Ahlfors, L., Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH, 3rd edition, 1979 (c).Google Scholar

Arnold, V.I., Ordinary Differential Equations, translated from the Russian by Richard A., Silverman, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973 (c).Google Scholar

Audin, M., Geometry, Berlin; New York: Springer, 2003 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bär, C., Elementary Differential Geometry, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, M., A Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry, Berlin; New York: Springer, 2003 (r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, M., Jacob's Ladder of Differential Geometry; translated by Lester J., Senechal, New York; London: Springer, 2010 (r).Google Scholar

Bonola, R., Non-Euclidean Geometry: A Critical and Historical Study of Its Development, with writings of Lobachevskiĭ and Boylai (trans. by Halsted, ), translated by H. S., Carslaw, Dover Publications, Miniola, NY, 1955 (c,r).Google Scholar

Borsuk, K., Szmielew, W., Foundations of Geometry, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1960 (c,r).Google Scholar

Bos, H., Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes' transformation of the early modern concept of construction, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, W.E., DiPrima, R.C., Elementary Differential Equations, Wiley, 9th edition, Hoboken, NJ, 2008 (c).Google Scholar

Brannan, D., Esplen, M.F., Gray, J.J., Geometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brentjes, S., Ahmad, al-Karabisi'sCommentary on Euclid's “Elements,” in Sic Itur Ad Astra: Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften, edited by M., Folkerts and R., Lorch, Harrassowitz Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2000 (c).Google Scholar

Buekenhout, F., Handbook of Incidence Geometry: Buildings and Foundations, North-Holland, Amsterdam New York, 1994 (c).Google Scholar

Butzer, P.L., Fehér, F., eds. E.B., Christoffel, the infiuence of his work on mathematics and the physical sciences. International Christoffel Symposium in Honour of Christoffel on the 150th Anniversary of His Birth (1979: Aachen, Germany, and Monschau, Germany), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel; Boston, 1981 (a).

Carmo, M.P. do, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976 (c,r).Google Scholar

Carmo, M.P. do, Riemannian Geometry, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartan, Ë., Leçons sur al géometrie des espaces de Riemann, Gauthier-Villar, Paris, 1928 (c).Google Scholar

Chern, S.-S., Chen, W.H., Lam, K.S., Lectures on Differential Geometry, World Scientific, Singapore; River Edge, NJ: 1999 (a,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coddington, E., A Brief Account of the Historical Development of Pseudospherical Surfaces from 1827 to 1887, Columbia University thesis 1905 (c).

Conrad, B.P., Differential Equations: A Systems Approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002 (c).Google Scholar

Coolidge, J.L., The Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1909 (c).Google Scholar

Coolidge, J.L., A History of Geometrical Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1940, reissued by Dover Publication, NY, 1963 (a,r).Google Scholar

Coxeter, H.S.M., Non-Euclidean Geometry, The University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1947 (c).Google Scholar

Dacorogna, B., Introduction to the Calculus of Variations, Imperial College Press, London, 2004 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dombrowski, P., 150 years after Gauss'Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas, Astérique 62, 1979 (c,r).Google Scholar

Dubrovin, B.A., Fomenko, A.T., Novikov, S.P., Modern Geometry—Methods and Applications: Vol. 1, The geometry of surfaces, transformation groups, and fields (1984); vol. 2, The geometry and topology of manifolds (1985); vol. 3, Introduction to homology theory (1990), trans. by S.P., Novikov and R.G., Burns, Springer-Verlag, New York (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugas, R., A History of Mechanics, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 1988 (c).Google Scholar

Einstein, A., The Principle of Relativity, selected papers of Einstein, Minkowski, and others, Dover Publications, NY, 1952 (c).Google Scholar

Encyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Geometrie, Vol. 3, especially section 3. Essays by H., von Mangoldt, R., von Lilienthal, G., Scheffers, A., Voss, H., Liebmann, E., Salkowski, R., Weitzenböck, L., Berwald. Edited by W.F., Mayer and H., Mohrmann, Teubner, Leipzig, 1902–1927 (a).Google Scholar

Euclid, , The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, translated by Sir T. L., Heath, 3 vols., 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, 1926. Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1956 (c,r).Google Scholar

Fiala, F., Mathematische Kartographie, VEB Verlag Technik, Berlin, 1957 (c).Google Scholar

Gallot, S., Hulin, D., Lafontaine, J., Riemannian Geometry, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 1990 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauss, C.-F., Gesammelte Werke, hrsg. von der kgl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Published 1870 by Dieterich in Göttingen. Band 1. Disquisitiones arithmeticae. Band 2. HŽhere Arithmetik. Band 3. Analysis. Band 4. Wahrscheinlichkeits-Rechnung und Geometrie. Band 5. Mathematische Physik. Band 6. Astronomische Abhandlungen (a,r).

Gauss, C.-F., Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas, Commentationes Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Göttingesis Recentiores. In the collected works, Volume VI, pp. 99–146. Reprinted in 150 years after Gauss' “Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas” edited by P., Dombrowski, including an English translation from “General Investigations of Curved Surfaces” (published 1965) Raven Press, New York, translated by A.M., Hiltebeitel and J.C., Morehead, plus commentary. Société mathématique de France, 1979. Astérisque, 62 (c,r).Google Scholar

Gindikin, S. G., Tales of Physicists and Mathematicians (trans. A., Shuchat), Birkhäuser, Boston, 1988 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, A.; Abbena, E.; Salamon, S., Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica, 3rd edition, Chapman and Hall, CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2006 (a,r).Google Scholar

Gray, J.J., Linear differential equations and group theory from Riemann to Poincaré, Birkhaüser, Boston, 1985: 2nd edition, 2008 (c,r).Google Scholar

Gray, J.J., Ideas of space: Euclidean, non-Euclidean, and relativistic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2nd edition, 1989 (c,r).Google Scholar

Gray, J.J., Janos, Bolyai, Non-Euclidean Geometry and the Nature of Space, Burndy Library Publications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004 (c,r).Google Scholar

Gray, J.J., Worlds out of Nothing; a course on the history of geometry in the 19th century, Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. London: Springer, 2007 (a,r).Google Scholar

Greenberg, M.J., Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, 4th edition, 2008 (c,r).Google Scholar

Guillemin, V., Pollack, A., Differential Topology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974 (c,r).Google Scholar

Hicks, N., Notes on Differential Geometry, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., London, 1971 (c,r).Google Scholar

Hilbert, D., Grundlagen der Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig, 1899. Editions: 2nd, 1903; 3rd, 1909; 4th, 1913; 5th, 1922; 6th, 1923; 7th, 1930. English translation, Foundations of Geometry, translated by E.J., Townsend, Open Court Pub. Co., Chicago, 1902 (c,r).Google Scholar

Hilbert, D., David Hilbert's lectures on the foundations of mathematics and physics, 1891–1933. General editors, W., Ewald and M., Hallett, Springer, Berlin; New York, 2004 (a).Google Scholar

Hilbert, D.; Cohn-Vóssen, S., Geometry and the Imagination; translated by P., Nemenyi, Chelsea Pub. Co., New York, 1952 (a).Google Scholar

Hopf, H., Differential Geometry in the Large: Seminar lectures, New York University, 1946 and Stanford University, 1956; with a preface by S.S. Chern, Berlin; Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983 (a).Google Scholar

Hsiung, C.-C., A First Course in Differential Geometry, Wiley, New York; 1981 (r).Google Scholar

Huygens, C., Horologium oscillatorium sive de motu pendularium, Muguet, Paris, 1673.Google Scholar

Jacobson, N., Basic Algebra II, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, 2009 (c).Google Scholar

Katz, V., A History of Mathematics, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA. 3rd edition, 2008 (c,r).Google Scholar

Klein, F., Vorlesungen §ber nicht-euklidische Geometrie. Newly edited by W., Rosemann. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1928 (c).Google Scholar

Kobayashi, S., Nomizu, K., Foundations of Differential Geometry, in two volumes, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 1963, 1969 (a,r).Google Scholar

Kreyszig, E., Differential Geometry, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1964 (a).Google Scholar

Kulczycki, S., Non-Euclidean Geometry. Translated from Polish by Stanislaw, Knapowski, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, 1961 (a,r).Google Scholar

Kühnel, W., Differential Geometry: curves - surfaces - manifolds; trans. by Bruce, Hunt. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006 (a).Google Scholar

Lambert, J.H., Beyträge zum Gebrauche der Mathematik und deren Anwendung. Berlin, Dritte Theil, 1772 (c).Google Scholar

Lang, S.Calculus of Several Variables, UTM Series, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1987 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, S., Linear Algebra, UTM series, Springer-Verlag, NY, 2010 (c).Google Scholar

Lakatos, I., Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery; edited by John, Worrall and Elie, Zahar, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1976 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laplace, P.S., Mécanique Céleste, vol. 1, 1829; vol. 2, 1832; vol. 3, 1834; and vol. 4, 1839, Hilliard, Gray, Little and Wilkins, Boston (c).Google Scholar

Laubenbacher, R., Pengelley, D., Mathematical expeditions: Chronicles by the explorers. UTM: Readings in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999 (c, r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, J.M., Introduction to smooth manifolds, Springer, New York, 2003 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legendre, A.M., Éléments of Géometrie, Chez Firmin Didot, Paris, fifth edition, 1804 (a).Google Scholar

Lenz, H., Nichteuklidische Geometrie, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1967 (a,r).Google Scholar

Levi-Civita, T., The Absolute Differential Calculus. Translated by M., Long, Blackie, London, 1929 (c,r).Google Scholar

Loria, G., Spezielle Algebraische und Transscendente Ebene Kurven. Theorie und Geschichte, trans. into German by Fritz, Schütte, Teubner Verlag, Leipzig, 1902 (c,r).Google Scholar

Massey, W.S., A Basic Course in Algebraic Topology, GTM 127, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, 3rd edition (c,r).Google Scholar

McCleary, J., A First Course in Topology: Continuity and Dimension, STML/31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006, (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonell, P.W., Introduction to Map Projections, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1979 (c).Google Scholar

Meschkowski, H., Noneuclidean Geometry, Academic Press, New York, 1964 (a,r).Google Scholar

Meyer, T.H., Introduction to Geometrical and Physical Geodesy: Foundations of Geomatics, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 2010 (c,r).Google Scholar

Millman, R.S., Parker, G.D., Elements of Differential Geometry, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1977 (a).Google Scholar

Millman, R.S., Parker, G.D., Geometry: A Metric Approach with Models, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics Series, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moise, E., Geometric Topology in Dimensions 2 and 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977, (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munkres, J., Topology, 2nd edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000 (c,r).Google Scholar

Needham, T., Visual Complex Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999 (c,r).Google Scholar

Pais, A., “SubtleistheLord…”The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford University Press, New York, 1982 (c,r).Google Scholar

O'Neill, B., Elementary Differential Geometry, Academic Press, New York, 1966 (a,r).Google Scholar

O'Neill, B., Semi-Riemannian Geometry: With Applications to Relativity, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1983 (c,r).Google Scholar

Oprea, J., The Mathematics of Soap Films: Explorations with Maple®. American Mathematics Society, STML 10, Providence, RI, 2000 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Playfair, J., Elements of Geometry; containing the first six books of Euclid, with two books on the geometry of solids. To which are added, elements of plane and spherical trigonometry, Bell and Bradfute, and G. G. and J. Robinson, London, 1795 (c,r).Google Scholar

Pogorelov, A.V., Differential Geometry. Trans. from the first Russian ed. by Leo F., Boron, P., Noordhoff, Groningen, ca. 1950 (c,r).Google Scholar

Poincaré, J.H., Science and Méthode, Flammarion, Paris, 1908. English translation, Science and Method, translated by Francis, Maitland, with preface by Bertrand Russell, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London and New York, 1914 (c).Google Scholar

Prenowitz, W.; Jordan, M., Basic Concepts of Geometry, Ardsley House, New York, 1965 (a).Google Scholar

Pressley, A., Elementary Differential Geometry, London; New York: Springer, 2001 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proclus, A.Commentary on the first Book of Euclid's Elements. Translated, with introduction and Notes, by Glenn R., Morrow, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970 (c).Google Scholar

Richards, J., Mathematical Visions: The Pursuit of Geometry in Victorian England, Academic Press, New York, 1988 (a).Google Scholar

Riemann, B., Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, ed. R., Dedekind and H., Weber, Göttingen, 1892 with Supplement in 1902, Teubner, Leipzig. Reissued by Dover, New York, 1953 (c,r).Google Scholar

Robinson, A., Elements of Cartography, Wiley, New York, 1960 (a).Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, B., A History of non-Euclidean Geometry (trans. A., Shenitzer), 1st English edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, P.J., Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometry: An Analytic Approach, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1986 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saccheri, Girolamo, Euclides ab omni naevo Vindicatus (Euclid vindicated of every fiaw), Mediolani 1733. Translated from the Latin by George Bruce, Halstead, AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 1986, (c,r).Google Scholar

Scholz, E., Geschichte des Mannigfaltigkeitsbegriffs von Riemann bis Poincaré. Birkhäuser, Basel-Boston-Stuttgart, 1980 (c,r).Google Scholar

Schouten, J.A., Der Ricci-Kalkl, Springer, Berlin, 1924; The Ricci Calculus, English translation, 1954 (c).Google Scholar

Schröder, E., Kartenentwürfe der Erde, Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun, 1988 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharpe, R., Differential Geometry: Cartan's Generalization of Klein's Erlangen Program, Springer-Verlag, GTM 166, New York, 1997 (c).Google Scholar

Shirokov, P.A., A Sketch of the Fundamentals of Lobachevskian Geometry. Prepared for publication by I.N., Bronshtein. Translated from the 1st Russian ed. by Leo F., Boron, with the assistance of Ward D. Bouwsma, P. Noordhoff, Groningen, 1964 (c,r).Google Scholar

Sommerville, D., The Elements of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Dover, New York, 1958 (a).Google Scholar

Sommerville, D., Bibliography of Non-Euclidean Geometry, Chelsea, House New York, 1970 (a).Google Scholar

Snyder, J.P., Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1993 (c,r).Google Scholar

Sperry, P., Short Course in Spherical Trigonometry, Johnson Publ. Co., Richmond, VA, 1928 (a).Google Scholar

Spivak, M., Calculus on Manifolds, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1971 (c,r).Google Scholar

Spivak, M., A Comprehension Introduction to Differential Geometry. Vol. 1–2 1970, vol. 3–5, 1975, Publish or Perish Press, Boston, MA; 2nd editions, 1979 (c,a,r).Google Scholar

Stäckel, P., Engel, F., Die Theorie der Parallellinien von Euklid bis auf Gauss, Teubner, Leipzig, 1895 (c,r).Google Scholar

Stehney, A.K., Milnor, T.K., D'Atri, J.E., Banchoff, T.F., editors, Selected Papers on Geometry (The Raymond W. Brink selected mathematical papers; v. 4), Mathematical association of Amer; Washington, DC (1979) (a,r).

Stillwell, J.C., Geometry of Surfaces, Springer, New York, 1992 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stillwell, J.C., Sources of Hyperbolic Geometry, American Mathematics Society, Providence, RI, 1996 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stillwell, J.C., Four Pillars of Geometry, Springer, New York, 2005 (c, r).Google Scholar

Stoker, J.J., Differential Geometry, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969 (a).Google Scholar

Struik, D.J., Lectures on Classical Differential Geometry, Addison-Wesley Press, Cambridge, MA, 1950 (r).Google Scholar

Todhunter, I., History of the Mathematical Theories of Attraction and Figure of the Earth from Newton to Laplace, MacMillan and Co., London, 1873 (c).Google Scholar

Torretti, R., Philosphy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1978 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Brummelen, G., The Mathematics of the Heavens and the Earth: The Early History of Trigonometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009 (c,r).Google Scholar

Vitale, G., Euclide restituto, ovvero gli antichi elementi geometrici ristaurati e facilitati da Vitale Giordano da Bitonto. Libri XV. (“Euclid Restored, or the ancient geometric elements rebuilt and facilitated by Giordano Vitale, 15 Books”), (1st edition 1680, Rome. 2nd edition with additions 1686, Rome) (c).Google Scholar

Warner, F., Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups, GTM vol. 94, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weatherburn, C.E., Differential Geometry of Three Dimensions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1927 (a).Google Scholar

Weyl, H., The Concept of a Riemann Surface, translated by G.R., MacLane, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1955. Reissued by Dover Publications, NY, 2009 (c).Google Scholar

Willmore, T., An Introduction to Differential Geometry, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1959 (a).Google Scholar

Yoder, J. G.Unrolling Time: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematization of Nature, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988 (c).Google Scholar

Zwikker, C., Advanced Plane Geometry, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1950 (c).Google Scholar

Beltrami, E., Rizsoluztione del problema: “Riportare i punti di una superficie sopra un plano in modo che le linee geodetiche vengano rappresentate da linee rette,” Annali di Mathematiche pura ed applicata (1)7(1865), 185–204 (c).Google Scholar

Beltrami, E., Saggio di interpretazione della Geometria non-Euclidea, Giornale di Mat., 6(1868), 284–312. Translated into English in (Stillwell 1996) (c,r).Google Scholar

Beltrami, E., Teoria fundamentale degli spazii di curvatura constante, Annali. Di Mat., ser. II 2(1869), 232–55. Translated into English in (Stillwell 1996) (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertrand, J., Démonstration d'un théorème de M. Gauss, J. Math. Pure Appl. 13(1848), 80–6. Contains an account of Diguet's theorem (c).Google Scholar

Blanuša, D., Über die Einbettung hyperbolischer Räume in euklidische Räume, Monatsh. Math. 59 (1955), 217Ð229 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonnet, P.O., Mémoire sur la théorie générale des surfaces, Journal de l'École Polytechnique, 32(1848), 1–46 (c).Google Scholar

Bonnet, P.O., Mémoire sur la théorie des surfaces applicables sur une surface donnée, J. École Poly. 24(1865), 209–30 (a).Google Scholar

Brooks, J., Push, S., The Cycloidal Pendulum, The Amer. Math. Monthly, 109(2002), 463–465 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busemann, H., Non-Euclidean geometry, Math. Mag. 24(1950), 19–34 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cayley, A., A sixth memoir upon quantics, Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society of London, 149(1859), 61–90 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christoffel, E.B., Über dis Transformation der homogenen Differentialausdrücke zweiten Grades, Crelle 70(1869), 46–70 (c).Google Scholar

Coddazi, D., Mémoire relatif à l'application des surfaces les unes sur les autres (envoyé au concours ouvert sur cette question en 1859 par l'Academie des Sciences), Mém. prés. div. sav.Acad. Sci. Paris (2)27(1883), 1–47 (c).Google Scholar

Doyle, P.H., Moran, D.A., A Short Proof that Compact 2-manifolds can be triangulated, Inventiones Mathematiques 5(1968), 160–162 (c).Google Scholar

Einstein, A., Grossmann, M., Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitätstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation, B.G. Teubner (separatum), Leipzig (1913); with addendum by Einstein, in Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 63(1914), pp. 225–61. (Papers, Vol. 4) (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., De constructione aequationum ope motus tractorii aliisque ad methodum tangentium inversam pertinentibus, Comm. acad. sci. Petroopl. 8(1736), 1741, 66–85. Opera Omnia, Series I, vol. XXXII83–107 (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., Principes de la trigonomŐtrie sphŐrique, tirés de la méthode des plus grands et plus petits; mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres (Berlin) 9(1753). [Berlin, 1755] (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., Recherches sur la courbure des surfaces, E333, M′‘emoires de l'academie des sciences de Berlin, 16(1760), 1767, 119–143. In Opera Omnia (1) 28, 1–22 (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., De solidis quorum superficiem in planum explicare licet, Novi Comm. Acad. Sci. Petropolitanae, 16(1771), 1772, 3–34. E419, in Opera Omnia (1) 28, 298–321 (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., De mensura angulorum solidorum, Acta Academiae Sci. Imp. Petropolitinae, 2(1781), 31–54. E514 in Opera Omnia (1) 26, 204–223 (c).Google Scholar

Euler, L., Methodus facilis omnia symptomata linearum curvarum non in eodem plano sitarum investigandi, Acta Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitinae 1782, 1786, 19–57. Opera Omnia: Series 1, 28(1782), 348–38 (c).Google Scholar

Frenet, F., Sur les courbes à double courbure, extrait d'une thèse à la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse, le 10 juillet 1847, J. Math. Pure Appl. 17(1852), 437–447 (c).Google Scholar

Gauss, C.-F., Allgemeine Auflösung der Aufgabe: Die Theile einer andern gegebnen Fläche so abzubilden, dass die Abbildung dem Abgebildeten in den kleinsthen Theilen ähnlich wird (als Beantwortung der von der königlichen Societät der Wissenschaften in Copenhagen für 1822 aufgegebnen Preisfrage), Astr. Abh. (1825), 1–30 (a).Google Scholar

Gauss, C.-F., Beiträge zur Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen, Juli 1849, Gesammlte Werke vol. 3 (1876) (c).Google Scholar

Gray, J.J., Non-Euclidean geometry – a re-interpretation, Hist. Math. 6(1979), 236–58 (a,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazzidakis, J.N., Über einige Eigenschaften der Flächen mit constantem Krümmungsmass, J. für reine und angew. Math. 88(1887), 68–73.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D., Über Flächen von konstanter Gausscher Krümmung, TAMS 1(1901), 87–99 (c).Google Scholar

Hoffman, D., Meeks, W.H., Minimal surfaces based on the catenoid, Amer. Math. Monthly 97(1990), 702–30 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmgren, E., Sur les surfaces à courbure constant négative, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Series A-B, 134(1902), 740–43 (c).Google Scholar

Hopf, H., Rinow, W., Über den Begriff der vollständigen differentialgeometrischen Fläche, Comm. Math. Helv. 3(1931), 209–25 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopf, H., Über die Drehung der Tangenten und Sehnen ebener Kurven, Comp. Math. 2(1935), 50–62 (c).Google Scholar

Hopf, H., Zur Topologie der komplexen Mannigfaltigkeiten, Studies and Essays presented to R. Courant, Interscience Publishers Inc., New York, 1948, 167–185 (c).Google Scholar

Jacobi, C.G.J., Demonstration et amplificatio nova theorematis Gaussiani de quadrata integra triangula in data superficie e lineis brevissimis formati, J. Math. Crelle 16(1837), 344–350 (c).Google Scholar

Klein, F., Über die sogenannte Nicht-Euclidische Geometrie, Math. Ann. 4(1871), 573–625 (cf. Ges. Math. Abh. 1, 244–350) (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagrange, J. L. “Sue les courbes tautochrones.” Mém. de l'Acad. Roy. des Sci. et Belles-Lettres de Berlin 21, 1765. Reprinted in Oeuvres de Lagrange, tome 2, section deuxime: Mmoires extraits des recueils de l'Academie royale des sciences et Belles-Lettres de Berlin. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, pp. 317–332, 1868 (c).Google Scholar

Lambert, J.H., Theorie der Parallellinien, 1786. Excerpts in Stäckel, Engel (c).Google Scholar

Lambert, J. H., Observations trigonométriques. Mémoires de l'Académie royale des sciences de Berlin, année 1768/1770, 327–354.Google Scholar

Laubenbacher, R., Pengelley, D., Mathematical expeditions: Chronicles by the explorers. UTM: Readings in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawlor, G., A new minimization proof for the brachistochrone, Amer. Math. Monthly 103(1996), 242–249 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legendre, A.M., Éléments of Géometrie, Chez Firmin Didot, Paris, fifth edition, 1804 (a).Google Scholar

Levi-Civita, T., Nozione di parallelismo in una varietà qualunque, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 42(1917), 173–205 (c).Google Scholar

Liebmann, H., Über die Verbiegung der geschlossenen Flächen positiver Krümmung, Math. Ann. 53(1900), 81–112 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lobachevskiĭ, N.I., O natschalach geometrii (Russian), Kasaner Bote 1829–1930 (c).Google Scholar

Lobachevskiĭ, N.I., Imaginary geometry (Woobrashajemaja geometrija), Papers of the University of Kasan, 1835. Appeared in French in J. für reine und angew. Math. 17(1837), 295–320 (c).Google Scholar

Lobachevskiĭ, N.I., New foundations of geometry with a complete theory of parallels (Nowja natschala geometrii s polnoj teorijij parallelnych), Papers of the University of Kasan, 1835–1838 (c).Google Scholar

Lobachevskiĭ, N.I., Application of imaginary geometry to certain integrals (Primjenjenije woobrashajemoj geometrii k njekotorych integralach), Papers of the University of Kasan, 1836 (a).Google Scholar

Lumiste, Ü, Martin Bartels as researcher: his contribution to analytical methods in geometry. Historia Math. 24(1997), 46–65 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lützen, J., Interactions between mechanics and differential geometry in the 19th century, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 49(1995), 1–72 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mac Lane, S., Metric postulates for plane geometry, Amer. Math. Monthly 66(1959), 543–55 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mainardi, G.Su la teoria generale delle superficie, G. Ist. Lomb. Milano (2)9(1857), 385–98 (c).Google Scholar

Malus, E. L., Traité d'Óptique, in Mémoires présentés à lInstitut des sciences par divers savants, 2(1811), 214–302 (c).

McCleary, J., On Jacobi's remarkable curve theorem, Historia Math. 21(1994), 377–85 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCleary, J., Trigonometries, Amer. Math. Monthly, 109(2002), 623–38 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millman, R.S.; Stehney, A.K., The geometry of connections, Amer. Math. Monthly, 80(1973), 475–500 (a,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minding, F., Über die Curven des kürzesten Perimeters auf krummen Flächen, J. Math. Crelle 5(1830), 297–304 (c).Google Scholar

Minding, F., Wie sich enscheiden läßt, ob zwei gegebene krumme Flächen auf einander abwickelbar sind oder nicht; nebst Bemerkungen über die Flächen von unveränderlichem Krümmungsmaße, Crelle 1(1839), 370–87 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, J.W., A problem in cartography, Amer. Math. Monthly 76(1969), 1101–12 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milnor, J.W., Hyperbolic geometry: The first 150 years, BAMS 6(1982), 9–24 (a,r).Google Scholar

Pinl, M., Christoffels Weg zum absoluten Differentialkalkül und sein Beitrag zur Theorie des Krümmungstensors, in Butzer and Fehér (1981), 474–79 (c,r).Google Scholar

Poincaré, J.H., Théorie des Groupes Fuchsiens, Acta Mathematica 1(1882), 1–62. Translated into English in (Stillwell 1996) (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poincaré, J.H., Analysis situs, J. École Poly. (2)1(1895), 1–123 (c).Google Scholar

Puiseux, V., Sur le même théorème, J. Math. Pure Appl. 13(1848), 87–90. See (Bertrand) (c).Google Scholar

Radó, T., Über den Begriff der Riemannschen Fläche, Acta Litt. Sci. Szeged 2(1925), 100–21 (c).Google Scholar

Reich, K., Die Geschichte der Differentialgeometrie von Gauss bis Riemann (1828–1868). Arch. History Exact Sci. 11(1973/1974), 273–382 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricci, G., Levi-Civita, T., Méthodes de calcul différentiel absolu et leur applications, Math. Annalen 54(1901), 125–201 (c).Google Scholar

Riemann, B., Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen 13(1868) (c,r).Google Scholar

Riemann, B., Commentatio mathematica, qua respondere tentatur quaestioni ab Illma Academia Parisiensi propositae: “Trouver quel doit être l'état calorifique d'un corps solide homogène indéfeni pour qu'un système de courbes isothermes, à un instant donné, restent isothermes après un temps quelconque, de telle sorte que la température d'un point puisse s'exprimer en fonction du temps et de deux autres variables indépendantes.” (1861), Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, 2nd ed., 391–404 (c).Google Scholar

Rodrigues, O., Recherches sur la théorie analytique des lignes et des rayons de courbure des surfaces, et sur la transformation d'une classe d'intégrales doubles, qui ont un rapport direct avec les formules de cette théorie, École Poly. Corresp. 3(1814–1816), 162–82 (c).Google Scholar

Rozendorn, È. R., A realization of the metric ds2 = du2 +f2(u) dv2 in a five-dimensional Euclidean space. (Russian) Akad. Nauk Armjan. SSR Dokl. 30(1960), 197–99 (a).Google Scholar

Russell, B., Geometry, non-Euclidean, in Encyclopedia Britannica, Suppl. vol. 4, 1902. Cited in Heath (Euclid) (c).

Scholz, E., The concept of manifold, 1850–1950. In History of topology, edited by I.M., James, 25–64, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1999 (c,r).Google Scholar

Scholz, E.Gauss und die Begründung der “höhere” Geodäsie, In S. S., Demidov; M., Folkerts; D., Rowe; C.-J., Scriba (Hrsg.): Amphora. Festschrift für Hans Wuğing. Basel: BirkhŁLuser, 1992, 631–47 (c).Google Scholar

Scholz, E., C.F., GaußPräzisionsmessungen terrestrischer Dreiecke und seine Überlegungen zur empirischen Fundierung der Geometrie in den 1820er Jahren. In: Folkerts, , Menso, ; Hashagen, , Ulf; Seising, Rudolf; (Hrsg.): Form, Zahl, Ordnung. Studien zur Wissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte. Ivo Schneider zum 65. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004, 355Ð380 (c).Google Scholar

Serret, J.A., Sur quelques formules relatives à double courbure, J. Math. Pure Appl. 16(1851), 193–207 (c).Google Scholar

Struik, D., Outline of a history of differential geometry. I, Isis 19(1933), 92–120, II, 20(1934), 161–91 (c,r).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taurinus, F.A., Theorie der Parallellinien, published in 1825. In Engel, and Stäckel, (1895) (c).Google Scholar

Tchebychev, P.L., Sur la coupe des vêtements, OEuvres, vol. 2, 708 (c).

Weyl, H., Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie, Math. Z. 2(1918), 384–411 (c).CrossRefGoogle Scholar