Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:32:08.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chap. 19 - LONG-LASTING FILLERS: HOW STRUCTURE AFFECTS FUNCTION

from PART THREE - FILLERS AND NEUROTOXINS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Sorin Eremia
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Whatever substance is injected within human tissues, it will start a series of reactions that must be known. These reactions are part of the normal healing process, with the aim of removing or isolating the foreign body from the host tissue. They follow three phases: recognition of the foreign body, removal or isolation, and a final healing phase. But these reactions can be either reduced or enhanced by the structure of the injected filler. Therefore it seems important to well understand these mechanisms to choose, if not the best, then the least harmful product available.

FOREIGN BODY REACTION: THE INFLAMMATORY PROCESS

Phase 1: The Foreign Body Must Be Identified

Identification is the role of the monocytes from the bloodstream, activated into macrophages by factors released through the wound, even a minimal puncture, by platelets coming into contact with the extracellular matrix (ECM).

Adhesion

Macrophages must adhere to the foreign body. This adhesion is the most important aspect of the cellular interaction. It is mediated by adsorption, the deposition of glycoproteins from the ECM and/or plasma on the surface of the foreign body. The more the proteins cover the surface, the more cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation will be efficient.

Recognition

These deposited proteins start a specific recognition by monocyte/macrophage surface cell receptors. There is also a nonspecific interaction between cell surface molecules (oligosaccharides), the adsorbed proteins, and the implant surface.

Phase 2: The Foreign Body Must Be Removed

Removal is accomplished through phagocytosis from:

  1. monocytes/macrophages

  2. neutrophils/polymorphonuclears

  3. keratinocytes, if the implant is superficial (papillary dermis).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nicolau, PJ. Long lasting and permanent fillers: biomaterial influence over host tissue response. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007:119;2271–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morhenn, VB, Lemperle, G, Gallo, RL. Phagocytosis of different particulate dermal filler substances by human macrophages and skin cells. Dermatol. Surg. 2002;28:484–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Misiek, DJ, Kent, JN, Carr, RF. Soft tissue response to hydroxylapatite particles of different shapes. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1984;42:150–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelb, H, Schumacher, HR, Cukler, J, et al. In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology and surface area. J. Orthop. Res. 1994;12:83–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, JP, Yaremchuck, MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1997;100:1336–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saylan, Z. Facial fillers and their complications. Aesthetic Surg. J. 2003;23:221–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smetana, KJ. Cell biology of hydrogels. Biomaterials 1993;14:1046–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppley, BL, Summerlin, D-J, Prevel, CD, et al. Effects of positively charged biomaterial for dermal and subcutaneous augmentation. Aesthtic Plast. Surg. 1994;18:413–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D-J, Ohsaki, K, Ii, P-C, et al. Thickness of fibrous capsule after implantation of hydroxyapatite in subcutaneous tissue in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.. 1999;45:322–6.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolau, PJ. Long lasting and permanent fillers: biomaterial influence over host tissue response. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007:119;2271–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morhenn, VB, Lemperle, G, Gallo, RL. Phagocytosis of different particulate dermal filler substances by human macrophages and skin cells. Dermatol. Surg. 2002;28:484–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Misiek, DJ, Kent, JN, Carr, RF. Soft tissue response to hydroxylapatite particles of different shapes. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 1984;42:150–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelb, H, Schumacher, HR, Cukler, J, et al. In vivo inflammatory response to polymethylmethacrylate particulate debris: effect of size, morphology and surface area. J. Orthop. Res. 1994;12:83–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, JP, Yaremchuck, MJ. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1997;100:1336–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saylan, Z. Facial fillers and their complications. Aesthetic Surg. J. 2003;23:221–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smetana, KJ. Cell biology of hydrogels. Biomaterials 1993;14:1046–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppley, BL, Summerlin, D-J, Prevel, CD, et al. Effects of positively charged biomaterial for dermal and subcutaneous augmentation. Aesthtic Plast. Surg. 1994;18:413–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D-J, Ohsaki, K, Ii, P-C, et al. Thickness of fibrous capsule after implantation of hydroxyapatite in subcutaneous tissue in rats. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.. 1999;45:322–6.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×