Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:23:19.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Label-Free Biosensor Technologies in Small Molecule Modulator Discovery

from Section Four - Chemical Genomics Assays and Screens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Haian Fu
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Label-free biosensor technologies allow the detection of molecular interactions and cell-based biological readouts without the need for conventional labels or engineered cell lines with overexpressed targets. A number of label-free detection technologies have been used for monitoring biomolecular interactions, most notably surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (SPR) and isothermocalorimetry (ITC) [1–4]. With the rapid development of label-free based detection instrumentation in recent years, the power of various label-free technologies for studying biomolecular interactions and endogenous cellular events has been recognized by biomedical investigators, especially scientists involved in high-throughput screening (HTS). This, in turn, has led to a rapidly expanding list of various assay formats for HTS and allowed, for the first time, label-free screening for drug discovery in an HTS format [3, 5]. This chapter reviews basic principles of several major label-free biosensor technologies, with emphasis on microplate-based technologies and their practical applications in small molecule modulator discovery.

Traditional Label-Based Technologies for HTS

Various in vitro biochemical assays and cell-based methods are frequently employed in HTS for small molecule modulator discovery. These assays are often performed in a microplate format (96/384/1536 wells) in order to meet the demand of handling large sample numbers in primary HTS. In vitro biochemical assays rely on the use of an isolated or purified target that is often coupled with a tag (e.g., a fluorophor) for detection. These targets include purified adaptor proteins, enzymes, receptors, or cellular extract containing the target(s) of interest. Common detection methods in biochemical HTS assays include fluorescence polarization (FP), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), fluorescence intensity (FI), luminescence, and absorbance. FP measures the binding of a macromolecule to a relatively small peptide or ligand labeled with a fluorophore [6]. Binding of a macromolecule to the fluorophore-labeled small ligand/peptide slows down its rotation in solution and generates an FP signal. FRET allows the measurement of interacting molecules within a certain distance (<100 Å) (see Chapter 14 for details). The target and its binding partner are labeled separately, with a donor and a paired acceptor fluorophore containing matching excitation and emission spectra. Binding of the two molecules brings the donor and acceptor into close proximity, allowing energy transfer from the donor to the acceptor and FRET signal production. FRET signals can be derived in order to provide structural proximity information of molecular interactions [7]. FI-based assays measure changes in fluorescence intensity resulting from biochemical reactions. For example, cleavage of an appropriately fluorophore-labeled substrate by an enzyme can lead to a change in fluorescence intensity [8]. Biochemical assays are routinely used for monitoring receptor-ligand interactions, protein-protein interactions, and enzymatic activities (e.g., kinases and proteases).

Type
Chapter
Information
Chemical Genomics , pp. 245 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jason-Moller, LMurphy, MBruno, J 2006 Overview of Biacore systems and their applicationsCurr Protoc Protein Sci 13Google Scholar
Gauglitz, GProll, G 2008 Strategies for label-free optical detectionAdv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 109 395Google Scholar
Rich, R. LMyszka, D. G 2007 Higher-throughput, label-free, real-time molecular interaction analysisAnal Biochem 361 1Google Scholar
Piliarik, MVaisocherova, HHomola, J 2009 Surface plasmon resonance biosensingMethods Mol Biol 503 65Google Scholar
Dodgson, KGedge, LMurray, D. CColdwell, M 2009 A 100K well screen for a muscarinic receptor using the Epic label-free system – a reflection on the benefits of the label-free approach to screening seven-transmembrane receptorsJ Recept Signal Transduct Res 29 163Google Scholar
Smith, D. SEremin, S. A 2008 Fluorescence polarization immunoassays and related methods for simple, high-throughput screening of small moleculesAnal Bioanal Chem 391 1499Google Scholar
Klostermeier, DMillar, D. P 2001 Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer: a versatile tool for the analysis of nucleic acidsBiopolymers 61 159Google Scholar
Glickman, J. FWu, XMercuri, RIlly, CBowen, B. RHe, YSills, M 2002 A comparison of ALPHAScreen, TR-FRET, and TRF as assay methods for FXR nuclear receptorsJ Biomol Screen 7 3Google Scholar
Eglen, R. M 2002 Enzyme fragment complementation: a flexible high throughput screening assay technologyAssay Drug Dev Technol 1 97Google Scholar
Cooper, M. A 2006 Non-optical screening platforms: the next wave in label-free screeningDrug Discov Today 11 1068Google Scholar
Cooper, M. A 2006 Optical biosensors: where next and how soon?Drug Discov Today 11 1061Google Scholar
Kenakin, T. P 2009 Cellular assays as portals to seven-transmembrane receptor-based drug discoveryNat Rev Drug Discov 8 617Google Scholar
Fang, Y 2007 Non-invasive optical biosensor for probing cell signallingSensors 4 2316Google Scholar
Fang, YFerrie, A. M 2008 Label-free optical biosensor for ligand-directed functional selectivity acting on beta(2) adrenoceptor in living cellsFEBS Lett 582 558Google Scholar
Atienza, J. MYu, NKirstein, S. LXi, BWang, XXu, XAbassi, Y. A 2006 Dynamic and label-free cell-based assays using the real-time cell electronic sensing systemAssay Drug Dev Technol 4 597Google Scholar
McGuinness, R 2007 Impedance-based cellular assay technologies: recent advances, future promiseCurr Opin Pharmacol 7 535Google Scholar
Velusamy, VArshak, KKorostynska, OOliwa, KAdley, CAn overview of foodborne pathogen detection: in the perspective of biosensorsBiotechnol Adv 28 232
Bosch, M. ESanchez, A. JRojas, F. SOjeda, C. B 2007 Optical chemical biosensors for high-throughput screening of drugsComb Chem High Throughput Screen 10 413Google Scholar
Shiau, A. KMassari, M. EOzbal, C. C 2008 Back to basics: label-free technologies for small molecule screeningComb Chem High Throughput Screen 11 231Google Scholar
Homola, J 2003 Present and future of surface plasmon resonance biosensorsAnal Bioanal Chem 377 528Google Scholar
Hoa, X. DKirk, A. GTabrizian, M 2007 Towards integrated and sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensors: a review of recent progressBiosens Bioelectron 23 151Google Scholar
Crona, MFurrer, ETorrents, EEdgell, D. RSjoberg, B. M 2010 Subunit and small-molecule interaction of ribonucleotide reductases via surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysesProtein Eng Des Sel 23 633Google Scholar
Adamczyk, MMoore, J. AYu, Z 2000 Application of surface plasmon resonance toward studies of low-molecular-weight antigen-antibody binding interactionsMethods 20 319Google Scholar
Shliom, OHuang, MSachais, BKuo, AWeisel, J. WNagaswami, CNassar, TBdeir, KHiss, EGawlak, SHarris, SMazar, AHigazi, A. A 2000 Novel interactions between urokinase and its receptorJ Biol Chem 275 24304Google Scholar
Kawamoto, S. AThompson, A. DColeska, ANikolovska-Coleska, ZYi, HWang, S 2009 Analysis of the interaction of BCL9 with beta-catenin and development of fluorescence polarization and surface plasmon resonance binding assays for this interactionBiochemistry 48 9534Google Scholar
Huber, W 2005 A new strategy for improved secondary screening and lead optimization using high-resolution SPR characterization of compound-target interactionsJ Mol Recognit 18 273Google Scholar
Mattu, MDi Giovine, PSteinkuhler, CDe Francesco, RAltamura, SCecchetti, OCarfi, ABarbato, G 2008 Development and optimization of a binding assay for histone deacetylase 4 using surface plasmon resonanceAnal Biochem 377 267Google Scholar
Cochran, SLi, C. PFerro, V 2009 A surface plasmon resonance-based solution affinity assay for heparan sulfate-binding proteinsGlycoconj J 26 577Google Scholar
Mandine, EGofflo, DJean-Baptiste, VSarubbi, ETouyer, GDeprez, PLesuisse, D 2001 Src homology-2 domain binding assays by scintillation proximity and surface plasmon resonanceJ Mol Recognit 14 254Google Scholar
Shumaker-Parry, J. SAebersold, RCampbell, C. T 2004 Parallel, quantitative measurement of protein binding to a 120-element double-stranded DNA array in real time using surface plasmon resonance microscopyAnal Chem 76 2071Google Scholar
Buckle, M 2001 Surface plasmon resonance applied to DNA-protein complexesMethods Mol Biol 148 535Google Scholar
Davis, T. MWilson, W. D 2001 Surface plasmon resonance biosensor analysis of RNA-small molecule interactionsMethods Enzymol 340 22Google Scholar
Dickopf, SFrank, MJunker, H. DMaier, SMetz, GOttleben, HRau, HSchellhaas, NSchmidt, KSekul, RVanier, CVetter, DCzech, JLorenz, MMatter, HSchudok, MSchreuder, HWill, D. WNestler, H. P 2004 Custom chemical microarray production and affinity fingerprinting for the S1 pocket of factor VIIaAnal Biochem 335 50Google Scholar
Takeda, HFukumoto, AMiura, AGoshima, NNomura, N 2006 High-throughput kinase assay based on surface plasmon resonance suitable for native protein substratesAnal Biochem 357 262Google Scholar
Takeda, HGoshima, NNomura, NHigh-throughput kinase assay based on surface plasmon resonanceMethods Mol Biol 627 131
Boozer, CKim, GCong, SGuan, HLondergan, T 2006 Looking towards label-free biomolecular interaction analysis in a high-throughput format: a review of new surface plasmon resonance technologiesCurr Opin Biotechnol 17 400Google Scholar
Thoma, RLoffler, BStihle, MHuber, WRuf, AHennig, M 2003 Structural basis of proline-specific exopeptidase activity as observed in human dipeptidyl peptidase-IVStructure 11 947Google Scholar
Giannetti, A. MKoch, B. DBrowner, M. F 2008 Surface plasmon resonance based assay for the detection and characterization of promiscuous inhibitorsJ Med Chem 51 574Google Scholar
Fan, XWhite, I. MShopova, S. IZhu, HSuter, J. DSun, Y 2008 Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: a reviewAnal Chim Acta 620 8Google Scholar
Cunningham, B. TLaing, L 2006 Microplate-based, label-free detection of biomolecular interactions: applications in proteomicsExpert Rev Proteomics 3 271Google Scholar
Cunningham, B. TLi, PSchulz, SLin, BBaird, CGerstenmaier, JGenick, CWang, FFine, ELaing, L 2004 Label-free assays on the BIND systemJ Biomol Screen 9 481Google Scholar
Lin, BQiu, JGerstenmeier, JLi, PPien, HPepper, JCunningham, B 2002 A label-free optical technique for detecting small molecule interactionsBiosens Bioelectron 17 827Google Scholar
Wu, MCoblitz, BShikano, SLong, SSpieker, MFrutos, A. GMukhopadhyay, SLi, M 2006 Phospho-specific recognition by 14–3-3 proteins and antibodies monitored by a high throughput label-free optical biosensorFEBS Lett 580 5681Google Scholar
O’Malley, S. MXie, XFrutos, A. G 2007 Label-free high-throughput functional lytic assaysJ Biomol Screen 12 117Google Scholar
Fang, YFerrie, A. MFontaine, N. HMauro, JBalakrishnan, J 2006 Resonant waveguide grating biosensor for living cell sensingBiophys J 91 1925Google Scholar
Atienza, J. MYu, NWang, XXu, XAbassi, Y 2006 Label-free and real-time cell-based kinase assay for screening selective and potent receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors using microelectronic sensor arrayJ Biomol Screen 11 634Google Scholar
Fang, Y 2006 Label-free cell-based assays with optical biosensors in drug discoveryAssay Drug Dev Technol 4 583Google Scholar
Giaever, IKeese, C. R 1993 A morphological biosensor for mammalian cellsNature 366 591Google Scholar
Xi, BYu, NWang, XXu, XAbassi, Y. A 2008 The application of cell-based label-free technology in drug discoveryBiotechnol J 3 484Google Scholar
Fang, YFrutos, A. GVerklereen, R 2008 Label-free cell-based assays for GPCR screeningComb Chem High Throughput Screen 11 357Google Scholar
Velasco-Garcia, M. N 2009 Optical biosensors for probing at the cellular level: a review of recent progress and future prospectsSemin Cell Dev Biol 20 27Google Scholar
Ponti, JCeriotti, LMunaro, BFarina, MMunari, AWhelan, MColpo, PSabbioni, ERossi, F 2006 Comparison of impedance-based sensors for cell adhesion monitoring and in vitro methods for detecting cytotoxicity induced by chemicalsAltern Lab Anim 34 515Google Scholar
Xiao, CLachance, BSunahara, GLuong, J. H 2002 Assessment of cytotoxicity using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing: concentration and time response function approachAnal Chem 74 5748Google Scholar
Wang, LZhu, JDeng, CXing, W. LCheng, J 2008 An automatic and quantitative on-chip cell migration assay using self-assembled monolayers combined with real-time cellular impedance sensingLab Chip 8 872Google Scholar
Lee, P. HGao, Avan Staden, CLy, JSalon, JXu, AFang, YVerkleeren, R 2008 Evaluation of dynamic mass redistribution technology for pharmacological studies of recombinant and endogenously expressed G protein-coupled receptorsAssay Drug Dev Technol 6 83Google Scholar
Fang, YFerrie, A. MFontaine, N. HYuen, P. K 2005 Characteristics of dynamic mass redistribution of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in living cells measured with label-free optical biosensorsAnal Chem 77 5720Google Scholar
Chan, L. LGosangari, S. LWatkin, K. LCunningham, B. T 2007 A label-free photonic crystal biosensor imaging method for detection of cancer cell cytotoxicity and proliferationApoptosis 12 1061Google Scholar
Fang, YFerrie, A. MLi, G 2005 Probing cytoskeleton modulation by optical biosensorsFEBS Lett 579 4175Google Scholar
Owens, R. MWang, CYou, J. AJiambutr, JXu, A. SMarala, R. BJin, M. M 2009 Real-time quantitation of viral replication and inhibitor potency using a label-free optical biosensorJ Recept Signal Transduct Res 29 195Google Scholar
Fleming, M. RKaczmarek, L. K 2009 Use of optical biosensors to detect modulation of Slack potassium channels by G protein-coupled receptorsJ Recept Signal Transduct Res 29 173Google Scholar
Du, YLi, ZLi, LChen, Z. GSun, S. YChen, PShin, D. MKhuri, F. RFu, H 2009 Distinct growth factor-induced dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) profiles for monitoring oncogenic signaling pathways in various cancer cellsJ Recept Signal Transduct Res 29 182Google Scholar
Zhang, J. HChung, T. DOldenburg, K. R 1999 A simple statistical parameter for use in valuation and validation of high throughput screening assaysJ Biomol Screen 4 67Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×