Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T14:05:19.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PORTUGAL

Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Allan R. Brewer-Carías
Affiliation:
Universidad Central de Venezuela
Joaquim de Sousa Ribeiro
Affiliation:
University of Coimbra
Get access

Summary

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW METHOD APPLIED IN PORTUGAL

The most important aspect of the Portuguese system of control of the constitutionality of legal norms is the fact that, according to Article 204 of Portuguese Constitution, “in matters brought before them for decision, the courts shall not apply any rules that contravene the provisions of this Constitution or the principles contained there.”

Every court (judicial, administrative, and fiscal) is vested with jurisdiction to review complaints involving violation of the Constitution. Moreover, every single judge is, in itself, a sort of constitutional court, as he or she must control the constitutionality of the rules that are applicable to the matters that are brought before the judge. If the judge thinks that those rules contravene the provisions of the Constitution, then he or she must refuse to apply them. However, the decisions in constitutional issues of other courts are not definitive, as there is always the possibility to appeal to the Constitutional Court.

The Constitutional Court is the only authority vested with ultimate jurisdiction to review of constitutionality, so that Article 221 of the Portuguese Constitution states: “The Constitutional Court is the court that has the specific power to administer justice in matters involving questions of legal and constitutional nature.”

It must be mentioned that Portugal does not have mechanisms like the German Verfassunsgsbeschwerde or the Spanish recurso de amparo.

Type
Chapter
Information
Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators
A Comparative Law Study
, pp. 721 - 734
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×