Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T23:52:31.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Quantifying Dialect Similarity by Comparison of the Lexical Distribution of Phonemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Warren Maguire
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
John Nerbonne
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Charlotte Gooskens
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Sebastian Kürschner
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Renée van Bezooijen
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Get access

Summary

Abstract This paper describes a new method for quantifying the similarity of the lexical distribution of phonemes in different varieties of a language (in this case English). In addition to introducing the method, it discusses phonological problems which must be addressed if any comparison of this sort is to be attempted, and applies the method to a limited data set of varieties of English. Since the method assesses their structural similarity, it will be useful for analysing the historical development of varieties of English and the relationships (either as a result of common origin or of contact) that hold between them.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years considerable progress has been made in assessing the relationships between linguistic varieties by measuring the similarity between strictly comparable sets of phonetic data. In particular, measurement of Levenshtein Distance (see, for example, Nerbonne, Heeringa, and Kleiweg, 1999; Nerbonne and Heeringa, 2001; Heeringa, 2004) has proved useful for determining the relationships between closely related varieties, and the ‘Sound Comparisons’ method for assessing the distance between varieties provides a very promising alternative technique for looking into the changing relationships between closely-related and not so closely-related varieties (Heggarty, McMahon and McMahon, 2005; McMahon, Heggarty, McMahon and Maguire, 2007).

Phonetic comparison algorithms of this sort are not, however, without their problems. Firstly, they often depend upon auditory phonetic transcriptions of one degree of fineness or another, with all the associated issues of transcriber isoglosses, inaccuracies and realism that this method brings (see Milroy and Gordon, 2003: 144–152 for a discussion of the issues).

Type
Chapter
Information
Computing and Language Variation
International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing Volume 2
, pp. 261 - 278
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×