According to several estimates, up to 0.5% of all stars could have a planet similar to our Earth, but on the average about four billion years older than Earth, because our Sun is not an old star and star formation was most productive in the early times. Regarding the origin and evolution of life, our own case is at present the only instance of life we know of. Are we permitted to generalize this single case? Can we do statistics with n = 1? The laws of statistics say that n = 1 yields an estimate for the average, but none for the mean error (which would need at least n = 2). This means that assuming us to be average has the highest probability of being right, but we do not have any indication of how wrong this may be. Leaving statistics and arguing by analogy, we may add that most things in nature do not scatter over too large a range, up to a few powers of ten, mostly. Thus, the best we can do is to assume that we are average, but to allow for a wide (but not infinite) error of this assumption. If we now generalize our own case, then life in our Galaxy would have started on about one billion planets several billion years ago. And, arguing by extrapolation, we should expect this life to have developed meanwhile extremely far beyond our own present state.