Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:21:16.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2009

J. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, David L. 1995. “After General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, U.S. Pushes Direct Investment,” The Wall Street Journal, February 2, P.A14.Google Scholar
Abelson, Donald. 2001. “International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services: Myths versus Reality.” Presentation Made at Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Workshop on Internet Traffic Exchange, Berlin, June 7–8.
Acheson, Keith and Christopher, Maule. 2004. “Convention on Cultural Diversity,” Journal of Cultural Economics 28: 243–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adlung, Rudolf, Antonio, Carzeniga, Bernard, Hoekman, Masamichi, Kono, Mattoo, Aaditya, and Chauvet, P.. 2002. “The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Key Features and Sectors,” in Bernard, Hoekman, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Philip, English (eds.). Development, Trade, and the World Trade Organization: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
af Malmborg, M. and Stråth, B. (eds.). 2002. The Meaning of Europe. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Agence-France, Presse. 2005. “Give up Web Domination, US Told,” September 30.
Aggarwal, Vinod K. (ed.). 1998. Institutional Design for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aglietta, Michel. 1979. A Theory of Regulation: The US Experience. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alleman, James and Barbara, Sorce. 1997. “International Settlements: A Time for Change”. Paper presented at Global Networking ’97 Conference, June 15–18.
,Americans for United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2004. Prospects & Retrospects 1(1), Inaugural Issue.
Appadurai, Arjun 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. (ed.). 2000. Globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 2004. “The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition,” in Rao, Vijayendra and Walton, Michael (eds.). Culture and Public Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Aronson, Jonathan D. 1998. “Telecom Agreement Tops Expectations,” in Hufbauer, Gary Clyde and Wada, Erika (eds.). Unfinished Business: Telecommunications After the Uruguay Round. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Aronson, Jonathan D. and Peter, F. Cowhey. 1988. When Countries Talk: International Trade in Telecommunications Services. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Ashling, Jim. 2005. “The Future of Internet Governance Remains Unresolved.” Information Today 22(8).Google Scholar
,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation TEL WG). 1998. Singapore Declaration. Third Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Ministerial Meeting on the Telecommunications and Information Industry (Telecommunications Ministers Meeting3). June 3–5. Singapore: www.apectelwg.org/apecdata/telwg/ICAIS/singapore.html (accessed February 2001).Google Scholar
,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation TEL WG). 1999a. First International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services Information Seminar Issues Paper. March 8 in Miyazaki, Japan. www.apii.or.kr/apec/atwg/pritgtgid.html (accessed February 2001).
,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation TEL WG). 1999b. Transcript of the Second International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services Information Seminar. September 21 in Lima, Peru: www.apectelwg.org/apecdata/telwg/ICAIS/transcri.html (accessed February 2001).
,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation TEL WG). 2000a. Cancun Declaration. Fourth Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Ministerial Meeting on the Telecommunications and Information Industry (Telecommunications Ministers Meeting4), May 24–26 at Cancun, Mexico: www.apii.or.kr/apec/are/telminsub01.html (accessed May 2001).Google Scholar
,Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation TEL WG). 2000b. Report to the 4th Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Ministerial Meeting On Telecommunications and Information Industry, May 24–26 at Cancun, Mexico: www.apii.or.kr/apecdata/telwg/ICAIS/ICAISrep.htm (accessed May 2001).
,Associated Press. 1993. “France Claims Trade Victory, but Hollywood Wins at Box Office,” December 14.
Australia, . 1999. “International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services: Australia's Objectives for the Project.” Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group, 19th Meeting, PLEN/G/03: www2.apii.or.kr/telwg/ICAIS/Aust.html (accessed February 2001).
Axelrod, Robert. 1985. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, David and Abraham, L. Newman. 2004. “The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions, Macro Influence,” Journal of European Public Policy 14(6): 827–46.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Raymond, Duvall (eds.). 2005. Power in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bendrath, Ralf and Jeannette Hofmann, . 2005. “The Return of the State in Cyberspace: Regulation and Legitimacy on the Internet – The Domain Name System and Privacy,” prepared for the CISS/ETH conference “The Internet and the Changing Face of International relations and Security.” Lucerne, Switzerland, May 23–25, 2005.Google Scholar
Beniger, James R. 1986. The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Alexander, George. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. C. and Sharpe, Kenneth E.. 1979. “Agenda Setting and Bargaining Power: The Mexican State versus Transnational Automobile Corporations,” World Politics 32: 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berezin, Mabel and Martin, Schain (eds.). 2003. Europe Without Borders: Remapping Territory, Citizenship, and Identity in a Transnational Age. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas, Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, Tim, and Mark, Fischetti. 1999. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
Berridge, G. E. and Alan, James. 2003. A Dictionary of Diplomacy. 2nd edn. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1988. Protectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 2005. “From Seattle to Hong Kong,” World Trade Organization Special Edition. Foreign Affairs December.
Biersteker, Thomas. 1995. “The ‘Triumph’ of Liberal Economic Ideas in the Developing World,” in Stallings, Barbara (ed.). Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J. and Cynthia, Weber. 1996. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Pierre. 2001. The Idea of France. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Blouin, Chantal. 2000. “The World Trade Organization Agreement on Basic Telecommunications: A Reevaluation,” Telecommunications Policy 24: 135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bolkenstein, Fritz. Member of the European Commission. 2000. Letter to Mr. Robert L. Mallet, The Acting Secretary Of Commerce, US Department of Commerce. FB/FFH/pt D 701 (2000), July 18.
Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds.). 2004. Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John and Peter, Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braman, Sandra. 2002. “Informational Meta-Technologies, International Relations, and Genetic Power: The Case of Biotechnologies,” in James, N. Rosenau, and , J. P. Singh (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braman, Sandra. (ed.). 2004. The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, Jeremy and Tim, Costello. 1998. Global Village and Global Pillage: Economic Reconstruction from the Bottom Up. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, John. 2005. “Costa Rica's Challenge to US Restrictions on the Import of Underwear,” in Peter, Gallagher, Patrick, Low, and Andrew, L. Stoler (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, Robert R., Jeffrey, P. Cunard, Director, Mark D.. 1988. The Telecom Mosaic: Assembling The New International Structure. London: Butterworth Scientific for International Institute of Communications.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977/1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc and Eric, Reinhardt. 2003. “Developing Countries and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Trade 37(4): 719–35.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Structure of Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Charles, Jones, and Richard, Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Richard, Little. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kelly. 2004. “Telecommunications and audio-visual services in the Context of the World Trade Organization: Today and Tomorrow,” in Damien, Geradin and David, Luff (eds.). The World Trade Organization and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. 1940. The Twenty Year Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume II. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1998. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume III. End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cate, Fred H. 1997. Privacy in the Information Age. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Cave, Martin and Len, Waverman. 1998. “The future of international settlements,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 883–98.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2006. Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheen, Lim Chze. 2005. “Strategies for the Liberalization of the Services Sector,” in Peter, Gallagher, Patrick, Low, and Andrew, Stoler (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,CNN.com. 1999. “France to Defend Film Trade from Hollywood at World Trade Organization,” November 29.
Coase, , Ronald, H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica 4: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, , Ronald, H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocq, Emmanuel and Messerlin, Patrick. 2005. “French Audio-Visual Policy: Impact and Compatibility with Trade Negotiations,” in Paolo, Guerrieri and Iapadre, P. Lelio (eds.). Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Codding, George A. Jr. 1972. The International Telecommunication Union: An Experiment in International Cooperation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Codding, George A., Jr. and Rutkowski, Anthony M.. 1982. The International Telecommunication Union in a Changing World. Denham, MA: Artech House.Google Scholar
Cogburn, Derrick L. 2004. “Elite Decision-Making and Epistemic Communities: Implications for Global Information Policy,” in Sandra, Braman (ed.). The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cogburn, Derrick L. 2005. “Global Internet Governance: Who's Winning, Who's Losing, and Who Cares?” Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August.Google Scholar
,Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Fifth Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. On the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/European Economic Community “Television Without Frontiers,” as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 1999–2000. Brussels, November 8.Google Scholar
Comor, Edward. 2002. “New Technologies and Consumption: Contradictions in the Emerging World Order,” in Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Comor, Edward. 2008. Consumption and the Globalization Project: International Hegemony and the Annihilation of Time. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1985. “Trade Wars: A Comparative Study of Anglo-Hanse, Franco-Italian, and Hawley-Smoot Conflicts,” World Politics 38: 146–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, Carlos M. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights, the World Trade Organization and Developing Countries: The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement and Policy Options. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.Google Scholar
Cowhey, Peter. 1990. “The International Telecommunications Regime: The Political Roots of Regimes of High Technology,” International Organization 44(2): 169–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowhey, Peter. 1998. “Federal Communications Commission Benchmarks and the Reform of the International Telecommunications Market,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 899–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowhey, Peter. 2004. “Accounting Rates, Cross-Border Services and the Next World Trade Organization Round on Basic Telecommunications Services,” in Damien, Geradin and David, Luff (eds.). The World Trade Organization and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowhey, Peter and Aronson, Jonathan D.. 1989. “Global Diplomacy and National Policy Options for Telecommunications,” in Cowhey, Peter F., Aronson, Jonathan D., and Szekely, Gabriel (eds.). Changing Networks: Mexico's Telecommunications Options. Centre for US-Mexican Studies Monograph Series No. 32. San Diego: University of California.Google Scholar
Cowhey, Peter and Richards, Joseph. 2006. “Building Global Service Markets: Economic Structure and State Capacity,” in Levy, Jonah D (ed.). The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. 1987. Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 1994. “A Security Regime among Democracies: Cooperation among Iroquois Nations,” International Organization 48(3): 345–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crescenzi, , Mark, J. C. 2005. Economic Interdependence and Conflict in World Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Croome, John. 1999. Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Cukier, Kenneth Neil. 1999. “Bandwidth Colonialism? The Implications of Internet Infrastructure on International E-Commerce.” Paper presented at INET 99: www.isoc.org/inet99/1e/1e_2.htm (accessed August 2001).
Cutler, Claire, Virginia, Haufler, and Tony, Porter (eds.). 1999. Private Authority in International Affairs. New Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Da Grazia, Victoria. 2005. Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina. 2003. Food Fights Over Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina. 2004. “International Institutions and Issue-Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade,” The American Political Science Review 98(1): 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christina. 2006. “Do World Trade Organization Rules Create a Level Playing Field? Lessons from the Experience of Peru and Vietnam,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callières, François. 1716/1963. On the Manner of Negotiating with Princes; on the Uses of Diplomacy; the Choice of Ministers and Envoys; and the Personal Qualities Necessary for Success in Missions Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald J. 1997. Parchment, Printing, Hypermedia: Communication and World Order Transformation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald J.. 2002. “Circuits of Power: Security in the Internet Environment,” in James, N. Rosenau, and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Deising, Paul. 1991. How does Social Science Work? Reflections on Practice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Delanty, Gerard. 1999. Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Délégation Permanente de la France auprès de l'Organisation Mondiale du Commerce. October 16, 2002. “France, European Union and Cultural Diversity.” Document. Geneva.
Delich, Valentina. 2002. “Developing Countries and the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System,” in Bernard, Hoekman, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Philip, English (eds.). Development and the World Trade Organization: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
,Department of Commerce (DOC). 1997a. Notice. “Request for Comments on the Registration and Administration of Internet Domain Names” (Notice of Inquiry). Federal Register 62, no. 127 (July 2): 35895–35897.Google Scholar
,Department of Commerce (DOC). 1997b. Summary of Comments. “Registration and Administration of Internet Domain Names”: www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/DNSComments_SUM.htm (accessed April 2000).
,Department of Commerce (DOC). 1998a. Proposed Rules. “Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses” (Green Paper). Federal Register 63, No. 34 (February 20): 8825–8833.Google Scholar
,Department of Commerce (DOC). 1998b. Statement of Policy. “Management of Internet Names and Addresses” (White Paper). Federal Register 63, No. 111 (June 10): 31741–31751.Google Scholar
,Department of Trade and Industry, United Kingdom. October 2002. Liberalising Trade in Services: A New Consultation on the World Trade Organisation General Agreement on Trade in Services Negotiations: www2.dti.gov.uk/ewt/service.htm (accessed October 10, 2003).
Destler, I. M. 1992. American Trade Politics, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Devereaux, Charan. 2002. International Trade Meets Intellectual Property: The Making of the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement: www.ksgcase.harvard.edu/casetitle.asp?caseNo=1661.0.Google Scholar
Diesing, Paul. 1991. How Does Social Science Work? Reflections on Practice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Dollar, David and Kraay, Aart. 2002. “Growth is Good for the Poor,” Journal of Economic Growth 7(3): 193–225.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1997. Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, Socialism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 1995. “Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights at the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade,” Prometheus 13(1).Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter. 2003. “When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization,” International Negotiation 8: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter and Ruth, Mayne (eds.). 2002. Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access and Development. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, William J. 2000. “The Rise and Decline of the International Telecommunications Regime,” in Christopher, T. Marsden (ed.). Regulating the Global Information Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drake, William J. and Kalypso, Nicolaides. 1992. “Ideas, Interests, and Institutionalization: ‘Trade in Services’ and the Uruguay Round,” International Organization 46(1): 37–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, William J. and Noam, Eli M.. 1997. “The World Trade Organization Deal on Basic Telecommunications: Big Bang or Little Whimper,” Telecommunications Policy 21: 799–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. (ed.). 2003. Locating the Proper Authorities: The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W.. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dupont, Cédric, Cosimo, Beverelli, and Stéphanie, Pézard. 2006. “Learning in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Some Results from Simulation for Developing Countries,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.). Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
E-commerce Times. 2002. “World Wants More Say in Control of World Wide Web,” November 15: www.ecommercetimes.com.
Eko, Lyombe. 2003. “Freedom of the Press in Africa,” in Johnston, Donald H. Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications. vol. 2. London: Academic Press, pp. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electronic Commerce and Law Report. Arlington, VA: Bureau of National Affairs: www.bna.com/e-law/.
Emerson, Robert M., Fretz, Rachel I., and Shaw, Linda L.. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,EurActiv.com. 2006. “European Court of Justice Puts End to European Union Passenger Data Transfers to U.S.” May 31: www.euractiv.com/en/justice/ecj-puts-eu-air-passenger-data-transfers-us/article-155680.
,European Commission. 1997. Global Information Networks: Ministerial Declaration. Ministerial Conference. Bonn, July 6–8: http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/bonn/Min_declaration/i_finalen.html.
,European Commission. 1998a. “Reply of the European Community and Its Member States to the US Green Paper,” March 20: www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/103dftmail/03_20_98.htm.
,European Commission. 1998b. “Internet: the Future,” Press Release, July 7: http://europa.eu.int.
,European Commission. 1999a. “European Union Considers Draft US ‘Safe Harbor’ Principles,” Press Release, April 19: http://europa.eu.int.
,European Commission. 1999b. “Commission Decides to Send Reasoned Opinions to Nine Member States,” Press Release, July 29: http://europa.eu.int.
,European Commission. 2000. “Draft Package Agreed for Protection of Data Transferred from European Union to US,” Press Release, March 15: http://europa.eu.int.
,European Commission Data Protection Working Party. 1997. First Orientations on Transfers of Personal Data to Third Countries – Possible Ways Forward in Assessing Adequacy, June 26: http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/media/dataprot/wpdocs/wpdocs_97.htm.
,European Commission Data Protection Working Party. 1998a. Working Document, Judging Industry Self Regulation: When Does it Make A Meaningful Contribution to the Level of Data Protection in a Third Country, January 14: http://europa.eu.int/comm./internal_market/en/media/dataprot/wpdocs/wp7en.htm.
,European Commission Data Protection Working Party. 1998b. Working Document, Preliminary Views on the Use of Contractual Provisions in the Context of Transfers of Personal Data to Third Countries, April 22: http://europa.eu.int/comm./internal_market/en/media/dataprot/wpdocs/wp9en.htm.
Evans, Peter, Harold, K. Jacobson, and Robert D. Putnam, (eds.). 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fagre, Nathan and Wells, Louis T. 1982. “Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host Governments,” Journal of International Business Studies Fall: 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2003. “Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce: The European Union-U.S. Safe Harbor Arrangement,” International Organization 57(2): 277–306.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2006. “Privacy in Europe is a Casualty of America's Terror War,” Financial Times, July 3.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement and International Cooperation,” International Organization 52(2): 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission). 1990. Notice of Proposed Rule Making, Federal Register 55.155: 32648, July.Google Scholar
,Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission). 1991. Report and Order. Federal Register 56.107: 25370.Google Scholar
,Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission). 1996a. Policy Statement on International Accounting Rate Reform. Federal Communications Commission 96–37. January 31.
,Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission). 1996b. International Settlement Rates: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Communications Commission 96–484. December 19.
,Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission). 2000. U.S. IMTS Net Settlement Payments, 1985–1999. December 4: www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/account.html (accessed August 2001).
Feketekuty, Geza. 1988. International Trade in Services: An Overview and Blueprint for Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Feketekuty, Geza. 1992. “Negotiating the World Information Economy,” in Harvey, Sapolskyet al. (eds.). The Telecommunications Revolution: Past, Present and Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feketekuty, Geza. 2000. “Assessing and Improving the Architecture of General Agreement on Trade in Services,” in Pierre, Sauvé and Stern, Robert M. (eds.). General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 18 November 2002a. “Media: A Closer Watch on All Channels.”
Financial Times. 16 December 2002b. “Content & Analysis: Regulating Cyberspace.”
Financial Times. 8 December 2003a. “Internet Deal Averts Clash at Information Summit.”
Financial Times. 9 December 2003b. “Managing of Internet Addresses Defended.”
Financial Times. 1–2 October 2005a. “US Unmoved on Control of the Web Address System.”
Financial Times. 16 November 2005b. “An Untangled Web: Government Control Will Politicize and Stifle the Internet.”
Financial Times. 2007a. “Trading Ritual and Reality: How Global Business Reduces the Need for Bilateral Pacts.”
Financial Times. 2007b. “Key to it All: Commercial Considerations Complicate Internet Privacy.”
Financial Times. 2007c. “Facebook in Privacy U-turn over Beacon.”
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2001. “Exporting the English School,” Review of International Studies 27(3): 509–13.Google Scholar
Fisch, Gerhard. 2001. “Regionalism and Multilateralism – Side by Side,” in Deutsch, Klaus Günter and Speyer, Bernard (eds.). The World Trade Organization Millennium Round: Freer Trade in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franda, Marcus. 2001. Governing the Internet: The Emergence of an International Regime. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert. 2002. “The Meaning of Europe in French National Discourse: A French Europe or a Europeanised France?” in Malmborg, Mikael af and Stråth, Bo (eds.). The Meaning of Europe: Variety and Contention Within and Among Nations. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Fredebeul-Krein, Markus and Andreas, Freytag. 1997. “Telecommunications and World Trade Organization Discipline: An Assessment of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Telecommunications Services,” Telecommunications Policy 21: 477–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 2000 (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo and Donaldo, Macedo. 1995. Ideology Matters. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Freymond, Jean F. 2002. “Historical Approach,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Frieden, Rob. 1998. “Falling Through the Cracks: International Accounting Rate Reform at the International Telecommunication Union and World Trade Organization,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 963–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Rob. 1999. “Last Days of the Free Ride: The Consequences of Settlement-based Interconnection for the Internet,” Info 1(3): 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Rob. 2001. “Does a Hierarchical Internet Necessitate Multilateral Intervention?,” North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 25: 361–405.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey (ed.). 1996. The Rational Choice Controversy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Friedman, Ray. 2004. “Studying Negotiations in Context: An Ethnographic Approach,” International Negotiation 9: 375–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L. 2000. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas L.. 2005. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Funabashi, Yoicho. 1988. Managing the Dollar: From the Plaza to the Louvre. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Galbi, Douglas A. 1998. “Distinctive Arrangements for International Interconnection?,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 945–51.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Peter. 2000. Guide to the World Trade Organization and Developing Countries. World Trade Organization and Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Peter, Patrick, Low, and Andrew, Stoler (eds.). 2005. Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
García Canclini, Néstor. 1995. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Richard N. 1956. Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: Anglo-American Collaboration in the Reconstruction of Multilateral Trade. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
,General Accounting Office (GAO). 2000. Department of Commerce: Relationship with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
Geradin, Damien and David, Luff (eds.). 2004. The World Trade Organization and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Gereffi, Gary. 1995. “Global Production Systems and Third World Development,” in Barbara, Stallings (ed.). Global Change, Regional Response: The New International Context of Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1962. American Scientists and Nuclear Weapons Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1982. War & Change in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2003. “The Substantive Importance of Necessary Condition Hypothesis,” in Gary, Goertz and Harvey, Starr (eds.). 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Harvey, Starr (eds.). 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Goff, Patricia M. 2000. “Invisible Borders: Economic Liberalization and National Identity,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 533–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Patricia M. 2007. Limits to Liberalization: Local Culture in a Global Marketplace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gorlin, Jacques. 1985. A Trade-Based Approach for the International Copyright Protection for Computer Software. Paper for International Business Machines.
Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Edward M. 2000. Fighting the Wrong Enemy: Anti-Global Activities and Multinational Enterprises. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Ian, Shapiro. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1982. “Between Dependency and Autonomy: India's Experience with the International Computer Industry,” International Organization 36: 609−32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrieri, Paolo and Iapadre, P. Lelio. 2005. “Introduction,” in Paolo, Guerrieri, P. Lelio, Iapadre and Georg, Koopman (eds.). 2005. Cultural Diversity and International Economic Integration: The Global Governance of the Audio-Visual Sector. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Guild, Elspeth and Evelien, Brouwer. 2006. “The Political Life of Data: The European Court of Justice Decision on the Passenger Name Records Agreement Between the European Union and the US,” Center for European Policy Studies 109: 1–6: at www.ceps.be.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 2004. Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hackley, Susan, Waters, Nancy J., and Sarah, Woodside. 2006. “How Creating ‘Communities of Learning’ and ‘Common Cultures’ Fosters Collaboration: The e-Parliament, the Israeli Settlements Project, and the Mexican Negotiation Skills Training Workshop,” International Negotiation 11: 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Beth, Simmons. 1987. “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization 41 (3): 491–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, Herbert H. 1984. “Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights,” Social Problems 32: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992/1941. On Collective Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian. 2006. “Diplomacy, Anti-diplomacy and International Society,” in Richard, Little and John, Williams (eds.). The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler with Michael, Hart. 1995. Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1996. Transnational Connections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. March 1998. “Globalization and Tempering Trade Conflict: Two Illustrative Cases from the U.S.-European Union Experience,” Paper Presented at the International Studies Association, Minneapolis, MN.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio, Negri. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hart, Jeffrey. 1976. “Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations,” International Organization 30(2).Google Scholar
Headrick, Daniel. 1991. The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851–1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Dorothee. 2005. Negotiating Privacy: The European Union, the United States, and Personal Data Protection. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, David, Goldblatt, and Jonathan, Perraton. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Henwood, Doug. 2003. After the New Economy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 2001. Crossing Boundaries: Selected Writings. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. 1993. New Issues in the Uruguay Round and Beyond. The Economic Journal 103(421): 1528–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Mitchell M. 1995. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley. 1977. “An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus Summer: 47–60.Google Scholar
Terrence, Hopmann, P. 1996. The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max and Theodor, Adorno. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Robert B. 1989. The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Reed. 1997. Separate Statement by Chairman Hundt on International Settlement Rates Report and Order. News Release. Federal Communications Commission. August 7.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. “The Clash of Civilizations?,” Foreign Affairs 72(3).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. and Berger, , (eds.), P. L.. 2002. Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Global Era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics,” International Organization 53(2): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2006. “The State of International Society,” in Richard, Little and John, Williams (eds.). 2006. The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
,Internet Ad Hoc Committee. 1996. “International Ad Hoc Committee Charter,” 11 November: www.iahc.org/iahc-charter.html (accessed April 2000). (iTop-Level Domain stands for international top-level domain name, which was later termed generic Top-Level Domain (gTop-Level Domain).)
,International Network on Cultural Policy (International Network on Cultural Policy). 2003. Draft International Convention on Cultural Diversity by the Working Group on Cultural Diversity and Globalization July 29, 2003. Presented to Ministers at the 6th Annual Ministerial Meeting of the International Network on Cultural Policy in Opatije, Croatia, October 16–18, 2003: http://206.191.7.19/iicd/list_e.shtml (accessed October 10, 2003).
Ingram, Paul, Jeffrey, Robinson, and Marc, Busch. 2005. “The Intergovernmental Network of World Trade: IGO Connectedness, Governance, and Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 111(3): 824–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innis, Harold. 1950. Empire and Communications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
,International Intellectual Property Alliance. 1985. Piracy to US Copyrighted Works in Ten Selected Countries. Submitted to United States Trade Representative.
,International Studies Review. 2003. Forum: Theory Synthesis in International Relations.
,International Telecommunication Union. 1989. International Telecommunication Regulations.
,International Telecommunication Union. 1997a. Report of the Informal Expert Group on International Telecommunication Settlements, April 9: www.itu.int/intset/expert/issuesp2.htm (accessed June 2001).
,International Telecommunication Union. 1997b. World Telecommunication Development Report 1996/97: Trade in Telecommunications. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.Google Scholar
,International Telecommunication Union. 1999. “80 Organizations Sign Memorandum of Understanding to Restructure the Internet.” Press Release: www.itu.int/newsarchive/press/releases/1997/itu-08.html.
,International Telecommunication Union. 2000. World Telecommunications Standardization Assembly -2000 Document 49 – Recommendation D. iii – Substantive Issues.
,International Telecommunication Union. 2001. Summary of ITU Internet Reports: Intellectual Property Telephony, 2001: www.itu.int/osg/spu/wtpf/wtpf2001/casestudies/index.html (accessed September 2001).
,International Telecommunication Union. 2001–02. Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2000–2001: www.ituarabic.org/arabbook/2004/GTTR-2000.pdf.
,International Trade Centre. 1999. Trade in Information Technology Products and the World Trade Organization Agreements: Current Situation and Views of Exporters in Developing Countries. Geneva: International Trade Centre United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
International Trade Reporter (International Trade Reporter). 1998–2001. Various issues.
,Internet Governance Project. 2005. Political Oversight of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers: a Briefing for the World Summit on the Information Society Summit: www.internetgovernance.org/publications.html.
,ITU Study Group 3. 2000. Accounting Rate Reform Undertaken by ITU-T Study Group 3. May 26: www.itu.int/ITU-T/com3/accounting_rate/index.html (accessed June 8, 2001).
Jackson, John H. 1997. The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvie, I. 1992. Hollywood's Overseas Campaign: The North Atlantic Movie Trade, 1920–1950. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jarvie, I.. 1998. “Free Trade as Cultural Threat: American Film and TV Exports in the Post-war Period,” in Geoffrey, Nowell-Smith and Steven, Ricci (eds.). Hollywood and Europe: Economics, Culture and National Identity: 1945–1995. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Jawara, Fatoumata, and Aileen, Kwa. 2003. Behind the Scenes at the World Trade Organization: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Jeancolas, Jean-Pierre, . 1992. “From the Blum-Byrnes Agreement to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Affair,” in Geoffrey, Nowell-Smith and Steven, Ricci (eds.). Holly- wood and Europe: Economics, Culture, National Identity: 1945–95. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1999. “Evolution, Choice, and International Change,” in David, A. Lake and Robert, Powell. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kantor, Mickey. 2004. “Film Pirates are Robbing Us All,” Financial Times, November 19.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.). 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D. 1998. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52(4).Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn, Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsey, Jane. 2006. “Globalization of Cultural Policymaking and the Hazards of Legal Seduction,” in Murdoch, G. and Wasko, J. (eds.). Media in the Age of Marketization. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Kende, Michael. 2000. “The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones.” Federal Communications Commission, Office of Plans and Policy, Working Paper No. 32.
Kende, Michael and Jason, Oxman. 1999. “The Information Exchange: Interconnection on the Internet.” Paper Presented to the Telecommunication Research Policy Conference.
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O.. 2001. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World,” The American Political Science Review 95(1).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, and Helen, Milner (eds.). 1996. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Keohane, Robert O. and JosephS. Nye, Jr S. Nye, Jr. 1998. “Power and Interdependence in the Information Age,” Foreign Affairs 77(5).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert and Joseph, Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kim, Sangbae and Jeffrey, A. Hart. 2002. “The Global Political Economy of Wintelism: A New Mode of Power and Governance in the Global Computer Industry,” in Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles. 1978. Economic Response: Comparative Studies in Trade, Finance and Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O, and Sidney, Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Klein, Hans. 2004. “Private Governance for Global Communications: Technology, Contracts, and the Internet,” in Sandra, Braman (ed.) 2004. The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephan (ed.). 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Krasner, Stephan. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Krasner, Stephan. 1991. “Global Telecommunications and National Power,” International Organization 43: 336–66.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). 2004. International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kuran, Timur. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs,” in Imre, Lakatos and Alan, Musgrave (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. and Robert, Powell. 1999. Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal. 2002. L'Europe en Première Ligne. Paris: Editions Du Seuil.Google Scholar
Lange, Andre. 1998. Trends in the World Audiovisual Market. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Market.Google Scholar
Lax, David A. and Sebenius, James K. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
L'Ecuyer, P. and Ken, Rogerson. 2000. “Broadcast Policies of the European Union: Constraints on Globalization?” Paper presented at the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, March 2000.
Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levy, Brian and Spiller, Pablo T.. 1996. Regulations, Institutions and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, David A. 1999. Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the European Union and the Nation-State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Stephen A. 1975. “International Telecommunications Satellite Organization: Technology, Politics and the Transformation of a Regime,” International Organization 2(3): 665–80.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” American Political Science Review 65(3): 682–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Economics: The World's Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew and Hidemi, Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1985. The Enchanted World: Inflation, Credit and World Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1987. Mirages and Miracles: The Crises of Global Fordism, trans. Macey, David. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Litfin, Karen. 2002. “Public Eyes: Satellite Imagery, the Globalization of Transparency, and New Networks of Surveillance,” in Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Little, Richard and John, Williams (eds.). 2006. The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Liu, Joseph P. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in Internet Coordination: A Domain Name Case Study,” Indiana Law Journal 74: 587–626.Google Scholar
Luke, Timothy. 1989. Screens of Power: Ideology, Domination and Resistance in Information Society. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Donaldo. 2000. “Introduction to the Anniversary Edition,” in Paulo, Freire. 2000/1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Madden, Gary and Savage, Scott J. 1998. “Interconnection in International Telecommunications: An Empirical Investigation of United States Settlement Rates,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 953–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magder, Ted. September 2004. “Transnational Media, International Trade and the Idea of Cultural Diversity,” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 18(3).Google Scholar
Mann, Catherine L., Eckert, Sue E, and Sarah, Cleeland Knight. 2000. Global Electronic Commerce: A Policy Primer. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2006. “Democratization and International Organizations,” International Organization 60: 137–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Eric, Reinhardt. 2003. “Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization on the Formation of Preferential Trading Arrangements,” International Organization 57: 829–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, Juan A. and Martin, Roy (eds.). 2008. Opening Markets for International Trade in Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and World Trade Organization Negotiations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Renee, Marlin-Bennett. 2004. Knowledge Power: Intellectual Property, Information and Privacy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa and Beth, Simmons. 2001. International Institutions: An International Organization Reader. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Mason, Robin. 1998. “Internet Telephony and the International Accounting Rate System,” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 931–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Christopher. 2002. The Information Society: A Sceptical View. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
May, Christopher. 2007. The World Intellectual Property Organization: Resurgence and the Development Agenda. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
May, Christopher and Sell, Susan K.. 2006. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
May, Frederick. 1992. Launching the Uruguay Round: Clayton Yeutter and the Two-Track Decision. Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Georgetown University, Case 144.Google Scholar
McDowell, Stephen D., Steinberg, Philip E., and Tomasello, Tami K.. 2008. Managing the Infosphere: Governance, Technology and Cultural Practice in Motion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, Timothy. 2004. “Case Studies and the Limits of the Quantitative Worldview,” in Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds.). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1965/1934. Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Melody, William. 1997. Telecom Reform: Principles, Policies and Regulatory Practices. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.Google Scholar
Melody, William. 2000. “Telecom Myths: The International Revenue Settlements Subsidy,” Telecommunications Policy 24(1).Google Scholar
Meltzer, Arthur M., Jerry, Weinberger, and Zinman, M. Richard (eds.). 1993. Technology in the Western Political Tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Messerlin, Patrick, Siwek, Stephen E, and Emmanuel, Cocq. 2004. The Audiovisual Service Sector in the General Agreement on Trade in Services Negotiations. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Metzger, Miriam. 2007. “Consumer Privacy Management in Electronic Commerce,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12: 335–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. with Keiko, Kubota. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries,” International Organization 59: 107–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mody, Asoka. 1989. “Information Industries in the Newly Industrializing Countries, ” in Crandall, Robert W. and Kenneth, Flamm (eds.). Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International Competition and Regulations in Telecommunications. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. 2002. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. “Integrating International and Domestic Politics: A Theoretical Introduction,” in Evans, Peter, Harold, Jacobson, and Putnam, Robert (eds.). Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51(4): 513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2003. “Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical,” International Studies Review March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Milton L. 1998. Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton L.. 2002. Ruling the Roost: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton, Kuerbis, Brenden N, and Christiane, Page. 2007. “Democratizing Global Communication? Global Civil Society and the Campaign for Communication Rights in the Information Society,” International Journal of Communication 1: 1–31.Google Scholar
Mueller, Milton and Dale, Thompson. 2004. “Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers and International Telecommunications Satellite Organization: Global Communication Technologies and their Incorporation into International Regimes,” in Sandra, Braman (ed.). The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2004. “Tools for Qualitative Research,” in Brady, Henry E. and David, Collier (eds.). Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Murmann, Johann Peter. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Craig N. and Roger, Tooze (eds.). 1991. The New International Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRef
Narlikar, Amrita. 2003. International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and World Trade Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita and Odell, John S. 2006. “The Strict Distributive Strategy for a Bargaining Coalition: The Like Minded Group in the World Trade Organization, 1998–2001,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Narlikar, Amrita and Diana, Tussie. 2004. “The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the World Trade Organization,” The World Economy 27(7).Google Scholar
,National Telecommunications and Information Administration (National Telecommunications and Information Administration). 2000. “U.S. Delegation Objects to ITU Assembly Action on International Internet Pricing.” News Release. US Department of Commerce. October 6: www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2000/wtsa100600.htm.
Neil, Gary T. 1997. MAI and Canada's Cultural Sector. Canadian Council for the Arts, October: www.ccarts.ca/en/advocacy/publications/policy/mai.htm (accessed May 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, Sidney G.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
,Network Solutions. 1997. Prospectus Pursuant to Rule 424, September 26: www.freedgar.com.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham. 2008. “Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Transgovernmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive,” International Organization 62(1): 103–30.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham L. and David, Bach. 2004. “Self-Regulatory Trajectories in the Shadow of Public Power: Resolving Digital Dilemmas in Europe and the United States,” Governance 17: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Harold. 1969 (1939). Diplomacy, 3rd edn. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, Kalypso. 1995. “International Trade in Information–Based Services: The Uruguay Round and Beyond,” in Drake, William J. (ed.). The New Information Infrastructure: Strategies for U.S. Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Press.Google Scholar
Niemann, Arne. 2006. “Beyond Problem-Solving and Bargaining: Communicative Action in International Negotiations,” International Negotiation, December.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noam, Eli. 1989. “International Telecommunications in Transition,” in Crandall, Robert W. and Flamm, Kenneth (eds.). Changing the Rules: Technological Change, International Competition and Regulation in Communications. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Noam, Eli. 1991. Television in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noam, Eli. 2001. Interconnecting the Network of Networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C.. 1994. “Economic Performance through Time,” American Economic Review 84(3): 359–68.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. NCR-921872 2000. 1993 (cited April 2000): www.networksolutions.com/legal/internic/cooperative-agreement/agreement.html.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr.. 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World's Only Superpower Can't Go it Alone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. Jr.. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 1985. “The Outcomes of International Trade Conflicts: The US and South Korea, 1960–1981,” International Studies Quarterly 29: 263−86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, John. 1993a. International Trade Bargaining Under Uncertainty: Cognitive Hypotheses and Evidence. Prepared for the Project on Fairness Claims, Harmonization, and Gains from Trade. Mimeo: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 1993b. “International Threats and Internal Politics: Brazil, the European Community, and the United States, 1985–1987,” in Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D. (eds.). Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 1997. “Policy Beliefs and International Economic Negotiations.” Paper Presented at the International Studies Association, Toronto, Canada.
Odell, John. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 2002. “Bounded Rationality and the World Political Economy,” in Andrews, David M., Henning, C. Randall, and Pauly, Louis (eds.). Governing the World's Money. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Odell, John. (ed.). 2006. Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Odell, John S. and Sell, Susan K.. 2006. “Reframing the Issue: The World Trade Organization Coalition on Intellectual Property and Public Health, 2001,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development,” The American Political Science Review87.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1996a. Meeting Report: Access and Pricing for Information Infrastructure Services: Communication Tariffication, Regulation and the Internet. Dublin, Ireland. June 20–21: www.oecd.org.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1996b. The Treatment of Cultural Measures in the MAI. Note by the Chairman. Negotiating Group on the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI). DAFFE/MAI(96)29, October 14.
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2001. Figures: Statistics on the Member Countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action,” American Political Science Review 92(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 2006. The Future of Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxfam, . March 2002. Rigged Rules and Double Standards: Trade, Globalization and the Fight Against Poverty.
Oxley, Robert. 1990. The Challenge of Free Trade. London, Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar
Ademola, Oyejide, T.. 2002. “Special and Differential Treatment,” in Bernard, Hoekman, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Philip, English (eds.). Development, Trade, and the World Trade Organization: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Palan, Ronen. 2003. “Susan Strange's Vision for a Critical International Political Economy,” in Harry, Bauer and Elisabetta, Brighi (eds.). International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years. London: Millennium Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Pangestu, Mari. 2002. “Industrial Policy and Developing Countries,” in Bernard, Hoekman, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Philip, English (eds.). Development, Trade, and the World Trade Organization: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 504–8.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. J. 2004. “Diverging Orbits: Situation Definitions in Creation of Regimes for Broadcast and Remote Sensing Satellites,” American Political Science Review 98(2).Google Scholar
Peterson, Spike V. 1997. “Whose Crisis? Early and Post-modern Masculinism,” in Stephen, Gill and Mittelman, James H. (eds.). Innovation and Transformation in International Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petrazzini, Ben. 1995. The Political Economy of Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries: Privatization and Liberalization in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Petrazzini, Ben. 1996. Global Telecom Talks: A Trillion Dollar Deal. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Pieterse, J. N. 2004. Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Porat, Marc Uri. 1977. The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement. Washington: Office of Telecommunications, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Preeg, Ernest H. 1995. Traders in a Brave New World: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Priyadarshi, Shishir. 2005. “Decision-Making Processes in India: The Case of Agriculture Negotiations,” in Gallagher, Peter, Low, Patrick, and Stoler, Andrew (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-level Games,” International Organization 42: 427−60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, Chakravarthi. 2002. Developing Countries and Services Trade: Chasing a Black Cat in a Dark Room, Blindfolded. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Colin. 1996. Australia's Peak Demand for Internet Bandwidth: A Modeling and Forecasting Methodology. La Trobe University, Online Media Program, Research Report No. 3.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. 1999. “Introduction by the Series Editor,” in Levy, D. A.. Europe's Digital Revolution: Broadcasting Regulation, the European Union and the Nation-State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivoli, Pietra. 2005. The Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy: An Economist Examines the Markets, Power, and Politics of World Trade. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Robert, Maryse. 2000. Negotiating North American Free Trade Agreement: Explaining the Outcome in Culture, Textile, Autos, and Pharmaceuticals. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade,” The American Political Science Review 81(4): 1121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, Richard. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1980. The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, 2nd edn. London: Nichols Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N.. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N.. 1997. Along the Domestic−Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N.. 2003. Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N.. 2008. People Count! Networked Individuals in Global Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. and Ernst-Otto, Czempiel. 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridgew, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). 2002. Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Ross, G. 1995. Jacques Delors and European Integration. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, Marc. 2007. “Google's Proposals on Internet Privacy do not Go Far Enough,” Financial Times, 24 September.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin. 2008. “Beyond the Main Street: Audiovisual Services in PTAs,” in Marchetti, Juan A. and Martin, Roy (eds.). Liberalizing Trade in Services: Bilateral, Regional, and Multilateral Perspectives in the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey Z. 2002. “Psychological Approach,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues. Second Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization 36(2): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993a. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations,” International Organization 47(1): 139–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. (ed.). 1993b. Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Michael. 1998. Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Salacuse, Jeswald W. 2000. “Lessons for Practice,” in Zartman, I. William and Rubin, Jeffrey Z. (eds.). Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Salazar-Xirinachs, José Manuel, Wetter, Theresa, Steinfatt, Karsten, and Ivascanu, Daniela. 2001. “Customs Unions,” in Salazar-Xirinachs, J. M. and Robert, Maryse. Toward Free Trade in the Americas. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Sam, Phna, and Vo Thanh, Thu. 2005. “Preparation by Vietnam's Banking Sector for World Trade Organization Accession,” in Peter, Gallagher, Patrick, Low, and Stoler, Andrew L. (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre. 2006. “Introduction,” In United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Trends in Audiovisual Markets: Regional Perspectives from the South. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre and Stern, Robert M. (eds.). 2000. General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Schiller, Daniel. 1982. Telematics and Government. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Eric. 2007. “Global Privacy Standards are Needed,” Financial Times, 19 September.
Schneider, Cynthia P. 2006. “Cultural Diplomacy,” Brown Journal of World Affairs 13(1).Google Scholar
Leonard, Schoppa. 1997. Bargaining with Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Bill. 2001. Presentation Made at Session on “Traffic Exchange in the New Environment: Global Networks.” Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Workshop on Internet Traffic Exchange, Berlin, June 7–8.
Scott, James. 1987. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1990. Domination and the Art of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sebenius, James K. 1983. “Negotiating Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties,” International Organization37: 281–316.Google Scholar
Sebenius, James K.. 2002. “International Negotiation Analysis,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan K. 1995. “Intellectual Property Protection and Antitrust in the Developing World: Crisis, Coercion, and Choice,” International Organization 49(2): 315–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sell, Susan K.. 1998. Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan. 1999. “Multinational Corporations as Agents of Change: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights,” in Cutler, A. Clare, Virginia, Haufler, and Tony, Porter. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 2005. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2005. “Power, Governance, and the World Trade Organization: A Comparative Institutional Approach,” in Michael, Barnett and Raymond, Duvall (eds.). Power in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl and Varian, Hal R.. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devinder. 1994. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to World Trade Organization: Seeds of Despair. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.Google Scholar
Sherman, Laura. 1999. “‘Wildly Enthusiastic’ About the First Multilateral Agreement on Trade in Telecommunications Services,” Federal Communication Law Journal 51: 60–110.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 1999. Leapfrogging Development?: The Political Economy of Telecommunications Restructuring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2000a. “Weak Powers and Globalism: The Impact of Plurality on Weak-Strong Negotiations in the International Economy,” International Negotiation 5: 449–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2000b. “The Institutional Environment and Effects of Telecommunications Privatization and Liberalization in Asia,” Telecommunications Policy 24(10–11): 885–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2002a. “Introduction: Information Technologies and the Changing Scope of Power and Governance,” in Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2002b. “Negotiating Regime Change: The Weak, the Strong and the World Trade Organization Telecom Accord,” in James, N. Rosenau and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance, pp. 239–72. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2003. “International Communication Regimes,” in Johnston, Donald H.. Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications, Vol. 3. London: Academic Press, 463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2004. “The Persistence and Breakdown of Exclusion and Territoriality in Global Telecommunications Regimes,” in Sandra, Braman (ed.). The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2005a. “Services Commitments: Case Studies from Belize and Costa Rica,” in Gallagher, P., Low, P., and Stoler, A. L. (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2005b. “Reflexivity and Falsification in Qualitative Methods: With an Endnote on Identity and Interest Formation,” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2005c. “Wiggle Rooms: New Issues and North-South Negotiations During the Uruguay Round,” in Odell, John S. and Antonio, Ortiz Mena (eds.). How to Negotiate Over Trade: A Summary of New Research for Developing Countries. Documentos de Trabajo, Numero 113. División de Estudios Internacionales, Centro de Investigación y Docensias Económicas (CIDE), Mexico.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2006a. “Coalitions, Developing Countries, and International Trade: Research Findings and Prospects,” International Negotiation 11(3): 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2006b. “The Evolution of National Interests: New Issues and North-South Negotiations During the Uruguay Round,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2007a. “Metapower, Networks, Security, and Commerce,” in Myriam, Dunnet al. (ed.). Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2007b. “Culture or Commerce? A Comparative Assessment of International Interactions and Developing Countries at United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, World Trade Organization, and Beyond,” International Studies Perspectives 8: 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. P. 2008a. “Paulo Freire: Possibilities for Dialogic Communication in the Information Age,” Key Thinkers in the Information Age. Information, Communication, Society.
Singh, J. P. 2008b. “General Agreement on Trade in Services Plus or Minus? Services Commitments in Comparative Contexts for Colombia and Uruguay,” in Marchetti, Juan A. and Martin, Roy (eds.). Opening Markets for International Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and World Trade Organization Negotiations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P. and Sarah, M. Gilchrist. 2002. “Three Layers of the Electronic Commerce Network: Challenges for the Developed and Developing Worlds,” Info 4(2): 31–41.Google Scholar
Sjostedt, Gunnar. 1994. “Negotiating the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade,” in Zartman, I. William (ed.). International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass Publishers, pp. 44–69.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, James McCall. 2006. “Compliance Bargaining in the World Trade Organization: Ecuador and the Bananas Dispute,” in Odell, John S. (ed.). Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization and North American Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. 2000. Technology and Capital in the Age of Lean Production: A Marxian Critique of the “New Economy.” Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Bertram I. 2003. “Deconstructing the Negotiations of Regime Dynamics,” in Spector, Bertram I. and Zartman, I. William (eds.). Getting it Done: Postagreement Negotiation and International Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Bertram I. and Zartman, I. William (eds.). 2003. Getting it Done: Postagreement Negotiation and International Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Spiwak, Lawrence J. 1998. “From International Competitive Carrier to the World Trade Organization: A Survey of the Federal Communications Commission's International Telecommunications Policy Initiatives 1985–1998,” Federal Communications Law Journal 51: 111–227.Google Scholar
Stanley, Kenneth B. 2000. “Toward International Settlement Reform: Federal Communications Commission Benchmarks vs. ITU Rates,” Telecommunications Policy 24(10).Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 1999. “The Limits of Strategic Choice: Constrained Rationality and Incomplete Explanation,” in Lake, David A. and Robert, Powell (eds.). Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization,” International Organization 56(2): 339–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Andrew L. 2005. “Mauritius: Co-operation in an Economy Evolving in the Future,” in Peter, Gallagher, Patrick, Low, and Stoler, Andrew L (eds.). Managing the Challenges of World Trade Organization Participation: 45 Case Studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stopford, John and Susan, Strange, with John, S. Henley. 1991. Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1982. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” International Organization, 36: 2, 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1988. States and Markets. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1991. “An Eclectic Approach,” in Murphy, Craig N. and Roger, Tooze (eds.). The New International Political Economy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swire, Peter P. and Litan, Robert E.. 1998. None of Your Business: Electronic Commerce and the European Privacy Directive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Teich, Albert H. 2006. Technology and the Future, 10th edn. Southbank, Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
,TeleGeography. 1997. TeleGeography 1997/98. Washington, DC: TeleGeography, Inc.Google Scholar
,TeleGeography 1998. TeleGeography 1999. Washington, DC: TeleGeography, Inc.Google Scholar
,TeleGeography 2000a. Hubs and Spokes. Washington, DC: TeleGeography, Inc.Google Scholar
,TeleGeography 2000b. TeleGeography 2001. Washington, DC: TeleGeography, Inc.Google Scholar
Telstra, . 1999. Submission on the National Bandwidth Inquiry Discussion Paper on International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services.
Thomas, Douglas and John, Seeley Brown. 2007. “Why Virtual Worlds Matter,” Working Paper. Institute for Network Culture. University of Southern California. Los Angeles, 21 October.Google Scholar
Tolan, Sandy. 1994. “Against the Grain,” Los Angeles Times Magazine, July 10.Google Scholar
Trans Atlantic Business Dialogue (TABD). “1997 Rome Communique”: www.tabd.com/recom/97rome.html.
Tuthill, Lee. 1996. “Users’ Rights? The Multilateral Rules on Access to Telecommunications,” Telecommunications Policy 20(2): 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Daniel, Kahneman. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions,” Journal of Business 59(4): S251–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Tyson, Laura D'Andrea and John, Zysman (eds.). 1983. American Industry in International Competition: Government Policies and Corporate Strategies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Underdal, Arild. 2002. “The Outcomes of Negotiation,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Underhill, Geoffrey R. D. 2000. “Introduction: Conceptualizing the Changing Global Order,” in Richard, Stubbs and Underhill, Geoffrey R. D.. Political Economy and the Changing Global Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2001. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Adopted at the 31st Session of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization General Conference, November 2, 2001: www.unesco.org/culture/pluralism/diversity.
,United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2005a. International Flows of Selected Cultural Goods and Services, 1994–2003. Montreal, Quebec: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics: www.uis.unesco.org/ev_en.php?ID=6372_201& URL=DO_TOPIC.
,United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2005b. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, October 20, 2005: http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-UR_ID=11281&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 1999. Lessons from the MAI. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2002. Audiovisual Services: Improving Participation of Developing Countries. Trade and Development Board: Commission on Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities. TD/B/COM.1/EM.20/2, September 27, 2002.
,United States Government. 1984. U.S. National Study on Trade in Services: A Submission by the United States Government to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
,United States Government. 1999. “Background Paper on International Charging Arrangements for Internet Services,” Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Telecommunications Working Group, 19th Meeting, PLEN/G/03: www2.apii.or.kr/telwg/19tel/plenary/plen-g-01-html (accessed February 2001).
Urry, John. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
,US House. 1997. Internet Domain Names. Science Subcommittee on Basic Research. 105th Congress, 1st Session, September 25.
,US House Committee on Energy and Commerce. 2001. The European Union Data Protection Directive: Implications for the U.S. Privacy Debate. 107th Cong., 1st session, March 8: http://energycommerce.house.gov/107/hearings/03082001Hearing49/hearing.htm.
United States Trade Representative, . 1997. Joint European Union-US Statement on Electronic Commerce. Washington, DC: United States Trade Representative.Google Scholar
Valenti, Jack. 1989. “The European Community Makes Ominous Sounds About Broadcast Quotas.” Remarks Made to the Advisory Committee on International Communication and Information Policy. Department of State, Washington, DC, July 17.
Varian, Hal R. and Carl, Shapiro. 1998. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vattimo, Gianni. 1993. “Postmodernity, Technology, Ontology,” in Meltzer, Arthur M, Jerry, Weinberger, and Zinman, M. Richard (eds.). Technology in the Western Political Tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Venturelli, Shalini. 1999. Liberalizing the European Media; Politics, Regulation, and the Public Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1948. “Power Versus Plenty as Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” World Politics 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voon, Tania. 2007. Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waelde, Charlotte. 1997. “Domain Names and Trade Marks: What's in a Name?,” in Lilian, Edwards and Charlotte, Waelde (eds.). Law and the Internet: Regulating Cyberspace. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Wagner, Lynn M. 2008. Problem-Solving and Bargaining in International Negotiations. Leiden: Hotei Publishing.Google Scholar
Wales, Elspeth. 1997. “Rules of the Name,” Communications International 24(7).Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. October 13, 1995. “U.S. may be Losing its Trade Bully Status.”
Wall Street Journal. May 20, 1997. “General Motors is Leading Candidate for Project in China Sought by Other Car Makers.”
Walsh, Virginia. 2004. Global Institutions and Social Knowledge: Generating Research at the Scripps Institution and the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission 1900–1990s. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard E., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel E., and Mc-Kersie, Robert B.. 1994. Strategic Negotiations: A Theory of Change in Labor-Management Relations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard E. and McKersie, Robert B.. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
,Washington Times. November 24, 1993. “Clash of Cultures Creates Latest Block to World Trade Pact.”
Watal, Jayashree. 2001. Intellectual Property Rights in the World Trade Organization and Developing World. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watal, Jayashree. 2003. “Implementing the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement,” in Bernard, Hoekman, Aaditya, Mattoo, and Philip, English (eds.). Development, Trade, and the World Trade Organization: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 359–68.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol. 1–2, Guenther, Ross and Claus, Wittich (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46: 384–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werbach, Kevin. 1997. “Digital Tornado: The Internet and Telecommunications Policy.” Federal Communications Commission, Office of Plans and Policy, Working Paper No. 29.
,Working Group on Internet Governance. ND. Draft Working Group on Internet Governance Issue Paper on International Internet Connections. www.wgig.org/docs/WP-Peering.pdf (accessed December 10, 2005).
,Working Group on Internet Governance. ND. 2005. Background Report: The Working Group on Internet Governance: www.wgig.org/docs/BackgroundReport.doc.
,White House. 1997. A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
White, S. B. and Neale, M. A.. 1991. “Reservation Prices, Resistance Points, and BATNAs: Determining the Parameters of Acceptable Negotiated Outcomes,” Negotiation Journal, October: 379–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2002. “Global Governance: A Preliminary Interrogation,” in Rorden, Wilkinson and Steve, Hughes (eds.). Global Governance: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2005. “Introduction: Concepts and Issues in Global Governance,” in Rorden, Wilkinson (ed.). The Global Governance Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2006. The World Trade Organization: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden and Steve, Hughes (eds.). 2002. Global Governance: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. 1983. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert R. 1977. “Negotiation as a Management Process,” World Politics 30: 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winham, Gilbert R. 1986. International Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Winham, Gilbert. 1996. “International Trade Policy in a Globalizing Economy,” International Journal LI: 638–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winham, Gilbert R.. 1998. “Explanations of Developing Country Behaviour in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Uruguay Round Negotiation,” World Competition and Law Review, March: 109–34.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. 1977. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. 1988. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Alan. 2000. Economic Perspectives on the Internet. New York: Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics.Google Scholar
Woodrow, Brian R. 1991. “Tilting Toward a Trade Regime: The ITU and the Uruguay Round Services Negotiations,” Telecommunications Policy 15(4): 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Intellectual Property Organization (World Intellectual Property Organization). 1999. Report of the Internet Domain Name Process. World Intellectual Property Organization Publication No. 439(E). Geneva: www.wipo2.wipo.int.process1.Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization. ND. “Proposals for the New Negotiations”: www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/s_propnewnegs_e.htm (accessed October 8, 2003).
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1996a. Press Brief: Basic Telecoms, December 8.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1996b. Report of the Group on Basic Telecommunications, April 30: www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/servte_e/tel15_e.htm (accessed June 2000).
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1996c. Minutes of the Meeting. Dispute Settlement Body. 19 June 1996. WT/DSB/M/19.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1997a. Canada – Certain Measures Regarding Periodicals. Report of the Appellate Body. WT/DS31/R, March 14.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1997b. Canada – Certain Measures Regarding Periodicals. Report of the Appellate Body. WT/DS31/AB/R, June 30.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1998a. Work Programme on Electronic Commerce. WT/L/274, September 30.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1998b. Audiovisual Services: Background Note by Secretariat. Council for Trade in Services. S/C/W/40, June 15.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 1998c. Electronic Commerce and the Role of the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
,World Trade Organization. ND. 2001a. Communication from Switzerland: General Agreement on Trade in Services 2000: Audio-visual Services. Council for Trade in Services Special Session. S/CSS/W/74, May 4.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 2001b. Communication from Brazil: Audiovisual Services. Council for Trade in Services Special Session. S/css/W/99, July 9.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 2001c. Declaration on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement and Public Health. Ministerial Conference, Doha, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/W2, November 14.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 2005. Communication from Hong Kong, China, Japan, Mexico, The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu; and United States. Joint Statement on the Negotiation of Audiovisual Services. TNS/S/W/49, June 30.
,World Trade Organization. ND. 2006. World Trade Report 2006: Exploring the Links between Subsidies, Trade and the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Wriggins, Howard. 1976. “Up for Auction,” in Zartman, I. William (ed.). The 50% Solution: How to Bargain Successfully with Hijackers, Strikers, Bosses, Oil Magnates, Arabs, Russians, and Other Worthy Opponents in this Modern World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yoffie, David B. 1983. Power and Protectionism: Strategies of the Newly Industrializing Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. 2002. “Capitalism, Technology, and Liberalization: The International Telecommunications Regime, 1865–1998,” in Rosenau, James N. and Singh, J. P. (eds.). Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. with Sutton, Brent A.. 1996. Governing Global Networks: International Regimes for Transportation and Communications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 1971. The Politics of Trade Negotiations Between Africa and the European Economic Community: The Weak Confront the Strong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 1985. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. (ed.). 1987. Positive Sum: Improving North-South Negotiations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Zartman, I. William. 2003. “Negotiating the Rapids: The Dynamics of Regime Formation,” in Spector, Bertram I. and Zartman, I. William (eds.). Getting it Done: Postagreement Negotiation and International Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 2004. “The Structure of Negotiation,” in Kremenyuk, Victor A. (ed.). International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
William, Zartman, I and Maureen, Berman. 1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
William, Zartman, I and Rubin, Jeffrey Z.. 2000. Power and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittrain, Jonathan. 1999. “Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers: Between the Public and the Private – Comments Before Congress,” 14B Berkeley Technology Law Journal1081–2.Google Scholar
Zittrain, Jonathan. 2004. “Internet Points of Control,” in Sandra, Braman (ed.). The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zoellick, Robert. 2006. “Ditch Obstinate Posturing to Clinch a Doha Deal,” Financial Times, September 25.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • J. P. Singh, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Negotiation and the Global Information Economy
  • Online publication: 29 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551918.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • J. P. Singh, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Negotiation and the Global Information Economy
  • Online publication: 29 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551918.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • J. P. Singh, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Negotiation and the Global Information Economy
  • Online publication: 29 June 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551918.009
Available formats
×