Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T20:18:06.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Who and how: engaging well-connected fishers in social networks to improve fisheries management and conservation

from Part II - Case studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Örjan Bodin
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Christina Prell
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Loreto Bay National Marine Park was conceived as a people-oriented park where protection and sustainable use of marine resources were to be achieved. There have been advances towards these goals since the park was created, but the involvement of resource users in natural resource management and conservation still remains a challenge as in many other people-oriented parks worldwide (Brechin et al., 2002; Wilshusen et al., 2002; Adams et al., 2004). Many factors determine in what aspects, when, and how resource users could be involved in resource management and conservation. However, in all cases natural resource managers face the issue of identifying and involving resource users who could spread ideas and practices to improve natural resource management and conservation. This issue becomes increasingly relevant in large-scale initiatives (e.g. ecosystem-based management initiatives) where it is more effective and efficient to find representatives who can participate in planning processes and then communicate with, and engage, their peers (Layzer, 2008; Kubo and Supriyanto, 2010). Thus, the issue of identifying and involving resource users is also affected by the scale at which a management and conservation initiative is intended.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Networks and Natural Resource Management
Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance
, pp. 119 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. M.Aveling, R.Brockington, D. 2004 Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of povertyScience 306 1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A.Gibson, C. C. 1999 Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservationWorld Development 27 629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, J. 2003 Introduction: uniting science and participation in the process of innovation – research for developmentPound, B.Snapp, S.McDougall, C.Braun, A.Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods. Uniting Science and ParticipationLondonIDRC and Earthscan Books1Google Scholar
Bechara, A.Bar-On, R. 2006 Neurological substrates of emotional and social intelligence: evidence from patients with focal brain lesionsCacioppo, J. T.Visser, P. S.Pickett, C. L.Social Neuroscience. People Thinking about Thinking PeopleCambridge, MAMIT Press13Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 2004 Rethinking community-based conservationConservation Biology 18 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1964 Exchange and Power in Social LifeNew York, NYWileyGoogle Scholar
Bodin, O.Crona, B. 2009 The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?Global Environmental Change 19 366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, P. 1987 Power and centrality: a family of measuresAmerican Journal of Sociology 92 1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P.Everett, M. G. 2006 A graph-theoretic perspective on centralitySocial Networks 28 466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P.Everett, M. G.Freeman, L. C. 2002 UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network AnalysisHarvard, MAAnalytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P.Foster, P. C. 2003 The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typologyJournal of Management 29 991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, D. J. 1984 Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organizationAdministrative Science Quarterly 29 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brechin, S. R.Wilshusen, P. R.Fortwangler, C. L.West, P. C. 2002 Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political processSociety and Natural Resources 15 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S.Duguid, P. 2000 The Social Life of InformationBoston, MAHarvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Christy, F. T. 1996 The death of open access and the advent of property right regimes in fisheriesMarine Resource Economics 11 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONANP 2002 Programa de Manejo Parque Nacional Bahía de Loreto, MéxicoMéxico, D.F.Comision Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas y Secretaria del Ambiente y Recursos NaturalesGoogle Scholar
Cook, K. S.Whitmeyer, J. M. 1992 Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysisAnnual Review of Sociology 18 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crona, B.Bodin, O. 2006 What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-managementEcology and Society 11 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. C.Cvetkovich, G. T. 1995 Social Trust. Toward a Cosmopolitan SocietyWestport, CTPraegerGoogle Scholar
Ewert, A. W.Baker, D. C.Bissix, G. C. 2004 Integrated Resource and Environmental Management. The Human DimensionNew York, NYCABI PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1979 Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarificationSocial Networks 1 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatewood, J. B.McCay, B. J. 1990 Comparison of job-satisfaction in 6 New-Jersey fisheries – implications for managementHuman Organization 49 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goleman, D. 1998 What makes a leader?Harvard Business Review9Google ScholarPubMed
Granovetter, M. 1985 Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology 91 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Barreras, J. A. 2001 Reporte marino y costero del Municipio de Loreto, BCS, MéxicoLoreto, Baja California SurGEA y PNBLGoogle Scholar
Ingram, P.Clay, K. 2000 The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociologyAnnual Review of Sociology 26 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D.Hanson, J. R. 1993 Informal networks: the company behind the chartsHarvard Business Review 71 104Google Scholar
Kubo, H.Supriyanto, B. 2010 From fence-and-fine to participatory conservation: mechanisms of transformation in conservation governance at the Gunung Halimun-Salak National Park, IndonesiaBiodiversity Conservation 19 1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layzer, J. A. 2008 Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-based Management and the EnvironmentCambridge, MAMIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1969 The Elementary Structure of KinshipBoston, MABeaconGoogle Scholar
Locke, H.Dearden, P. 2005 Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigmEnvironmental Conservation 32 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiolo, J. R.Johnson, J. 1988
Mansuri, G.Rao, V. 2004 Community-based and -driven development: a critical reviewThe World Bank Research Observer 19 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascia, M. B.Brosius, J. P.Dobson, T. A. 2003 Conservation and the social sciencesConservation Biology 17 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D. 2003 Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchangeSociological Theory 21 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, L. D.Takahashi, N.Peterson, G. 2000 Risk and trust in social exchange: an experimental test of a classical propositionAmerican Journal of Sociology 105 1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noteboom, B. 2007 Social capital, institutions and trustReview of Social Economy LXV 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990 Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective ActionNew York, NYCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1999 Coping with tragedies of the commonsAnnual Review of Political Science 2 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E.Gardner, R.Walker, J. 1994 Rules, Games, and Common-pool ResourcesAnn Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C.Hare, M. 2004 Processes of social learning in integrated resource managementJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prell, C.Hubacek, K.Quinn, C.Reed, M. S. 2008 Who’s in the network?’ When stakeholders influence data analysisSystemic Practice and Action Research 21 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J.Smith, D. 2004 Social capital in biodiversity conservation and managementConservation Biology 18 631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez-Sanchez, S. 2007
Ramirez-Sanchez, S.Pinkerton, E. 2009 The impact of resource scarcity on bonding and bridging social capital: the case of fishers’ information-sharing networks in Loreto, BCS, MexicoEcology and Society 14 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songorwa, A.Buhrs, T.Hughey, K. F. D. 2000 Community-based wildlife management in Africa: a critical review of the literatureNatural Resource Journal 40 604Google Scholar
Stiles, R. G. 1972 Fishermen, wives and radios: aspects of communication in a Newfoundland fishing communityAndersen, R.Wadel, C.North Atlantic Fishermen. Anthropological Essays on Modern FishingSt. Johns, Newfoundland and LabradorInstitute for Social and Economic Research (ISER)35Google Scholar
Triantaphyllou, E. 2000 Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Applied Optimization Series DordrechtKluwer AcademicCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergeest, P. 2006 CBNRM communities in actionTyler, S. R.Communities, Livelihoods and Natural Resources. Action Research and Policy Change in AsiaIntermediate Technologies Development Group Publishing/International Development Research Centre321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S.Faust, K. 1999 Social Network Analysis. Methods and ApplicationsCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Wilshusen, P. R.Brechin, S. R.Fortwangler, C. L.West, P. C. 2002 Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent protection paradigm in international biodiversity conservationSociety and Natural Resources 15 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×