Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T09:17:27.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Putting process on the map: why ecotones are important for preserving biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Thomas B. Smith
Affiliation:
Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California at Los Angeles, 1609 Hershey Hall, Box 951496, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496
Sassan Saatchi
Affiliation:
Radar Science Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Catherine Graham
Affiliation:
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Hans Slabbekoorn
Affiliation:
Behavioural Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Greg Spicer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, San Francisco, State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
Andrew Purvis
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
John L. Gittleman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Thomas Brooks
Affiliation:
Conservation International, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The mechanisms responsible for generating high rainforest diversity have been of keen interest to biologists for over a century (Moritz et al. 2000; Prance 1982; Wallace 1852). Numerous theories for rainforest diversification and speciation have been advanced, but few have been rigorously tested (Moritz et al. 2000). While the evolutionary processes that give rise to, and maintain, rainforest diversity are debated within the scientific community, the loss and degradation of rainforests continues at an alarming rate. Currently, conservative estimates of rainforest loss in some regions is estimated to approach 1% per year (Achard et al. 2002), and rates of human-induced forest degradation and fragmentation are likely to be many times higher (Wuethrich 2000). Given the current crisis, understanding the processes that generate and maintain rainforest diversity takes on added importance and urgency. Despite the importance of considering evolutionary and ecological process in conservation planning (Desmet et al. 2002; Smith et al. 1993), few rainforest conservation efforts consider landscape features, which harbour the evolutionary processes on which the generation of new biodiversity ultimately depends (Smith et al. 2001a).

The belief that refugial isolation is responsible for rainforest speciation (Haffer 1969, 1997) has, in particular, been an important driver of conservation prioritisation in many regions (Myers et al. 2000; Hamilton et al. 2001; Myers 2002). However, the conservation focus on refugia has serious shortcomings (Smith et al. 2001a; Spector 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, F., Eva, H. D.Stibig, H.-J.et al. 2002 Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aleixo, A. 2002. Molecular systematics and the role of the ‘varzea-terra-firma’ ecotone in the diversification of Xiphorhynchus woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae). Auk 119, 621–40Google Scholar
Alves-Gomes, J. A., Orti, G., Haygood, M., Heiligenberg, W. & Meyer, A. 1995 Phylogenetic analysis of the South American electric fishes (Order Gymnotiformes) and the evolution of their electrogenic system: a synthesis based on morphology, electrophysiology, and mitochondrial sequence data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12, 298–318Google Scholar
Anderson, M. E. & Conner, R. N. 1985 Northern cardinal song in three forest habitats in eastern Texas. Wilson Bulletin 97, 436–49Google Scholar
Baker, M. C. 1982 Vocal dialect recognition and population genetic consequences. American Zoologist 22, 561–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmford, A., Mace, G. M. & Ginsberg, J. R. 1998 The challenges to conservation in a changing world: putting processes on the map. In Conservation in a changing world (ed. , G. M. Mace, , A. Balmford & , J. R. Ginsberg). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Benkman, C. W. 1987 Crossbill foraging behavior, bill structure, and patterns of food profitability. Wilson Bulletin 93, 351–68Google Scholar
Bolnick, D. I. 2001 Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 410, 463–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, W. J., Midgley, G. F. 2000 A proposed CO2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Global Change Biology 6, 865–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, W. J., Midgley, G. F. & Woodward, F. I. 2003 The importance of low atmospheric CO2 and fire in promoting the spread of grasslands and savannas. Global Change Biology 9, 973–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, R. I. 1979 Adaptive morphology of song in Darwin's finches. Journal of Ornithology 120, 353–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, T., Balmford, A., Burgess, N.et al. 2001 Toward a blueprint for conservation in Africa. BioScience 51, 613–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. P., Dingle, H. & Klassen, S. P. 1997 Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution 51, 1182–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catchpole, C. K. 1987 Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2, 94–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, J. P. 1932 The birds of the Belgian Congo. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural HistoryGoogle Scholar
Colinvaux, P. A., Irion, G., Rasanen, M. E.et al. 2001 A paradigm to be discarded: Geological and paleoecological data falsify the HAFFER & PRANCE refuge hypothesis of Amazonian speciation. Amazoniana 16, 609–46Google Scholar
Cowling, R. M. & Pressey, R. L. 2001 Rapid plant diversification: Planning for an evolutionary future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5452–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Mace, G. M. & Wayne, R. K. 2000 Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 290–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauget, J. M. & Menaut, J. C. 1992 Evolution sur 20 ans de'une parcelle de savane boisée non protégée du feu dans la reserve de Lamto (Côte-d'Ivoire). CODEN/CNDLAR 47, 621–30Google Scholar
Defries, R. S., Hansen, M. C. & Townshend, J. R. G. 2000 Global continuous fields of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21, 1389–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, P. G., Cowling, R. M., Ellis, A. G. & Pressey, R. L. 2002 Integrating biosystematic data into conservation planning: perspectives from southern Africa's Succulent Karoo. Systematic Biology 51, 317–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2003 Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421, 259–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. V. & Beerli, P. 2000 Gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54, 1839–54Google ScholarPubMed
Endler, J. 1992 Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 139, 125–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1982 Pleistocene forest refuges: Fact or fancy. In Biological diversification in the tropics (ed. , G. T. Prance). New York: Columbia University Press
Felsenstein, J. 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrier, S. 2002 Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: Where to from here?Systematic Biology 51, 331–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldsa, 1994 Geographical patterns for relict and young birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation 3, 107–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. J. & Bernatchez, L. 2001 Adaptive evolutionary conservation: Towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Molecular Ecology 10, 2741–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funk, D. J. 1998 Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: Host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52, 1744–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gautier, L. 1989 Contact forêt-savane en Côte d'Ivoure central: evolution de la surface forestière de la reserve de Lamto (sud du V-Baoulé). Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 136, 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S., Li, H. & Vose, M. D. 2000 Patterns of parapatric speciation. Evolution 54, 1126–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, B. R. & Grant, P. R. 1989 Evolutionary Dynamics of a Natural Population: The Large Cactus Finch of the Galapagos. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Guillet, B., Achoundong, G.Happi, J. Y.et al. 2001 Agreement between floristic and soil organic carbon isotope (13C/12C, 14C) as indicators of forest invasion of savannas during the last century in Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17, 809–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffer, J. 1969 Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165, 131–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haffer, J. 1997 Alternative models of vertebrate speciation in Amazonia: An overview. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 451–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Taylor, D. & Howard, P. 2001 Hotspots in African forests as Quaternary refugia. In African Rain Forest Ecology and Conservation (ed. , W. Weber, , L. J. T. White & , A. Vedder), pp. 57–67. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Handford, P. 1981 Vegetational correlates of variation in the song of Zonotrichia capensis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8, 203–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happi, Y. 1997 Arbres contre graminées: la lente invasion de la savane par la foret au center-Cameroun. Unpublished thesis, Université de Paris-Sorbonne
Heuwinkel, H. 1982 Schalldruckpegel und Frequenzspektren der Gesänge von Acrocephalus arundinaceus, A. scirpeus, A. schoenobaenus und A. palustris und ihre Beziehung zur Biotopakustik. Ökologie der Vögel 4, 85–174Google Scholar
Hutchinson, M. F., Nix, H. A., McMahon, J. P. & Ord, K. D. 1996 The development of a topographic and climate database for Africa. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, NCGIA, Santa Barbara, CA
Keith, S., Urban, E. K. & Fry, C. H. 1992 The Birds of Africa, volume 4. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Klump, G. M. 1996 Bird communication in the noisy world. In Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds (ed. , D. E. Kroodsma & , E. H. Miller), pp. 321–38. New York: Cornell University Press
Kocher, T. D., Thomas, W. K., Meyer, A. 1989 Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 86, 6196–200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanave, C., Preparata, G., Saccone, C. & Serio, G. 1984 A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20, 86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebrun, J. 1960 Sur la richesse de la flore de divers territories africains. Academie Royale des Sciences d'Outre-Mer, Bulletin des Séances 6, 669–90Google Scholar
Losos, J. B., Jackman, T. R., Larson, A., Queiroz, K. & Rodriguez-Schettino, L. 1998 Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279, 2115–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losos, J. B., Warheit, K. B. & Schoener, T. W. 1997 Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards. Nature 387, 70–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, G. & Bernatchez, L. 1999 Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis): support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution 53, 1491–1505Google ScholarPubMed
Mace, G. M., Balmford, A. & Ginsberg, J. R. (eds) 1998 Conservation in a Changing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. 2001 MacClade, Version 4. Sunderland, MA: SinauerGoogle Scholar
Maley, J. 1996 The African rain forest – main characteristics of changes in vegetation and climate from the Upper Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 104B, 31–73Google Scholar
Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. 2000 Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. & O'Hara, R. J. 1986 The biogeographical evidence supporting the Pleistocene forest refuge hypothesis. Evolution 40, 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menaut, J. C., Gignoux, J., Prado, C. & Clobert, J. 1990 Tree community dynamics in a humid savanna of the Côte d'Ivoire: modelling the effect of fire and competition with grass and neighbours. Journal of Biogeography 17, 471–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, N. & Thomas, D. 1997 World Atlas of Desertification. London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Millington, A. C., Styles, P. J. & Critchley, R. W. 1992 Mapping forests and savannas in sub-Saharan Africa from advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR) imagery. In Nature and Dynamics of Forest-Savanna Boundaries (ed. , P. A. Furley, , J. Proctor & , J. A. Ratter), pp. 37–62. New York: Chapman and Hall
Moritz, C. 2002. Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51, 238–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, C., Patton, J. L., Schneider, C. J. & Smith, T. B. 2000 Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 533–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. 2002 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. & Knoll, A. H. 2001 The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5389–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., Fonseca, da G. & Kent, J. 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. O. 1998 Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority-setting. In Conservation in a Changing World (ed. , G. M. Mace, , A. Balmford & , J. R. Ginsberg), pp. 251–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Nyerges, A. E. & Green, G. M. 2002 The ethnography of landscapes: GIS and remote sensing in the study of forest change in West African Guinea savanna. American Anthropologist 102, 271–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, M. R. & Smith, T. B. 1998 Ecology and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 502–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, A. & Kornfield, I. 1996 An improved amplification and sequencing strategy for phylogenetic studies using the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene. Genome 39, 793–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimm, S. L., Ayres, M., Balmford, A.et al. 2001 Can we defy nature's end?Science 293, 2207–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podos, J. 1997 A performance constraint of the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51, 537–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prance, G. T. (ed.) 1982 Biological Diversification in the Tropics. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, J. K., Falush, D. & Stephens, M. 2002 Inference of population structure in recently admixed populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 71, 177Google Scholar
Reznick, D. N., Shaw, F. H., Rodd, F. H. & Shaw, R. G. 1997 Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275, 1934–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, R. R. & Hostert, E. E. 1993 Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years?Evolution 47, 1637–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, F., Oliver, J. L., Marin, A. & Medina, J. R. 1990 The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142, 485–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. J. & Brenowitz, E. A. 1985 The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist 126, 87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saatchi, S., Graham, C. & Smith, T. 2001 Using High-Definition Satellite Imagery to Assess the Loss of Ecotone Habitats in the Congo Basin. Central African Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE) final report, USAID
Schluter, D. 1988. The evolution of finch communities on islands and continents: Kenya vs. Galapagos. Ecological Monographs 58, 229–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, D. 1996 Ecological causes of speciation. American Naturalist 148, S40–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, D. 2000 The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C., Smith, T. B., Larison, B. & Moritz, C. 1999 A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: ecological gradients vs. rainforest refugia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94, 13869–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, C. J. & Moritz, C. 1999 Refugial isolation and evolution in Australia's wet tropics rainforest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B266, 191–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D., Foresta, H., Mariotti, A.et al. 1996 Present dynamics of the savanna-forest boundary in the Congolese Mayombe: a pedological, botanical and isotopic (13C and 14C) study. Oecologia 106, 516–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Searcy, W. A. & Yasukawa, K. 1996 Song and female choice. In Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds (ed. , D. E. Kroodsma & , E. H. Miller), pp. 454–73. New York: Cornell University Press
Sibley, C. G. & Ahlquist, J. E. 1990 Phylogeny and Classification of Birds: A Study in Molecular Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Simard, M., Saatchi, S. & Grandi, G. 2000 The use of decision tree and multiscale texture for classification of JERS-1 SAR data over tropical forest. IEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38, 2310–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H., Ellers, J. & Smith, T. B. 2002 Bird song and sound transmission: the benefits of reverberation. Condor 104, 564–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. 2002a Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B357, 493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. 2002b Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: An analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56, 1849–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. B. 1990 Natural selection on bill characters in the two bill morphs of the African finch Pyrenestes ostrinus. Evolution 44, 832–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. B., Bruford, M. W. & Wayne, R. K. 1993 The preservation of process: the missing element of conservation programs. Biodiversity Letters 1, 164–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Smith T. B., Calsbeek, R., Wayne, R. K., Holder, K. H. & Pires, D. (2005) Testing alternative mechanisms of evolutionary divergence in an African rainforest passerine bird. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 257–68Google Scholar
Smith, T. B., Kark, S.Schneider, C. J., Wayne, R. K. & Moritz, C. 2001a Biodiversity hotspots and beyond: the need for preserving environmental transitions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. B., Schneider, C. J. & Holder, K. 2001b Refugial isolation versus ecological gradients: Testing alternative mechanisms of evolutionary divergence in four rainforest vertebrates. Genetica (Dordrecht) 112–113, 383–98Google Scholar
Smith, T. B., Wayne, R. K., Girman, D. J. & Bruford, M. W. 1997 A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276, 1855–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. B., Wayne, R. K., Girman, D. J. & Bruford, M. W. 2005 Evaluating the divergence-with-gene-flow model in natural populations: The importance of ecotones in rainforest speciation. In Tropical Rain Forests: Past, Present and Future (ed. , E. Bermingham, , C. W. Dick & , C. Moritz), pp. 148–65. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Spector, S. 2002 Biogeographic crossroads as priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 16, 1480–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P. & Kinnison, M. T. 2003 Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2002 PAUP 4.0. (3.0s ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Tavare, D. 1986 Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures in Mathematics and the Life Sciences 17, 57–86Google Scholar
Via, S. 2002 The ecological genetics of speciation. American Naturalist 159, S1–S7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, A. R. 1852 On the monkeys of the Amazon. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 20, 107–10Google Scholar
White, L. J. T. 2001 Forest-savanna dynamics and the origins of maintenance forest in central Gabon. In African Rain Forest Ecology and Conservation (ed. , W. Weber, , L. J. T. White & , A. Vedder), pp. 165–82. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Wiley, R. H. & Richards, D. G. 1982 Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In Acoustic Communication in Birds (ed. , D. E. Kroodsma & , E. H. Miller), pp. 131–81. New York: Academic Press
Wuethrich, B. 2000 Conservation biology: Combined insults spell trouble for rainforests. Science 289, 35–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Putting process on the map: why ecotones are important for preserving biodiversity
    • By Thomas B. Smith, Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California at Los Angeles, 1609 Hershey Hall, Box 951496, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496, Sassan Saatchi, Radar Science Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Catherine Graham, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Hans Slabbekoorn, Behavioural Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, Greg Spicer, Department of Biology, San Francisco, State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Putting process on the map: why ecotones are important for preserving biodiversity
    • By Thomas B. Smith, Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California at Los Angeles, 1609 Hershey Hall, Box 951496, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496, Sassan Saatchi, Radar Science Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Catherine Graham, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Hans Slabbekoorn, Behavioural Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, Greg Spicer, Department of Biology, San Francisco, State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Putting process on the map: why ecotones are important for preserving biodiversity
    • By Thomas B. Smith, Center for Tropical Research, Institute of the Environment, University of California at Los Angeles, 1609 Hershey Hall, Box 951496, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1496, Sassan Saatchi, Radar Science Section, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Catherine Graham, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Hans Slabbekoorn, Behavioural Biology, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, Greg Spicer, Department of Biology, San Francisco, State University, 1600 Holloway, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.008
Available formats
×