Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:03:09.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: The Context of Police Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2009

Geoffrey P. Alpert
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
Roger G. Dunham
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access

Summary

we live in a world that increasingly displays distaste for the use of physical force to direct or control the behavior of others. Democracy as a form of governmental decision making is winning out over totalitarianism, and war is less tolerated as a solution to conflict. On a nongovernmental level, there are severe penalties for fighting and bullying in schools and spanking is increasingly viewed as inappropriate parenting. Similarly, the movement to end violence against intimates is growing ever stronger with increasingly severe penalties for spouse abuse. There is one profession in Western society, however, that has not only retained the right to use physical force against its citizens, but has its members trained and encouraged to do so. The police are prepared to use force on a daily basis and while there may be considerable pressure to limit and restrict the use of force by the police against citizens, no one is calling for them to abandon its use. Indeed, it would be unconscionable to make such a demand.

Despite the fact that the police represent the last bastion of civilian government-sanctioned violence against citizens, research on police use of force is surprisingly scarce. David Bayley (1994) drew attention to the discrepancy between the significance of the police role in modern society and the amount of attention given to it by researchers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Police Use of Force
Officers, Suspects, and Reciprocity
, pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpert, Geoffrey, and Roger Dunham. The Force Factor: Measuring Police Use of Force Relative to Suspect Resistance. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, 1997
Alpert, Geoffrey, and Smith, William. “How Reasonable is the Reasonable Man? Police and Excessive Force.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 85(1994): 481–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, David H. Police for the Future. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994
Crank, John. P. Understanding Police Culture. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co., 1998
Garner, Joel, Maxwell, Christopher, and Cedrick, Heraux. “Characteristics Associated with the Prevalence and Severity of Force Used by the Police.” Justice Quarterly 19 (December 2002): 705–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginger, James. “Under Observation: Leadership in American Policing.” In Criminal Justice Research: Inspiration, Influence and Ideation (pp. 99–132). Ed. Ian McKenzie and Ray Bull. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2002
Goldstein, Herman. Problem-Oriented Policing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990
Graham v. Connor. (1989). 490 U.S. 386
Greenberg, David. “On One-Dimensional Marxist criminology.” Theory and Society 3(1976): 610–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Jack, and Geoffrey P. Alpert. “Police Overview.” In Violence in America: An Encyclopedia (pp. 531–9). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1999
Haller, Mark. “Historical Roots of Police Behavior: Chicago, 1890–1925.” Law and Society Review 10(1976): 303–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappeler, Victor. Critical Issues in Police Civil Liability. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 2001
Manning, Peter, Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1997
Mapp v. Ohio. (1961). 367 U.S. 643
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals. Police. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973
National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. Wickersham Commission Reports. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith, 1971 [Originally published 1931]
National Research Council. Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967
Reiss, Albert. “Police Brutality … Answers to Key Questions.” In Law and Order: Police Encounters (pp. 271–280). Ed. M. Lipsky. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1970
Skolnick, Jerome, and James Fyfe. Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force. New York: Free Press, 1993
Stretesky, Paul B. “The Political Economy of Police Violence.” In Policing and Violence (pp. 1–24). Ed. Ronald G. Burns and Charles E. Crawford Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002
Tennessee v. Garner. (1985). 471 U.S. 1
Terrill, William. Police Coercion: Application of the Force Continuum. New York: LFB Publishing, 2001
Walker, Samuel. Police Accountability: The Role of Citizen Oversight. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2001
Walker, Samuel. Popular Justice: A History of American Criminal Justice, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998
Walker, Samuel, and Charles Katz. The Police in America: An Introduction, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002
Walker, Samuel and Betsy Wright Kreisel. “Varieties of Citizen Review: The Relationship of Mission, Structure, and Procedures to Police Accountability.” In Critical Issues in Policing: Contemporary Readings (pp. 338–355). Eds. Geoffrey F. Alpert and Roger G. Dunham. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press, 2001
Walker, Samuel, and B. Wright. Citizen Review of the Police – 1994: A National Survey. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, 1995

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×