Ackerman, B. ‘The Living Constitution’ (2007) 120 Harvard Law Review1737Google Scholar

Ackerman, B. ‘Discovering the Constitution’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, B.We the People: Foundations (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, T. A. ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’ (1987) 96 Yale Law Journal943CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, L. ‘Introduction’ in Alexander, L. (ed) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Alexy, R. ‘Balancing, constitutional review, and representation’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, R. ‘Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, R. ‘On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, R.A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Allan, T. R. S.Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Amar, A. R. ‘The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthurs, H. ‘Constitutional Courage’ (2003) 49 McGill Law Journal1Google Scholar

Audi, R. ‘The Place of Religious Argument in a Free and Democratic Society’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review677Google Scholar

Barak, A.Purposive Interpretation in Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, R. E. ‘An Originalism for Nonoriginalists’ (1999) 45 Loyola Law Review611Google Scholar

Barnett, R. E. ‘Underlying Principles’ (2007) 24 Constitutional Commentary405Google Scholar

Barnett, R. E.Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Beatty, D. M.The Ultimate Rule of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beetham, D.The Legitimation of Power (London: MacMillan Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, R.Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, I. ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist?’ in Hardy, H. and Hausheer, R. (eds) Isaiah Berlin: The Proper Study of Mankind. An Anthology of Essays (London: Chatto & Windus, 1997)Google Scholar

Berlin, I. ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Hardy, H. (ed) Liberty (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickel, A.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Black, H. L.Constitutional Faith (New York: Knopf, 1968)Google Scholar

Botterell, A. M. ‘In Defence of Infringement’ (2008) 27 Law and Philosophy269CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugger, W. ‘May Government Ever Use Torture? Two Responses from German Law’ (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, R. (ed). Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)

Constant, B. ‘The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns’ in Fontana, B. (ed) Benjamin Constant: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. ‘It is absurd to calculate human rights according to a cost-benefit analysis’ Guardian (London 24 May 2006)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R.Taking Rights Seriously (new impression, London: Duckworth, 2000)Google Scholar

Ellis, E. (ed). The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)

Ely, J. H. ‘Flag Desecration: A Case Study in the Roles of Categorization and Balancing in First Amendment Analysis’ (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ely, J. H.Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Fallon, Jr, R. H. ‘The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’ (2008) 121 Harvard Law Review1693Google Scholar

Feinberg, J. ‘Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’ (1978) 7 Philosophy and Public Affairs93Google ScholarPubMed

Finnis, J. ‘A Bill of Rights for Britain? The Moral of Contemporary Jurisprudence’ (1985) 71 Proceedings of the British Academy303Google Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Abortion, Natural Law, and Public Reason’ in George, R. P and Wolfe, C. (eds) Natural Law and Public Reason (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Commensuration and Public Reason’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Natural Law and Legal Reasoning’ in George, R. P (ed) Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (New York: Clarendon Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Natural Law and the Ethics of Discourse’ (1999) 12 Ratio Juris354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘On “Public Reason”’ (2007) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1/2007

Finnis, J. ‘On “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”’ (1985) 30 American Journal of Jurisprudence21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Revolutions and Continuity of Law’ in Simpson, A. W. B (ed) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973)Google Scholar

Finnis, J. ‘Public Reason, Abortion, and Cloning’ (1998) 32 Valparaiso University Law Review361Google ScholarPubMed

Finnis, J. ‘Some Professorial Fallacies About Rights’ (1971–1972) 4 Adelaide Law Review377Google Scholar

Finnis, J.Fundamentals of Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)Google Scholar

Finnis, J.Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar

Finnis, J.O Racji Publicznej [On ‘Public Reason’] (Warsaw: Ius et Lex, 2005)Google Scholar

Fordham, M. and Mare, T.. ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds) Understanding Human Rights Principles (Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar

Frantz, L. B. ‘The First Amendment in the Balance’ (1962) 71 Yale Law Journal1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, L. L.The Morality of Law (revd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969)Google Scholar

Gardbaum, S. ‘Limiting Constitutional Rights’ (2007) 54 UCLA Law Review789Google Scholar

Gardner, J. ‘Some types of law’ in Edlin, D. E. (ed) Common Law Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Garibaldi, O. M. ‘General Limitations on Human Rights: The Principle of Legality’ (1976) 17 Harvard International Law Journal503Google Scholar

Gewirth, A. ‘Are There Any Absolute Rights?’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Glendon, M. A.Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: The Free Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J.The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Greer, S. ‘“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal412CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greer, S. ‘Constitutionalizing Adjudication under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greer, S.The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greer, S.The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999)Google Scholar

Griffith, J. A. G. ‘The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 Modern Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.. Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Habermas, J. ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ (2001) 29 Political Theory766CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. ‘Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism’ (1995) 92 Journal of Philosophy109Google Scholar

Habermas, J. ‘Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State’ in Gutmann, A (ed) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Hiebert, J. L.Limiting Rights: The Dilemma of Judicial Review (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Hogg, P. W. ‘Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court’ in Goldsworthy, J. (ed) Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Hogg, P. W. ‘Section 1 Revisited’ (1991–1992) 1 National Journal of Constitutional Law1Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W. N.Fundamental Legal Conceptions As Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919)Google Scholar

Holmes, S.Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Huscroft, G. ‘Is the defeat of health warnings a victory for human rights? The Attorney-General and pre-legislative scrutiny for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights’ (2003) 14 Public Law Review109Google Scholar

Jackson, V. C. ‘Ambivalent Resistance and Comparative Constitutionalism: Opening up the Conversation on “Proportionality,” Rights and Federalism’ (1999) 1 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law583Google Scholar

Jackson, V. C. ‘Being Proportional About Proportionality’ (2004) 21 Constitutional Commentary803Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G. ‘The “Limitation Clauses” of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mestral, A. L. C. and others (eds) The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Cowansville, Quebec: Yvon Blais, 1986)Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, G. J. ‘An unconstitutional constitution? A comparative perspective’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds). Understanding Human Rights Principles (Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001)

Kavanagh, A. ‘Original Intention, Enacted Text, and Constitutional Interpretation’ (2002) 47 American Journal of Jurisprudence255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavanagh, A. ‘The Idea of a Living Constitution’ (2003) 16 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kavanagh, A.Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Kommers, D. P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd edn, London: Duke University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Kumm, M. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’ in Pavlakos, G. (ed) Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar

Kumm, M. ‘Who is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law’ (2006) 7 German Law Journal341Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W.Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Letsas, G.A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)

Lukes, S.‘Comparing the Incomparable: Trade-offs and Sacrifices’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Macedo, S. ‘In Defence of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?’ in George, R. P., and Wolfe, C.(eds) Natural Law and Public Reason (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Marmor, A. ‘Should we Value Legislative Integrity?’ in Bauman, R. W. and Kahana, T. (eds) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, A. ‘The First Amendment is an Absolute’ [1961] Supreme Court Review 245

Meyerson, D.Rights Limited: Freedom of Expression, Religion, and the South African Constitution (Kenwyn: Juta, 1997)Google Scholar

Michelman, F. I. ‘Human Rights and the Limits of Constitutional Theory’ (2000) 13 Ratio Juris63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, B. W. ‘Justification and Rights Limitation’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Nozick, R.Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974)Google Scholar

Oberdiek, J. ‘Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and its Place in the Theory of Rights’ (2004) 23 Law and Philosophy325Google Scholar

Oberdiek, J. ‘Specifying Rights Out of Necessity’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oberdiek, J. ‘What's Wrong with Infringements (Insofar as Infringements are Not Wrong): A Reply’ (2008) 27 Law and Philosophy293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porat, I. ‘The Dual Model of Balancing: A Model for the Proper Scope of Balancing in Constitutional Law’ (2006) 27 Cardozo Law Review1393Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. ‘Review Article: Constitutional Law From a Pragmatic Perspective’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal299CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J. ‘Reply to Habermas’ (1995) 92 Journal of Philosophy132Google Scholar

Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

Rawls, J.Political Liberalism (expanded edn., New York: Columbia University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Raz, J. ‘On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’ in Alexander, L (ed) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Raz, J.Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (New York: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Raz, J.Practical Reason and Norms (new edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Raz, J.The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (New York: Clarendon Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, J.The Morality of Freedom (New York: Clarendon Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reich, C. A. ‘Mr Justice Black and the Living Constitution’ (1963) 76 Harvard Law Review673CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivers, J. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubenfeld, J.Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadurski, W.Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005)Google Scholar

Sajó, A.Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism (Budapest: Central European University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Schauer, F. ‘Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and the United States: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture’ in Nolte, G. (ed) European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Schauer, F. ‘Speech and “Speech”––Obscenity and “Obscenity”: An Exercise in the Interpretation of Constitutional Language’ (1979) 67 Georgetown Law Journal899Google Scholar

Schmitt, C.Legality and Legitimacy (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitt, C.Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Schmitt, C.The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Shafer-Landau, R. ‘Specifying Absolute Rights’ (1995) 37 Arizona Law Review209Google Scholar

Smith, S. D. ‘What Does Constitutional Interpretation Interpret?’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Solum, L. B. ‘Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review729Google Scholar

Solum, L. B. ‘On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’ (1987) 54 University of Chicago Law Review462CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sottiaux, S.Terrorism and the Limitation of Rights: The ECHR and the US Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. ‘Incommensurability and Kinds of Valuation: Some Applications in Law’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements’ (1995) 108 Harvard Law Review1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, C. R.Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Sweet, A. S. and Mathews, J.. ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law27Google Scholar

Thayer, J. B. ‘The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’ (1893) 7 Harvard Law Review129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thayer, JB.John Marshall (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1901)Google Scholar

Thomson, J. J. ‘Some Ruminations on Rights’ in Parent, W (ed) Rights, Restitution, and Risk (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Thomson, JJ.The Realm of Rights (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Tully, J. ‘Introduction’ in Gagnon, A.-G. and Tully, J. (eds) Multinational Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Tully, J. ‘The agonic freedom of citizens’ (1999) 28 Economy and Society161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, J. ‘The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, J.Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, J.The Unattained Yet Attainable Democracy: Canada and Quebec Face the New Century (The Desjardins Lecture, McGill University, 23 March 2000)Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘Do Judges Reason Morally?’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘Introduction’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘Principles of Legislation’ in Bauman, R. W. and Kahana, T. (eds). The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review817Google Scholar

Waldron, J. ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J.Law and Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J.Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Waldron, J.The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waluchow, W. J.A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Walzer, M.Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983)Google Scholar

Whittington, K. E. ‘The New Originalism’ (2004) 2 Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy599Google Scholar

Whittington, K. E.Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Whittington, K. E.Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. ‘Incommensurability: Four Proposals’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L.Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H. (eds). Zettel (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967)Google Scholar

Woolman, S. ‘Limitation’ in Chaskalson, M. et al (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa (1st edn, Cape Town: Juta, 1996)Google Scholar

Yowell, P. ‘A Critical Examination of Dworkin's Theory of Rights’ (2007) 52 American Journal of Jurisprudence93CrossRefGoogle Scholar