Abbott, Carl. Colorado: A History of the Centennial State. Boulder, Colo., 1976.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H.Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altschuler, Glenn C., and Blumin, Stuart M.. Rude Republic: Americans and Their Politics in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, N.J., 2000.Google Scholar

Argersinger, Peter H.Structure, Process and Party: Essays in American Political History. Armonk, N.Y., 1992.Google Scholar

Bensel, Richard Franklin. The Political Economy of Industrialization, 1877–1900. Cambridge, U.K., 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boots, Ralph Simpson. The Direct Primary in New Jersey. New York, 1917.Google Scholar

Bryce, James. The American Commonwealth. Edited and abridged by Hacker, Louis M.. Putnam's, G. P. Sons edition. 2 vols. New York, 1959.Google Scholar

Bullough, William A.The Blind Boss and His City: Christopher Augustine Buckley and Nineteenth Century San Francisco. Berkeley, Calif., 1979.Google Scholar

Burner, David. The Politics of Provincialism: The Democratic Party in Transition, 1918–1932. New York, 1967.Google Scholar

Chambers, William Nisbet, and Burnham, Walter Dean, eds. The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development. New York, 1967.Google Scholar

Chase, James S.Emergence of the Presidential Nominating Convention, 1789–1832. Urbana, Ill., 1973.Google Scholar

Cherney, Robert W.American Politics in the Gilded Age. Wheeling, Ill., 1997.Google Scholar

Clemens, Elizabeth S.The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar

Connolly, James J.The Triumph of Ethnic Progressivism: Urban Political Culture in Boston, 1900–1925. Cambridge, Mass., 1998.Google Scholar

Croly, Herbert. Progressive Democracy. New York, 1914.Google Scholar

Dallinger, Frederick W.Nominations for Elective Office in the United States. New York, 1903.Google Scholar

Darcy, R., and Rohrs, Richard C.. A Guide to Quantitative History. Westport, Conn., 1995.Google Scholar

David, Paul T.Party Strength in the United States. Charlottesville, Va., 1972.Google Scholar

Davis, Winfield J.History of Political Conventions in California, 1849–1892. Sacramento, Calif., 1893.Google Scholar

Dill, R. G.The Political Campaigns of Colorado with Complete Tabulated Statements of the Official Vote. Denver, 1895.Google Scholar

Diner, Steven J.A Very Different Age: Americans of the Progressive Era. New York, 1998.Google Scholar

Dobie, Edith. The Political Career of Stephen Mallory White: A Study of Party Activities Under the Convention System. Stanford, Calif., 1927.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Thomas C.Rocky Mountain Politics. Albuquerque, N.Mex., 1940.Google Scholar

Epstein, Leon D.Political Parties in the American Mold. Madison, Wis., 1986.Google Scholar

Ethington, Philip J.The Public City: The Political Construction of Urban Life in San Francisco, 1850–1900. Cambridge, U.K., 1994.Google Scholar

Finegold, Kenneth. Experts and Politicians: Reform Challenges to Machine Politics in New York, Cleveland and Chicago. Princeton, N.J., 1995.Google Scholar

Flint, Winston Allen. The Progressive Movement in Vermont. Washington, D.C., 1941.Google Scholar

Fredman, L. E.The Australian Ballot: The Story of an American Reform. East Lansing, Mich., 1968.Google Scholar

Goebel, Thomas. A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890–1940. Chapel Hill, N.C., 2002.Google Scholar

Hichborn, Franklin. Story of the Session of the California Legislature of 1909. San Francisco, 1909.Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Richard. The American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It. New York, 1948.Google Scholar

Issel, William, and Cherney, Robert W.. San Francisco, 1865–1932: Politics, Power and Urban Development. Berkeley, Calif., 1986.Google Scholar

Jensen, Richard. The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896. Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar

Josephson, Matthew. The Politicos, 1865–1896. New York, 1938.

Katznelson, Ira, and Milner, Helen V., eds. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York, 2002.Google Scholar

Keating, Edward. The Gentleman from Colorado. Denver, 1961.Google Scholar

Keller, Morton. Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America. Cambridge, Mass., 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr.Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups. 5th ed. New York, 1964.Google Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr.Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York, 1949.Google Scholar

Keyssar, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York, 2000.Google Scholar

Kousser, J. Morgan. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One Party South, 1880–1910. New Haven, Conn., 1974.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C.The Power of the Press: The Birth of American Political Reporting. New York, 1986.Google Scholar

Link, Arthur S., and McCormick, Richard L.. Progressivism. Arlington Hts., Ill., 1983.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, Allen Fraser. Robert M. La Follette and the Establishment of the Direct Primary in Wisconsin, 1890–1904. New Haven, Conn., 1941.Google Scholar

Marcus, Robert D.Grand Old Party: Political Structure in the Gilded Age, 1880–1896. New York, 1971.Google Scholar

Martin, Boyd A.The Direct Primary in Idaho. New York, 1947.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard L.From Realignment to Reform: Political Change in New York State, 1893–1910. Ithaca, N.Y., 1981.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard L.The Party Period in Public Policy: American Politics from the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era. New York, 1986.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard P.The History of Voting in New Jersey: A Study of the Development of Election Machinery, 1664–1911. New Brunswick, N.J., 1953.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard P.The Presidential Game: The Origins of American Presidential Politics. New York, 1982.Google Scholar

McCormick, Richard P.The Second American Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1966.Google Scholar

McGerr, Michael E.The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865–1928. New York, 1986.Google Scholar

McSeveney, Samuel T.The Politics of Depression: Political Behavior in the Northeast, 1893–1896. New York, 1972.Google Scholar

Merriam, Charles Edward, Gosnell, Harold F., and Overacker, Louise. Primary Elections. Chicago, 1928.Google Scholar

Millspaugh, Arthur Chester. Party Organization and Machinery in Michigan Since 1890. Baltimore, 1917.Google Scholar

Morgan, Edmund S.Inventing the People: Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York, 1988.Google Scholar

Mowry, George L.The California Progressives. Berkeley, Calif., 1951.Google Scholar

National Conference on Practical Reform of Primary Elections. Proceedings of the National Conference on Practical Reform of Primary Elections, January 20 and 21, 1898. Chicago, 1898.

Noble, Ransom E.New Jersey Progressivism Before Wilson. Princeton, N.J., 1946.Google Scholar

Pegram, Thomas R.Partisans and Progressives: Private Interest and Public Policy in Illinois, 1870–1922. Urbana, Ill., 1992.Google Scholar

Philipp, Emanuel L.Political Reform in Wisconsin. Madison, Wis., 1973.Google Scholar

Pollock, James K.The Direct Primary in Michigan, 1909–1935. Ann Arbor, Mich., 1943.Google Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W.Consequences of Party Reform. Oxford, 1983.Google Scholar

Ranney, Austin. Curing the Mischiefs of Faction: Party Reform in America. Berkeley, Calif., 1975.Google Scholar

Rapport, George C.The Statesman and the Boss. New York, 1961.Google Scholar

Remsen, Daniel S.Primary Elections: A Study for Improving the Basis of Party Organization. New York, 1895.Google Scholar

Reynolds, John F.Testing Democracy: Electoral Behavior and Progressive Reform in New Jersey, 1880–1920. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1988.Google Scholar

Rogin, Michael Paul, and Shover, John L.. Political Change in California: Critical Elections and Social Movements. Westport, Conn., 1970.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E. E.The Semi-Sovereign People. New York, 1960.Google Scholar

Shafer, Byron E.Partisan Approaches to Postwar American Politics. New York, 1998.Google Scholar

Shafer, Byron E., and Badger, Anthony J.. Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775–2000. Lawrence, Kans., 2001.Google Scholar

Shefter, Martin. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, N.J., 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silbey, Joel H.The American Political Nation, 1838–1893. Stanford, Calif., 1991.Google Scholar

Smith, Hedrick. The Power Game: How Washington Works. New York, 1987.Google Scholar

Sorauf, Frank J.Party Politics in America. 2nd ed. Boston, 1972.Google Scholar

Summers, Mark Wahlgren. Party Games: Getting, Keeping, and Using Power in Gilded Age Politics. Chapel Hill, N.C., 2004.Google Scholar

VanderMeer, Philip R.The Hoosier Politician: Officeholding and Political Culture in Indiana, 1896–1920. Urbana, Ill., 1985.Google Scholar

Ware, Alan. The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North. Cambridge, U.K., 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ware, Alan. The Breakdown of Democratic Party Organization, 1940–1980. Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar

Wattenberg, Martin P.The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. London, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiebe, Robert H.The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York, 1967.

Wiebe, Robert H.Self-Rule: A Cultural History of American Democracy. Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar

Williams, R. Hal. The Democratic Party and California Politics, 1880–1896. Stanford, Calif., 1973.Google Scholar

Woodruff, Clinton Rogers, ed. Proceedings of the New York Conference for Good City Government and the Sixth Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League [1900]. Philadelphia, 1900.Google Scholar

Woodruff, Clinton Rogers, ed. Proceedings of the Rochester Conference for Good City Government and the Seventh Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League [1901]. Philadelphia, 1901.Google Scholar

Woodruff, Clinton Rogers, ed. Proceedings of the Chicago Conference for Good City Government and the Tenth Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League [1904]. Philadelphia, 1904.Google Scholar

Woodruff, Clinton Rogers, ed. Proceedings of the New York Conference for Good City Government and the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League [1905]. Philadelphia, 1905.Google Scholar

Wright, James Edward. The Politics of Populism: Dissent in Colorado. New Haven, Conn., 1974.Google Scholar

Anonymous. “Doubts about the Direct Primary.” Literary Digest, Oct. 10, 1914, pp. 672–73.

Aylsworth, Leon E. “Primary Elections – Legislation of 1909–1910.” American Political Science Review 6 (Feb. 1912): 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, Charles A. “The Direct Primary Movement in New York.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 7 (1910): 187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Carl. “The Unit Rule in National Nominating Conventions.” American Historical Review 5 (Oct. 1899): 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernheim, A. C. “Party Organizations and Their Nominations to Public Office in New York City.” Political Science Quarterly 3 (Mar. 1888): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Emily Newell. “Every Man His Own Campaign Manager.” The Outlook, Feb. 25, 1911, pp. 426–33.Google Scholar

Bogue, Allan G., Clubb, Jerome M., McKibbin, Carroll R., and Traugott, Santa A.. “Members of the House of Representatives and the Process of Modernization, 1789–1960.” Journal of American History 63 (Sept. 1976): 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonaparte, Charles J. “An Elective Boss.” The Outlook, Dec. 4, 1909, pp. 773–76.Google Scholar

Boots, Ralph S. “Party Platforms in State Politics.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 106 (Mar. 1923): 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brickner, Issac M. “Direct Primaries Versus Boss Rule.” The Arena 41 (Aug. 1909): 550–56.Google Scholar

Buenker, John D. “The Mahatma and Progressive Reform: Martin Lomasney as Lawmaker, 1911–17.” New England Quarterly 44 (Sept. 1971): 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buenker, John D. “The Politics of Resistance: The Rural-Based Yankee Republican Machines of Connecticut and Rhode Island.” New England Quarterly 47 (June 1974): 212–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buenker, John D. “Sovereign Individuals and Organic Networks: Political Cultures in Conflict During the Progressive Era.” American Quarterly 40 (June 1988): 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnham, Walter Dean. “The System of 1896: An Analysis.” In The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, ed. Kleppner, Paul, Walter Dean Burnham, Ronald P. Formisano, Samuel P. Hays, Richard Jensen, and William G. Shade. 147–202. Westport, Conn., 1981.Google Scholar

Chrislock, Carl H. “Sidney M. Owen: An Editor in Politics.” Minnesota History 36 (Dec. 1958): 109–26.Google Scholar

Committee on Political Parties of the American Political Science Association. “Toward a More Responsible Two Party System.” American Political Science Review 44 (Sept. 1950): 15–84.

Cox, Ora Ellen. “The Socialist Party in Indiana Since 1896.” Indiana Magazine of History 12 (June 1916): 95–130.Google Scholar

Crossley, James Judson. “The Regulation of Primary Elections by Law.” Iowa Journal of History and Politics 1 (Apr. 1903): 165–92.Google Scholar

Dunn, Arthur Wallace. “The Direct Primary: Promise and Performance.” Review of Reviews 46 (Oct. 1912): 439–45.Google Scholar

Easley, Ralph M. “The Sine Qua Non of Caucus Reform.” Review of Reviews 16 (Sept. 1897): 322–24.Google Scholar

Ethington, Philip J. “The Metropolis and Multicultural Ethics: Direct Democracy Versus Deliberative Democracy in the Progressive Era.” In Progressivism and the New Democracy, ed. Milkis, Sidney M. and Mileur, Jerome M.. 192–225. Amherst, Mass., 1999.Google Scholar

Evans, Frank B. “Wharton Barker and the Republican National Convention of 1880.” Pennsylvania History 27 (Jan. 1960): 28–43.Google Scholar

Filene, Peter G. “An Obituary for the Progressive Movement.” American Quarterly 22 (Spring 1970): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ford, Henry Jones. “The Direct Primary.” North American Review 190 (July 1909): 1–14.Google Scholar

Formisano, Ronald P. “The Concept of Political Culture.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 31 (Winter 2001): 393–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geiser, Karl F. “Defects in the Direct Primary.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 106 (Mar. 1923): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godkin, E. L. “The Nominating System.” Atlantic Monthly 79 (Apr. 1897): 450–67.Google Scholar

Green, George Walton. “Facts About the Caucus and the Primary.” North American Review 137 (Sept. 1883): 257–69.Google Scholar

Haigh, Henry A. “The Alger Movement of 1888.” Michigan History Magazine 9 (1925): 173–214.Google Scholar

Hand, Samuel B., Marshall, Jeffrey D., and Sanford, D. Gregory. “‘Little Republics’: The Structure of State Politics in Vermont, 1854–1920.” Vermont History 53 (Summer 1985): 141–66.Google Scholar

Hays, Samuel P. “The Politics of Reform in Municipal Government in the Progressive Era.” Pacific Northwest Quarterly 55 (Oct. 1964): 157–69.Google Scholar

Hein, Clarence J. “The Adoption of Minnesota's Direct Primary Law.” Minnesota History 35 (Dec. 1957): 341–51.Google Scholar

Hemstreet, William. “Theory and Practice of the New Primary Law.” The Arena 28 (Dec. 1902): 585–95.Google Scholar

Holli, Melvin G. “Mayor Pingree Campaigns for the Governorship.” Michigan History 57 (Summer 1973): 151–73.Google Scholar

Hopkins, John S. “Direct Nomination of Candidates by the People.” The Arena 19 (June 1898): 729–39.Google Scholar

Horack, Frank Edward. “The Operation of the Primary Election Law in Iowa.” Iowa Journal of History and Politics 19 (Jan. 1921): 94–124.Google Scholar

Horack, Frank Edward. “Primary Elections in Iowa.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 7 (1910): 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hotchkiss, William H. “The Movement for Better Primaries.” Review of Reviews 17 (May 1898): 583–89.Google Scholar

Insley, Edward. “How to Reform the Primary Election System.” The Arena 17 (June 1897): 1013–23.Google Scholar

Insley, Edward. “Needed Political Reforms.” The Arena 29 (Jan. 1903): 71–75.Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. “Toward Understanding Nineteenth Century Congressional Careers: Ambition, Competition, and Rotation.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (Nov. 1977): 669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Key, V. O. Jr. “The Direct Primary and Party Structure: A Study of State Legislative Nominations.” American Political Science Review 58 (Mar. 1954): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleppner, Paul. “Voters and Parties in the Western States, 1876–1900.” Western Historical Quarterly 14 (Jan. 1983): 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lederle, John W., and Aid, Rita Feiler. “Michigan State Party Chairmen, 1882–1956.” Michigan History 41 (Sept. 1957): 257–68.Google Scholar

Ludington, Arthur. “Election Laws: The New Geran Law in New Jersey.” American Political Science Review 5 (Nov. 1911): 579–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lukes, Timothy J. “Progressivism Off-Broadway: Reform Politics in San Jose, California, 1880–1920.” Southern California Quarterly 76 (Winter 1994): 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, Ralph. “National Party Fortunes and Local Political Structure: The Case of Two California Mining Towns, 1850–1870.” Southern California Quarterly 57 (Fall 1975): 271–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClosky, Herbert. “Are Political Conventions Undemocratic?” New York Times Magazine, Aug. 4, 1968, p. 10.

McCormick, Richard L. “The Party Period and Public Policy: An Exploratory Hypothesis,” Journal of American History 66 (Sept. 1970): 279–98.

Merriam, Charles Edward. “Some Disputed Points in Primary Election Legislation.” Proceedings of the American Political Science Association 4 (1907): 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milholland, John E. “The Danger Point in American Politics.” North American Review 164 (Jan. 1897): 97–105.Google Scholar

Millspaugh, Arthur C. “The Operation of the Direct Primary in Michigan.” American Political Science Review 10 (Nov. 1916): 710–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noble, David W. “Progressivism.” In Encyclopedia of American Political History, ed. Greene, Jack P.. Vol. 4. 992–1004. New York, 1984.Google Scholar

Petersen, Eric Falk. “The Adoption of the Direct Primary in California.” Southern California Quarterly 54 (Winter 1972): 363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, Eric Falk. “The Struggle for the Australian Ballot in California.” California Historical Quarterly 51 (Fall 1972): 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, John F., and McCormick, Richard L.. “Outlawing ‘Treachery’: Split Tickets and Ballot Laws in New York and New Jersey, 1880–1914.” Journal of American History 72 (Mar. 1986): 835–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodgers, Daniel T. “In Search of Progressivism.” Reviews in American History 10 (Dec. 1982): 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roosevelt, Theodore. “Machine Politics in New York City.” The Century 33 (Nov. 1886): 74–82.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. “Faded Glory.” New York Times Magazine, July 12, 1992, p. 14.Google Scholar

Shaw, William B. “The Direct Primary on Trial.” The Outlook, Oct. 24, 1908, pp. 383–89.Google Scholar

Shefter, Martin. “Regional Receptivity to Reform: The Legacy of the Progressive Era.” Political Science Quarterly 98 (Autumn 1983): 459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starring, Charles R. “Hazen S. Pingree: Another Forgotten Eagle.” Michigan History 32 (June 1948): 129–49.Google Scholar

Taylor, William B., and West, Elliott. “Patron Leadership at the Crossroads: Southern Colorado in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Pacific Historical Review 17 (Aug. 1973): 335–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Throne, Mildred. “Electing an Iowa Governor, 1871: Cyrus Clay Carpenter.” Iowa Journal of History 48 (Oct. 1950): 335–70.Google Scholar

Truman, David B. “Party Reform, Party Atrophy, and Constitutional Change: Some Reflections.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (Winter 1984–85): 637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, Schuyler C. “Pre-Primary Conventions.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 106 (Mar. 1923): 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warden, G. B. “The Caucus and Democracy in Colonial Boston.” New England Quarterly 43 (Mar. 1970): 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weeks, O. Douglas. “The White Primary, 1944–1948.” American Political Science Review 42 (June 1948): 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, Victor J. “Round Table on Nominating Methods: The Development of a Technique for Testing the Usefulness of a Nominating Method.” American Political Science Review 20 (Feb. 1926): 139–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westbrook, Robert B. “Politics as Consumption: Managing the Modern American Election.” In The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History, 1880–1980, eds. Fox, Richard Wrightman and Lears, T. J. Jackson. 145–73. New York, 1983.Google Scholar

Wicker, Tom. “Let Some Smoke In.” New York Times Magazine, June 14, 1992, p. 34.Google Scholar

Sarasohn, Stephen B. “The Regulation of Parties and Nominations in Michigan: The Politics of Election Reform.” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1953.

Warner, Robert Mark. “Chase S. Osborn and the Progressive Movement.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, 1957.

Wolfe, Arthur Coffman. “The Direct Primary in American Politics.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, 1966.

William Penn Collins Collection.

Colorado Federation of Women's Clubs Collection.

Edward P. Costigan Papers.

Edward Keating Papers.

George J. Kindel Papers.

National Republican League. “Souvenir of the Seventh Annual Convention of the National Republican League Meeting in Denver, June 26, 1894.”

T. J. O'Donnell Papers.

Harper M. Orahood Papers.

Thomas M. Patterson Papers.

Jose Urbano Vigil Papers.

Daniel M. Burns Papers.

Committee of Fifty. “Address of the Committee of Fifty to the People [1882].”

League of Republican Clubs. “Plans for Effective County Organization.”

George Cooper Pardee Papers.

Pillsbury, Arthur Judson. “Plans for Effective County Organization of the Republican Party in California.” Tulare, Calif., 1898.

Republican Party of California. “Proceedings of the Republican State Convention, Sacramento, June 18th to June 19th, 1861.”

Republican Party of California. “Proceedings of the Union State Convention Held at Sacramento on the 17th and 18th Days of June, 1862.” San Francisco, 1862.

Republican Party of California. “Roll Call of the Republican State Convention, 1882.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “By-laws and Rules of the Republican County Committee for 1873–74.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “Proceedings of a Meeting Held at Platt's Hall, San Francisco, June 11th, 1872 … to Ratify the Nominations of U. S. Grant and Henry Wilson.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “Rules and Regulations of the Republican Party of San Francisco.” 1881.

Rice Aner Beal Papers.

Ferry Family Papers.

Harrison Greer Papers.

Chase S. Osborn Papers.

California League of Republican Clubs. “Second Biennial Convention of the California League of Republican Clubs, Held at Los Angeles, Apr. 27–28, 1900.”

California Republican Club. “Proceedings of the Republican League of 1900.”

James N. Gillett Papers.

Warren T. Sexton Papers.

Colorado Federation of Jane Jefferson Clubs Collection

Job Adams Cooper Papers.

John Franklin Shaforth Papers.

William A. Hamill Papers.

Henry Moore Teller Collection.

Joel F. Vaille Papers.

Stephen Mallory White Papers.

William Penn Collins Collection.

Colorado Federation of Women's Clubs Collection.

Edward P. Costigan Papers.

Edward Keating Papers.

George J. Kindel Papers.

National Republican League. “Souvenir of the Seventh Annual Convention of the National Republican League Meeting in Denver, June 26, 1894.”

T. J. O'Donnell Papers.

Harper M. Orahood Papers.

Thomas M. Patterson Papers.

Jose Urbano Vigil Papers.

Daniel M. Burns Papers.

Committee of Fifty. “Address of the Committee of Fifty to the People [1882].”

League of Republican Clubs. “Plans for Effective County Organization.”

George Cooper Pardee Papers.

Pillsbury, Arthur Judson. “Plans for Effective County Organization of the Republican Party in California.” Tulare, Calif., 1898.

Republican Party of California. “Proceedings of the Republican State Convention, Sacramento, June 18th to June 19th, 1861.”

Republican Party of California. “Proceedings of the Union State Convention Held at Sacramento on the 17th and 18th Days of June, 1862.” San Francisco, 1862.

Republican Party of California. “Roll Call of the Republican State Convention, 1882.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “By-laws and Rules of the Republican County Committee for 1873–74.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “Proceedings of a Meeting Held at Platt's Hall, San Francisco, June 11th, 1872 … to Ratify the Nominations of U. S. Grant and Henry Wilson.”

Republican Party of San Francisco, California. “Rules and Regulations of the Republican Party of San Francisco.” 1881.

Rice Aner Beal Papers.

Ferry Family Papers.

Harrison Greer Papers.

Chase S. Osborn Papers.

California League of Republican Clubs. “Second Biennial Convention of the California League of Republican Clubs, Held at Los Angeles, Apr. 27–28, 1900.”

California Republican Club. “Proceedings of the Republican League of 1900.”

James N. Gillett Papers.

Warren T. Sexton Papers.

Colorado Federation of Jane Jefferson Clubs Collection

Job Adams Cooper Papers.

John Franklin Shaforth Papers.

William A. Hamill Papers.

Henry Moore Teller Collection.

Joel F. Vaille Papers.

Stephen Mallory White Papers.