Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:00:28.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - ‘Thou shalt not judge’ … Spanish judicial decision-making in asylum and the role of judges in interpreting the law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Guy S. Goodwin-Gill
Affiliation:
All Souls College, Oxford
Hélène Lambert
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Spain has traditionally been a country of emigration. However, during the mid 1980s, a regular trend of increasing immigration emerged that over time has modified the demographic composition of the country. The number of non-nationals living in Spain has been rising quickly and at 1 January 2009 more than five and a half million foreigners (5,598,691 people) were registered as living in Spain. Of them, 40.18 per cent had received a residence card under European Community (EC) law and 39.73 per cent under the general immigration regime. Accordingly, 20.09 per cent of the foreigners registered in the country at that time were not lawfully resident (although this figure includes lawfully present individuals whose claims were still pending). Given that the Spanish census at 1 January 2009 recorded a population of more than forty-six and a half million people, about 12 per cent of the Spanish population at that time were non-nationals. Since then the figure has continued to rise and the number of non-nationals lawfully resident in the country increased to 4,495,349 foreigners lawfully resident at 31 December 2009.

These figures are relevant, not only as they reveal a clear immigration trend, but also in so far as they include individuals whose grounds for residence arise from a protection claim other than refugee status under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention). Therefore, individuals granted subsidiary protection or other protection-related statuses are included in these statistics.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Limits of Transnational Law
Refugee Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial Dialogue in the European Union
, pp. 107 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×