Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T19:30:13.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The liberalization of energy services: are PTAs more energetic than the GATS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Mireille Cossy
Affiliation:
WTO Secretariat
Juan A. Marchetti
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Martin Roy
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Energy is an indispensable component of daily life. It gives us light, allows us to cook our food and heat – or cool – our homes, and transports us on road, rail, or water, or in the air. It underpins all economic activities. A lack of reliable and affordable energy supply affects human welfare and economic development. The importance of this sector for social and economic life, coupled with the specificities of energy trade, have led governments to be directly involved in the provision of energy goods and services. Until the beginning of the 1990s the structure of the energy sector left limited room for private operators. The market was dominated by large, vertically integrated state-owned utilities, which were responsible for the whole chain, from exploration and production to marketing and sale to the final consumer; trade in energy was seen essentially as trade in goods, in which services were a value added element. Moreover, many countries endowed with energy resources were not members of the GATT/WTO.

This explains why energy was a missing chapter of the services negotiations during the Uruguay Round (1986–94) and why current GATS commitments are scarce. As in other infrastructure service sectors, however, the situation has changed over the last fifteen years. The trend toward privatization and liberalization in a number of countries, together with technological developments, have contributed to the emergence of new service activities for private operators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Opening Markets for Trade in Services
Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations
, pp. 405 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cossy, Mireille. 2005. “Water Services at the WTO,” in Weiss, Edith Brown, Chazournes, Laurence Boisson, and Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie (eds.), Fresh Water and International Economic Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 117–41.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2002. Liberalizing Global Trade in Energy Services, Washington, DC: AEI Press.Google Scholar
,IEA. 2007. World Energy Outlook 2007, Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Melly, Christopher. 2003. “Electric Power and Gas Market Reform and International Trade in Services,” in ,UNCTAD, Energy and Environmental Services: Negotiating Objectives and Development Priorities, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 164–77.Google Scholar
Musselli, Irene, and Zarrilli, Simonetta. 2005. “Oil and Gas Services: Market Liberalization and the Ongoing GATS Negotiations,” Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2): 551–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Martin, Marchetti, Juan, and Lim, Hoe. 2007. “Services Liberalization in the New Generation of Preferential Trade Agreements: How Much Further than the GATS?World Trade Review, 6(2): 155–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UNCTAD. 2003. Managing “Request–Offer” Negotiations under the GATS: The Case of Energy Services, UNCTAD/DITC/TNCS/2003/5, Geneva: United Nations: Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
,USITC. 2000. Power Services: Recent Reforms in Selected Foreign Markets, Publication no. 3370, Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
,USITC. 2001. Natural Gas Services: Recent Reforms in Selected Markets, Publication no. 3458, Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
,USITC. 2003. Oil and Gas Field Services: Impediments to Trade and Prospects for Liberalization, Publication no. 3582, Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
,USITC. 2005. Renewable Energy Services: An Examination of US and Foreign Markets, Publication no. 3805, Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×