Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T10:43:53.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - PCBs in the Upper and Tidal Freshwater Hudson River Estuary: The Science behind the Dredging Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Joel E. Baker
Affiliation:
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland
W. Frank Bohlen
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Department of Marine Sciences
Richard F. Bopp
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Bruce Brownawell
Affiliation:
Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook University
Tracy K. Collier
Affiliation:
Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Kevin J. Farley
Affiliation:
Environmental Engineering Department, Manhattan College
W. Rockwell Geyer
Affiliation:
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Rob Nairn
Affiliation:
Baird & Associates
Lisa Rosman
Affiliation:
Coastal Protection and Restoration Division
Jeffrey S. Levinton
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

Introduction

From the latter 1940s until 1977, the General Electric Corporation (GE) discharged an estimated 200,000 to 1.3 million pounds (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000a) of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the Hudson River from two electrical capacitor manufacturing plants at Hudson Falls and Fort Edward, New York (Fig. 24.1). In 1977, under a settlement agreement with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, GE stopped direct discharges of PCBs to the river, although leakage of PCBs from the factory sites to the river continues to this day. PCBs used at the GE plants were oily liquids containing dozens of distinct PCB compounds. Most of these components are persistent in the environment, attach strongly to soils and river sediments, and readily accumulate in fish, wildlife, and humans (National Research Council, 2001a). These properties, combined with the large discharges of PCBs from the GE plants over 50+ years, have led to elevated levels of PCBs in the water, sediments, and biota of the Upper Hudson River (defined here as the stretch upstream of the Troy lock and dam). Levels of PCBs in the Hudson River ecosystem are among the highest in the United States.

PCB contamination in the Hudson River is a management problem for the public because it has likely increased human health risks (primarily from consumption of fish), increased ecological risks to fish and fish-eating birds and mammals, and caused losses of river use and the resulting economic impacts (catch and release only fishery; advisories on fish consumption; restrictions on navigational dredging limiting access to the Champlain Canal; restrictions on and the increased costs of dredging; and commercial fishery closure).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1999. Public Health Implications of Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), U.S. Public Health Service, http://www.epa.gov/ost/fish/pcb99.html
Ashley, J. T. F., Horwitz, R., Ruppel, B., and Steinbacher, J. 2003. A comparison of accumulated PCB patterns in American eels and striped bass from the Hudson and Delaware River estuaries. Marine Pollution Bulletin 486: 1294–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, P., Blazer, V., and Harshbarger, J. C. 2001. Bullhead tumor prevalence as affected by point source closure and remedial dredging in the Black River, OH, in Coastal Zone 01. Proceedings of the 12 Biennial Coastal Zone Conference, Cleveland, OH, July 15–19, 2001. published by U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA/CSC/20120-CD. CD-ROM. Charleston, SC: NOAA Coastal Services Center
Baumann, P. C., and Harshbarger, J. C. 1995. Decline in liver neoplasms in wild brown bullhead catfish after coking plant closes and environmental PAHs plummet. Environmental Health Perspectives 103: 168–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumann, P. C., and Harshbarger, J. C. 1998. Long term trends in liver neoplasm epizootics of brown bullhead in the Black River, Ohio. Environmental Monitoring Assessment 53: 213–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, R. F., Simpson, H. J., and Deck, B. L. 1985. Release of Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Contaminated Hudson River Sediments. Final report prepared for NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, contract NYS C00708, June, 1985Google Scholar
Bopp, R. F., Simpson, H. J., Olsen, C. R., and Kostyk, N. 1981. PCB's in sediments of the tidal Hudson River, New York, Environmental Science and Technology 15: 210–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremle, G., and Larsson, P. 1998a. PCBs in Eman river ecosystem. Ambio 27 (5): 384–92Google Scholar
Bremle, G., and Larsson, P. 1998b. PCB concentration in fish in a river system after remediation of contaminated sediment. Environmental Science and Technology 32 (22): 3491–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremle, G., Okla, L., and Larsson, P. 1998. PCB in water and sediment of a lake after remediation of contaminated sediment. Ambio 27 (5): 398–403Google Scholar
Bucciferro, M. M. 2000. “Floods in Glens Falls Led to Push for Dam.” The Post-Star, Glens Falls, NY, May 29, 2000, p. A3
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2001. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Canadian tissue residue guidelines for the protection of wildlife consumers of aquatic biota: Summary table. Winnipeg, MB (http://www.ec.gc.ca/ceqg_rcqe/tissue.htm)
Eisler, R. 2000. Handbook of Chemical Risk Assessment: Health Hazards to Humans, Plants, and Animals. Vol. 1–3. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 1903 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, J. E., Norstrom, R. J., and Smith, G. E. J. 1996. Patterns, trends, and toxicological significance of chlorinated hydrocarbon and mercury contaminants in bald eagle eggs from the Pacific Coast of Canada, 1990–1994. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 31: 354–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Electric. 2000. Environmental Dredging: An Evaluation of its Effectiveness in Controlling Risk, General Electric Company Corporate Environmental Program, Albany, New York
Giesy, J. P., Verbrugge, D. A., Othout, R. A., Bowerman, W. W., Mora, M. A., Jones, P. D., Newsted, J. L., Vandervoort, C., Heaton, S. N., Aulerich, R. J., Bursian, S. J., Ludwig, J. P., Ludwig, M., Dawson, G. A., Kubiak, T. J., Best, D. A., and Tillitt, D. E. 1994a. Contaminants in fishes from Great Lakes-influenced section and above dams of three Michigan rivers. I: Concentrations of organochlorine insecticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxin equivalents, and mercury. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 27: 202–12Google Scholar
Giesy, J. P., Verbrugge, D. A., Othout, R. A., Bowerman, W. W., Mora, M. A., Jones, P. D., Newsted, J. L., Vandervoort, C., Heaton, S. N., Aulerich, R. J., Bursian, S. J., Ludwig, J. P., Ludwig, M., Dawson, G. A., Kubiak, T. J., Best, D. A., and Tillitt, D. E. 1994b. Contaminants in fishes from Great Lakes-influenced section and above dams of three Michigan rivers. II: Implications for health of mink. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 27: 213–23Google Scholar
Golub, M. S., Donald, J. M., and Reyes, J. A. 1991. Reproductive toxicity of commercial PCB mixtures: LOAELs and NOAELs from animal studies. Environmental Health Perspectives 94: 245–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Great Lakes Sport Fish Advisory Task Force. 1993. Protocol for a Uniform Great Lakes Sport Fish Consumption Advisory
Halbrook, R. S., Aulerich, R. J., Bursian, S. J., and Lewis, L. 1999. Ecological Risk Assessment in a large river-reservoir: 8. Experimental study of the effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on reproductive success in mink. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18: 649–54Google Scholar
Heaton, S. N., Bursian, S. J., Giesy, J. P., Tillitt, D. E., Render, J. A., Jones, P. D., Verbrugge, D. A., Kubiak, T. J., and Aulerich, R. J. 1995. Dietary exposure of mink to carp from Saginaw Bay, Michigan. 1. Effects on reproduction and survival, and the potential risks to wild mink populations. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 28: 334–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Joint Commission. 1989. Revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978. Office Consolidation, International Joint Commission, United States and Canada, September, 1989
Liebert, D., Baker, J. E., Ko, F. C., Connell, D., Burrell, T., Poukish, C., Luckett, C., Foprest, Q., Beaty, W., Burch, V., Fairall, B., McKay, J., Evans, W., and Johnson, D. 2001. Bioaccumulative Toxic Chemicals in Fish from Maryland Waters, Fall 2000. Final report to the Maryland Department of the Environment, University of Maryland Report [UMCES]CBL01–0133Google Scholar
McCarty, J. P., and Secord, A. L. 1999. Nest-building behavior in PCB-contaminated tree swallows. The Auk 116: 55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meador, J. P., Collier, T. K., and Stein, J. E. 2002. Determination of a tissue and sediment threshold for tributyltin to protect prey species of juvenile salmonids listed under the US Endangered Species Act. Aquatic Conservation 12: 539–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monosson, E. 2000. Reproductive and developmental effects of PCBs in fish: a synthesis of laboratory and field studies. Reviews in Toxicology 3: 25–75Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. J., Sample, B. E., Suter, G. W., Parkhurst, B. R., and Teed, R. S. 1999. A probabilistic risk assessment of the effects of methylmercury and PCBs on mink and kingfishers along East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak Ridge Tennessee, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18: 2941–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. S., Anulacion, B. F., French, B. L., Hom, T., Reichert, W. L., Buzitis, J., and Collier, T. K. 2001. Biomarker and Histopathologic Responses in Flatfish after Site Remediation in Eagle Harbor, Washington, USA, in Droscher, T. (ed.). Proceedings of the 2001 Puget Sound Research Conference, Puget Sound Action Team, Olympia, WAGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press
National Research Council. 2001a. A Risk-Management Strategy for PCB-Contaminated Sediments, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press
National Research Council. 2001b. Compensating for Wetlands Losses Under the Clean Water Act. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 2001a. Injuries to Hudson River Fishery Resources: Fisheries Closures and Consumption Restrictions. Hudson River Natural Resource Damage Assessment Final Report, Albany, New York. http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/dfwmr/habitat/nrd/index.htm
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 2001b. Hudson River PCB Biota Database. Bureau of Habitat, Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources, Albany, NY, Updated 13 March 2001
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 2001c. DEC : Mammals, Soil Near Hudson River Have Elevated PCB Levels. Press Release, April 2, 2001. www.dec.state.ny.us/websites/press/pressrel/2001-52.html
New York State Department of Health, 1998. Health Consultation: Survey of Hudson River Anglers And an Estimate of Their Exposure to PCBs. Albany, New York
Newell, A. J., Johnson, W., and Allen, L. K. 1987. Niagara River Biota Contamination Project: Fish Flesh Criteria for Piscivorous Wildlife. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Technical Report 87–3, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
NOAA letter, 2000. Comments on December 2000 Hudson River PCBs Reassessment RI/FS Phase 3 Report: Feasibility Study and the December 2000 Superfund Proposed Plan for the Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site. Letter from NOAA Coastal Resource Coordinator to U.S. EPA Region II, 17 April 2001. Numbers cited are rounded to two significant figures here
O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. 1998. Fort Edward Dam PCB Remnant Containment, 1997 Post-Construction Remnant Deposit Monitoring Program, Summary Report. Monitoring performed pursuant to Consent Decree 1990; 90-CV-575 between the United States and General Electric Company. Report prepared for General Electric Company, Albany, NY, November, 1998
O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. 1999. 1998 Upper Hudson Sediment Coring Program. Final report prepared for General Electric Company Corporate Environmental Programs, Albany, NY
QEA, 1999. PCBs in the Upper Hudson River. Report prepared for General Electric, Albany, NY, May, 1999. http://hudsonvoice.com/PDF/Executive_Summary.pdf
QEA 2000. Hudson River Monitoring Program, Final 1998 Summary Report. Monitoring performed pursuant to Consent Decree 1990; 90-CV-575 between the United States and General Electric Company. Report prepared for General Electric Company, Albany, NY
QEA 2001. Hudson River Monitoring Program, Final 1998 Summary Report. Monitoring performed pursuant to Consent Decree 1990; 90-CV-575 between the United States and General Electric Company. Report prepared for General Electric Company, Albany, NY
Reinert, R. E., Knuth, B. A., Kamrin, M. A., and Stober, Q. J. 1991. Risk assessment, risk management, and fish consumption advisories in the United States. Fisheries 6: 5–122.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, L. W., and Hansen, L. G. (eds.). 2001. PCBs: Recent Advances in the Environmental Toxicology and Health Effects. Lexington, KY: The University Press of KentuckyGoogle Scholar
RPI, 2001. Analysis of Hudson River Water Column PCB Data and 100-Year Flood Estimate. Task 3 Final Report to NYSDEC, Contract C003844, Hudson River Sediment Consultation, Richard Bopp, Project Director
Safe, S. 1994. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 24: 87–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, R. A., and Barnes, C. R. 1983. Trends in Polychlorinated Biphenyl Concentrations in Hudson River Water Five Years After Elimination of Point Sources. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations, Report 83–4206Google Scholar
Secord, A. L., and McCarty, J. P. 1997. Polychlorinated biphenyl contamination of tree swallows in the Upper Hudson River Valley, New York. Effects on Breeding Biology and Implications for Other Bird Species, New York Field Office, USFWS, Cortland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Secord, A. L., McCarty, J. P., Echols, K. R., Meadows, J. C., Gale, R. W., and Tillitt, D. E. 1999. Polychlorinated biphenyls and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlordibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents in tree swallows from the Upper Hudson River, New York State, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18: 2519–25Google Scholar
Steuer, J. J. 2000. A mass-balance approach for assessing PCB movement during remediation of a PCB-contaminated deposit on the Fox River, Wisconsin. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4245Google Scholar
Thomann, R. V., Mueller, J. A., Winfield, R. P., and Huang, C. R. 1989. Mathematical Model of the Long-Term Behavior of PCBs in the Hudson River Estuary. Report prepared for the Hudson River Foundation. Grant Nos. 007/87A/030 and 011/88A/030Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Phase 1 Report – Review Copy – Interim Characterization and Evaluation, Hudson River PCB Reassessment RI/FS. USEPA Work Assignment No. 013–2N84. Prepared for USEPA by TAMS Consultants, Inc. and Gradient Corporation
United States Environmental Protection Agency 1997. Phase 2 Report, Further Site Characterization and Analysis, Volume 2C – Data Evaluation and Interpretation Report (DEIR), Hudson River PCBs RI/FS. Prepared for USEPA Region 2 and USACE by TAMS Consultants, Inc., the Cadmus Group, Inc., and Gradient Corporation
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2000a. Hudson River PCB Superfund Site (New York) Superfund Proposed Plan, December
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2000b. Further Site Characterization and Analysis, Revised Baseline Modeling Report (RBMR), Hudson River PCB Reassessment RI/FS. Prepared for USEPA Region 2 and USACE Kansas City District by TAMS Consultants, Inc., Limno-Tech, Inc., Menzie-Cura & Associates, Inc., and Tetra-Tech, Inc
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2000c. Revised Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment, Hudson River PCB Reassessment, Volume 2E, http://www.epa.gov/hudson/revisedbera_tables.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2000d. Revised Baseline Modeling Report, Hudson River PCB Reassessment, Volume 2D, http://www.epa.gov/Hudson/rbmr_bk1&2_chpt1_5.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency 2001. Whitman Decides to Dredge Hudson River, Press Release, 1 August 2001. (www.epa.gov/hudson/augpressrelease.pdf)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1999. Letter to the U.S. EPA from the Commencement Bay Trustees
Weiner, K. S. 1991. Commencement Bay Near shore/Tidal flats Superfund Completion Report. Report for St. Paul Waterway Sediment Remedial Action. Submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for Simpson Tacoma Kraft Company and Champion International CorporationGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×