Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T16:56:11.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Florian Coulmas
Affiliation:
German Institute for Japanese Studies, Tokyo
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Sociolinguistics
The Study of Speakers' Choices
, pp. 236 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Daniel M. and Strogatz, Steven H.. 2003. Modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 24: 900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ager, Dennis. 1996. ‘Francophonie’ in the 1990s: Problems and Opportunities. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ager, Dennis. 2001. Motivation in Language Planning and Language Policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Alexander, Neville. n.d. Linguistic rights, language planning and democracy in post-Apartheid South Africa. In Baker, Steven J. (ed.), Language Policy: Lessons from Global Models. Monterey Institute of International Studies, 116–29.
Alexiou, Margaret. 1982. Diglossia in Greece. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard Languages, Spoken and Written. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 156–93.Google Scholar
Allard, Rodrigue and Réal Landry. 1992. Ethnolinguistic vitality beliefs and language maintenance and loss. In Fase, W., Jaespaert, K. and Kroon, S. (eds.), Maintenance and Loss of Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altehenger-Smith, Sherida. 1987. Language choice in multilingual societies: a Singapore case study. In Knapp, Karlfried, Enninger, Werner and Knapp-Potthoff, Annelie (eds.), Analyzing Intercultural Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, Ulrich (ed.) 1979. Dialect and Standard in Highly Industrialized Societies. Special issue, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 21.
Amonoo, Reginald F. 1994. La situation linguistique au Ghana et les problèmes de standardisation. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardization of Languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 23–32.Google Scholar
Andersen, Elaine Slossberg. 1992. Speaking with Style: The Sociolinguistic Skills of Children. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Annamalai, E. 1989. The language factor in code mixing. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 75: 47–54.Google Scholar
Appel, Rene and Pieter, Muysken. 1987. Language Contact and Bilingualism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Appiah, A. K. and Gates, H. L. (eds.) 1995. Identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter and Smith, Norval (eds.) 1994. Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, Bill, Griffiths, Gareth and Tiffin, Helen. 2002. The Empire Writes Back. Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. (ed.) 1998. Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter and Hinskens, F.. 1996. The convergence and divergence of dialects in Europe: new and not so new developments in an old area. Sociolinguistica 10:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Peter. 2002. Sprachwandel in Japan – Pronominale Selbstreferenz bei männlichen Sprechern. Unpublished MA thesis, Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf.
Backhaus, Peter.forthcoming. Multilingualism in Tokyo – Reading the Signs. PhD thesis, University Duisburg-Essen.
Bailey, Guy. 2002. Real and apparent time. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 312–32.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan and Sand, Lori. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3: 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip and Eversley, John (eds.) 2000. Multilingual Capital. London: Battelbridge.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, Ayo. 1982. Standard Nigerian English: issues of identification. In Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 99–111.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis E. 1982. Grammar and Good Taste. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, David. 1994. Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Battestini, Simon. 1997. Ecriture et texte. Contribution africaine. Quebec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Bayraktaroğlu, Arin and Sifianou, Maria (eds.) 2001. Linguistic Politeness across Boundaries: The Case of Greek and Turkish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, U. 1989. Class theory: still the axis of critical social scientific analysis? In Wright, Eric O. (ed.), The Debate on Classes. London: Verso, 127–56.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M. and Giles, Howard. 1984. Speech-accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 5–32.Google Scholar
Bentahila, Abdelâli and Eirlys E. Davies. 1998. Codeswitching: an unequal partnership? In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1986. Linguistic constraints on intrasentential code-switching: a study of Spanish/Hebrew bilingualism. Language in Society 15: 313–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1971. Class, Codes and Control: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge and Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Birch, Barbara M. 1995. Quaker Plain Speech: a policy of linguistic divergence. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 116: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 1994. The construct of oral and written language. In Verhoeven, Ludo (ed.), Functional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Joshua. 1977. The beginnings of Arabic diglossia: a study of the origins of Neoarabic. Afroasiatic Linguistics 4: 175–202.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter and John J. Gumperz. 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structures: code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 407–34.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bokamba, Eyamba. 1988. Code-mixing, language variation and linguistic theory: evidence from Bantu languages. Lingua 76: 21–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas P. 2002. Race and the Rise of Standard American. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, Elisabeth. 1994. Introduction: writing and recorded knowledge. In Broone, E. and Mignolo, W. (eds.), Writing without Words. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 3–26.Google Scholar
Brauner, Siegmund. 1994. Zur Herausbildung und Entwicklung des Schona als moderne nationale Literatursprache Simbabwes. In Fodor, I. and Hagège, C. (eds.), Language Reform: History and Future. Hamburg: Buske, vol. 3, 163–85.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias. 1992. Patterns of language shift in East Africa. In Herbert, Robert (ed.), Language and Society in Africa. Cape Town: Witwatersrand University Press, 287–303.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias. 1996. Language contact and language displacement. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 273–84.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias. 1998. Various ways of dying and different kinds of death: scholarly approaches to language endangerment on the African continent. In Matsumura, Kazuto (ed.), Studies in Endangered Languages. Tokyo: Hituzi, 85–100.Google Scholar
Breton, Roland J.-L. 1991. Geolinguistics: Language Dynamics and Ethnolinguistic Geography. Translated and expanded by Schiffman, Harold F.. Ottawa and Paris: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Breton, Albert and Peter Mieszkowski. 1977. The economics of bilingualism. In Oates, Wallace E. (ed.), The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Toronto and Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 261–73.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1990. Language Variation in South Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1991. Small linguistic societies from a global perspective. IT and mass media for small linguistic societies. Special issue, EMI 29: 11–18.Google Scholar
Britto, Francis. 1986. Diglossia: A Study of the Theory with Application to Tamil. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Steven. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert. 1969. Medieval and Modern Greek. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Dédé and Hout, Roeland. 1992. Gender-related variation in Amsterdam vernacular. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko. 2001. Language, nationalism and war in Yugoslavia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 151: 69–87.Google Scholar
Burstein, J. 1989. Politeness strategies and gender expectations. CUNY Forum: Papers in Linguistics 14: 31–7.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (ed.) 1990. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1992. ‘Not gender difference but the difference gender makes’ – explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casagrande, Joseph B. 1948. Comanche baby language. International Journal of American Linguistics 14: 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta. 1973. The Interplay of Social and Linguistic Factors in Panama. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Certeau, Michel, Julia, Dominique and Revel, Jacques. 1975. Une politique de la langue: La Révolution Française et les patois. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Cerulo, K. 1997. Identity construction: new issues, new directions. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) 2002. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Suhas. 1986. Diglossia in Bengali. In Krishnamurti, Bh. (ed.), South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 294–311.Google Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1996a. Toward a phonographic writing system of Chinese: a case study in writing reform. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 122: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1996b. Modern written Chinese, dialects and regional identity. Language Problems and Language Planning 20: 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1991. Introduction: sociolinguistics and English around the world. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2002. Sex and gender in variationist research. In Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 423–43.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Terty N. and Lipset, Seymour M.. 2001. The Breakdown of Class Politics: A Debate on Post-industrial Stratification. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Thomas. 2002. Language choice in a nation under transition: the struggle between English and French in Cambodia. Language Policy 1, 1: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 1991. Community Languages: The Australian Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael. (ed.) 1992. Pluricentric Languages. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Coggle, Paul. 1993. Do You Speak Estuary?London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Conseil de la langue française. 2000. La langue de l'affichage à Montréal de 1997 à 1999. Québec: Conseil de la langue française.
Cooper, Robert L. 1984. The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 50: 5–20.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian (ed.) 1981a. Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian (ed.) 1981b. A Festschrift for Native Speaker. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1987. What writing can do to language: some preliminary remarks. In Battestini, Simon (ed.), Developments in Linguistics and Semiotics, Language Teaching and Learning, Communication across Cultures. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1986. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 107–29.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1989. Language adaptation in Meiji Japan. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Language Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1991. European integration and the idea of a national language. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), A Language Policy for the European Community. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1992a. Linguistic etiquette in Japanese society. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 299–323.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1992b. Language and Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 1999. The Far East. In Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 399–413.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 2002. Comment [to Hudson 2002]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 59–62.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian 2003. Writing Systems: An Introduction to their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Coupland, Justine and Giles, Howard. 1991. Language, Society and the Elderly: Discourse, Identity and Ageing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cravens, Thomas D. and Giannelli, Luciano. 1995. Relative salience of gender and class in a situation of competing norms. Language Variation and Change 7: 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James (ed.) 1992. Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1995). The Evolution of AAVE in a Rural Texas Community: An Ethnolinguistic Study. PhD dissertation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Daoust, Denise. 1991. Terminological change within a language planning framework. In Marshall, David F. (ed.), Language Planning. Focusschrift in Honor of Joshua A. Fishman on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 281–309.Google Scholar
Daswani, C. J and Parchani, S.. 1978. Sociolinguistic Survey on Indian Sindhi. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Davies, Alan. 1991. The Native Speaker in Applied Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Day, Richard R. 1985. The ultimate inequality: linguistic genocide. In Wolfson, Nessa and Manes, Joan (eds.), Language of Inequality. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers, 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, John. 1984. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Deshpande, Madhav. 1979. Sociolinguistic Attitudes in India. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Devine, Fiona. 1996. Social Class in Britain and America. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Devine, Monica. 1991. Baby Talk: The Art of Communicating with Infants and Toddlers. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Dhir, Krishna S. and Savage, Theresa. 2002. The value of a working language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 158: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilke, Charles Wentworth. 1868/69. Greater Britain: A Record of Travel in English-Speaking Countries. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1991. The endangered languages of Australia, Indonesia and Oceania. In Robins, R. H. and Uhlenbeck, E. M. (eds.), Endangered Languages. London and New York: Berg, 229–55.Google Scholar
Djité, Paulin G. 1990. The place of African languages in the revival of the Francophonie movement. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 86: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, J. E. 1956. Early modern standard English. Transactions of the Philological Society 1955, 25–54.Google Scholar
DoE 1995. 1991 Deprivation Index: A Review of Approaches and a Matrix of Results. London: HMSO.
Domínguez, Francesc and López, Núria. 1995. Language International World Directory of Sociolinguistic and Language Planning Organizations. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1982. Language loss and maintenance in language contact situations. In Lambert, R. D. and Freed, B. F. (eds.), The Loss of Language Skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy c. (ed.) 1989. Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, William. 1984. Language and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Theo. 1990. The liberation of Afrikaans. ABLA papers no. 14, Brussels: Research Centre on Multilingualism.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1989. The whole women: sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1: 245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (ed.) 1991. New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edgell, Stephen. 1993. Class. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, John. 1985. Language, Society and Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, John. 1994. Multilingualism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, W. (ed.) 1992. Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1992. On the historicity of politeness. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 71–107.Google Scholar
Eideneier, Hans. 2000. Zur mittelalterlichen Vorgeschichte der neugriechischen Diglossie. Hamburg: Sonderforschungsbereich Mehrsprachigkeit.Google Scholar
Eira, Christina. 1998. Authority and discourse: towards a model for orthography selection. Written Language and Literacy 1(2):171–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkhafaifi, Hussein M. 2002. Arabic language planning in the age of globalization. Language Problems and Language Planning 26(3): 253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endleman, Shalom. 1995. The politics of language: the impact of language legislation on French- and English-language citizens of Quebec. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 116: 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eroms, Hans-Werner and Haider Munske, Horst (eds.) 1997. Die Rechtschreibreform: Pro und Kontra. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Extra, Guus and Gorter, Durk (eds.) 2001. The Other Languages of Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fabricius, Anne H. 2000. T-Glottaling Between Stigma and Prestige: A Sociolinguistic Study of Modern RP. PhD dissertation, Copenhagen Business School.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph. 1990. The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2002. The multidialectal Arabic lexicon. Recherches Linguistiques, Linguistic Research. Rabat: Publications de l'Institut d'Etudes et de Recherches sur Arabisation.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15: 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1977. Baby talk as simplified register. In Snow, Catherine E. and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 209–35.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1982. Foreword. In Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Oxford: Pergamon Press, vii–xi.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Language planning and language change. In Cobarrubias, Juan and Fishman, Joshua A. (eds.), Progress in Language Planning. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton, 29–40.Google Scholar
Fernández, Mauro. 1995. Los orígines del término diglossia: historia de una historia mal contada. Historiographia Linguistica 22: 163–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Rosalie and Sarah Slabbert. 1997. ‘I'll meet you halfway with language’: code-switching within a South African urban context. In Pütz, Martin (ed.), Language Choices: Conditions, Constraints and Consequences. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 381–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John L. 1958. Social influences on the choice on a linguistic variant. Word 14: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1964. Language maintenance and language shift as fields of inquiry. Linguistics 9: 32–70.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1965. Who speaks what language to whom and when?La Linguistique 2: 67–88.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1967. Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1972. The Sociology of Language: An Interdisciplinary Social Science Approach to Language in Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1980. Bilingualism and biculturism as individual and as societal phenomena. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1989. Language and Ethnicity in Minority Sociolinguistic Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) 2001. Can Threatened Languages Be Saved?Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 2002. Comment [to Hudson 2002]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 93–100.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. et al. (eds.) 1966. Language Loyalty in the United States. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A., Conrad, Andrew W. and Rubal-Lopez, Alma (eds.) 1996. Post-Imperial English: Status Change in Former British and American Colonies, 1940–1990. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Paul and MacWhinney, Brian. 1995. The Handbook of Child Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fodor, Istvan. 1983. Quelques conclusions: comment les ‘Esqimaux’ développent-ils leurs parlers en langues littéraires? In Fodor, I. and Hagège, C. (eds.), Language Reform: History and Future. Hamburg: Buske, vol. 3, 455–81.Google Scholar
Frangoudaki, Anna. 1997. The metalinguistic prophecy on the decline of the Greek language: its social function as the expression of a crisis in Greek national identity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frangoudaki, Anna. 2002. Comment [to Hudson 2002]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 101–7.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1979. Language Shift. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1989. A History of Economics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Mohandas K. 1965. Our Language Problem. Edited by Hingorani, Anand T.. Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 1991. Language Selection and Switching in Strasbourg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, François, Leclerc, Jacques and Maurais, Jacques. 1993. Langues et constitutions: recueil des clauses linguistiques des constitutions du monde. Québec: Office de la langue française.Google Scholar
GEN: Global English Newsletter. www.engcool.com/GEN/weblog.php
Gibbon, Margaret. 1999. Feminist Perspectives on Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Richard Bourhis and D. M. Taylor. 1977. Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles, Howard (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 307–48.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1986. Prototypes: Between Plato and Wittgenstein. In Craig, Colette (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, John H. and Marshall, Gordon. 1992. The promising future of class analysis: a response to recent critiques. Sociology 26 (3): 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Roseann Dueñas and Melis, Idikó (eds.) 2000. Language Ideologies: Critical Perspectives on the Official English Movement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack and Ian Watt. 1968. Introduction. In Goody, Jack (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–68.Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth. 1997. Sex, speech and stereotypes: why women's speech is closer to the standard. Language in Society 26: 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Edmund W. and Wilkerson, Doxey A.. 1966. Compensatory Education for the Disadvantaged. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2000. Wonderful World: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Government of India. 1966. A Common National Script for Indian Languages. New Delhi.
Graddol, David. 1997. The Future of English?London: British Council.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph (ed.) 1963. Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Leonora A. and Whaley, Lindsay J. (eds.) 1998. Endangered Languages: Current Issues and Future Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Grillo, Ralph D. 1989. Dominant Languages: Language and Hierarchy in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grin, François (ed.) 1996. Economic approaches to language and language planning: an introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 121: 1–16.
Grin, François 2001. English as economic value: facts and fallacies. World Englishes 20: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grivelet, Stéphane. 1999. La digraphie: changements et coexistences d'écritures. Doctoral thesis, Université Montpellier III – Paul Valéry.
Grosjean, François. 1985. The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 6: 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1967. Language and communication. In Bertram M. Gross (ed.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 373: 219–31.
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunaratne, Shelton A. 2003. Proto-Indo-European expansion, rise of English, and the international language order: a humanocentric analysis. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 164: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R. S., Abbi, Anvita and Aggarwal, Kailash S. (eds.) 1995. Language and the State: Perspectives on the Eighth Schedule. New Delhi: Creative Books.Google Scholar
Haaland, Gunnar. 1969. Economic determinants in ethnic processes. In Barth, Fredrik (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 58–74.Google Scholar
Haas, Walter. 2002. Comment [to Hudson 2002]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 109–15.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1992. Le souffle de la langue. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1997. Cultural politics of identity in Latin America. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 567–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kira and Bucholtz, Mary. 1995. Gender Articulated. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Anita B. 2001. Lexical diffusion as a factor of phonetic change: the case of Modern French nasal vowels. Language Variation and Change 13: 209–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. 1991. Ireland. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. B. 1992. When courtesy fails: gender roles and polite behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22: 1399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy. 1980. The Language Makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy. 2000. Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Harwood, Jake, Giles, Howard and Richard, Y. Bourhis. 1994. The genesis of vitality theory: historical patterns and discoursal dimensions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 108: 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Kenji. 2003. Class Structure in Contemporary Japan. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1970. Bilingualism, language contact and immigrant languages in the United States: a research report 1956–1970. Current Trends in Linguistics 10: 505–91.Google Scholar
Haust, Delia and Norbert Dittmar. 1998. Taxonomic or functional models in the description of codeswitching? Evidence from Mandinka and Wolof in African contact situations. In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayhoe, M. and Parker, S. (eds.) 1994. Who Owns English?Buckingham and Philadelphia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Head, B. F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Patrick. 2002. Die Rezeption westlicher Linguistik im modernen Japan bis Ende der Shōwa-Zeit. Munich: Iudicium.Google Scholar
Held, Gudrun. 1992. Politeness in linguistic research. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 131–53.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 1992. The politics of code-switching and language choice. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 13: 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica. 1995. Language choice, social institutions, and symbolic domination. Language in Society 24: 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlies and Bußmann, Hadumond (eds.) 2001/2. Gender Across Languages, vols. 1–3. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 2001. Talking in Johannesburg: the negotiation of identity in conversation. In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide II. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, M. E. 1929. Lautveränderungen in der Individualsprache einer Mundart. Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 11: 195–214.Google Scholar
Hibiya, Junko. 1988. A Quantitative Study of Tokyo Japanese. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 1993. Structure and practice in language shift. In Hyltenstam, Kenneth and Viberg, Åke (eds.), Progression and Regression in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–93.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1992. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet and Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.) 2003. Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, David. 2002. Modern Greek: towards a standard language of a new diglossia? In Jones, Mari C. and Esch, Edith (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 169–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honey, John. 1989. Does Accent Matter?London and Boston: Faber.Google Scholar
Hudson, Alan. 2002. Outline of a theory of diglossia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Geoffrey. 1994. Maltese, from Arabic dialect to European language. In Fodor, I. and Hagège, C. (eds.), Language Reform: History and Future. Hamburg: Buske, vol. 6, 331–46.Google Scholar
Hwang, Juck-Ryoon. 1990. ‘Deference’ versus ‘politeness’ in Korean speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82: 41–55.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth and Viberg, Åke (eds.) 1993. Progression and Regression in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1980. Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays. Washington, DC: Center of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko and Megumi Yoshida. 1999. Sociolinguistics: honorifics and gender differences. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 444–80.Google Scholar
Igboanusi, Herbert and Peter, Lothar. 2004. Oppressing the oppressed: threats of Hausa and English on Nigeria's minority languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 170: 131–40.Google Scholar
Imada, Takatoshi. 1991. Modernity and its deconstruction: metamorphosis of civilization. International Review of Sociology New Series, 3: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Fumio. 1994. Hōgengaku no shin chihei [New Horizons in Dialectology]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Inoue, Fumio. 1997. S-shaped curves of language standardization. Issues and Methods in Dialectology 8: 79–93.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 1994. Gender and linguistic modernization: a historical account of the birth of Japanese women's language. In Buchholz, Mary et al. (eds.), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: Women and Language Group, 322–33.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. and Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of Language. Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 35–83.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Greg. 1996. Lesbian and gay male language use: a critical review of the literature. American Speech 71: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo. 1977. The social implications of intra-sentential code-switching. In Amastae, Jon and Elías-Olivares, Lucía (eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic Aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–208.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo.1996. In search of the deeper message: codeswitching rationales of Mexican-Americans and Malaysians. In Hellinger, Marlis and Ammon, Ulrich (eds.), Contrastive Sociolinguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo.1998a. Conveying a broader message through bilingual discourse: an attempt at contrastive codeswitching research. In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo. (ed.) 1998b. Codeswitching Worldwide. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo. 2001a. Language alternation: the third kind of codeswitching mechanism. In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide II. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Rodolfo. (ed.) 2001b. Codeswitching Worldwide II. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1986. The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions and Models for Non-Native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kahane, Henry. 1982. American English: from a colonial substandard to a prestige language. In Kachru, Braj B. (ed.), The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 229–36.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.) 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kakavá, Christina. 1997. Sociolinguistics and modern Greek: past, current, and future directions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M. 2003. Globalization of English, and language maintenance and shift in South Africa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 164: 65–81.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert B. and Baldauf, Richard B.. 1997. Language Planning: from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 1996. Linguistic etiquette. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 373–85.Google Scholar
Keller, R. E. 1982. Diglossia in German-speaking Switzerland. In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard Languages, Spoken and Written. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 70–93.Google Scholar
Kemper, S. 1994. ‘Elderspeak’: speech accommodation to older adults. Aging and Cognition 1: 17–28.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, Lachman M. 1983. Plural Languages, Plural Cultures: Communication, Identity and Socio-political Change in Contemporary India. Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
Kibbee, Douglas A. 2003. Language policy and linguistic theory. In Maurais, Jacques and Morris, Michael A. (eds.), Languages in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Robert D. 2001. The poisonous potency of script: Hindi and Urdu. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 150: 43–59.Google Scholar
King, Ross, 1998. Nationalism and language reform in Korea: the Questione della Lingua in precolonial Korea. In Pai, Hyung Il and Tangherlini, Timothy R. (eds.), Nationalism and the Construction of Korean Identity. Berkeley: Center for Korean Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 33–72.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. 1978. Introduction. In Kloss, Heinz and Grant D. McConnell, 1978–1989. The Written Languages of the World: A Survey of the Degree and Modes of Use, vol. 1, 19–79.
Kloss, Heinz and Grant D. McConnell. 1978–1989. The Written Languages of the World: A Survey of the Degree and Modes of Use, vols. 1–3.
Kramer, Johannes. 1994. Lëtzeburgesch – eine Nationalsprache ohne Norm. In Fodor, István and Hagège, Claude (eds.), Language Reform: History and Future. Hamburg: Buske, vol. 6, 391–405.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael. 1992. The world's languages in crisis. Language 68: 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. (ed.) 1986. South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Krumbacher, K. 1902. Das Problem der neugriechischen Schriftsprache. Munich: Königlich-Bayrische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kummer, Manfred. 1992. Politeness in Thai. In Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 325–36.Google Scholar
Kwan-Terry, Anna. 2000. Language shift, mother tongue, and identity in Singapore. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 143: 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of sound change. Word 19: 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1981. What can be inferred about change in progress from synchronic descriptions?Variation Omnibus (NWAVE VIII), 177–200.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2: 205–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol.1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labrie, Normand. 1993. La construction linguistique de la Communauté européennne. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1992. Another view of endangered languages. Language 68 (4): 809–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1993. Migration and language shift in urban India. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 103: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1996. Language planning in the former Soviet Union: the case of Estonia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 118: 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T. 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark, Johnson. 1985. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Jacob M. and Kellner-Heinkele, Barbara. 2001. Politics of Language in the Ex-Soviet Muslim States; Azerbayjan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. London: Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue and Réal Allard (eds.) 1994. Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Topic issue, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 108.
Laponce, Jean A. 1987. Languages and their Territories. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Laporte, Pierre-Etienne. 1994. Les mots-clés du discours politique en aménagement linguistique au Québec et au Canada. In Truchot, Claude (ed.), Le Plurilinguisme européen. Paris: Champion, 97–114.Google Scholar
Leech, N. Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Page, Robert. 1986. Acts of identity. English Today 8: 21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. B. and Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. L. 1984. Atatürk's language reform as an aspect of modernization in the Republic of Turkey. In Landau, Jacob M. (ed.), Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 195–213.Google Scholar
Li, David C. S. 2003. Between English and Esperanto: what does it take to be a world language?International Journal of the Sociology of Language 164: 33–63.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 1996. Network analysis. In Goebel, Hans and Nelde, Peter H. et al. (eds.), Contact Linguistics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 805–11.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 1998. The ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions in the analysis of conversational code-switching. In Auer, Peter (ed.), Code-Switching in Conversation. Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 156–76.Google Scholar
Li, Wei, Dewaele, Jean-Marc and Housen, Alex (eds.) 2002. Opportunities and Challenges of Bilingualism. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Louw, P. Eric. 2004. Political power, national identity and language: the case of Afrikaans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 170: 43–58.Google Scholar
Lüdi, Georges. 1986. Forms and functions of bilingual speech in pluricultural migrant communities in Switzerland. In Fishman, J. A. et al. (eds.), The Fergusonian Impact. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, vol. 2, 217–36.Google Scholar
Lüdi, Georges et al. (eds.) 1997. Die Sprachenlandschaft der Schweiz. Berne: Office fédérale de la statistique.Google Scholar
Mackerras, Colin. 1994. China's Minorities: Integration and Modernization in the Twentieth Century. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, William F. 1989. Determining the status and function of languages in multinational societies. In Ammon, Ulrich (ed.), Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, William F. 2003. Forecasting the fate of languages. In Maurais, Jacques and Morris, Michael A. (eds.), Languages in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–81.
Magner, Thomas F. 2001. Digraphia in the territories of the Croats and Serbs. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 150: 11–26.Google Scholar
Maher, John C. and Y. Kawanishi. 1995. Maintaining culture and language: Koreans in Osaka. In Maher, J. C. and MacDonald, G. (eds.), Diversity in Japanese Culture and Language. London: Kegan Paul International, 160–77.Google Scholar
Marçais, W. 1930. La diglossie arabe. L'enseignement public no. 97: 401–9; no 105: 20–39, 120–33.
Marshall, David F. 1986. The question of an official language: language rights and the English Language Amendment. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 60: 7–75.Google Scholar
Martin-Jones, Marilyn and Jones, Kathryn (eds.) 2000. Multilingual Literacies: Reading and Writing Different Worlds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Endangered languages of mainland Southeast Asia. In Robins, R. H. and Uhlenbeck, E. M. (eds.), Endangered Languages. London and New York: Berg, 189–228.
McCallen, Brian. 1989. English: A World Commodity. The International Market for Training in English as a Foreign Language. London: The Economic Intelligence Unit Ltd.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2003. The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
Meeuwis, Michael and Jan Blommaert. 1998. A monolectal view of code-switching: layered code-switching among Zairians in Belgium. In Auer, Peter (ed.), Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London and New York: Routledge, 76–98.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, R. R. 1995. How to be polite in Indian English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 116: 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1918. Les langues dans l'Europe nouvelle. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Deton, Norma. 2002. Language and identity. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 475–99.Google Scholar
Menn, Lise and Jean Berko Gleason. 1986. Babytalk as a stereotype and register: adult reports of children's speech patterns. In Fishman, Joshua A. et al. (eds.), The Fergusonian Impact. In Honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, vol. I, 111–25.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley and Milroy, James. 1992. Social networks and social class: toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley and James Milroy. 1997. Varieties and variation. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 47–64.Google Scholar
Milroy, Leslie and Muysken, Pieter (eds.) 1995. One Speaker, Two Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Janus and Quist, Pia. 2003. Research on youth language in Denmark. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159: 45–55.Google Scholar
Moelino, Anton M. 1994. Standardization and modernization in Indonesian language planning. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardization of Languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 117–30.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1994. Language planning and small languages – the case of the Pacific area. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardizzione delle lingue, Standardization of languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 131–60.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Müller-Thurau, Claus-Peter. 1985. Lexikon der Jugendsprache. Düsseldorf and Vienna: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Musa, Monsur. 1996. Politics of language planning in Pakistan and the birth of a new state. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 118: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993a. Social Motivations for Codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993b. Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1997. Code-switching. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 217–37.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. (ed.) 1998. Codes and Consequences: Choosing Linguistic Varieties. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakano, Jun. 1993. Nihonjin no nakigoe [Japanese crying voices]. Tokyo: NTT Shuppan.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, R. 1998. Language Behaviour: Acquisition and Evolutionary History. New Delhi and London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Narayan, R. K. 1990 [first published 1945]. The English Teacher. London: Mandarin.Google Scholar
Navarro, V. 1990. Race or class versus race and class: mortality differentials in the United States. Lancet 2: 139–71.Google Scholar
Nelde, Peter H. et al. (eds.) 1995. Contact Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nelde, Peter H., Strubell, Miquel and Williams, Glyn. 1996. The Production and Reproduction of the Minority Language Groups in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Ngom, Fallou. 2002. Linguistic borrowing as evidence of the social history of the Senegalese speech community. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 158: 37–51.Google Scholar
Thiong'o, Ngũgĩ Wa. 1981. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia. 1983. Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural South. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House, 54–68.Google Scholar
Nomoto, Kikuo. 1975. How much has been standardized over the past twenty years? In Fred, C.Peng, C. (ed.), Language in Japanese Society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine. 1989. Dutch and Moroccan Arabic in Contact: Code-Switching among Moroccans in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ohara, Y. 1997. Shakaionseigaku no kanten kara mita nihonjin no koe no kōtei [High and low pitch of the voice of Japanese from the point of view of sociophonetics]. In Sachiko, Ide (ed.), Josei no sekai [The world of women]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, 42–58.Google Scholar
Oksaar, Els. 1997. Pragmatic and semiotic agreement, behavioreme-switching and communicative awareness: on concepts in the analysis of bilingual behavior. In Eliasson, Stig and Jahr, Ernst Håkon (eds.), Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, David R. and Torrance, Nancy (eds.) 2001. The Making of Literate Societies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ó Muirithe, D. (ed.) 1977. The English Language in Ireland. Dublin: The Mercier Press.Google Scholar
O'Riagáin, Pádraig. 1997. Language Policy and Social Reproduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2000. Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. Stamford: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V. 1998. Is genetic connection relevant in code-switching? Evidence from South Asian languages. In Jacobson, Rodolfo (ed.), Codeswitching Worldwide. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanayak, D. P. 1985. Diversity in communication and languages; predicament of a multilingual nation state: India, a case study. In Wolfson, Nessa and Manes, Joan (eds.), Language of Inequality. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki. 1996. Language change in apparent time and in real time: possessive constructions in Helsinki colloquial Finnish. In Samspel & Variation: sprakliga studier tillägnade Bengt Nordberg pa 60-arsdagen. Uppsala Universitet, Institut för Nordiska Sprak 3.2: 375–86.
Pedersen, Inge Lise. 2003. Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159: 9–28.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee, McDaniel, Susan Leas, Bailey, Guy and Bassett, Marvin. 1986. Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States, vol. 1: Handbook. Athens, GA.: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alistair. 1994. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Carol W. 1990. Turkish in contact with German: language maintenance and loss among immigrant children in Berlin (West). International Journal of the Sociology of Language 90: 97–130.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philological Society. 1978. The Neogrammarians. Oxford: Blackwell.
Picard, Dominique. 1998. Politesse, savoir-vivre et relations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: HarperPerennial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, Jonathan. 1990. Language regimes and political regimes. In Weinstein, Brian (ed.), Language Policy and Political Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 241–61.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1982. Bilingualism and vernacular. In Hartford, Beverly, Valdman, Albert and Foster, Charles R. (eds.), Issues in International Bilingual Education: The Role of the Vernacular. New York: Plenum, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana. (ed.) 2000. The English History of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. and Eccles, John C.. 1977. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Berlin and London: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Richard. 2002. Language planning and the British Empire: comparing Pakistan, Malaysia and Kenya. Current Issues in Language Planning 3: 205–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhakaran, Varija. 1998. Multilingualism and language shift in South Africa: the case of Telugu, an Indian language. Multilingua 17: 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prah, Kwesi K. 2001. Language, literacy, the production and reproduction of knowledge, and the challenge of African development. In Olson, David D. and Torrance, Nancy (eds.), The Making of Literate Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 123–41.Google Scholar
Pranjković, Ivo. 2001. The Croatian standard language and the Serbian standard language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 147: 31–50.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1987. Sarah Gorby, Yiddish folksinger: a case study of dialect shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 67: 83–116.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramptonx, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ravitch, Dianne. 2003. The Language Police. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Rhee, M. J. 1992. Language planning in Korea under the Japanese colonial administration, 1910–1945. Language, Culture and Curriculum 5(2): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication 6(3): 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Rickford, Russel J. (2000). Spoken Soul: The History of Black English. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rintell, Ellen. 1981. Sociolinguistic variation and pragmatic ability: a look at learners. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 11–34.Google Scholar
Roberts, Peter A. 1988. West Indians and their Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H. and Uhlenbeck, Eugenius M. (eds.) 1991. Endangered Languages. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1984. The Language of Children and Adolescents. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. Communicating Gender. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rubin, Joan. 1985. The special relation of Guarani and Spanish in Paraguay. In Wolfson, Nessa and Manes, Joan (eds.), Language of Inequality. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Arial. 2000. Economics and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1979. Why do low-prestige language varieties persist? In Giles, H. and Clair, R. N. St (eds.), Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell, 145–58.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Aquilino and Dueñas, María. 2002. Language planning in the Spanish–speaking world. Current Issues in Language Planning 3(3): 280–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safran, William. 1999. Nationalism. In Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 77–93.Google Scholar
Salhi, Kamal. 2002. Critical imperatives of the French language in the Francophone world: colonial legacy – postcolonial policy. Current Issues in Language Planning 3: 317–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanada, Shinji. 1987. Hyōjungo no seiritsu jijō [The circumstances of language standardization]. Tokyo: PHP.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David and Poplack, Shana. 1981. A formal grammar of code-switching. Papers in Linguistics 14(2): 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2004. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in Sociolinguistics. In Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert and Mattheier, Klaus (eds.), Sociolinguistics, Soziolinguistik: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. 2nd edition. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter 1003–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Ochs, Elinor. 1986. Language Socialization across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Harold. 1996. Linguistic Culture and Language Policy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1996. Narrative as self-portrait: sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society 25: 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlobinski, Peter. 1995. Jugendsprachen: speech styles of youth subcultures. In Stevenson, Patrick (ed.), The German Language and the Real World: Sociolinguistic, Cultural, and Pragmatic Perspectives on Contemporary German. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 315–37.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1984. Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Lee. 1999. Love in a Dead Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1983. Code-shifting patterns in Chicano Spanish. In Elías-Olivares, Lucía (ed.), Spanish in the U.S. Setting. Arlington, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingualism, 71–87.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1984. Language and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structures, usages and ideology. In Mertz, E. and Parmentier, P. (eds.), Signs in Society. London and New York: Academic Press, 219–59.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra (ed.). 1998. The Native Speaker: Multilingual Perspectives. New Delhi and London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Singh, Udaya Narayan. 1995. Comments. In Gupta, R. S., Abbi, Anvita and Aggarwal, Kailash S. (eds.) 1995, Language and the State: Perspectives on the Eighth Schedule. New Delhi: Creative Books, 42–8.Google Scholar
Sirles, Craig A. 1999. Politics and Arabization: the evolution of postindependence North Africa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 137: 115–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael G. 1998. Language and Power in the Creation of the USSR, 1917–1953. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 1988. Women and politeness: the Javanese example. Language in Society 17: 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solèr, Clau. 1991. Romanisch im Schams. Zurich: Phonogrammarchiv der Universität Zürich.Google Scholar
Zhengchun, Song. 1992. Multilingual families of the Tuvinian people in Xinjiang (Mongolia). International Journal of the Sociology of Language 97: 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotiropoulos, Dimitri. 1992. The standardization of modern Greek. Sociolinguistica: Internationales Jahrbuch für Europäische Soziolinguistik 6: 163–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1985. Man Made Language. 2nd edition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard and Cooper, Robert L.. 1991. The Languages of Jerusalem. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Srivastava, R. N. 1984. Linguistic minorities and national languages. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Linguistic Minorities and Literacy. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, Danny D., Nagata, Hiroshi and Aline, David P.. 2001. Psycholinguistics. Language, Mind and World. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stromquist, Nelly P. 1999. Gender and literacy development. In Wagner, Daniel A., Venezky, Richard L. and Street, Brian V. (eds.), Literacy: An International Handbook. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 271–6.Google Scholar
Strubell i Trueta, Miquel. 1994. Catalan in Valencia: the story of an attempted secession. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardizzione delle lingue, Standardization of Languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 229–54.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1997. Language and the mediation of experience: linguistic representation and cognitive orientation. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 358–73.Google Scholar
Subbarao, K. V., Agnihotri, R. K. and Mukerjee, A.. 1991. Syntactic strategies and politeness phenomena. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Yoshio. 1997. Japanese Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sun Hongkai and Florian Coulmas (eds.) 1992. News from China: Minority Languages in Perspective. Special issue, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 97.
Swaan, Abram. 2002. Woorden van de wereld. Het mondiale talstelsel. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1992. Women's language in Sweden. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 173–84.Google Scholar
Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1996. Language and identity. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 315–26.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2002. Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 729–63.Google Scholar
Takahara, Kumiko. 1991. Female speech patterns in Japanese. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1991. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Tessarolo, M. 1990. Minoranze linguistiche e imagine della lingua: una ricera sulla realà italiana. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette. 1991. La langue en mouvement: simplification, régularisation, restructuration. LINX (Linguistique – Paris X, Nanterre) 25: 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Pierrette and Vincent, Diane. 1990. Un Corpus de Français Parlé. Montréal : Recherches Sociolinguistiques 1.Google Scholar
Togeby, Ole. 1992. Is there a separate women's language?International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94: 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, George. 1991. Linguistic Purism. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, Robert W. 1992. Spanish as a pluricentric language. In Clyne, M. (ed.), Pluricentric Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 45–70.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie and Henley, Nancy (eds.) 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tollefson, James W. 1991. Planning Language, Planning Inequality. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, Jeanine. 1994. Mixing Two Languages: French-Dutch Contact in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truchot, Claude. 2003. The linguistic influence of the European Union. In Maurais, Jacques and Morris, Michael A. (eds.), Languages in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1984. Sociolinguistics. 2nd edition. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1988. Norwich revisited: recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World Wide 9: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1994. Dialects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Uchida, Aki. 1992. When ‘difference’ is ‘dominance’: a critique of the ‘antipower-based’ cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society 21: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallverdú, Francesc. 1984. A sociolinguistic history of Catalan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 47: 13–28.Google Scholar
Van Hoorde, Johan. 1998. Let Dutch die? Over the Taalunie's dead body. InfoNT 2 (Conférence des Services de Traduction des Etats Européens, The Hague), 6–10.
Varennes, Fernand. 1996. Language, Minorities and Human Rights. London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Verdoodt, Albert. 1989. Western Europe (vol. 3 of Kloss, H. and McConnell, G. D. (eds.), The Written Languages of the World: A Survey of the Degree and Modes of Use). Quebec: Laval University Press.Google Scholar
Verma, Shivendra K. 1982. Swadeshi English: form and function. In Pride, J. (ed.), New Englishes. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 174–87.Google Scholar
Wang, Hahn-Sok. 1990. Toward a description of the organization of Korean speech levels. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82: 25–39.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1987. Languages in Competition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko and Ehlich, Konrad (eds.) 1992. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah. [1789] 1992. Dissertation on the English language: with notes, historical and critical. Excerpts in Crawford, James (ed.), Language Loyalties: A Source Book on the Official English Controversy. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press: 33–6.Google Scholar
Wegner, Daniel. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Brian. 1983. The Civic Tongue. Political Consequences of Language Choices. New York and London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Veronika. 1996. Reclame en tweetaligheid in Brussel. In Brusselse thema's 3, Brussels: Vrije universiteit, 45–74.Google Scholar
Wexler, Paul. 1991. Yiddish – the fifteenth Slavic language: a study of partial language shift from Judeo-Sorbian to German. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 91: 9–150.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, Sue and Wooffitt, Robin. 1995. The Language of Youth Subculture. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Williams, Colin. 1999. The Celtic World. In Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–85.Google Scholar
Williams, Glyn. 1987. Bilingualism, class dialect, and social reproduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 66: 85–98.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 1997. Dialect in society. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 107–26.Google Scholar
Woods, Nicola. 1997. The formation and development of New Zealand English: interaction of gender-related variation and linguistic change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Eric O. 1989. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Eric. O. and Perrone, L.. 1977. Marxist class categories and income inequality. American Sociological Review 42: 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Roger. 1991. Latin and the Romance Languages in the Early Middle Ages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 1980. Arbeitsbuch Semantik. Königstein: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Wurm, Stephen A. 1994. Graphisation and standardisation of languages. In Lüdi, Georges (ed.), Sprachstandardisierung, Standardisation des langues, Standardization of Languages. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 255–72.Google Scholar
Yağmur, Kutlay. 2004. Language maintenance patterns of Turkish immigrant communities in Australia and Western Europe: the impact of majority attitudes on ethnolinguistic vitality perceptions. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 165: 121–42.Google Scholar
Yousseff, Valerie. 1993. Children's linguistic choices: audience design and societal norms. Language in Society 22: 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssi, Abderrahim. 1995. The Moroccan triglossia: facts and implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 112: 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zepeda, Ofelia and Jane H. Hill. 1991. The condition of Native American languages in the United States. In Robins, R. H. and Uhlenbeck, E. M. (eds.), Endangered Languages. London and New York: Berg, 135–55.Google Scholar
Zimin, Susan. 1981. Sex and politeness: factors in first- and second-language use. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 35–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Florian Coulmas, German Institute for Japanese Studies, Tokyo
  • Book: Sociolinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815522.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Florian Coulmas, German Institute for Japanese Studies, Tokyo
  • Book: Sociolinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815522.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Florian Coulmas, German Institute for Japanese Studies, Tokyo
  • Book: Sociolinguistics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815522.015
Available formats
×