Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:12:18.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Radiotherapy planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Andrew Tyler
Affiliation:
Medical Physicist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK
Louise Hanna
Affiliation:
Consultant, Clinical Oncologist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK
Louise Hanna
Affiliation:
Velindre Hospital, Cardiff
Tom Crosby
Affiliation:
Velindre Hospital, Cardiff
Fergus Macbeth
Affiliation:
Velindre Hospital, Cardiff
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is important to understand the basic techniques of radiotherapy planning because these will help when developing complex plans. These techniques, which are taught at the FRCR Part I level (Royal College of Radiologists), are used by the treatment centre's Physics Department for checking the validity of calculations before they are applied to patients, and anyone interpreting plans will need to be familiar with them to know whether it is worth adjusting treatment plans during review.

There are several useful reviews of radiotherapy physics in the literature. One by Shiu and Mellenberg (2001) includes sections on isodose planning. Another, by Purdy (2000), provides a perspective on future directions in 3D treatment planning. Radiotherapy is a rapidly developing field and it is important to ensure that new methods satisfy safety and effectiveness requirements before being adopted as routine treatments.

This chapter will deal with the general principles of developing isodose plans that are suitable for treatment and will use specific examples to highlight particular points. It will focus mainly on external beam radiotherapy with megavoltage photons; there will be shorter sections on the use of electrons and brachytherapy. Some aspects of radiotherapy planning using lower energy (kilovoltage) photons will be discussed in Chapter 33 (see p. 382).

Treatment planning overview

Radiotherapy planning can be divided into stages as follows:

  • Patient preparation, position and immobilisation.

  • Localisation method (e.g. orthogonal films, CT scanning, and image co-registration).

  • Definition of target volumes and organs at risk.

  • Radiotherapy technique, including beam arrangements, beam energy, size and shape, weighting, wedges, and production of isodose plan.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apisarnthanarax, S., Elliott, D. D., El-Nagger, A. K.et al. (2006). Determining optimal clinical target volume margins in head-and-neck cancer based on microscopic extracapsular extension of metastatic neck nodes. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 64, 678–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beavis, A. W. (2004). Is tomotherapy the future of intensity-modulated radiation therapy?Br. J. Radiol., 77, 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Institute of Radiology. (2003). Geometric Uncertainties in Radiotherapy. Defining the Planning Target Volume. Prepared by a Working Party of the British Institute of Radiology. London: British Institute of Radiology.
Bortfeld, T. (2006). intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review and preview. Phys. Med. Biol., 51, R363–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coles, C. E., Moody, A. M., Wilson, C. B.et al. (2005a). Reduction of radiotherapy-induced late complications in early breast cancer: the role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and partial breast irradiation. Part I – normal tissue complications. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.), 17, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, C. E., Moody, A. M., Wilson, C. B.et al. (2005b). Reduction of radiotherapy-induced late complications in early breast cancer: the role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and partial breast irradiation. Part II – radiotherapy strategies to reduce radiation-induced late effects. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.), 17, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearnaley, D. P., Khoo, V. S., Norman, A. R.et al. (1999). Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 353, 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraass, B., Doppke, K., Hunt, M.et al. (1998). American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med. Phys., 25, 1773–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoire, V., Coche, E., Cosnard, G.et al. (2000). Selection and delineation of lymph node target volumes in head and neck conformal radiotherapy. Proposal for standardizing terminology and procedure based on the surgical experience. Radiother. Oncol., 56, 135–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbano, Guerrero M. T. and Nutting, C. M. (2004a). Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part I. Br. J. Radiol., 77, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbano, Guerrero M. T. and Nutting, C. M. (2004b). Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part II. Br. J. Radiol., 77, 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T. S., Ritter, M. A., Tome, W. A.et al. (2005). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; emerging cancer treatment technology. Br. J. Cancer, 92, 1819–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornick, D. C., Litzenberg, D. W., Lam, K. L.et al. (1998). A tilt and roll device for automated correction of rotational setup errors. Med. Phys., 25, 1739–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1976). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 24. Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma rays in Radiotherapy Procedures. Bethesda, Maryland: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1985). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 38. Dose and Volume Specification for Reporting Intracavitary Therapy in Gynaecology. Bethesda, Maryland: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1993). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 50. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Bethesda, Maryland: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1997). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 58. Dose and Volume Specification in Interstitial Brachytherapy. Bethesda, Maryland: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1999). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 62. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 50). Bethesda, Maryland: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (2004). International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 71. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Electron Beam Therapy. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 4 (No. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jansen, E. P. M., Dewit, L. G. H., Herk, M.et al. (2000). Target volumes in radiotherapy for high-grade malignant glioma of the brain. Radiother. Oncol, 56, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, T. and Rugg, L. J. (1999). From technical quality assurance of radiotherapy to a comprehensive quality of service management system. Radiother. Oncol., 51, 281–90,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, F. M. (2003). The Physics of Radiation Therapy, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Klein, E. E., Harms, W. B., Low, D. A.et al. (1995). Clinical implementation of a commercial multileaf collimator: dosimetry, networking, simulation and quality assurance. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 33, 1195–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langen, K. M. and Jones, D. T. L. (2001). Organ motion and its management. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 50, 265–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, J., Holloway, L., Fuller, M.et al. (2005). Effect of intravenous contrast on treatment planning system dose calculations in the lung. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 28, 190–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logue, J. P., Sharrock, C. L., Cowan, R. A.et al. (1998). Clinical variability of target volume description in conformal radiotherapy planning. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 41, 929–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNair, H. A., Adams, E. J., Clark, C. H.et al. (2003). Implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the radiotherapy department. Br. J. Radiol., 76, 850–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, W. J. (1967). Radium dosage: the Manchester system/compiled from articles, by Ralston Paterson (and others). Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Nutting, C., Dearnaley, D. P. and Webb, S. (2000a). Intensity modulated radiation therapy: a clinical review. Br. J. Radiol., 73, 459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutting, C. M., Khoo, V. S., Walker, V.et al. (2000b). A randomized study of the use of a customized immobilization system in the treatment of prostate cancer with conformal radiotherapy. Radiother. Oncol., 54, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padhani, A. R., Khoo, V. S., Suckling, J.et al. (1999). Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 44, 525–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierquin, B., Dutreix, A., Paine, C. H.et al. (1978). The Paris system in interstitial radiation therapy. Acta Radiol. Oncol. Radiat. Phys. Biol., 17, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pötter, R., Haie-Meder, C., Limbergen, E.et al. (2006). Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology working group (II): concepts and terms in three-dimensional image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-three-dimensional dose volume parameters and aspects of three-dimensional image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother. Oncol., 78, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdy, J. A. (2000). Future directions in three-dimensional treatment planning and delivery: a physicist's perspective. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 46, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdy, J. A. (2002). Dose-volume specification: new challenges with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 12, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purdy, J. A. and Harms, W. B. (1998). Quality assurance for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Strahlenther. Onkol., 174, (Suppl. 2), 2–7.Google Scholar
Senan, S., Chapet, O., Lagerwaard, F. J.et al. (2004). Defining target volumes for non-small cell lung carcinoma. Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 14, 308–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seppenwoolde, Y., Shirato, H., Kitamura, K.et al. (2002). Precise and real-time measurement of three-dimensional tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 53, 822–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimizu, S., Shirato, H., Kitamura, K.et al. (2000). Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 48, 1591–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiu, A. S. and Mellenberg, D. E. (2001). General practice of radiation oncology physics in the 21st century: American Association of Physicists in Medicine Monograph no. 26. Madison, Wisconsin: Medical Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
Weiss, E., and Hess, C. F. (2003). The impact of gross tumor volume (gross tumour volume) and clinical target volume (clinical target volume) definition on the total accuracy in radiotherapy theoretical aspects and practical experiences. Strahlenther. Onkol., 179, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. R. and Thwaites, D. I. (2000). Radiotherapy Physics in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bomford, C. K. and Kunkler, I. H. (2003). Walter and Miller's Textbook of Radiotherapy. Radiation Physics, Therapy and Oncology, 6th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Dobbs, J., Barrett, A. and Ash, D. (1999). Practical Radiotherapy Planning, 3rd edn. New York: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gerbaulet, A., Pötter, R., Mazeron, J.-J.et al. (2002). The GEC European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Handbook of Brachytherapy. Brussels: European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.Google Scholar
Hoskin, P. (2006). Radiotherapy in Practice. External Beam Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoskin, P. and Coyle, C. (2005). Radiotherapy in Practice. Brachytherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joslin, C. A. F., Flynn, A. and Hall, E. J. (2001). Principles and Practice of Brachytherapy: Using Afterloading Systems. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Radiotherapy planning
    • By Andrew Tyler, Medical Physicist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK, Louise Hanna, Consultant, Clinical Oncologist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK
  • Edited by Louise Hanna, Tom Crosby, Fergus Macbeth
  • Book: Practical Clinical Oncology
  • Online publication: 23 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545375.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Radiotherapy planning
    • By Andrew Tyler, Medical Physicist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK, Louise Hanna, Consultant, Clinical Oncologist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK
  • Edited by Louise Hanna, Tom Crosby, Fergus Macbeth
  • Book: Practical Clinical Oncology
  • Online publication: 23 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545375.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Radiotherapy planning
    • By Andrew Tyler, Medical Physicist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK, Louise Hanna, Consultant, Clinical Oncologist, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, Whitchurch, Cardiff, UK
  • Edited by Louise Hanna, Tom Crosby, Fergus Macbeth
  • Book: Practical Clinical Oncology
  • Online publication: 23 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545375.005
Available formats
×