Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:16:13.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

74 - Family

from F

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Jon Mandle
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
David A. Reidy
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access

Summary

Rawls included the family, understood as the primary venue for the rearing and educating of future citizens, as an essential part of society’s basic structure. Ideally, the family serves as what John Stuart Mill called the first school of social justice by raising children through affection, example, and guidance to develop the cooperative virtues and sentiments upon which the just society depends (TJ §70). These include the desires to interact with their fellow citizens on fair terms, and also to participate as fully cooperating members of society. Children’s education should further include practical measures to prepare them to become self-supporting, and knowledge of their equal constitutional and civic rights (PL 199), although these sorts of education may be provided outside the home by schools. It is the family’s role in the formation of future citizens that justiies its inclusion among the institutions of the basic structure. In Rawls’s words in “Public Reason Revisited,” “the family is part of the basic structure, since one of its main roles is to be the basis of orderly production and reproduction of society and its culture from one generation to the next” (CP 595).

Rawls speciies a society’s basic structure as the system of interaction among the main political, economic, and social institutions – how they operate together to form the background conditions against which associational and personal ends are pursued. Rawls’s principles of justice apply directly to this system, but only indirectly to the basic structure’s component institutions. So although the basic structure must satisfy the difference principle, requiring that inequalities work to the greatest advantage of the least well off, it is neither required nor appropriate for judges to apply the difference principle in deciding cases between litigants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Family
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.076
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Family
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.076
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Family
  • Edited by Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany, David A. Reidy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Book: The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon
  • Online publication: 05 February 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026741.076
Available formats
×