Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:37:08.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Non-biomarker maturity parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

K. E. Peters
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
C. C. Walters
Affiliation:
ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Co.
J. M. Moldowan
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

This chapter explains how certain non-biomarker parameters, such as ratios involving n-alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons, are used to assess thermal maturity. Critical information on specificity and the means for measurement are highlighted before the discussion of each parameter.

Various characteristics of petroleum samples can be used to assess their relative level of thermal maturity. For related crude oils of increasing thermal maturity, the n-alkane envelope becomes displaced toward lower-molecular-weight homologs (see Figure 4.23).API-gravity and nC19/nC31 and saturate/aromatic ratios increase, while sulfur, nitrogen, and isoprenoid/n-alkane ratios decrease. For example, thermal maturity is the principal factor controlling the strong inverse correlation between API gravity and sulfur content for Monterey oils from the Santa Barbara Channel and offshore Santa Maria Basin (Baskin and Peters, 1992). Some of the more commonly applied non-biomarker maturity parameters are discussed below.

ALKANES AND ISOPRENOIDS

Isoprenoid/n-alkane ratios

Specific for maturity, but also affected by other processes, such as source and biodegradation. Measured using peak heights or areas from gas chromatography (e.g. see Figure 2.16).

As discussed above, pristane/nC17 and phytane/nC18 decrease with thermal maturity as more n-alkanes are generated from kerogen by cracking (Tissot et al., 1971). These isoprenoid/n-alkane ratios can be used to assist in ranking the thermal maturity of related, non-biodegraded oils and bitumens. However, organic matter input (Alexander et al., 1981) and secondary processes such as biodegradation can affect these ratios (Figure 4.26).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Biomarker Guide , pp. 641 - 644
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×