Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:58:45.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The use of foreign asylum jurisprudence in the German administrative courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Guy S. Goodwin-Gill
Affiliation:
All Souls College, Oxford
Hélène Lambert
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access

Summary

Introduction

German jurisprudence is marked by a long tradition of protection for ­refugees. The 1949 Constitution (or Basic Law) for the Federal Republic of Germany, known as the Grundgesetz (hereafter GG), adopted a fundamental right to asylum in Article 16, paragraph 2, section 2. Its short wording states: ‘Persons persecuted on political grounds enjoy the right of asylum.’ In 1952 Germany ratified the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950. The Convention was enacted by the National Transformation Act of 7 August 1952. In 1953 Germany ratified the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 (hereafter Refugee Convention). The treaty was enacted by the National Transformation Act of 24 December 1953.

Only nine months prior to the entry into force of the above ­legislation, the first statutory order concerning the recognition of refugee ­status in accordance with the Refugee Convention had been ­enacted. The GG, however, did not incorporate a recognition procedure for refugees wanting to apply for the right to asylum. The procedure as such was ­overseen by civil servants of the Federal Ministry of the Interior. In 1965 this statutory order was replaced with the first Aliens Act. The new legislation included a recognition procedure not only for refugees in the sense of the Refugee Convention but also for ‘other foreigners’. The Refugee Convention had previously only been applicable to those whose well-founded fear of persecution arose by reason of events occurring before 1 January 1951.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Limits of Transnational Law
Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union
, pp. 57 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×