Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:38:49.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The relationship between individual and culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Seger M. Breugelmans
Edited by
Fons J. R. van de Vijver ,
Athanasios Chasiotis  and
Seger M. Breugelmans
Seger M. Breugelmans
Affiliation:
Tilburg University, the Netherlands
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Athanasios Chasiotis
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Seger M. Breugelmans
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

The relationship between individual and culture

Cross-cultural psychology has much to be satisfied with. The need to take cultural or ethnic differences into account when studying psychological processes has become widely recognised in mainstream psychology, papers on cross-cultural comparisons are regularly published in psychology books and journals, and courses on intercultural, multicultural, cross-cultural or cultural psychology have become part and parcel of many psychology curricula. With cross-cultural psychology reaching maturity and interest in cross-cultural issues growing, now may be a good time for a reorientation on the relationship between individual and culture (see Chapter 1).

In this chapter I argue that despite all the empirical and methodological advances in our field, our notion of how individuals and culture relate has remained somewhat underdeveloped. Much cross-cultural research seems to take the view of culture as a stable, general factor in the environment that automatically influences the psychological processes of individuals. The individual is seen to deal with culture either through adaptation to culture as context or through internalisation of cultural models and ideas. The view of individuals automatically adapting to or internalising a general cultural context is reinforced by the trend to define cultures in terms of psychological content, by which I mean positions on specific psychological variables such as emotions (shame-cultures and guilt-cultures), notions of the self (interdependent self and independent self) or values (collectivism and individualism).

Type
Chapter
Information
Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology , pp. 135 - 162
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Arends-Tóth, J. V., and Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish-Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., and McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., and Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, R. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., and Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, R., and Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1965) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., and Cremer, D. (2007). The role of emotions in cross-cultural justice research. In Cremer, D. (ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 83–104). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., and Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Emotion without a word: Shame and guilt with Rarámuri Indians and rural Javanese. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1111–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwers, S. A., Hemert, D. A., Breugelmans, S. M., and Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). A historical analysis of empirical studies published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1961). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In Hsu, F. L. (ed.), Psychological anthropology (pp. 333–52). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Creighton, M. R. (1990). Revisiting shame and guilt cultures: A forty-year pilgrimage. Ethos, 18, 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fischer, R., Ferreira, M. C., Assmar, E., et al. (2009). Individualism–collectivism as descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B., and Markam, S. S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. H., and Jahoda, G. (1966). On the scope and methods of cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, H. (1999). Becoming a moral child: The socialization of shame among young Chinese children. Ethos, 27, 180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Nishii, L., and Raver, J. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness–looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heine, S. J. (2005). Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, & Toguchi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 531–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heine, S. J. (2008). Cultural psychology. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106, 766–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., and Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, N., and Henrich, J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E., and Camerer, C. (eds.) (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Ethnography and experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H., and Kempen, H. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H., and Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (2008). The superorganism: The beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. (2000). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. F. (2008). Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31, 130–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. F., and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H. and Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. III, pp. 1–49). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Katz, D., and Allport, F. H. (1931). Students' attitudes. Oxford: Craftsman.Google Scholar
Keller, H. (2007). Cultures of infancy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kim, H., and Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., and Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in two cultures: A cultural look at New Look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A., and Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, T., Ellsworth, P., Mesquita, B., Leu, J., Tanida, S., and Veerdonk, E. (2008). Placing the face in context: Cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 365–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masuda, T., and Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama's theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., and Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J.-P., and Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mio, J. S., Hackett, L., and Tumambing, J. (2006). Multicultural psychology: Understanding our diverse communities. Boston, MA: McGraw.Google Scholar
Miyake, K., and Yamazaki, K. (1995). Self-conscious emotions, child rearing, and child psychopathology in Japanese culture. In Tangney, J. P. and Fischer, K. W. (eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 488–504). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., and Leung, K. (2000). Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 100–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., and Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., and Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Denver, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., and Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., and Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Sorensen, N., Reber, R., and Chen, S. X. (2009). Connecting and separating mind-sets: Culture as situated cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 217–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., and Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (2003). Coherence of culture and generalizability of data: Two questionable assumptions in cross-cultural psychology. In Berman, J. and Berman, J. (eds.), Cross-cultural differences in perspective on the self (vol. 49 of the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation) (pp. 257–305). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards convergence? In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 1, pp. 347–87). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., and Soudijn, K. A. (2002). Behaviour–culture relationships and ontogenetic development. In Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H. and Schoelmerich, A. (eds.), Between biology and culture: Perspectives on ontogenetic development (pp. 320–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., and Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sam, D. L., and Berry, J. W. (eds.) (2006). Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1997). Profiles of emotion-antecedent appraisal: Testing theoretical predictions across cultures. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 113–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R., and Wallbott, H. G. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 310–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., and Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., and Vevea, J. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., and Herskovits, K. J. (1966). The influence of culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Shiraev, E. B., and Levy, D. A. (2007). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications (3rd edn). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., and Kağitçibaşi, Ç. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 94–109). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Toomela, A. (1996). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization. Culture and Psychology, 2, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1988). Collectivism versus individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In Verma, G. K. and Bagley, C. (eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition (pp. 60–95). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51, 407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C., and Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vijver, F. J. R., and Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R., Hemert, D. A., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.) (2008). Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vliert, E. (2009). Climate, affluence, and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hemert, D. A., Poortinga, Y. H., and Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Emotion and culture: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 913–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandello, J. A., and Cohen, D. (2004). When believing is seeing: Sustaining norms of violence in cultures of honor. In Schaller, M. and Crandall, C. (eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 281–304). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2005). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Paterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., and Karp, S. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., and Schug, J. (2008). Preferences versus strategies as explanations for culture-specific behavior. Psychological Science, 19, 579–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, X., Tam, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., and Chiu, C.-Y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×