Busch, D., ‘Indirect Representation and the Lando Principles: An Analysis of Some Problem Areas from the Perspective of English Law’ (1999) 7 ERPL319–48Google Scholar

Busch, D., Indirect Representation in European Contract Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)Google Scholar

Collier, J., ‘Actual and Ostensible Authority of an Agent: A Straightforward Question and Answer’ (1984) 43 CLJ26–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

du Plessis, J., ‘The Promises and Pitfalls of Mixed Legal Systems: The South African and Scottish Experiences’ (1998) Stell LR338–50Google Scholar

du Plessis, J., ‘Comparative Law and the Study of Mixed Legal Systems’, in Reimann, M. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Kokkini-Iatridou, D.et al., Een inleiding tot het rechtsvergelijkende onderzoek (Deventer: Kluwer, 1988)Google Scholar

Lévy-Ullman, H. (trans. Walton, F. P.), ‘The Law of Scotland’ (1925) Juridical Review370–91Google Scholar

MacQueen, H. L., ‘Scots and English Law: The Case of Contract’ (1998) Current Legal Problems204–29Google Scholar

McMeel, G., ‘The Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Agency’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review387–411Google Scholar

Oderkerk, A. E., De preliminaire fase van het rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek (Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, 1999)Google Scholar

Reid, K. G. C., ‘The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems’ (2003) 78 Tul LR5–40Google Scholar

Smits, J. M., The Contribution of Mixed Legal Systems to European Private Law (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001)Google Scholar

Smits, J. M., The Making of European Private Law: Towards a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System (trans. Kornet, N.) (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002)Google Scholar

Tan, C.-H., ‘Undisclosed Principals and Contract’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review480–509Google Scholar

Verhagen, H. L. E., ‘Agency and representation’, in Smits, J. M., Elgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law (Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2006), pp. 33–56Google Scholar

Whitty, N. R., ‘The Civilian Tradition and Debates on Scots Law’ (1996) TSAR227–39 and 442–57Google Scholar

Wilson, W. A., ‘The Importance of Analysis’, in Carey Miller, D. and Meyers, D. W. (eds.), Comparative and Historical Essays in Scots Law: A Tribute to Professor Sir Thomas Smith (Edinburgh: Butterworths and Law Society of Scotland, 1992)Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R., Visser, D. and Reid, K. G. C., Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H., Introduction to Comparative Law (trans. Weir, T.), 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Bell, J., Boyron, S. and Whittaker, S., Principles of French Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bénabent, A., Droit civil: Les contrats spéciaux civils et commerciaux, 5th edn (Paris: Montchrestien, 2001)Google Scholar

Boudot, M., ‘Apparence’ (2003) Répertoire de droit civil, 1–19Google Scholar

Bouloc, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Commercial 1994, p. 548, No 12

Bradgate, R. and White, F., Commercial Law, 8th edn (Blackstone: London, 2001)Google Scholar

Calais-Auloy, J., D 1963, J 277–9

Calais-Auloy, J., D 1966, J 449–50

Capitant, H. (ed.), Les Grands Arrêts de la Jurisprudence Civile, 10th edn (Paris: Dalloz, 1997)

Chen, C. W., Apparence et représentation en droit positif français (Paris: LGDJ, 2000)Google Scholar

Cornu, G., Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 1963, 573–4

Cornu, G., Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 1969, 804–6

Cornu, G., Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 1977, 570–72

Cozian, M., Viandier, A. and Barbaux-Deboissy, F., Droit des sociétés, 17th edn (Paris: Litec, 2004)Google Scholar

Danis-Fatôme, A., Apparence et contrat (Paris: LGDJ, 2004)Google Scholar

Quenaudon, R., ‘Le mandat’, Jurisc Dalloz, fascicule 20

Didier, P. and Lequette, Y.De la représentation en droit privé (Paris: LGDJ, 2000)Google Scholar

Esmein, P., Juris Classeur Périodique - Semaine Juridique 1963, II, 13104

Flattet, G., Les contrats pour le compte d'autrui: essai critique sur les contrats conclus par un intermédiaire en droit français (Toulouse: F. Boisseau, 1950)Google Scholar

Guestin, J., Traité de droit civil: Introduction générale (Paris: LGDJ, 1994)Google Scholar

Huet, J., Traité de droit civil: les principaux contrats spéciaux, 2nd edn. (Paris: LGDJ, 2001)Google Scholar

Huet, J.Droit civil: Les contrats spéciaux civils et commerciaux, 5th edn (Paris: Montchrestien, 2001)Google Scholar

Izorche, M. L., ‘A propos du contrat sans représentation’ (1999) D Chron369–74Google Scholar

Gall, J., French Company Law (London: Oyez Publishing, 1974)Google Scholar

Tourneau, Ph., ‘Mandat’ (2000) Répertoire de droit civil26–52Google Scholar

Malaurie, P., Aynès, L. and Gautier, P. Y., Cours de droit civil: Les Contrats spéciaux, 14th edn (Paris: Cujas, 2002)Google Scholar

Monéger, J., ‘Baux commerciaux et théorie de l'apparence’ (1993) I Juris-Classeur périodique: édition notariale et immobilière103–9Google Scholar

Storck, M., Essai sur le mécanisme de la représentation dans les actes juridiques, LGDJ, Bibl. dr. Privé, t. 172, 1982

Vidal, D., Droit des sociétés, 4th edn (Paris: LGDJ, 2003)Google Scholar

Baudry-Lacantinerie, G., Traité théorique et pratique de droit civil, XIX (Paris: Larose and Tenin, 1908)Google Scholar

Boonen, H., ‘De rechtsschijn’, RW 1950–51

Cauffman, C., ‘The Principles of European Contract Law’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht 2001

Demogue, R., Traité des obligations en général, vol. I (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1923)Google Scholar

Page, H., Traité élémentaire de droit civil belge (Brussels: Bruylant, 1945–1975)Google Scholar

Page, H. and Meinertzhagen-Limpens, A., Traité élémentaire de droit civile belge, vol. IV, Les Principaux Contrats (Brussels: Bruylant, 1997)Google Scholar

Depuyt, D., ‘Artikel 848 Ger. W.’, in Depuydt, P., Laenens, J., Lindemans, D., and Raes, S., Gerechtelijk recht. Commentaar van rechtspraak en rechtsleer (Antwerp: Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen, 2005), p. 137Google Scholar

Quenaudon, R., in Juris-classeurs civils, v° art. 1991 à 2002 C.C., fascicule 20, 2002, no. 12

Dirix, E., Obligatoire verhoudingen tussen contractanten en derden, (Antwerp: Kluwer, 1984)Google Scholar

Dirix, E., Tilleman, B. and Orshoven, P., De Valks juridisch woordenboek (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2001)Google Scholar

Dumont, M.-P., L'opération de commission (Paris: Litec, 2000)Google Scholar

Foriers, P-A., ‘L'apparence, source autonome d'obligations, ou application du principe général de l'exécution de bonne foi’, Journal des tribunaux 1989, 543Google Scholar

Foriers, P-A., ‘Le droit commun des intermédiaires commerciaux: courtiers, commissionnaires, agents’, in Glansdorff, B. (ed.), Les intermédiaires commerciaux (Brussels, Editions du Jeune Barreau de Bruxelles, 1990), p. 79Google Scholar

Foriers, P-A., ‘Aspects de la représentation en matière contractuelle’, in Les Obligations Contractuelles (Brussels: Jeune Barreau Edn, 2000)Google Scholar

Foriers, P.-A. and Glansdorff, F., Contrats spéciaux, vols. I and III (Brussels: Brussels University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Foriers, P.-A. and Jafferali, R., ‘Le mandat (1991 à 2004)’, in Glansdorff, F., Actualités de quelques contrats spéciaux (Brussels: Bruylant, 2005), pp. 91–2Google Scholar

Gilcart, S., La société en formation, Une étude du mécanisme sui generis de l'article 60 du Code des sociétés (Mechelen: Wolters Kluwer Belgium, 2004)Google Scholar

Herbots, J. H., Stijns, S., Degroote, E., Lauwers, W. and Samoy, I., ‘Overzicht van rechtspraak (1995–1998): Bijzondere Overeenkomsten’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht 2002, 57Google Scholar

Kluyskens, A., Beginselen van burgerlijk recht, vol. IV, De contracten (Antwerp: Standaard, 1952)Google Scholar

Kruithof, R., ‘La théorie de l'apparence dans une nouvelle phase’, Revue critique de la jurisprudence belge 1991, 68–73Google Scholar

Kruithof, R., ‘Overzicht van rechtspraak’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht 1994, 225–7Google Scholar

Kruithof, R., Bocken, H., Ly, F. and Temmerman, B., ‘Overzicht van rechtspraak (1981–1992). Verbintenissen’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht 1994, 171Google Scholar

Lambrecht, B. and Samoy, I., ‘Schijn van berusting en ontkentenis van proceshandeling’ (obs. to Brussels 10 June 2002), P&B 2002, 307–12Google Scholar

Laurent, F., Principes de droit civil français, 33 parts (Brussels: Bruylant, 1878)Google Scholar

Limpens, L., La vente en droit belge (Brussels: Bruylant, 1960)Google Scholar

Limpens, L., Paulus, C. and Ras, H. E., Preadviezen, De zaakwaarneming naar Belgisch recht en naar Nederlands recht (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1968)Google Scholar

Paulus, C., Zaakwaarneming, in APR (Brussels: Larcier, 1970)Google Scholar

Paulus, C. and Boes, R., ‘Lastgeving’, in Algemene Praktische Rechtsverzameling (Gent: Story-Scientia, 1978)Google Scholar

Petel, P., Le contrat de mandat (Paris: Dalloz, 1994)Google Scholar

Sagaert, V., ‘Zaakwaarneming’, in Dirix, E. and Oevelen, A. (eds.), Bijzondere overeenkomsten, Commentaar met overzicht van rechtspraak en rechtsleer (Deurne: Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar

Samoy, I., Middellijke vertegenwoordiging. Vertegenwoordiging herbekeken vanuit het optreden in eigen naam voor andermans rekening (Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia, 2005)Google Scholar

Samoy, I., ‘De gevolgen van gesimuleerde rechtshandelingen’, in Smits, J. and Stijns, S. (eds.), Inhoud en werking van de overeenkomst naar Belgisch en Nederlands recht, (Antwerpen-Groningen: Intersentia, 2005), pp. 268–9Google Scholar

Stijns, S., ‘Het algemeen regime van de verbintenis’, in Stijns, S. and Vandenberghe, H. (eds.), Verbintenissenrecht, Themis (Bruges: Die Keure, 2000–01), p. 18Google Scholar

Stijns, S., Leerboek verbintenissenrecht (Bruges: Die Keure, 2005)Google Scholar

Stijns, S. and Vandenberghe, H. (eds.), Verbintenissenrecht, Themis (Bruges: Die Keure, 2000–01)

Stijns, S. and Samoy, I., ‘La confiance légitime en droit privé des contrats’, in Dirix, E. and Leleu, Y.-H. (eds.), Rapports belges au congrès de l'académie internationale de droit comparé à Utrecht (Brussels: Bruylant, 2006), pp. 277–8Google Scholar

Stijns, S. and Callens, P., ‘Over tijdelijke vennootschappen en (schijn-)vertegenwoordiging’, Tijdschrift voor rechtspersoon en vennootschap 1989, 73Google Scholar

Stijns, S., Gerven, D. and Wery, P., ‘Chronique de jurisprudence (1985–1995). Les obligations: les sources’, Journal des tribunaux 1996, 696Google Scholar

Storck, M., in Juris-classeurs civils, v° art. 1119 C.civ., fascicule 7–1, 1992, no. 76

Tilleman, B., ‘Lastgeving’, in Algemene Praktische Rechtsverzameling (Deurne: Kluwer, 1997), pp 143, 151Google Scholar

Tilleman, B., ‘Sterkmaking’, in Ad amicissimum amici scripsimus, Vriendenboek Raf Verstegen (Bruges: Die Keure, 2004) p. 292Google Scholar

Tilleman, B., ‘Volmacht en sterkmaking bij oprichting van vennootschappen’, in Benoit-Moury, A., Caprasse, O., Thirion, N. and Tilleman, B. (eds.), De oprichting van vennootschappen en de opstartfase van de ondernemingen (Brussels: Die Keure, 2003), p. 332Google Scholar

Gerven, W., Bewindsbevoegdheid (Brussels: Bruylant, 1962)Google Scholar

Gerven, W., ‘Algemeen deel’, in Beginselen van Belgisch Privaatrecht, I, (Antwerp: Story-Scientia, 1987), p. 227Google Scholar

Gerven, W., and Covemaeker, S., Verbintenissenrecht (Leuven: Acco, 2006)Google Scholar

Liempt, F., ‘Hoever reikt het mandaat ad litem van een advocaat in het kader van een gerechtelijke vereffening-verdeling?’, in Pintens, W. and Mongh, J. Du, (eds.), Patrimonium 2006 (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2006), pp. 373–4Google Scholar

Oevelen, A., ‘De juridische grondslag en de toepassingsvoorwaarden van de verbondenheid van de lastgever bij een schijnmandaat’, Rechtskundig Weekblad 1989–90, 1429–30Google Scholar

Ommeslaghe, P., ‘L'apparence comme source autonome d'obligation et le droit belge’ (1983) Revue de droit international et de droit comparé154Google Scholar

Quickenborne, M., ‘Le fondement de l'inopposabilité des contre-lettres’, Revue critique de la jurisprudence belge 1975, 268Google Scholar

Verbruggen, C., ‘La théorie de l'apparence: quelques acquis et beaucoup d'incertitudes’, in Mélanges offerts à Pierre Van Ommeslaghe (Brussels: Bruylant, 2000)Google Scholar

Verougstraete, I., ‘Wil en vertrouwen bij het totstandkomen van overeenkomsten’, Tijdschrift voor Privaatrecht 1990, 1193Google Scholar

Wéry, P., L'exécution forcée en nature des obligations contractuelles non pécuniaires (Brussels: Kluwer, 1993)Google Scholar

Wéry, P., ‘Droit des contrats, Le mandat’, in Répertoire Notarial (Brussels: Larcier, 2000)Google Scholar

Baumbach, A., and Hopt, K J., Handelsgesetzbuch: HGB, 33rd edn, (München: Beck-Verlag, 2008)Google Scholar

Bork, R., Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuchs, 2nd edn (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck-Verlag, 2006)Google Scholar

Canaris, C.-W., Die Vertrauenshaftung im deutschen Privatrecht (München: Beck-Verlag, 1971)Google Scholar

Flume, W., Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts – Das Rechtsgeschäft, vol. II (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1965)Google Scholar

Krebs, P., Schmidt, C. (ed.), Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, vol. 1, 2nd edn (München: Beck-Verlag, 2005)

Laband, P., ‘Die Stellvertretung bei dem Abschluβ von Rechtsgeschäften nach dem allgemeinen Deutschen Handelsgesetzbuch’ (1866) 10 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht, 183Google Scholar

Larenz, K. and Wolf, M., Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, 9th edn (München: Beck-Verlag, 2007)Google Scholar

Leipold, D., German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) I: Einführung und allgemeiner Teil: ein Lehrbuch mit Fällen und Kontrollfragen, 4th edn (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck-Verlag, 2007)Google Scholar

Lobinger, T., Rechtsgeschäftliche Verpflichtung und autonome Bindung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck-Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar

Löwisch, M. and Neumann, D., Allgemeiner Teil des German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch), 7th edn (München: Beck-Verlag, 2004)Google Scholar

Lutter, M., Hommelhoff, P. and Bayer, W.GmbH-Gesetz: Kommentar, 16th edn (Köln: Otto Schmidt-Verlag, 2004)Google Scholar

Pentz, A., in Bayer, W. (ed.), Münchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, vol. I, 2nd edn (München: Beck-Verlag/Verlag Franz Vahlen, 2000)

Schilken, E., in J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen, 1st book – Allgemeiner Teil §§ 164–240, 15th edn (Berlin: Sellier – de Gruyter, 2004)Google Scholar

Schmidt-Kessel, M., in Prütting, H., Wegen, G. and Weinreich, G. G., German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch): Kommentar, 2nd edn (Neuwied: Luchterhand-Verlag, 2007)Google Scholar

Schmidt-Kessel, M., Handelsrecht – Unternehmensrecht, in Schulze, M. and Zuleeg, R., Europarecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, 2006)Google Scholar

Schramm, K.-H., in Säcker, F. J. (ed.), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, vol. I §§ 1–240, 5th edn (München: Beck-Verlag, 2006)Google Scholar

Brink, V., ‘Uitleg van rechtshandelingen of uitleg van gedingstukken’, in Kooten, H. J., Strikwerda, L., Timmerman, L. and Wattendorff, H. M. (eds.), Hartkampvariaties. Opstellen aangeboden aan prof. mr. A. S. Hartkamp ter gelegenheid van zijn afscheid als procureur-generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Deventer: Kluwer, 2006), pp. 1–13Google Scholar

Busch, D., Indirect Representation in European Contract Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)Google Scholar

Busch, D., ‘Uitleg van overeenkomsten’ (2002) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burerlijk Recht (a law journal)410–13Google Scholar

Ernes, A. L. H., ‘Schijn van volmacht op grond van functie?’ (1999) 6346 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (a law journal)143–147Google Scholar

Ernes, A. L. H., Onbevoegde vertegenwoordiging (Deventer: Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar

Ernes, A. L. H., ‘De positie van de tussenpersoon jegens een derde: instaan voor bestaan en omvang van een volmacht’ (2005) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Handelsrecht (a law journal)73–80Google Scholar

Ernes, A. L. H., ‘Aanstellingsvolmacht, schijn van volmachtverlening en “usual authority”’ (2004) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burerlijk Recht (a law journal)167–72Google Scholar

Florijn, E. O. H. P., Ontstaan en ontwikkeling van het nieuwe Burgerlijk Wetboek, (Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 1994)Google Scholar

Gepken-Jager, E. E. G., Vertegenwoordiging bij NV en BV: Een rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek naar de uitvoering van artikel 9 eerste EG-richtlijn inzake het vennootschapsrecht (Uitgave vanwege het Instituut voor Ondernemingsrecht Rijksuniversiteit Groningen no. 34) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar

Grinten, W. C. L., Lastgeving (Monografieën Nieuw BW: B-serie; 81) (Deventer: Kluwer, 1999)Google Scholar

Haanappel, P. P. C., Mackaay, E., New Netherlands Civil Code: Patrimonial Law (Property, Obligations and Special Contracts), (Deventer/Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1990)Google Scholar

Haanappel, P. P. C. and Mackaay, E., New Netherlands Civil Code: Patrimonial Law (Property, Obligations and Special Contracts) (The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International, 1999) (CD-ROM edition)Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S., ‘Bekrachtiging van nietige rechtshandelingen in het nieuwe burgerlijk wetboek’, in Abas, P., Veth, N. J. P. Giltay, Scholten, Y. and Wolffensperger, G. J. (eds.), Non sine causa: opstellen aangeboden aan Prof. Mr. G. J. Scholten ter gelegenheid van zijn afscheid als hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1979), pp. 115–134Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S. and Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Asser's Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht, Verbintenissenrecht, Algemene leer der overeenkomsten, 12th edn (Deventer: Kluwer 2005)Google Scholar

Hijma, J., Dam, C. C., Schendel, W. A. M. and Valk, W. L., Rechtshandeling en Overeenkomst (Studiereeks Burgerlijk Recht deel 3), 5th edn (Deventer: Kluwer, 2007)Google Scholar

Kluiver, H. J., ‘Bekrachtiging van rechtshandelingen en besluiten. Over Art. 3:58 BW als vangnet en trampoline’, in Kortmann, S. C. J. J., Faber, N. E. D. and Strens-Meulemeester, J. A. M. (eds.), Vertegenwoordiging en tussenpersoon (Serie Onderneming en Recht deel 17) (Deventer: Tjeenk Willink, 1999), pp. 69–88Google Scholar

Koppert-Van Beek, M. S., Handelen namens een op te richten vennootschap (Deventer: Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar

Kortmann, S. C. J. J., Mr. C. Asser's Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht, Vertegenwoordiging en rechtspersoon, De vertegenwoordiging, 8th edn (Deventer: Kluwer, 2004)Google Scholar

Maeijer, J. M. M., Mr. C. Asser's Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht, Vertegenwoordiging en rechtspersoon, De rechtspersoon, 8th edn (Deventer: Tjeenk Willink, 1997)Google Scholar

Nieskens-Isphording, B. W. M., Putt-Lauwers, A. E. M., Derdenbescherming (Monografieën Nieuw BW. A-serie; 22), 3rd edn (Deventer: Kluwer, 2002)Google Scholar

du Perron, C. E., Overeenkomst en derden (Deventer: Kluwer, 1999)Google Scholar

Reehuis, W. H. M. and Slob, E. E. (eds.), Invoering Boeken 3, 5 en 6, Parlementaire Geschiedenis van het nieuwe Burgerlijk Wetboek, Boek 3, Vermogensrecht in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 1990)

Schaick, A. C., Volmacht (Monografieën Nieuw BW. B-serie; 5) (Deventer: Kluwer, 1999)Google Scholar

Schilfgaarde, P., ‘Uitleg van rechtshandelingen’ (1997) 6282 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (a law journal), 587–592; (1997) 6283 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (a law journal), 611–615, reprinted in Peter van Schilfgaarde Select. Een bloemlezing uit zijn werk (Uitgaven vanwege het Instituut voor Ondernemingsrecht, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, nr. 35) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 385–408Google Scholar

Schilfgaarde, P., ‘Vertegenwoordiging’ (1974) 5280 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (a law journal), 669–676; (1974) 5281 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie (a law journal), 693–700; reprinted in Peter van Schilfgaarde Select. Een bloemlezing uit zijn werk (Uitgaven vanwege het Instituut voor Ondernemingsrecht, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, nr. 35) (Deventer Kluwer, 2000), pp. 39–70Google Scholar

Schoordijk, H. C. F., Vermogensrecht in het algemeen naar Boek 3 van het nieuwe BW (titel 1t/m 5, titel 11) (Deventer: Kluwer, 1986)Google Scholar

Schoordijk, H. C. F., Het handelen ten behoeve van de vennootschap in oprichting (Ars Notariatus nr. 47) (Amsterdam: Stichting tot Bevordering der Notariële Wetenschap, 1990)Google Scholar

Schoordijk, H C F., ‘Het leerstuk van de opgewekte schijn van volmacht en de Engels-Amerikaansrechtelijke leer van de “apparent authority”’, in Honderd jaar rechtsleven. De Nederlandse Juristen-Vereniging 1870–1970, (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1970), pp. 1–24; reprinted in Van Dunné, J M, Nieuwenhuis, J H, Vranken, J B M (eds), Verspreid werk van Prof. Mr. H. C. F. Schoordijk, (Deventer: Kluwer 1991), pp. 197–221Google Scholar

Sütö, V. J. A., ‘De invloed van Meijers’ rechtsvergelijkende expertise op zijn toelichting bij het ontwerp van volmacht 1954’, in Jansen, C. J. H. and Vrugt, M. (eds.), Recht en geschiedenis (Nijmegen Ars Aequi Libri, 1999), pp. 169–81Google Scholar

Sütö, V. J. A., Nieuw Vermogensrecht en rechtsvergelijking–reconstructie van een wetgevingsproces (1947–1961) (Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers, 2004)Google Scholar

Tjong Tjin Tai, T. F. E., ‘Driemaal schijnvolmacht’ (2001) NbBW70–3Google Scholar

Vranken, J. B. M., Mededelings-, informatie- en onderzoeksplichten in het verbintenissenrecht (Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, 1989)Google Scholar

Zeben, C. J., Du Pon, J. W. and Olthof, M. M. (eds.), Parlementaire Geschiedenis van het nieuwe Burgerlijk Wetboek, Boek 3, Vermogensrecht in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 1981)

Zwitser, R., ‘De aansprakelijkheid van de onbevoegde vertegenwoordiger naar Burgerlijk recht en Handelsrecht’ (1999) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burerlijk Recht (a law journal)199–208Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Second: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 1958)Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Third: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 2006)Google Scholar

Bester, D. H., ‘The Scope of an Agent's Power of Representation’ (1972) 89 South African Law Journal49–70Google Scholar

Brown, I. ‘The Agent's Apparent Authority: Paradigm or Paradox?’ (1995) Journal of Business Law360–372Google ScholarPubMed

Conant, M., ‘The Objective Theory of Agency: Apparent Authority and the Estoppel of Apparent Ownership’ (1968) 47 Nebraska Law Review678–704Google Scholar

Cook, W. W., ‘Agency by Estoppel’ (1905) 5 Columbia Law Review536–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, W. W., ‘Agency by Estoppel: A Reply’ (1906) Columbia Law Review34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridman, G. H. L., The Law of Agency, 7th edn (London: Butterworths, 1996)Google Scholar

Fry, E. (ed. Northcote, G. R.), A Treatise on the Specific Performance of Contracts, 3rd edn (London: Stevens, 1892)Google Scholar

Fry, E.A Treatise on the Specific Performance of Contracts, 6th edn (London: Stevens, 1921)Google Scholar

Mayson, S., French, D. and Ryan, C., Mayson, French and Ryan on Company Law, 24th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Morse, G., Charlesworth's Company Law, 17th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005)Google Scholar

Müller-Freienfels, W., ‘Law of Agency’ (1957) 6 American Journal of Comparative Law165–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Omar, P. J., ‘Crossing Time's Boundaries: A Comparative View of Legal Responses to the Pre-Incorporation Contract’ (2005) Singapore Journal of Legal Studies76–92Google Scholar

Pappas, T. G., ‘Rescission by Third Party Prior to Principal's Ratification of Agent's Unauthorized Action’ (1948) 2 Vanderbilt Law Review100–108Google Scholar

Powell, R., The Law of Agency, 2nd edn (London: Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1961)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency 15th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1985)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., ‘Some Agency Problems in Insurance Law’, in Rose, F. D. (ed.), Consensus ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996), pp. 77–95Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency, 18th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Stoljar, S. J., The Law of Agency: Its History and Present Principles (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1961)Google Scholar

Tan, C.-H., ‘The Principle in Bird v. Brown Revisited’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review626–644Google Scholar

Tan, C. -H., ‘Undisclosed Principals and Contract’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review480–509Google Scholar

Tan, C.-H. and Tjio, H., ‘Rethinking Apparent Authority’, in Tan, A. and Sharom, A. (eds.), Developments in Singapore and Malaysian Law: Proceedings of the National University of Singapore – University of Malaya Centennial Symposia 2005 (Singapore: Marshall Cavendish, 2006), pp. 50–88.Google Scholar

Wambaugh, E., ‘A Problem as to Ratification’ (1895) 9 Harvard Law Review60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, C. A., ‘The American Law Institute's Restatement of Contracts and Agency’ (1935) 1 University of Toronto Law Journal17–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winfield, P. H., Pollock's Principles of Contract, 13th edn (London: Stevens & Sons, 1950)Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Second: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 1958)Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Third: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 2006)Google Scholar

DeMott, D. A., ‘Statutory Ingredients in Common Law Change: Issues in the Development of Agency Doctrine’, in Worthington, S. (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice (Oxford: Hart, 2003), pp. 57–83Google Scholar

Duxbury, N., Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Fishman, S. A., ‘Inherent Agency Power – Should Enterprise Liability Apply to Agents’ Unauthorised Contracts?’ (1987) 19 Rutgers Law Journal1–57Google Scholar

Friedman, L. M., A History of American Law (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973)Google Scholar

Ingram, J. D., ‘Inherent Agency Powers: A Mistaken Concept Which Should Be Discarded’ (2004) 29 Oklahoma City University Law Review583–95Google Scholar

Kalman, L., Legal Realism at Yale (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1986)Google Scholar

King, D. B., and Seavey, W. A., A Harvard Law School Professor: Warren A. Seavey's Life and the World of Legal Education (Buffalo, NY: W. S. Hein, 2005)Google Scholar

McMeel, G., ‘Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Agency’ (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review387–411Google Scholar

Mechem, F. R., A Treatise on the Law of Agency, Including Not Only a Discussion of the General Subject, But Also Special Chapters on Attorneys, Auctioneers, Brokers and Factors, 2 vols, 2nd edn (Chicago: Callaghan, 1914)Google Scholar

Pulliam, S. and Zuckerman, G., ‘SEC Examines Rebates Paid to Large Funds’, Wall Street Journal, 6 January 2005, pp. C1, C4Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., ‘Apparent Authority And Illegible Signatures’, (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review55–6Google Scholar

Story, J., Commentaries on the Law of Agency as a Branch of Commercial and Maritime Jurisprudence, 9th edn, by Greenough, C. P. (Boston: Little Brown, 1882)Google Scholar

Ward, M. P., ‘A Restatement or a Redefinition: Elimination of Inherent Agency Power in the Tentative Draft of the Restatement (Third) of Agency’ (2002) 59 Washington and Lee Law Review1585–633Google Scholar

Watts, P., ‘The Creep of Negligence into Agency Law in Australia’, (2005) 26 Australian Bar Review185–92Google Scholar

White, G. E., Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History, expanded edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Winfield, P. H., Pollock's Principles of Contract, 13th edn (London: Stevens & Sons, 1950)Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Second: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 1958)Google Scholar

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Third: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 2006)Google Scholar

Dal Pont, G. E., The Law of Agency 2nd edn (Chatsworth, NSW: Butterworths, Australia, 2008)Google Scholar

Fry, E., A Treatise on the Specific Performance of Contracts, 3rd edn (London, Stevens: 1892)Google Scholar

Gardner, S., ‘The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel – Again’ (2006) 120 Law Quarterly Review492–512Google Scholar

Haudley, K. R., Estoppel by Conduct and Election (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Kötz, H. (trans. Weir, T.), European Contract Law I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, 18th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Atiyah, P. S., The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Balfour, J., Balfour's Prackticks (Edinburgh: Gregg Associates for the Stair Society, 1754, reprinted 1962–63)Google Scholar

Bell, G. J., Principles of the Law of Scotland, 10th edn, by Guthrie, W. (Edinburgh: W. Blackwood, 1899; reprinted 1989)Google Scholar

Bell, G. J., Commentaries on the Law of Scotland and on the Principles of Mercantile Jurisprudence, 7th edn, by McLaren, J. (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1870; reprinted 1990)Google Scholar

Bonell, M. J., ‘Agency’ in: Hartkamp, A., Hesselink, M., Hondius, E.et al. (eds.) Towards a European Civil Code, 3rd edn (Nijmegen/The Hague: Ars Aequi Libri/Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 381–97Google Scholar

Brown, I., ‘The Agent's Apparent Authority: Paradigm or Paradox?’ (1995) JBL360–72Google ScholarPubMed

Coulsfield, Lordet al., (eds.), Gloag and Henderson's The Law of Scotland, 12th edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2007)Google Scholar

Davidson, F., and Macgregor, L., Commercial Law in Scotland, 2nd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2008)Google Scholar

Dirleton, J. N., Some Doubts and Questions, in the Law, Especially of Scotland (Edinburgh: George Mosman, published posthumously, 1698)Google Scholar

Dunedin, Viscount, Wark, J. L. and Black, A. C. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of the Laws of Scotland, 1st edn (Edinburgh: W. Green & Sons Ltd, 1913) vol. I

Erskine, J., An Institute of the Law of Scotland, Nicholson, J. B. (ed.), 8th edn (Edinburgh: Butterworths/Law Society of Scotland, 1871; reprinted 1989)Google Scholar

Feltham, P., and Hochberg, D. and Leech, T., in Bower, S., The Law Relating to Estoppel by Representation, 4th edn (London, Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar

Fridman, G. H. L., The Law of Agency, 7th edn (London: Butterworths, 1996)Google Scholar

Gloag, W. M., The Law of Contract, a Treatise on the Principles of Contract in the Law of Scotland, 2nd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1929)Google Scholar

Gow, J. J., The Mercantile and Industrial Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1964)Google Scholar

Leake, S. M., Principles of the Law of Contracts, 6th edn (London: Stevens & Sons, 1911)Google Scholar

Macgregor, L., ‘Agency and Mandate’, in The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Reissue (Edinburgh: Butterworths, 2002)Google Scholar

Macgregor, L., ‘Specific Implement in Scots law’, in Smits, J., Haas, D. and Hesen, G. (eds), Specific Performance in Contract Law: National and Other Perspectives (Antwerp and London: Intersentia, 2008) pp. 67–91Google Scholar

Mackenzie Stuart, A. J., ‘Contract and Quasi-contract’ in, Walker, D. M. (ed.), An Introduction to Scottish Legal History (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1992), pp. 241–64Google Scholar

MacQueen, H. L., ‘Promoter's Contracts, Agency and the Jus Quaesitum Tertio’ 1982 Scots Law Times257–61Google Scholar

MacQueen, H. L., ‘Obligations’ in Sir Smith, T. B.et al. (eds.), The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Edinburgh: Butterworths/Law Society of Scotland, 1987–96), vol. XVGoogle Scholar

MacQueen, H., ‘Good Faith’, in MacQueen, H. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006), pp. 43–73Google Scholar

MacQueen, H. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006)

Mayson, S., French, D. and Ryan, C., Mayson, French and Ryan on Company Law, 24th edn, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007–8)Google Scholar

McBryde, W. W., The Law of Contract in Scotland, 3rd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2007)Google Scholar

Pothier, R. J., Treatise on the Law of Obligations (London: A. Strahan, 1806)Google Scholar

Powell, R., Law of Agency, 2nd edn (London: Pitman, 1961)Google Scholar

Rankine, J., A Treatise on the Law of Personal Bar in Scotland: Collated with the English law of Estoppel in Pais (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1921)Google Scholar

Reid, E. C., ‘Acquiescence in the Air: William Grant v. Glen Catrine Bonded Ware’ (2001) Juridical Review191–9Google Scholar

Reid, E C., ‘Personal Bar: Case-law in Search of Principle’ (2003) EdinLR340–66Google Scholar

Reid, E. C., and Blackie, J. W. G., Personal Bar (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2006)Google Scholar

Reid, K., and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), A History of Private Law in Scotland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency, 18th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B. and Davenport, B. J., Bowstead on Agency, 14th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1976)Google Scholar

Smith, T. B., Short Commentary on the Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1962)Google Scholar

Smith, Sir T. B., et al. (eds.), The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Edinburgh: Butterworths / Law Society of Scotland, 1987–96)

Stair, , 1st Viscount (James Dalrymple), Institutions of the Law of Scotland, Walker, D. M. (ed.), 6th edn (Glasgow and Edinburgh: The University Presses of Glasgow and Edinburgh, 1981)Google Scholar

Steyn, J., ‘Written Contracts: To What Extent May Evidence Control Language?’ (1988) 41 Current Legal Problems23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steyn, J., ‘Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men’ (1997) 113 Law Quarterly Review433–42Google Scholar

Stoljar, S. J., The Law of Agency (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1961)Google Scholar

Story, J., Commentaries on the Law of Agency as a branch of commercial and maritime jurisprudence, 9th edn by Greenough, C. P. (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1882)Google Scholar

Tan, C.-H., ‘The Principle in Bird v Brown Revisited’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review626–44Google Scholar

Trotter, W. F., The Law of Contract in Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Hodge, 1913)Google Scholar

Voet, J., Commentarius ad Pandectas: in quo, praeter romani juris principia ac controversias illustriores, jus etiam hodierman, et praecipuae fori quaestiones excutiuntur. Editio sexta (The Hague: Hagea comitum, 1731) 2 vGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, R., Visser, D. and Reid, K. G. C. (eds.), Mixed Legal Systems in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)

,American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Second: Agency (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute, 1958)Google Scholar

Beinart, B., ‘The English Legal Contribution in South Africa: The Interaction of Civil and Common Law’ (1981) Acta Juridica 7Google Scholar

Bester, D. H., ‘Scope of an Agent's Power of Representation’ (1972) 89 South African Law Journal49Google Scholar

Blackman, M. S.et al., ‘Companies’, in Joubert, W. A.et al. (eds.), The Law of South Africa, 1st re-issue (Durban: Butterworths, 1993 onwards), vol. 4(1)Google Scholar

Cilliers, H. S. and Benade, M. L., Corporate Law, 3rd edn (Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2000)Google Scholar

Villiers, J. E. R. and Macintosh, J. C., The Law of Agency in South Africa, 3rd edn, by Silke, J. M. (Cape Town, Juta, 1981)Google Scholar

Wet, J. C. and Wyk, A. H., Die Suid-Afrikaanse Kontraktereg en Handelsreg, 5th edn, 2 vols. (Durban: Butterworths, 1992)Google Scholar

Fourie, J. S. A., ‘Die wisselwerking tussen Suid-Afrikaanse maatskappyeregleerstukke’ (1988) 51 THRHR218–27Google Scholar

Fourie, J S A., ‘Volmagbeperkings en Ultra Vires Handelinge – Aspekte can Artikel 36 van die Maatskappywet in Oenskou’ (1990) 1 Stellenbosch L Rev388–99Google Scholar

Gibson, J. T. R., South African Mercantile and Company Law, 8th edn (Cape Town: Juta, 2003)Google Scholar

Grotius, H, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, vol. 2, Book 1 (trans. Kelsey, F. W.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925)Google Scholar

Grotius, H, Opinion No. 73, Consultatien, Advysen en Advertissementen, gegeven en geschreven bij verscheiden treffelijke rechts-geleerden in Holland, (Rotterdam: Isaak Naerus, 1662–83), vol. IIIGoogle Scholar

Hahlo, H. R. and Kahn, E., The Union of South Africa: The Development of its Laws and Constitution (London: Stevens, 1960)Google Scholar

Harker, J. R., ‘The Liability of an Agent for Breach of Warranty of Authority’ (1985) 102 South African Law Journal596–603Google Scholar

Joubert, D. J., ‘Die Waarborg van Volmagsbestaan’ (1969) 32 THRHR109–25Google Scholar

Joubert, D. J., Die Suid-Afrikaanse Verteenwoordigingsreg (Cape Town: Juta, 1979)Google Scholar

Joubert, D. J., ‘Agency and Stipulatio Alteri’, in Zimmerman, R. and Visser, D. (eds.), Southern Cross: Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), pp. 335–57

Jooste, R., ‘The Law of Agency’ (1975) Annual Survey of South African Law95Google Scholar

Jooste, R., ‘When do Pre-Incorporation Contracts have Retrospective Effect?’ (1989) 106 South African Law Journal507–16Google Scholar

Kerr, A. J., An Introduction to Roman Dutch Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1953)Google Scholar

Kerr, A. J., ‘Causation in Estoppel by Misrepresentation’ (1977) 94 South African Law Journal270Google Scholar

Kerr, A. J., The Law of Agency, 4th edn (Durban: Butterworths, 2006)Google Scholar

Meskin, P. M., Kunst, J. A. and Schmidt, K. E. (eds.), Henochsberg on the Companies Act, 5th edn, 2 vols. (looseleaf) (Durban: Butterworths, 1994)

Mc Lennan, J. S., ‘Some Thoughts on Remedies for an Agent's Breach of Warranty of Authority’ (1987) 104 South African Law Journal321Google Scholar

Neethling, J., Potgieter, J. M., and Visser, P. J., The Law of Delict, 5th edn (Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006)Google Scholar

Pothier, R. J., (trans. Rogers, B. G. and Wet, B. X.), Treatise on the Contract of Mandate (Johannesburg: Lex Patria, 1979)Google Scholar

Rabie, P. J., ‘Estoppel’, in Joubert, W. A.et al. (eds.), The Law of South Africa, 1st re-issue, 34 vols. (Durban: Butterworths, 1993 onwards), vol. 9, pp. 266–83Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead on Agency, 15th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1985)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency, 18th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Sonnekus, J. C., Rabie's The Law of Estoppel in South Africa, 2nd edn (Durban: Butterworths, 2000)Google Scholar

Sonnekus, J. C., ‘Skynverwekking en ‘n Verdeelde Appelhof’ (2003) 14 Stellenbosch L Rev29Google Scholar

Spencer Bower, G., The Law Relating to Estoppel by Representation, 4th edn, by Feltham, P., Hochberg, D. and Leech, T. (London: Butterworths, 2004)Google Scholar

Story, J., Commentaries on the Law of Agency as a Branch of Commercial and Maritine Jurspindence, 9th edn. by Greenough, C. P. (Boston: Little Brown, 1882)Google Scholar

Merwe, N. J., ‘Wanbeskouings oor Wanvoorstelling’ (1964) THRHR194–202Google Scholar

Walt, J., ‘Wat word van die nadeelvereiste by bedrog en estoppel?’ (1973) THRHR386–95Google Scholar

Jaarsveld, S. R., Die Leerstuk van Ratifikasie in die Suid-Afrikaanse Verteenwordigingsreg (Cape Town: HAUM, 1974)Google Scholar

Voet, J., Commontarius ad Pandectas (Cape Town: J. C. Juta, 1879)Google Scholar

Wanda, B. P. (original text by Wet, J. C.), ‘Agency and Representation’, in Joubert, W. A.et al. (eds.), The Law of South Africa, 2nd edn, 34 vols. (Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003), vol. 1, pp. 167–223Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R., ‘Good Faith and Equity’, in Zimmerman, R. and Visser, D. (eds.), Southern Cross: Civil Law and Common Law in South Africa (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), pp. 221–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, D., Indirect Representation in European Contract Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S., ‘Principles of Contract Law’, in Hartkamp, A., Hesselink, M., Hondius, E., et al. (eds.) Towards a European Civil Code, 3rd edn, (Nijmegen/The Hague: Ars Aequi Libri/Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 125–43Google Scholar

Lando, O. and Beale, H. (eds.) Principles of European Contract Law. Part I: Performance, Non-performance and Remedies, (Dordrecht/London/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995)

Lando, O. and Beale, H. (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law. Parts I and II, (The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2000)

Lando, O., Clive, E., Prüm, A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Principles of European Contract Law. Part III (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003)

Verhagen, H. L. E., ‘Comment on Arts. 3:201 and 3:202 Principles of European Contract Law’, in Busch, D., Hondius, E., Kooten, H., et al. (eds), The Principles of European Contract Law and Dutch Law. A Commentary (The Hague/London/New York/Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri/Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 141–50Google Scholar

Zimmermann, R., ‘The Principles of European Contract Law. Contemporary Manifestation of the Old, and Possible Foundation for a New, European Scholarship of Private Law’, in Faust, F. and Thüsing, G. (eds.), Beyond Borders: Perspectives on International and Comparative Law, Symposium in Honour of Hein Kötz (Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2006), pp. 111–47Google Scholar

Bonell, M. J., ‘Agency’, in Hartkamp, A., Hesselink, M., Hondius, E.et al. (eds.), Towards a European Civil Code, 3rd edn (Nijmegen/The Hague: Ars Aequi Libri/Kluwer Law International, 2004), pp. 381–97Google Scholar

Busch, D., Indirect Representation in European Contract Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., ‘Authority of agents’ (2005) ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement, Institut International pour L'Unification du Droit Privé Principles: New Developments and Applications, pp. 9–16

Gloag, W. M., The Law of Contract, a Treatise on the Principles of Contract in the Law of Scotland, 3rd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1929)Google Scholar

Macgregor, L., ‘Agency and Mandate’, in The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia, Reissue (Edinburgh: Butterworths, 2002)Google Scholar

McBryde, W. W., The Law of Contract in Scotland, 3rd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2007)Google Scholar

Peel, E., Treitel: The Law of Contract, 12th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar

Reynolds, F. M. B., ‘Authority of Agents’ (2005) ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement, UNIDROIT Principles: New Developments and Applications, 9–16

Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, 18th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2006)Google Scholar

Tan, C.-H., ‘Undisclosed Principals and Contract’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review480–509Google Scholar

Verhagen, H. L. E., ‘Comment on Art. 3:207 Principles of European Contract Law’, in Busch, D., Hondius, E., Kooten, H., et al. (eds.), The Principles of European Contract Law and Dutch Law. A Commentary (The Hague/London/New York/Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri/Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 163–6Google Scholar

Gloag, W. M., The Law of Contract, a Treatise on the Principles of Contract in the Law of Scotland, 2nd edn (Edinburg: W. Green, 1929)Google Scholar

Lévy-Ullman, H. (trans. Walton, F. P.), ‘The Law of Scotland’ 1925 Juridical Review370–91Google Scholar

Macgregor, L., ‘Agency’, in MacQueen, H. and Zimmermann, R., (eds.), European Contract Law: Scots and South African Perspectives (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006) pp. 123–50Google Scholar

MacQueen, H., ‘Promoter's Contracts, Agency and the Jus Quaesitum Tertio’ 1982 Scots Law Times257–61Google Scholar

MacQueen, H., ‘Obligations’, in Sir Smith, T. B.et al. (eds.), The Laws of Scotland: Stair Memorial Encyclopaedia (Edinburgh: Butterworths/Law Society of Scotland, 1987–96), vol. XVGoogle Scholar

Pothier, R. J., Treatise on the Law of Obligations (London: A. Strahan, 1806)Google Scholar

Reid, E. C. and Blackie, J. G., Personal Bar (Edinburgh: W Green, 2006)Google Scholar

Sonnekus, J. C., Rabie's The Law of Estoppel in South Africa, 2nd edn (Durban: Butterworths, 2000)Google Scholar