Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:29:55.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The interface with forensic services

from Part II - Interface issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

M. Dominic Beer
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Stephen M. Pereira
Affiliation:
Goodmayes Hospital, Essex
Carol Paton
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
James Anderson
Affiliation:
Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, The Bracton Centre, Dartford, Kent, UK
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Psychiatric intensive care is at the interface with forensic psychiatric services because they share a common clinical problem – violence. This is the behavioural disability which characterises the majority of patients within the forensic psychiatric service. Knowing how to evaluate violence, and quantify the risk of future violence, is the essence of risk assessment. Knowing when to refer a particular patient to forensic psychiatric services is an important part of effective risk management. Understanding what services are offered by forensic psychiatry is a necessary precondition to using that service effectively.

The aim of this chapter is to provide guidelines to those working outside forensic psychiatry on what is and what is not available within that service. The assessment of dangerousness is discussed elsewhere, but dangerousness in terms of risk to others is pivotal to an evaluation of a patient's need for secure care. It is therefore vital to know whether that patient warrants referral to forensic psychiatric services.

It is unrealistic, given existing resources, to imagine that forensic psychiatric services could, or should, manage all those patients who are violent. But knowing which patient should be managed in a more secure setting, whether that be intensive care or the local medium secure unit, is our current concern. However, there are no absolute rules or fixed access criteria; local services vary and are in a state of flux, developing new services for old problems. Many facilities at one time provided within the old asylums are being re-invented and re-named.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birmingham, L, Mason, D, Grubin, D. 1998 A Follow-up study of disordered men remanded to prison. Crim Behav Ment Health 8: 202–213Google Scholar
BontaJ, J,LawM, M,Hanson, K. 1998 The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 123: 123–142
Brooke, D, Taylor, C, Gunn, J, Maden, A. 1996 Point prevalence of mental disorder in unconvicted male prisoners in England and Wales. Br Med J 313: 1524–1527Google Scholar
Brown, CS, Lloyd KR, Donovan M. 2001 Trends in admissions to a regional secure unit (1983–1997). Med Sci Law 41(1): 35–40
Butler Committee Report. 1975 Better Services for the Mentally Ill. London: Home Office/DHSS
Dell, S, Robertson, G. 1988 Sentenced to Hospital. [Maudsley Monograph No. 32]. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Department of Health. 1995 Mental Health in England. London: Department of Health
Douglas KG, Guy LS, Weir J. 2006 HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme: overview and annotated bibliography. Burnaby, British Columbia: Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University
Eastman, NLG. 1993 Forensic psychiatric services in Britain. Int J Law Psychiatry 16: 1–26Google Scholar
Eastman NLG, Bellamy S. 1998 Admission criteria to secure services and service definitions. Unpublished
GroundsA, A,MelzerD, D,Fryers, T, Brugha, T. 2004 What determines access to medium secure psychiatric provision?J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 15: 1–6
Gunn, J, Taylor, PJ. 1993 Forensic Psychiatry Clinical Legal and Ethical Issues. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 624–640, 716
Gunn, J, Maden, A, Swinton, M. 1991 Treatment needs of prisoners with psychiatric disorders. Br Med J 300: 338–341Google Scholar
HalléP, P,FisetS, S,Hodgins, Set al. 1995 Profil Neuropsychologique de Personnes Atteintes de Schizophrénie Avec ou Sans Trouble d'Abus, de Drogues ou d'Alcool.” Poster presented at Société Québécoise de la Recherche en Psychologie, Ottawa, Canada, 1995
Heilbrun K, Peters L. 2000 The efficacy of community treatment programs. In: Hodgins, S, Müller-Isberner, R. (eds) Violence, Crime and Mentally Disordered Offenders: Concepts and Methods for Effective Treatment and Prevention. London UK: Wiley, pp. 187–210
HodginsS, S, and Müller-Isberner, R. (eds) 2000 Violence, Crime and Mentally Disordered Offenders: Concepts and Methods for Effective Treatment and Prevention. London: Wiley
Hodgins S, Toupin J, Côté G. 1996 Schizophrenia and antisocial personaltiy disorder: a criminal combination. In: Schlesinger, LB. (ed) Explorations in Criminal Psychopathology: Clinical Syndromes with Forensic Implications. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 217–237
Hodgins S, Côté G, Toupin J. 1998 Major mental disorders and crime: an aetiologic hypothesis. In: CookeD, D,Forth, A, Hare, RD (eds) Psychopathy: Theory, Research and Implications for SocietyDordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 231–256
James, D. 1999 Court Diverson at ten years: can it work, does it work and has it a future?J Forensic Psychiatry, 10: 507–524
James, DV, Hamilton, LW. 1991 Assessing efficacy and cost of a psychiatric liaison service to a magistrates' court. Br Med J 303: 282–285Google Scholar
LarocheI, I,HodginsS, S,Toupin, J. 1995 Liens entre les symptômes et le fonctionnement social chez des personnes souffrant de schizophrénie ou de trouble affectif majeur. Can J Psychiatry 40: 27–34
Lévéillée S. 1994 Evaluation multidimensionelle du reseau de support social de sujts schizophrenes. Thése de doctorat, Université de Montréal
MelzerD, D,TomB, B,Brugha, T. 2004 Access to medium secure psychiatric care in England and Wales. 1. A national survey of admission assessments. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 15: 7–31
Milmis Project Group. 1995 Monitoring Inner London mental illness services. Psychiatr Bull 19: 276–280
Mohan R, Slade N, Fahy T. 2004 Clinical characteristics of community forensic mental health services. Psychiatr Serv 55(11): 1294–1298
MonahanJ, Steadman HJ. 1994 Violence and Mental Illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Mullen, PE, BurgessP, P,WallaceC, C,PalmerS, S,Ruschena, D. 2000 Community care and criminal offending in schizophrenia. Lancet 355: 614–617
Offen, L, Taylor, PJ. 1985 Violence and resources: factors determining admission to an interim secure unit. Med Sci Law 25: 165–171Google Scholar
Quinsey, VL, Harris, GT, RiceME, ME,Cornier, CA. 1998 Violent Offenders – Appraising and Managing Risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
RasmussenK, K,LevanderS, S,Sletvold, H. 1995 Aggressive and non-aggressive schizophrenics: symptom profile and neuropsychological differences. Psychol Crime Law 15: 119–129
Reed Committee. 1992 Review of Health and Social Services for Mentally Disordered Offenders and Others Requiring Similar Services. London: DOH/Home Office
ReidJ, J,Lyne, M. 1997 The Quality of healthcare in prisons: results of a year's programme of semi-structured inspections. Br Med J 315: 1420–1424
Ricketts, D, CarnellH, H,Davies, S, Kaul, A, Duggan, C. 2001 First admissions to a regional secure unit over a sixteen year period: changes in demographic and service characteristics. J Forensic Psychiatry 12(1): 78–89
Royal College of Psychiatrists. 1996 Assessment and Clinical Management of Risk of Harm to Other People. Council Report CR53. London: Royal College of Psychiat rists
Schanda, H, FodesP, P,TopitzA, A,Knecht, G. 1992 Premorbid adjustment of schizophrenic criminal offenders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 86: 121–126
Tengström, A, HodginsS, S,Kullgren, G. 2001 Men with schizophrenia who behave violently: the usefulness of an early versus late start offendertypology. Schizophr Bull 27 (2): 205–218
Treasaden IH. 1985 Current practice in interim secure units. In: Goslin, L. (ed) Secure Provision. London: Tavistock
Walmesley, R. 1986 Personal Violence. Home Office Research Study No. 89. London: HMSO
Webster, CD, Douglas, KS, Eaves, D, Hart, SD. 1997 HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, version 2. Burnaby: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×