozley, J. K. 1926. The Impassibility of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Nancy. 2006. Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2002. ‘The Knowledge Argument Against Dualism’. Theoria 68: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003a. ‘Divine Omniscience and Experience: A Reply to Alter’. Ars Disputandi 3. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000098/index.html.Google Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003b. ‘Divine Omniscience and Knowledge De Se’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53: 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003c. ‘God's Point of View: A Reply to Mander’. The Heythrop Journal 44: 60–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2003d. ‘Thomas vs. Thomas: A New Approach to Nagel's Bat Argument’. Inquiry 46: 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2006. ‘Physicalism and Omniscience: A Reply to Beyer’. Sophia 44: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2007a. ‘A Further Reply to Beyer on Omniscience’. Sophia 46: 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin. 2007b. ‘The “Most Powerful” Response to the Knowledge Argument’. Unpublished manuscript, University of Birmingham.

Nagasawa, Yujin. Forthcoming. ‘The Knowledge Argument’. In Tim Bayne, Axel Cleeremans, and Patrick Wilken, eds., The Oxford Companion to Consciousness.

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat’. Philosophical Review 83: 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nemirow, Lawrence. 1980. ‘Review of Nagel's Mortal Questions’. Philosophical Review 89: 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nemirow, Lawrence. 1990. ‘Physicalism and the Cognitive Role of Acquaintance’. In Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Ngien, Dennis. 1997. ‘The God Who Suffers’. Christian Today, February 3.Google Scholar

O'Hear, Anthony, ed. 2003. Mind and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papineau, David. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pereboom, Derek. 1994. ‘Bats, Brain Scientists, and the Limitation of Introspection’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, John. 1979. ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’. NoÛs 13: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, John. 2001. Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Peterson, Michael L., ed. 1992. The Problem of Evil: Selected Readings. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. 1993. ‘A Definition of Physicalism’. Analysis 53: 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettit, Philip. 2004. ‘Motion Blindness and the Knowledge Argument’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 105–142.

Pike, Nelson. 1969. ‘Omnipotence and God's Ability to Sin’. American Philosophical Quarterly 6: 208–216.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1967. God and Other Minds. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1980a. Does God Have a Nature?Milwaukee, Wisc.: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1980b. God, Freedom and Evil. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1989. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin, and Grim, Patrick. 1993. Philosophical Studies 71: 267–306.CrossRef

Post, John F.. 2003. ‘Omniscience, Weak PSR and Method’. Philo 6: pp. 33–48. Http://www.vanderbilt.edu/~postjf/OmWpsrMeth7.02nc.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Post, John F. 2004. ‘Reply to Gale and Pruss’. Philo 7: 114–121. Http://www.vanderbilt.edu/~postjf/gale&pruss.htm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1962. ‘The Formalities of Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1963. ‘Rejoinder to Professor Lachs on Omniscience’. Philosophy 37: 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pruss, Alexander R. 2003. ‘Post's Critiques of Omniscience and of Talk of “All True Propositions”’. Philo 6: pp. 49–58. Http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85/papers/QuantifyingOverAllTruths.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichenbach, Bruce R. 1980. ‘Mavrodes on Omnipotence’. Philosophical Studies 37: 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Howard. 1982. Matter and Sense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Howard. 1993. ‘The Anti-Materialist Strategy and the “Knowledge Argument”’. In Robinson, , ed., Objections to Physicalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 159–183.Google Scholar

Rogers, Katherin A. 2000. Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, James F. 1969. Philosophical Theology. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Rowe, William L., ed. 2001. God and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel. 1992. God, Passibility, and Corporeality. Kampen, The Netherlands: Kok Pharos Publishing.Google Scholar

Sarot, Marcel. 2001. ‘Does God Suffer?: A Critical Discussion of Thomas G. Weinandy's Does God Suffer?’. Ars Disputandi 1. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000018/index.html.Google Scholar

Savage, C. Wade. 1967. ‘The Paradox of the Stone’. Philosophical Review 76: 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan. 2003. ‘Is There a Fundamental Level?’ NoÛs 37: 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, John. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shestov, Leon. 1962. ‘In Memory of a Great Philosopher: Edmund Husserl’, George L. Kline, trans. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmons, Keith. 1993. ‘On an Argument Against Omniscience’. NoÛs 44: 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, Jordan Howard. 2004. Logic and Theism: Arguments for and Against Beliefs in God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommers, Tamler. 2002. ‘Of Zombies, Color Scientists, and Floating Iron Bars’. Psyche 8. Http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8–22-sommers.html.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1983. Time, Creation, and the Continuum. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason, and Williamson, Timothy. 2001. ‘Knowing How’. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2000. ‘Physicalism and Necessary A Posteriori’. Journal of Philosophy 97: 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001a. ‘The Conceivability Argument and Two Conceptions of the Physical’. In Tomberlin, James, ed., Philosophical Perspectives 15: Metaphysics (Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Publishing), pp. 393–413.Google Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001b. ‘Physicalism’. In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2001 edition. Http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/physicalism.

Stoljar, Daniel. 2001c. ‘Two Conceptions of the Physical’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 253–281. Reprinted in Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2005. ‘Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts’. Mind and Language 20: 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel. 2006. Ignorance and Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stoljar, Daniel, and Yujin Nagasawa. 2004. ‘Introduction’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 1–36.

Strawson, Galen. 1994. Mental Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas D. 1991. ‘Omniscience, Immutability, and the Divine Mode of Knowing’. Faith and Philosophy 8: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. 1973. ‘Omnipotence’. American Philosophical Quarterly 10: 231–237.Google Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. 1977. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taliaferro, Charles. 1985. ‘Divine Cognitive Power’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Textor, Mark. 2001. ‘“Portraying” a Proposition’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 137–161.Google Scholar

Tilghman, B. R. 1991. ‘What Is It Like to Be an Aardvark?’ Philosophy 66: 325–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomberlin, James E., and McGuinness, Frank. 1977. ‘God, Evil and the Free Will Defense’. Religious Studies 13: 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trakakis, Nick. 1997. ‘The Absolute Theory of Omnipotence’. Sophia 36: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tye, Michael. 1999. ‘Phenomenal Consciousness: The Explanatory Gap as Cognitive Illusion’. Mind 108: 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tye, Michael. 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tye, Michael. 2003. ‘A Theory of Phenomenal Concepts’. In O'Hear (2003), pp. 91–105.

Unger, Peter. 1966. ‘On Experience and the Development of the Understanding’. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 1–9.Google Scholar

Ujvári, Márta. 1997. ‘Omniscience and Essential Indexicals’. In Meggle, Georg, ed., Proceedings of the 2nd Conference ‘Perspectives in Analytic Philosophy’, vol. 1, Philosophy of Language and Metaphysics (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 466–473.Google Scholar

Gulick, Robert. 1985. ‘Physicalism and the Subjectivity of the Mental’. Philosophical Topics 13: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Gulick, Robert. 1993. ‘Understanding the Phenomenal Mind: Are We All Just Armadillos?’ In Davies, and Humphreys, (1993). Reprinted in Lycan, William G., ed., Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 447–461. Page numbers refer to reprint.Google Scholar

Van Gulick, Robert. 2004. ‘So Many Ways of Saying No to Mary’. In Ludlow et al. (2004), pp. 365–405.

Inwagen, Peter. 1978. ‘The Possibility of Resurrection’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9: 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vierkant, Tillmann. 2002. ‘Zombie-Mary and the Blue Banana: On the Compatibility of the “Knowledge Argument” with the Argument from Modality’. Psyche 8. Http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v8/psyche-8–19-vierkant.html.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G. 2000. Does God Suffer?Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

Weinandy, Thomas G. 2002. ‘Does God Suffer?’ Ars Disputandi 2. Http://www.arsdisputandi.org/publish/articles/000023/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Alan R. 1982. The Nature of Knowledge. Totowa, N.J.: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Wielenberg, Erik J. 2000. ‘Omnipotence Again’. Faith and Philosophy 17: 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierenga, Edward R. 1983. ‘Omnipotence Defined’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43: 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wierenga, Edward R. 1988. ‘Omniscience and Knowledge De Se Et De Praesenti’. In Austin, David F., ed., Philosophical Analysis: A Defence by Example (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic).Google Scholar

Wierenga, Edward. 1989. The Nature of God: An Inquiry into Divine Attributes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Yandell, Keith E. 1994. ‘A Gross and Palpable Contradiction?: Incarnation and Consistency’. Sophia 33: 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeis, John. 1993. ‘A Trinity on a Trinity on a Trinity’. Sophia 32: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar