Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:36:50.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Computational Approach for Drug Target Identification

from Section Four - Chemical Genomics Assays and Screens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Haian Fu
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Drug research and development (R&D) is a comprehensive, expensive, and time-consuming enterprise, full of risk throughout the process [1]. In general, the pipeline for drug discovery is composed of three major steps: drug target identification and validation, lead compound discovery and optimization, and preclinical research (Figure 20.1). In the last decades, a lot of new technologies have been developed and applied in drug R&D to shorten the research cycle and reduce the expenses. Among them, computational approaches have revolutionized the pipeline of the discovery and development [2]. In the past forty years, computational technologies for drug R&D have been evolving very quickly, especially in recent decades with the unprecedented development of biology, biomedicine, and computer capabilities. In the postgenomic era, because of the dramatic increase of small molecule and biomacromolecule information, computational tools have been applied in almost every stage of drug R&D, greatly changing the strategy and pipeline for drug discovery [2]. Computational approaches span almost all stages in the discovery and development pipeline, from target identification to lead discovery and from lead optimization to preclinical or clinical trials (Figure 20.1).

As shown in Figure 20.1, the target identification and validation are the first two key stages in the drug discovery pipeline. By 2000, only about 500 drug targets had been reported [3, 4]. The completion of human genome project and numerous pathogen genomes unveiled that there are thirty thousand to forty thousand genes and at least the same number of proteins, and many of these proteins are potential targets for drug discovery. However, it is still a challenging task to identify and validate those druggable targets from thousands of candidate macromolecules [5].

Type
Chapter
Information
Chemical Genomics , pp. 279 - 290
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DiMasi, J. A.Hansen, R. W.Grabowski, H. G. 2003 The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costsJ Health Econ 22 151Google Scholar
Jorgensen, W. L. 2004 The many roles of computation in drug discoveryScience 303 1813Google Scholar
Drews, J 2000 Drug discovery: a historical perspectiveScience 287 1960Google Scholar
Leader, BBaca, Q. JGolan, D. E 2008 Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classificationNat Rev Drug Discov 7 21Google Scholar
Huang, C. MElmets, C. ATang, D. CLi, FYusuf, N 2004 Proteomics reveals that proteins expressed during the early stage of Bacillus anthracis infection are potential targets for the development of vaccines and drugsGenomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2 143Google Scholar
Marton, M. JDeRisi, J. LBennett, H. AIyer, V. RMeyer, M. RRoberts, C. JStoughton, RBurchard, JSlade, DDai, HBassett, D. EHartwell, L. HBrown, P. OFriend, S. H 1998 Drug target validation and identification of secondary drug target effects using DNA microarraysNat Med 4 1293Google Scholar
Lindsay, M. A 2003 Target discoveryNat Rev Drug Discov 2 831Google Scholar
Garcia-Lara, JMasalha, MFoster, S. J 2005 Drug Discov Today 10 643
Orth, A. PBatalov, SPerrone, MChanda, S. K 2004 The promise of genomics to identify novel therapeutic targetsExpert Opin Ther Targets 8 587Google Scholar
Brooijmans, NKuntz, I. D 2003 Molecular recognition and docking algorithmsAnnu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32 335Google Scholar
Ingo Muegge, M. R 2001 Small molecule docking and scoringReviews in Computational ChemistryLipkowitz, K. BBoyd, D. BJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc1
Carlson, H. A. 2002 Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving targetCurr Opin Chem Biol 6 447Google Scholar
Zeelen, F. J 1995 The lock-and-key principleTrends Pharm Sci 16 322Google Scholar
Abraham, D. JJohn, B. TDavid, J. T 2007 Structure-based drug design – a historical perspective and the futureComprehensive Medicinal Chemistry IITriggle, D. JTaylor, J. BOxfordElsevier65
Kuntz, I. DBlaney, J. MOatley, S. JLangridge, RFerrin, T. E 1982 A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactionsJ Mol Biol 161 269Google Scholar
Ekins, SMestres, JTesta, B 2007 In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profilingBr J Pharmacol 152 9Google Scholar
Kitchen, D. B.Decornez, H.Furr, J. R.Bajorath, J. 2004 Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applicationsNat Rev Drug Discov 3 935Google Scholar
Teague, S. J. 2003 Implications of protein flexibility for drug discoveryNat Rev Drug Discov 2 527Google Scholar
Böhm, H.-JStahl, M 2003 The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applicationsReviews in Computational ChemistryLipkowitz, K. BBoyd, D. BJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc41
Kollman, P. A 1993 Free energy calculations: applications to chemical and biochemical phenomenaChem Rev 93 2395Google Scholar
Ekins, SMestres, JTesta, B 2007 In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: applications to targets and beyondBr J Pharmacol 152 21Google Scholar
Waszkowycz, BPerkins, T. D. JSykes, R. ALi, J 2001 Large-scale virtual screening for discovering leads in the postgenomic eraIBM Systems J 40 360Google Scholar
Doman, T. NMcGovern, S. LWitherbee, B. JKasten, T. PKurumbail, RStallings, W. CConnolly, D. TShoichet, B. K 2002 Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1BJ Med Chem 45 2213Google Scholar
Rochu, DGeorges, CRepiton, JViguie, NSaliou, BBon, CMasson, P 2001 Thermal stability of acetylcholinesterase from Bungarus fasciatus venom as investigated by capillary electrophoresisBiochim Biophys Acta 1545 216Google Scholar
Honma, THayashi, KAoyama, THashimoto, NMachida, TFukasawa, KIwama, TIkeura, CIkuta, MSuzuki-Takahashi, IIwasawa, YHayama, TNishimura, SMorishima, H 2001 Structure-based generation of a new class of potent Cdk4 inhibitors: new de novo design strategy and library designJ Med Chem 44 4615Google Scholar
Enyedy, I. JLing, YNacro, KTomita, YWu, XCao, YGuo, RLi, BZhu, XHuang, YLong, Y. QRoller, P. PYang, DWang, S 2001 Discovery of small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 through structure-based computer screeningJ Med Chem 44 4313Google Scholar
Iwata, Y.Arisawa, M.Hamada, R.Kita, Y.Mizutani, M. Y.Tomioka, N.Itai, A.Miyamoto, S. 2001 Discovery of novel aldose reductase inhibitors using a protein structure-based approach: 3D-database search followed by design and synthesisJ Med Chem 44 1718Google Scholar
Enyedy, I. JLee, S. LKuo, A. HDickson, R. BLin, C. YWang, S 2001 Structure-based approach for the discovery of bis-benzamidines as novel inhibitors of matriptaseJ Med Chem 44 1349Google Scholar
Pang, Y. P.Xu, K.Kollmeyer, T. M.Perola, E.McGrath, W. J.Green, D. T.Mangel, W. F. 2001 Discovery of a new inhibitor lead of adenovirus proteinase: steps toward selective, irreversible inhibitors of cysteine proteinasesFEBS Lett 502 93Google Scholar
Baxter, C. A.Murray, C. W.Waszkowycz, B.Li, J.Sykes, R. A.Bone, R. G.Perkins, T. D.Wylie, W. 2000 New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databasesJ Chem Inf Comput Sci 40 254Google Scholar
Liu, HGao, Z. BYao, ZZheng, SLi, YZhu, WTan, XLuo, XShen, JChen, KHu, G. YJiang, H 2007 Discovering potassium channel blockers from synthetic compound database by using structure-based virtual screening in conjunction with electrophysiological assayJ Med Chem 50 83Google Scholar
Maggio, E. TRamnarayan, K 2001 Recent developments in computational proteomicsDrug Discov Today 6 996Google Scholar
Lenz, G. RNash, H. MJindal, S 2000 Chemical ligands, genomics and drug discoveryDrug Discov Today 5 145Google Scholar
Giese, KKaufmann, JPronk, G. JKlippel, A 2002 Unravelling novel intracellular pathways in cell-based assaysDrug Discov Today 7 179Google Scholar
Caron, P. RMullican, M. DMashal, R. DWilson, K. PSu, M. SMurcko, M. A 2001 Chemogenomic approaches to drug discoveryCurr Opin Chem Biol 5 464Google Scholar
Zheng, X. FChan, T. F 2002 Chemical genomics in the global study of protein functionsDrug Discov Today 7 197Google Scholar
Oi, H.Matsuura, D.Miyake, M.Ueno, M.Takai, I.Yamamoto, T.Kubo, M.Moss, J.Noda, M. 2002 Identification in traditional herbal medications and confirmation by synthesis of factors that inhibit cholera toxin-induced fluid accumulationProc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99 3042Google Scholar
Rockey, W. MElcock, A. H 2005 Rapid computational identification of the targets of protein kinase inhibitorsJ Med Chem 48 4138Google Scholar
Chen, Y. Z.Zhi, D. G. 2001 Ligand-protein inverse docking and its potential use in the computer search of protein targets of a small moleculeProteins 43 217Google Scholar
Chen, Y. Z.Ung, C. Y. 2001 Prediction of potential toxicity and side effect protein targets of a small molecule by a ligand-protein inverse docking approachJ Mol Graph Model 20 199Google Scholar
Paul, N.Kellenberger, E.Bret, G.Muller, P.Rognan, D. 2004 Recovering the true targets of specific ligands by virtual screening of the protein data bankProteins 54 671Google Scholar
Gasteiger, J.Rudolph, C.Sadowski, J. 1990 Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic moleculesTetrahedron Comput Methodol 3 537Google Scholar
Berman, H. MWestbrook, JFeng, ZGilliland, GBhat, T. NWeissig, HShindyalov, I. NBourne, P. E 2000 The Protein Data BankNucleic Acids Res 28 235Google Scholar
Todd, J. A.Ewing, I. D. K. 1997 Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screeningJ Comput Chem 18 1175Google Scholar
Kuntz, I. D 1992 Structure-based strategies for drug design and discoveryScience 257 1078Google Scholar
Goodsell, D. SOlson, A. J 1990 Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealingProteins 8 195Google Scholar
Morris, G. MGoodsell, D. SHuey, ROlson, A. J 1996 Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4J Comput Aided Mol Des 10 293Google Scholar
Morris, G. MGoodsell, D. SHalliday, R. SHuey, RHart, W. EBelew, R. KOlson, A. J 1998 Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy functionJ Comput Chem 19 1639Google Scholar
Gao, ZLi, HZhang, HLiu, XKang, LLuo, XZhu, WChen, KWang, XJiang, H 2008 PDTD: a web-accessible protein database for drug target identificationBMC Bioinformatics 9Google Scholar
Chen, XJi, Z. LChen, Y. Z 2002 TTD: Therapeutic Target DatabaseNucleic Acids Res 30 412Google Scholar
Wishart, D. SKnox, CGuo, A. CShrivastava, SHassanali, MStothard, PChang, ZWoolsey, J 2006 DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and explorationNucleic Acids Res 34 D668Google Scholar
Wang, JKollman, P. AKuntz, I. D 1999 Flexible ligand docking: a multistep strategy approachProteins 36 1Google Scholar
Li, HGao, ZKang, LZhang, HYang, KYu, KLuo, XZhu, WChen, KShen, JWang, XJiang, H 2006 TarFisDock: a web server for identifying drug targets with docking approachNucleic Acids Res 34 W219Google Scholar
Cai, JHan, CHu, TZhang, JWu, DWang, FLiu, YDing, JChen, KYue, JShen, XJiang, H 2006 Peptide deformylase is a potential target for anti- drugs: reverse docking, enzymatic assay, and X-ray crystallography validationProtein Sci 15 2071Google Scholar
Yue, LZhu, D. NYan, Y. QYu, B. Y 2006 Relationship between components changes and efficacy of Shengmaisan VII. Chemical dynamic change of schisandrin in ShengmaisanZhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 31 1010Google Scholar
Mazel, D.Pochet, S.Marliere, P. 1994 Genetic characterization of polypeptide deformylase, a distinctive enzyme of eubacterial translationEmbo J 13 914Google Scholar
Meinnel, T.Blanquet, S. 1994 Characterization of the Thermus thermophilus locus encoding peptide deformylase and methionyl-tRNA(fMet) formyltransferaseJ Bacteriol 176 7387Google Scholar
Margolis, P.Hackbarth, C.Lopez, S.Maniar, M.Wang, W.Yuan, Z.White, R.Trias, J. 2001 Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45 2432
Lee, M. DAntczak, CLi, YSirotnak, F. MBornmann, W. GScheinberg, D. A 2003 A new human peptide deformylase inhibitable by actinoninBiochem Biophys Res Commun 312 309Google Scholar
Serero, AGiglione, CSardini, AMartinez-Sanz, JMeinnel, T 2003 An unusual peptide deformylase features in the human mitochondrial N-terminal methionine excision pathwayJ Biol Chem 278 52953Google Scholar
Nguyen, K. THu, XColton, CChakrabarti, RZhu, M. XPei, D 2003 Characterization of a human peptide deformylase: implications for antibacterial drug designBiochemistry 42 9952Google Scholar
Lazennec, CMeinnel, T 1997 Formate dehydrogenase-coupled spectrophotometric assay of peptide deformylaseAnal Biochem 244 180Google Scholar
Ray, S. S.Bonanno, J. B.Rajashankar, K. R.Pinho, M. G.He, G.De Lencastre, H.Tomasz, A.Burley, S. K. 2002 Cocrystal structures of diaminopimelate decarboxylase: mechanism, evolution, and inhibition of an antibiotic resistance accessory factorStructure 10 1499Google Scholar
Scriven, FWlasichuk, K. BPalcic, M. M 1988 A continual spectrophotometric assay for amino acid decarboxylasesAnal Biochem 170 367Google Scholar
Chong, C. RSullivan, D. J 2007 New uses for old drugsNature 448 645Google Scholar
O’Connor, K. A.Roth, B. L. 2005 Finding new tricks for old drugs: an efficient route for public-sector drug discoveryNat Rev Drug Discov 4 1005Google Scholar
Ni, BZhu, TJiang, Z. ZZhang, RZhang, TZhang, L. Y 2008 In vitro and in silico approaches for analyzing the toxicological effect of triptolide on Cx43 in Sertoli cellsToxicol Mech Meth 18 717Google Scholar
Campillos, M.Kuhn, M.Gavin, A. C.Jensen, L. J.Bork, P. 2008 Drug target identification using side-effect similarityScience 321 263Google Scholar
Tsang, I. K 2007 Establishing the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicineNat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3 60Google Scholar
Hoessel, R.Leclerc, S.Endicott, J. A.Nobel, M. E.Lawrie, A.Tunnah, P.Leost, M.Damiens, E.Marie, D.Marko, D.Niederberger, E.Tang, W.Eisenbrand, G.Meijer, L. 1999 Indirubin, the active constituent of a Chinese antileukaemia medicine, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinasesNat Cell Biol 1 60Google Scholar
Chen, S. TDou, JTemple, RAgarwal, RWu, K. MWalker, S 2008 New therapies from old medicinesNat Biotechnol 26 1077Google Scholar
Harvey, A. L 2007 Natural products as a screening resourceCurr Opin Chem Biol 11 480Google Scholar
Newman, D. J 2008 Natural products as leads to potential drugs: an old process or the new hope for drug discoveryJ Med Chem 51 2589Google Scholar
Chen, XUng, C. YChen, Y 2003 Can an in silico drug-target search method be used to probe potential mechanisms of medicinal plant ingredients?Nat Prod Rep 20 432Google Scholar
Kopec, K. KBozyczko-Coyne, DWilliams, M 2005 Target identification and validation in drug discovery: the role of proteomicsBiochem Pharmacol 69 1133Google Scholar
Stockwell, B. R 2004 Exploring biology with small organic moleculesNature 432 846Google Scholar
Materi, WWishart, D. S 2007 Computational systems biology in drug discovery and development: methods and applicationsDrug Discov Today 12 295Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×