Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T00:56:24.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Interpretation of policy – the Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Commission, 1949–56

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Helen Mercer
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

The Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Commission (MRPC) of 1949–56 ranks as one of the main early regulatory commissions of private economic interests in peace-time Britain. In Britain direct state regulation of an industry, its structure, pricing and practices has generally taken the form either of nationalisation or of specific encouragement to rationalisation, for instance the schemes for industries in the 1930s, such as the Coal Mines Act and the Lancashire Cotton Corporation, the Development Councils of the 1940s and the work of the Industrial Reorganisation Corporation in the 1960s. The Monopolies Commission was very different from these experiments, as it was established to survey permanently and continuously the practices of all industrial sectors. In addition it had more in common with the statutory regulatory practices of the United States than with the self-regulation favoured in Britain.

Studies of the work of the Monopolies Commission have extensively analysed the types of decisions made, but are mainly geared to producing prescriptions for reform, or guidelines for future government action. They place the experience of the Monopolies Commission as one chapter in the story of the march towards improved public perceptions of the need to end restrictive practices and make capitalism competitive.

According to American regulation writing, however, either the legislation establishing the agencies is itself the product of the industry's own desire for regulation, or the regulatory commission accommodates itself to the interests of the firms it regulates. One analyst suggests a life-cycle of regulatory commissions: the commission starts by vigorously attempting to regulate the industry in line with its mandate as custodian of the public interest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Constructing a Competitive Order
The Hidden History of British Antitrust Policies
, pp. 104 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×