Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T07:01:09.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Reconfigurable architectures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Tauno Vähä-Heikkilä
Affiliation:
Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus (VTT)
Stepan Lucyszyn
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The focus of R&D activities in RF microsystems has been mostly at component and circuit levels. Component and circuit performances have tried to improve those of their semiconductor counterparts. This work has been successful in many cases. From the systems level point of view, RF MEMS technology offers improvements in tuning range, power linearity, insertion loss and scalability compared with other technologies. Tuning range relates to high-capacitance ratio switches, rather than continuous tuneability; a limitation that still exists with RF MEMS varactors. However, systems level improvements and new architectures can take full advantage of RF MEMS technology. Proposals for new architectures are continually being presented, but limited demonstrations have been reported to date.

For many applications, more and new functionalities are being sought by radio front-ends, to meet size and cost downscaling pressures. For example, several radios can be integrated into handsets and software-defined radio (SDR) concepts have been implemented in several applications. RF MEMS technology can be one of the enabling technologies to allow these new concepts to be implemented. The use of RF MEMS technology can offer the largest benefits when there are no directly competing technologies and in-high performance applications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advanced RF MEMS , pp. 343 - 358
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vähä-Heikkilä, T., “MEMS tuning and matching circuits, and millimeter wave on-wafer measurements”, Ph.D. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 2006 .pdf
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Varis, J., Tuovinen, J. and Rebeiz, G. M., “Reconfigurable RF MEMS impedance tuners and matching networks”, European Microwave Conference, Proceedings of Workshop on Smart MEMS for RF and Millimeter Wave Communications, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Oct. 2004Google Scholar
Malmqvist, R., Gustafsson, A., Nilsson, T., Samuelsson, C., Ferrer, I., Vähä-Heikkilä, T. and Erickson, R., “RF MEMS and GaAs based reconfigurable RF front-end components for wide-band multi-functional phased arrays”, Proceedings of the 36th European Microwave Conference, Manchester, UK, pp. 1798–801, 2006Google Scholar
Malmqvist, R., Alfredsson, M., Gustafsson, A. and Ouacha, A., “A 7.9–9.7GHz on-chip radar receiver front-end for future adaptive X-band smart skin array antennas”, IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Digest, Seattle, WA, pp. 1431–4, Jun. 2002Google Scholar
Gammel, P., Fisher, G. and Bouchaud, J., “RF MEMS and NEMS technology, devices and applications”, Bell Labs Tech. J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 29–59, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, G., “Power MEMS for base stations”, Proceedings of the 2nd RF-MEMS Workshop on Industry Application, RF power MEMS: Reliability and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 2007Google Scholar
Van, K. Caekenberghe, Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Rebeiz, G. M. and Sarabandi, K., “Ka-Band MEMS TTD passive electronically-scanned array (ESA)”, Proceedings of the IEEE AP-S International Symposium, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 513–16, Jul. 2006Google Scholar
Malmqvist, R., Samuelsson, C., Gustafsson, A., Boman, T., Ericsson, R., Björklund, S., Rantakari, P. and Vähä-Heikkilä, T., “On the use of MEMS phase shifters in a low-cost Ka-Band multifunctional ESA on a small UAV”, Proceedings of the 2007 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 969–72, Dec. 2007Google Scholar
Ziegler, V., “High-power handling RF-MEMS in aeronautical applications”, Proceedings of the 2nd RF-MEMS Workshop on Industry Application:, RF power MEMS: Reliability and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, Jun. 2007Google Scholar
Radant MEMS Inc., “World's first demonstration of microelectromechanical systems based X-band radar”, , Apr. 2006
Schönlinner, B., Abbaspour-Tamijani, A., Kempel, L. C. and Rebeiz, G. M., “Switchable low-loss RF MEMS Ka-band frequency-selective surface”, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2474–81, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbaspour-Tamijani, A., “Novel components for integrated millimeter-wave front-ends”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, 2004
Van Caekenberghe, K. and Vähä-Heikkilä, T., “An analog RF MEMS slotline true-time-delay phase shifter”, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2151–9, Sep. 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaia, P., Luxey, C., Jacquemod, G., Staraj, R., Kossiavas, G., Dussopt, L., Vacherand, F. and Billard, C., “MEMS based reconfigurable antennas”, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Ajaccio, France, vol. 1, pp. 175–9, 2004Google Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T. and Rantakari, P., “A metal-to-metal contact RF MEMS switch towards handsets applications”, SPIE Proceedings 6589, Proceedings of the Microtechnologies for the New Millennium Conference, Maspalomas, Spain, May 2007Google Scholar
J.-Park, H., Y.-Kim, D., Y.-Park, H., H.-Lee, C., Kwon, H., H.-Nam, J., and Bu, J.-U., “Tuneable planar inverted-F antenna using RF MEMS switch for the reduction of human hand effect”, Proceedings of MEMS 2007, Kobe, Japan, pp. 163–6, Jan. 2007Google Scholar
Boyle, K. R. and Steeneken, P. G., “A five-band reconfigurable PIFA for mobile phones”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3300–9, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Bezooijen, A., de Jongh, M., Chanlo, C., Ruijs, L., Jan ten Dolle, H., Lok, P., van Straten, F., Sneep, J., Mahmoudi, R. and van Roermund, A. H. M., “RF-MEMS based adaptive antenna matching module”, IEEE RF Integrated Circuits Symp. Digest, Honolulu, HI, pp. 573–6, 2007Google Scholar
Stulemeijer, J., “RF-MEMS switched capacitor device for mobile applications”, Proceedings of the European R&D Achievements in RF-MEMS and RF-Microsystems, Workshop in the 37th European Microwave Conference, Munich, Germany, Oct. 2007Google Scholar
Yang, S., Pan, H. K., Fathyl, A. E., El-Ghazaly, S. and Nair, V. K., “A novel reconfigurable mini-maze antenna for multi-service wireless universal receiver using RF MEMS”, IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Digest, San Francisco, CA, pp. 182–5, 2004Google Scholar
Kantanen, M., Lahdes, M., Vähä-Heikkilä, T. and Tuovinen, J., “A wideband automated measurement system for on-wafer noise parameter measurements at 50–75 GHz”, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1489–95, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Lahdes, M., Kantanen, M. and Tuovinen, J., “On-wafer noise parameter measurements at W-band”, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1621–8, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T. and Rebeiz, G. M., “A 4–18 GHz reconfigurable RF MEMS matching network for power amplifier applications”, Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 356–72, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Van, K. Caekenberghe, Varis, J., Tuovinen, J. and G.Rebeiz, M., “RF MEMS impedance tuners for 6–24 GHz applications”, Int. J. RF Microw. Comp. Aided Eng., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 265–78, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Varis, J., Tuovinen, J. and G.Rebeiz, M., “A 20–50 GHz RF MEMS single-stub impedance tuner”, IEEE Microw. Compon. Lett., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 205–7, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Varis, J., Tuovinen, J. and Rebeiz, G. M., “A V-band single-stub RF MEMS impedance tuner”, Proceedings of European Microwave Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1301–4, 2004Google Scholar
Vähä-Heikkilä, T., Varis, J., Tuovinen, J. and Rebeiz, G. M., “W-band RF MEMS double and triple-stub impedance tuners”, IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Digest, Long Beach, CA, pp. 923–6, 2005Google Scholar
Meierer, R. and Tsironis, C., “An on-wafer noise parameter measurement technique with automatic receiver calibration”, Microw. J., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 80–88, 1995Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×