Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T12:58:52.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Approximate inference in switching linear dynamical systems using Gaussian mixtures

from II - Deterministic approximations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

David Barber
Affiliation:
University College London
David Barber
Affiliation:
University College London
A. Taylan Cemgil
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Istanbul
Silvia Chiappa
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] D. L., Alspach and H. W., Sorenson. Nonlinear Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sum approximations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 17(4):439–448, 1972.Google Scholar
[2] Y., Bar-Shalom and Xiao-Rong, Li. Estimation and Tracking: Principles, Techniques and Software. Artech House, 1998.Google Scholar
[3] D., Barber. Expectation correction for smoothing in switching linear Gaussian state space models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:2515–2540, 2006.Google Scholar
[4] C., Carter and R., Kohn. Markov chain Monte Carlo in conditionally Gaussian state space models. Biometrika, 83:589–601, 1996.Google Scholar
[5] A. T., Cemgil, B., Kappen and D., Barber. A generative model for music transcription. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 14(2):679–694, 2006.Google Scholar
[6] S., Chib and M., Dueker. Non-Markovian regime switching with endogenous states and time-varying state strengths. Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 600, Econometric Society, August 2004.
[7] A., Doucet, N., de Freitas, K., Murphy and S., Russell. Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic Bayesian networks. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2000.Google Scholar
[8] S., Frühwirth-Schnatter. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
[9] Z., Ghahramani and G. E., Hinton. Variational learning for switching state-space models. Neural Computation, 12(4):963–996, 1998.Google Scholar
[10] T., Heskes and O., Zoeter. Expectation propagation for approximate inference in dynamic Bayesian networks. In A., Darwiche and N., Friedman, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 216–223, 2002.Google Scholar
[11] C.-J., Kim. Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econometrics, 60:1–22, 1994.Google Scholar
[12] C.-J., Kim and C. R., Nelson. State-Space Models with Regime Switching. MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
[13] G., Kitagawa. The two-filter formula for smoothing and an implementation of the Gaussian-sum smoother. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 46(4):605–623, 1994.Google Scholar
[14] G., Kitagawa. Monte Carlo filter and smoother for non-Gaussian nonlinear state space models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(1):1–25, 1996.Google Scholar
[15] U., Lerner, R., Parr, D., Koller and G., Biswas. Bayesian fault detection and diagnosis in dynamic systems. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AIII-00), pages 531–537, 2000.Google Scholar
[16] U. N., Lerner. Hybrid Bayesian networks for reasoning about complex systems. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2002.
[17] B., Mesot and D., Barber. Switching linear dynamical systems for noise robust speech recognition. IEEE Transactions of Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 15(6):1850–1858, 2007.Google Scholar
[18] T., Minka. A family of algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference. PhD thesis, MIT Media Lab, 2001.
[19] V., Pavlovic, J. M., Rehg and J., MacCormick. Learning switching linear models of human motion. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), number 13, pages 981–987, 2001. MIT Press.Google Scholar
[20] D. M., Titterington, A. F. M., Smith and U. E., Makov. Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
[21] O., Zoeter. Monitoring non-linear and switching dynamical systems. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2005.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×