Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T14:33:45.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

38 - Heidegger

from 9 - The diversity of philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Raymond Geuss
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Thomas Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

The German philosopher Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) is by a wide margin the single most influential philosopher of the twentieth century. His original motivation for doing philosophy arose out of religious concerns (he was raised as a Roman Catholic and studied for the priesthood, before converting to a radical form of Lutheranism just after the First World War), and one of the easiest ways to try to make sense of much of his philosophy is to trace in it the shadow of various traditional religious beliefs and doctrines. Thus philosophically in parallel to Heidegger’s own conversion from Catholicism to Protestantism, his early interest in scholastic metaphysics was increasingly placed in the service of a project that had its origins in a certain radical Protestant tradition of ‘negative theology’. The negative theologian holds that God is so different from anything else, so ‘transcendent’, that it is utterly impossible to grasp him in conceptual terms; he is accessible only through faith. Since human reason cannot know him, any form of theology (of rational, conceptually articulated doctrine) can be no more than a perverting distortion of the vital reality of religious belief. The only task left for philosophy in this construction is to destroy theology totally, to undermine from within the pretensions of human reason. Heidegger’s philosophy, like the National Socialism he espoused in the 1930s, was intended to initiate a conservative revolution, which would consign the whole of traditional philosophy, especially Neo-Kantianism, to the rubbish-bin, and also in some not easily definable way transform human life. His religious commitments after the National Socialist period seem to have remained strong until the very end of his life, although they became difficult to categorise in any conventional terms. Thus in an interview given in old age and published by his own request only after his death, he famously remarked that the modern world was so debased that ‘only a God could save us’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (1964). Jargon der Eigentlichkeit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1973 Tarnowski, K. and Will, F., Jargon of Authenticity, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1966). Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. Trans. 1973 Ashton, E. B., Negative Dialectics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferry, L. and Renaut, A. (1988). Heidegger et les modernes, Paris: Grasset Trans 1990 Philip, F., Heidegger and Modernity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. (ed.) (1993). Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit in Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 8, Halle: Niemeyer. Trans. 1962 Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Being and Time, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1929). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, Bonn: Friedrich Cohen Trans 1990 Taft, R., Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1950). Holzwege, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Trans. 2002 Young, J. and Haynes, K., Off the Beaten Track, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1953). Einführung in die Metaphysik, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Trans 1959 Manheim, R., Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1959). Gelassenheit, Pfullingen: Günther Neske. Trans. 1966 Anderson, J. M. and Freund, E. H., Discourse on Thinking, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1961). Nietzsche, Pfullingen: Günther Neske, 2 vols. Trans. 1979–87, Krell, D. F. and Capuzzi, F., Nietzsche, New York: Harper and Row, 4 vols.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1967). Wegmarken, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Trans. 1997 Krell, D. F., McNeill, W., and Sallis, J., Pathmarks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1975–). Gesamtausgabe, Frankfurt on Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. et al. (1976). Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten in Der Spiegel, 30. Jg., Nr. 23, 31 May 1976. Trans. 1990 Harries, L. in Martin Heidegger and National Socialism, ed. Neske, G. and Kettering, E., New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1993). The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1984). Heidegger: Denker in dürftiger Zeit: Zur Stellung der Philosophiein 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Merker, B. (1988). Selbsttäuschung und Selbsterkenntnis: Zu Heideggers Transformation der Phänomenologie Husserls, Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ott, H. (1988). Martin Heidegger: Unterwegs zu seiner Biographie, Frankfurt on Main: Campus Trans 1994 Blunden, A., Martin Heidegger: A Political Life, London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (1983). Der Denkweg Martin Heideggers, Pfullingen: Max Neske. Trans. 1987 Margushak, D. and Barber, S., Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, H. (1983). Philosophie in Deutschland 1831–1933, Frankfurt on Main: Suhrkamp Trans 1984 Matthews, E., Philosophy in Germany 1983–1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, J. (2002). Heidegger’s Later Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M. (1990). Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Heidegger
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.041
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Heidegger
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.041
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Heidegger
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.041
Available formats
×