Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T03:36:54.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Reluctant Imperialist? Reuters in the British Empire, 1851–1947

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Jonathan Silberstein-Loeb
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The tension between cooperation and exclusion in the supply of news was as pronounced throughout the British Empire as it was in the British Isles and in the United States. To spread costs and increase profits, Reuters, like the United Press in the United States, had an incentive to sell its news as widely as possible, but it too encountered a desire on the part of the press throughout the Empire to possess news exclusively. Colonial and commonwealth administrations regulated this relationship, typically by changes in telecommunications policy or by the allocation of intellectual property rights, and occasionally through judicial intervention and outright financial subsidy. On a daily basis, however, Reuters attempted to moderate the tension between exclusivity and cooperation among newspaper interests throughout the Empire. But, more often than not, access to Reuters’s news reports was used as a bargaining chip in the internecine conflicts between warring factions of the colonial press. As a consequence, Reuters’s news business was never particularly profitable. Before World War I, Reuters developed a private telegram business and associated lines of work to subsidize its newsgathering. After the war, in conjunction with the use of radio, Reuters developed a highly profitable and influential commercial news business. After 1930, the PA, which owned Reuters as a subsidiary, relied on these alternative sources of revenue, and the profits Reuters earned from its news services in the Empire, to offset the cost of international news to the newspapers of the British Isles.

Type
Chapter
Information
The International Distribution of News
The Associated Press, Press Association, and Reuters, 1848–1947
, pp. 163 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nicholas, T., “Enterprise and Management,” in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. 2: Economic Maturity, 1860–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 239Google Scholar
Bently, L., “Copyright and the Victorian Internet: Telegraphic Property Laws in Colonial Australia,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 38 (2004), 71–176Google Scholar
Headrick, D.R., The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Hills, J., Struggle for Global Control of Communication: The Formative Century (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Hugill, P.J., Global Communications since 1844: Geopolitics and Technology (London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Winseck, D.R. and Pike, R.M., Communication and Empire: Media, Markets, and Globalization, 1860–1930 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, R.W.D., “Imperial Dreams and National Realities: Britain, Canada and the Struggle for a Pacific Telegraph Cable, 1879–1902,” The English Historical Review, 115 (2000), 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D., “Reuters: News Agency of the British Empire,” Contemporary Record, 8 (1994), 195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaul, RA. C., Reporting the Raj: The British Press in India, c. 1880–1922 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), pp. 64–5Google Scholar
Jones, G., Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 226, 233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, R.A., The Dynamics of Victorian Business (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1980), pp. 237–9Google Scholar
Nalbach, A., “‘The Software of Empire’: Telegraphic News Agencies and Imperial Publicity, 1865–1914,” in Codell, J.F. (ed.), Imperial Co-histories: National Identities and the British and Colonial Press (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003), pp. 68–94Google Scholar
Desbordes, R., “Representing ‘Informal Empire’ in the Nineteenth Century: Reuters in South America at the Time of the War of the Pacific, 1879–83,” Media History, 14 (2008), 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G., “British Trading Companies and Industrial Development,” in Amatori, F. et al. (eds.), Deindustrialization and Reindustrialization in 20th Century Europe (Milan: Franco Angeli, 1999), p. 348Google Scholar
Read, D., “Reuters and South Africa: ‘South Africa is a Country of Monopolies’,” The South African Journal of Economic History, 11 (1996), 106–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, RA. E., The Press as Opposition: The Political Role of South African Newspapers (London: Chatto and Windus, 1975), p. 106Google Scholar
Walker, RA. M., Powers of the Press: The World’s Great Newspapers (London: Quartet Books, 1982), p. 318Google Scholar
Bayly, C.A., Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 338–44Google Scholar
Israel, M., Communications and Power: Propaganda and the Press in the Indian Nationalist Struggle, 1920–1947 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, M., Business, Race, and Politics in British India c. 1850–1960 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), pp. 137, 164–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnis, P., “How the International News Agency Business Model Failed – Reuters in Australia, 1877–1895,” Media History, 12 (2006), 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantanen, T., “The Struggle for Control of Domestic News Markets (1),” in Boyd-Barrett, O. and Rantanen, T. (eds.), The Globalization of News (London: Sage, 1998), pp. 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storey, G., Reuters’ Century, 1851–1951 (London: Max Parish, 1951), p. 119Google Scholar
Mayer, H., The Press in Australia (Melbourne: Lansdowne, 1964), p. 14Google Scholar
Livingston, K.T., The Wired Nation Continent: the Communication Revolution and Federating Australia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 51–9Google Scholar
Putnis, P., “Reuters in Australia: the Supply and Exchange of News, 1859–1877,” Media History, 10 (2004), 67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannis, G., “The New Zealand Press Association 1880–2006: The Rise and Fall of a Cooperative Model for News-gathering,” Australian Economic History Review, 48 (2008), 47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R., “Bringing the News to New Zealand: The Supply and Control of Overseas News in the Nineteenth Century,” Media History, 8 (2002), 21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryle, D., Disreputable Profession: Journalists and Journalism in Colonial Australia (Rockhampton, Queensland: Central Queensland University Press, 1997), pp. 34–6Google Scholar
Morrison, E., “Newspapers,” in Davison, G., et al. (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Australian History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 468Google Scholar
Moyal, A., “The History of Telecommunication in Australia, 1854–1930,” in Reingold, N. and Rothenberg, M. (eds.), Scientific Colonialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987), pp. 35–54Google Scholar
Inglis, K.S., “The Imperial Connection: Telegraphic Communication between England and Australia, 1872–1902,” in Madden, A.F. and Morris-Jones, W.H. (eds.) Australia and Britain: Studies in a Changing Relationship (London: University of London, 1980) pp. 21–38Google Scholar
Blainey, G., The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia’s History (London: Macmillan, 1968), pp. 222–7Google Scholar
Griffen-Foley, B., “The Fairfax, Murdoch and Packer Dynasties in Twentieth-Century Australia,” Media History, 8 (2002), 89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantanen, , “The Struggle,” p. 42; “The End of the Electronic News Cartel, 1927–1934” in Putnis, P., Wilke, J and Kaul, C. (eds.) International Circuits of News: Historical Development and Impacts. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2011Google Scholar
Marryat, F., Mr. Midshipman Easy (Boston: Marsh, Capen, and Lyon, 1836), p. 214Google Scholar
Allen, G., “North American Triangle: Canadian Press, Associated Press, and Reuters, 1918–1939,” in Putnis, P., Kaul, C., and Wilke, J. (eds.), International Circuits of News: Historical Studies (Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2011), p. 17Google Scholar
Cryle, GL. D., “The Empire Press Union and Antipodean Communications: Australian-New Zealand Involvement, 1909–50,” Media History, 8 (2002), 49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, S.J., News and the British World: The Emergence of an Imperial Press System, 1876–1922 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, S.J., “Communication and Integration: the British Dominion Press and the British World, c. 1876–1914,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 31 (2003), 190–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, S.J., “Webs, Networks, and Systems: Globalization and the Mass Media in the Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century British Empire,” Journal of British Studies, 46 (2007), 634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michie, R.C., The London and New York Stock Exchanges, 1850–1914 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1987), pp. 9, 38–9Google Scholar
Ferguson, N., The World’s Banker: The History of the House of Rothschild (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998), p. 573Google Scholar
Gabel, D., “Private Telecommunications Networks: an Historical Perspective,” in Noam, E. and NiShuilleabhain, A. (eds.), Private Networks Public Objectives (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996), pp. 41–2Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×