4 - Power
Framing sexual violence in young people's everyday encounters
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2011
Summary
A number of social and cultural unwritten rules regarding sex, love and consent influence young people's capacity to negotiate their love/sex relationships. While these rules can situate women, particularly, in positions that limit their ability to actively negotiate love/sex relationships, they do not necessarily always benefit men either, as they similarly limit men's ability to express alternative masculinities. This chapter considers how we can account for the persistence of young women's experiences of pressured and unwanted sex by examining the sociocultural understandings of gender, love, sex and consent. At issue is how we can understand both the extent to which young people's experiences across the sexual violence continuum are influenced by these broader social and cultural understandings, and the capacity for young people to re-write the rules. Drawing on the sociological theory of Pierre Bourdieu and engaging with postmodern feminist and gender theorists, in this chapter I further develop a framework for conceptualising sexual violence in light of the persistence of gender inequalities and power imbalances in the negotiation of consent while at the same time acknowledging the important ways that young people can and do exercise agency to re-negotiate ethical and consensual sex. First, however, I discuss some of the views and experiences that young people have shared with me about pressure, coercion and their sexual encounters.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sex, Power and ConsentYouth Culture and the Unwritten Rules, pp. 55 - 85Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, Sex, culture and justice: The limits of choice (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
, Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000).Google Scholar
, ‘The continuum of sexual violence’. In & (eds) Women, violence and social control (London: Macmillan, 1987) p. 54Google Scholar
‘Does it matter what you call it? The relationship between labeling unwanted sexual experiences and distress’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 72, no. 6 (2004) pp. 1090–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘But was it wanted? Young women's first voluntary sexual intercourse’, Journal of Family Issues, vol. 26, no. 8 (2005) pp. 1082–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, I never called it rape: The MS report on recognizing, fighting and surviving date and acquaintance rape (New York: Harper and Row, 1988)Google Scholar
, ‘When “no” becomes “yes”: Why girls and women consent to unwanted sex’, Applied & Preventive Psychology, vol. 6 (1997) p. 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Incidence and correlates of unwanted sex in relationships of middle and late adolescent women’, Archives Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, vol. 160, no. 6 (2006) pp. 591–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
& , ‘“If I really loved him enough, he would be okay”: Women's accounts of male partner violence’, Violence Against Women, vol. 6, no. 6 (2000) pp. 558–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , ‘Reformulating sexual script theory: Developing a discursive psychology of sexual negotiation’, Theory & Psychology, vol. 11, no. 2 (2001) pp. 209–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , ‘Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal’, Discourse & Society, vol. 10, no. 3 (1999) pp. 293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Happily never after: Young women's stories of abuse in heterosexual love relationships’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 11, no. 3 (2001) pp. 305–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Girls want sex, boys want love: Resisting dominant discourses of (hetero)sexuality’, Sexualities, vol. 6, no. 2 (2003) pp. 215–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , ‘Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women's talk about heterosexuality’, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 42 (2003) pp. 113–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘Gender difference and the production of subjectivity’ In et al. (eds) Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (London: Sage, 1984)Google Scholar
et al., The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power, 2nd edn (London: Tufnell Press, 2004)Google Scholar
, Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
& , ‘Where “angels” and “wusses” fear to tread: Sexual coercion in adolescent dating relationships’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 37, no. 1 (2001) pp. 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 58, no. 1 (1988) pp. 29–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , ‘Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 76, no. 3 (2006) pp. 297–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Ethical erotics: Reconceptualising anti-rape education’, Sexualities, vol. 8, no. 4 (2005) pp. 465–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Prosecutorial decisions in adult sexual assault cases: An Australian study (Canberra: Office of the Status of Women, 2004)Google Scholar
, Just ‘keeping the peace’, Issues No. 1 (Melbourne: Institute of Family Studies, Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2004)Google Scholar
, & , Sexual violence offenders: prevention and intervention approaches, Issues No. 54 (Melbourne: Institute of Family Studies, Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2006)Google Scholar
, ‘Going too far? Sex, sin and social policy’, Social Forces, vol. 84, no. 2 (2005) pp. 1207–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , ‘Talk about sexual miscommunication’, Women's Studies International Forum, vol. 20, no. 4 (1997) pp. 517–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. (New York: Free Press, 2005)Google Scholar
, ‘VII. Discourses of desire as governmentality: Young women, sexuality and the significance of safe spaces’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1 (2005) pp. 39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Reflexivity: Freedom or habit of gender?’ Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 20, no. 6 (2003) pp. 21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, & , ‘Doing it differently: Young women managing heterosexuality in Australia, Finland and Canada’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 3, no. 4 (2000) pp. 373–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & , The rural mural: Sexuality and diversity in rural youth (Melbourne: National Centre in HIV Social Research, Program in Youth/General Population Centre for the Study of Sexually Transmissible Diseases. Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University, 1996)Google Scholar
, ‘Class, status, party’. In & (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1914/1991) p. 187Google Scholar
& , ‘Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept’, Gender & Society, vol. 19, no. 6 (2005) p. 832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Beyond the birds and the bees: Constituting a discourse of erotics in sexuality education’, Gender and Education, vol. 16, no. 2 (2004) pp. 151–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘“Getting off” and “Going out”: Young people's conceptions of (hetero)sexual relationships’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 6, no. 6 (2004) pp 463–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘“Neverending love” and “blowing your load”: The meanings of sex to rural youth’, Sexualities, vol. 2, no. 1 (1999) pp. 69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Encyclopedia of feminist theories (London: Routledge, 2000)
, Feminism after postmodernism: Theorising through practice (London: Routledge, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Introduction: Feminism, Bourdieu and after’, Sociological Review, vol. 52, no. 2 (2004) pp. 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Encyclopedia of feminist theories (London: Routledge, 2000)
, Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Heterosexuality and feminist theory’. In (ed.) Theorising heterosexuality: Telling it straight, (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996) pp. 21–38Google Scholar
, Anticlimax: A feminist perspective on the sexual revolution (London: Women's Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, ‘Heterosexuality and the desire for gender’. In (ed.) Theorising heterosexuality: Telling it straight (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996) pp. 75–90Google Scholar
, ‘Sexuality and representation’. In et al. (eds) Australian feminism: A companion (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998) pp. 286–95Google Scholar
, ‘Feminist politics and the heterosexual predicament’. In (ed.) New sexual agendas (Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1997) pp. 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘“What you want, or what you get?” Young women talking about the gap between desired and lived heterosexual relationships in the 21st century’, Women's Studies International Forum, vol. 30 (2007) pp. 175–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence’, Signs, vol. 5 (1980) pp. 631–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Theorising heterosexuality: Telling it straight (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
, ‘Introduction: Thinking straight’. In (ed.) Thinking straight: The power, the promise and the paradox of heterosexuality (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
, ‘Truth and power’. In (ed.) Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Power (London: Penguin, 1976/2000) pp. 120Google Scholar
, ‘Power trouble: Performativity as critical theory’, Constellations, vol. 5, no. 4 (1998) pp. 456–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Technologies of the self’. In (ed.) Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Ethics (London: Penguin, 1982/2000) p. 223–52Google Scholar
, ‘The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom’. In (ed.) Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Ethics (London: Penguin, 1984/2000) pp. 281–302Google Scholar
, ‘Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture’, Sociological Theory, vol. 12, no. 1 (1994) pp. 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The subject and power’. In (ed.) Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Power (London: Penguin, 1982/2000), p. 342Google Scholar
, ‘Sexual ethics and violence prevention’, Social & Legal Studies, vol. 12, no. 2 (2003) pp. 199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy’, Political Theory, vol. 27, no. 1 (1999) pp. 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The passion and the pleasure: Foucault's art of not being oneself’, Theory Culture and Society, vol. 20, no. 2 (2003) pp. 119–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Masculine domination, radical feminism and change’, Feminist Theory, vol. 6, no. 3 (2005) pp. 325–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 16, no. 1 (1999) pp. 95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(trans. R Hurley), The will to knowledge: The history of sexuality (London: Penguin, 1976/1998)Google Scholar
et al., Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (London: Methuen, 1984) p. 115Google Scholar
, ‘Strange tempest: Agency, poststructuralism, and the shape of feminist politics to come’, International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies, vol. 6, no. 1/2 (2001) pp. 123–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Feminism and empowerment: A critical reading of Foucault’, Feminist Studies, vol. 20, no. 2 (1994) pp. 223–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)Google Scholar
, & , ‘The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme’, Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 20, no. 2 (2003) pp. 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
& , ‘Bourdieu, subcultural capital and risky girlhood’, Theory and research in education, vol. 3, no. 1 (2005) pp. 47–61Google Scholar
, ‘Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu’. In (ed.) Reading Bourdieu on society and culture (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000)Google Scholar
, ‘Feminists re-reading Bourdieu: Old debates and new questions about gender habitus and gender change’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 3, no. 1 (2005) pp. 11–30Google Scholar
, ‘Appropriating Bourdieu: Feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu's sociology of culture’, New Literary History, vol. 22, no. 4 (2006) pp. 1017–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Context and background: Pierre Bourdieu's analysis of class, gender and sexuality’, Sociological Review, vol. 52, s2 (2004) pp. 19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity?’ Sociology, vol. 40, no. 3 (2006) pp. 511–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, An invitation to reflexive sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), p. 167Google Scholar
, Sex, culture and justice: The limits of choice (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
, ‘Class, culture and the “predicaments of masculine domination”: Encountering Pierre Bourdieu’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 25, no. 4 (2004) pp. 489–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992) p. 2Google Scholar
, Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar
, ‘Post-feminism and popular culture’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 4, no. 3 (2004) pp. 255–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ideology of choice. Overstating and hiding injustice in the lives of young women: Findings from a study in North Queensland, Australia’, Women's Studies International Forum, vol. 31 (2008) pp. 53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar