Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:58:11.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Natural Goodness of Humanity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

Andrews Reath
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Barbara Herman
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Christine M. Korsgaard
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Men are wicked; a sad and constant experience makes proof unnecessary.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Despite the depressing sight, not so much of ills that oppress mankind from natural causes as of those men inflict upon each other, the mind is cheered by the prospect that things may be better in future.… Empirical arguments against the success of these resolves, which rest on hope, are insufficient here. The argument that what has not succeeded so far never will succeed, does not even justify the abandonment of a pragmatic or technological intention… much less than abandonment of a moral intention that becomes a duty unless its accomplishment is demonstrably impossible.

Immanuel Kant

Let us … begin by setting aside all the facts, for they do not affect the question.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Introduction

As Rousseau tells the story, he was walking along the road from Paris to Vincennes in 1749 (on his way to visit Diderot, then imprisoned in the château of Vincennes), contemplating a question from the Academy of Dijon – “Has the restoration of the sciences and the arts helped to purify morals?” – when he was overtaken by a flood of ideas, “a thousand lights.” Lying at the heart of this “sudden inspiration” was the thought that dominated his subsequent writing: “that man is naturally good, and that it is solely by [our] institutions that men become wicked” (M, 1136).

The conception of natural human goodness is not uniquely Rousseau's. Egalitarian and radical democratic political views commonly hold that human motivations supporting unjust institutions are not intrinsic to our nature, but explained by those institutions themselves.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reclaiming the History of Ethics
Essays for John Rawls
, pp. 102 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×