Beauchamp, C. “The Telephone Patents: Intellectual Property, Business, and the Law in the United States and Britain, 1876–1900,” (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2007).

Nalbach, A. “The Ring Combination: Information, Power, and the World News Agency Cartel, 1856–1914,” (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 1999).

Adams, E.E. “Collusion and Price Fixing in the American Newspaper Industry: Market Preservation Trends, 1890–1910,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79 (2002), 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akami, T.Japan’s News Propaganda and Reuters’ News Empire in Northeast Asia, 1870–1934. Dordorecht: Republic of Letters, 2012.Google Scholar

Albion, R.G.The Rise of New York Port. London: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1939.Google Scholar

Alchian, A.A. and Woodward, S. “The Firm Is Dead; Long Live the Firm: A Review of Oliver Williamson’s The Economic Institutions of Capitalism,” Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (1988), 65–79.Google Scholar

Allen, G. “News Across the Border: Associated Press in Canada, 1894–1917,” Journalism History, 31 (2006), 206–17.Google Scholar

Allen, G. “New Media, Old Media, and Competition: Canadian Press and the Emergence of Radio News, 1922–1941,” in Allen, G. and Robinson, D.J. (eds.), Communicating in Canada’s Past: Essays in Media History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, G. “North American Triangle: Canadian Press, Associated Press, and Reuters, 1918–1939,” in Putnis, P., Kaul, C., and Wilke, J. (eds.), International Communication and Global News Networks: Historical Perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2011, 189–216.Google Scholar

Aspinall, A.Lord Brougham and the Whig Party. London: Longmans, 1928.Google Scholar

Asquith, I. “The Structure, Ownership and Control of the Press, 1780–1855,” in Boyce, G., Curran, J., and Wingate, P. (eds.), Newspaper History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present Day. London: Constable, 1978, 98–116.Google Scholar

Atcheson, Jr., G. “The Cable Situation in the Pacific Ocean, with Special Reference to the Far East,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 122 (1925), 70–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BaehrJr., H.W.The New York Tribune since the Civil War. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1936.Google Scholar

Bagdikian, B.H.Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Baird, D.G. “Common Law Intellectual Property and the Legacy of International News Service v. Associated Press,” University of Chicago Law Review, 50 (1983), 411–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, D.G. “Property, Natural Monopoly, and the Uneasy Legacy of INS v. AP,” University Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper no. 246. (2008).

Bakker, G. “Trading Facts: Arrow’s Fundamental Paradox and the Emergence of Global News Networks, 1750–1900,” Working Papers on the Nature of Evidence: How Well do Facts Travel? (2007).

Baldasty, G.J.The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Baldasty, G.J.E.W. Scripps and the Business of Newspapers. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Baldasty, G.J. “The Economics of Working-Class Journalism, the E.W. Scripps Newspaper Chain, 1878–1908,” Journalism History, 25 (1999), 3–12.Google Scholar

Balganesh, S. “‘Hot News’: The Enduring Myth of Property in News,” Columbia Law Review, 111 (2011), 419–95.Google Scholar

Baillie, H.High Tension: The Recollections of Hugh Baillie. London: Werner Laurie, 1960.Google Scholar

Baker, C.E., Media, Markets, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barton, R.N. “New Media: the Birth of Telegraphic News in Britain,” Media History, 16 (2010), 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basse, D.Wolff’s Telegraphisches Bureau, 1849 bis 1933. Munich: K.G. Saur, 1991.Google Scholar

Bayly, C.A.Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India, 1780–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Beckert, S.The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belknap, G.N. “Oregon Sentinel Extras – 1858–1864,” Pacific Northwest Quarterly, 70 (1979), 178–80.Google Scholar

Bekken, J. “‘The Most Vindictive and Most Vengeful Power’: Labor Confronts the Chicago Newspaper Trust,”Journalism History, 18 (1992), 11–17.Google Scholar

Bensel, R.F.The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, L. “The Electric Telegraph and the Struggle over Copyright in News in Australia, Great Britain and India,” in Sherman, B. and Wiseman, L. (eds.), Copyright and the Challenge of the New. Alphen an den Rijn: Kluwer, 2012, 43–76.Google Scholar

Bently, L. “Copyright and the Victorian Internet: Telegraphic Property Laws in Colonial Australia,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 38 (2004), 71–176.Google Scholar

Bickel, K.News Empires: The Newspaper and the Radio. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1930.Google Scholar

Blainey, G.The Tyranny of Distance: How Distance Shaped Australia’s History. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar

Blanchard, M.A. “The Associated Press Antitrust Suit: A Philosophical Clash over Ownership of First Amendment Rights,” The Business History Review, 61 (1987), 43–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blondheim, M.News Over the Wires: the Telegraph and the Flow of Public Information in America, 1844–1897. London: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Blondheim, M. “‘Public Sentiment is Everything’: The Union’s Public Communications Strategy and the Bogus Proclamation of 1864,” Journal of American History, 89 (2002), 869–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blondheim, M. “‘Slender Bridges’ of Misunderstanding: The Social Legacy of Transatlantic Cable Communication,” in Finzsch, N. and Lehmkuhl, U. (eds.), Atlantic Communications: The Media in American and German History from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Berg, 2004, 153–69.Google Scholar

Blundell, J.W.Telegraph Companies Considered as Investments; with Remarks on the Superior Advantages of Submarine Cables. London: Effingham Wilson, 1869.Google Scholar

Bouckaert, B. “What Is Property?” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13 (1990), 775–817.Google Scholar

Boyce, R.W.D. “Imperial Dreams and National Realities: Britain, Canada and the Struggle for a Pacific Telegraph Cable, 1879–1902,” The English Historical Review, 115 (2000), 39–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd-Barrett, O.The International News Agencies. London: Constable, 1980.Google Scholar

Boyd-Barrett, O. “‘Global’ News Agencies,” in Boyd-Barrett, O. and Rantanen, T. (eds.), The Globalization of News. London: Sage, 1998, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinkley, A.The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar

Broadberry, S.Market Services and the Productivity Race, 1850–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadberry, S.N. and Ghosal, S. “From the Counting House to the Modern Office: Explaining Anglo-American Productivity Differences in Services, 1870–1990,” The Journal of Economic History, 62 (2002), 967–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooker-Gross, S.R. “News Wire Services in the Nineteenth-Century United States,” Journal of Historical Geography, 7 (1981), 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, L.Victorian News and Newspapers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Brown, R.D.Knowledge Is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1700–1865. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bruchey, S.The Roots of American Economic Growth, 1607–1861. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar

Bruton, P.W. “United States v. Associated Press,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 92 (1943), 209–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdick, C.K. “The Origin of the Peculiar Duties of Public Service Companies. Part II,” Columbia Law Review, 11 (1911), 514–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, L.R. and Wolseley, R.E. (eds.). Newsmen at Work: Reporting and Writing the News. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1949.

Campbell-Kelly, M. “Data Processing and Technological Change: The Post Office Savings Bank, 1861–1930,” Technology and Culture, 39 (1998), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camrose, W.E.B.British Newspapers and Their Controllers. London: Cassell, 1947.Google Scholar

Carter, J.D. “Before the Telegraph: The News Service of the San Francisco Bulletin, 1855–1861,” Pacific Historical Review, 11 (1942), 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Catledge, T.My Life and The Times. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.Google Scholar

Chadwick, E. “On the Economy of Telegraphy as Part of a Public System of Postal Communication,” Royal Society of Arts, 15 (1867), 222–30.Google Scholar

Chadwick, E. “Results of Different Principles of Legislations and Administration in Europe; of Competition for the Field, as Compared with Competition within the Field, of Service,” Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 22 (1859), 381–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, Jr., A. “The Growth of the Transnational Industrial Firm in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Comparative Analysis,” The Economic History Review, 33 (1980), 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, Jr., A.The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. London: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Chandler, Jr., A.Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Charnley, M.V.News by Radio. New York: Macmillan Co., 1948.Google Scholar

Church, R.A.The Dynamics of Victorian Business. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1980.Google Scholar

Coase, R. “The Federal Communications Commission,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 2 (1959), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. “The British Post Office and the Messenger Companies,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 4 (1961), 12–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R. “Rowland Hill and the Penny Post,” Economica, 6 (1939), 423–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, R.H. “The Market for Goods and the Market for Ideas,” The American Economic Review, 64 (1974), 384–91.Google Scholar

Cole, J. and Hamilton, J.M. “A Natural History of Foreign Correspondence: A Study of the Chicago Daily News, 1900–1921,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84 (2007), 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, H.M.From Pigeon Post to Wireless. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1925.Google Scholar

Colpus, E. “The Week’s Good Cause: Mass Culture and Cultures of Philanthropy at the Inter-war BBC,” Twentieth Century British History, 22 (2011), 305–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, F.H. “The Application of the Commerce Clause to the Intangible,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 58 (1910), 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, K.Barriers Down: The Story of the News Agency Epoch. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. “Newspaper Statesmanship for Peace,” in Mott, F.L. (ed.), Journalism in Wartime. Washington, DC: American Council on Public Affairs, 1943, 214–16.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. “Freedom of information,” Life, 17 (1944), 55–60.Google Scholar

Cooper, K.The Right to Know: An Exposition of the Evils of News Suppression and Propaganda. New York: Farrar, Straus and Cudahy, 1956.Google Scholar

Cooper, K.Kent Cooper and the Associated Press: An Autobiography. New York: Random House, 1959.Google Scholar

Crouthamel, J.L. “The Newspaper Revolution in New York, 1830–1860,” New York History, 45 (1964), 91–113.Google Scholar

Crouthamel, J.L.Bennett’s New York Herald and the Rise of the Popular Press. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Cronon, W.Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. London: Norton, 1991.Google Scholar

Cryle, D.Disreputable Profession: Journalists and Journalism in Colonial Australia. Rockhampton, Queensland: Central Queensland University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Cryle, D. “The Empire Press Union and Antipodean Communications: Australian-New Zealand Involvement, 1909–50,” Media History, 8 (2002), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curl, D.W.Murat Halstead and the Cincinnati Commercial. Boca Raton: University Press of Florida, 1980.Google Scholar

Curran, J. and Seaton, J.Power without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Curran, K.J. “Exclusive Dealing and Public Policy,” The Journal of Marketing, 15 (1950), 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daunton, M.Royal Mail: The Post Office since 1840. London: Athlone Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dennis, C.H.Victor Lawson: His Time and His Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Desbordes, R. “Representing ‘Informal Empire’ in the Nineteenth Century: Reuters in South America at the Time of the War of the Pacific, 1879–83,” Media History, 14 (2008), 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl, C.S.The Staff Correspondent. San Antonio, TX: Clegg, 1931.Google Scholar

Dobbin, F. “The Social Construction of the Great Depression: Industrial Policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France,” Theory and Society, 22 (1993), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, F.Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

DuBoff, R.B. “The Telegraph in Nineteenth-Century America: Technology and Monopoly,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26 (1984), 571–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

EkelundJr., R.B. and PriceIII, E.O. “Sir Edwin Chadwick on Competition and the Social Control of Industry: Railroads,” History of Political Economy, 11 (1979), 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, H. “Paradoxes of the Associated Press Decision: A Reply,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 13 (1946), 471–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, K.The Post Office in the Eighteenth Century: A Study in Administrative History. London: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Emery, M., Emery, E., and Roberts, N.L.. The Press and America: An Interpretive History of the Mass Media, 9th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.Google Scholar

Epstein, R.A. “International News Service v. Associated Press: Custom and Law as Sources of Property Rights in News,” Virginia Law Review, 78 (1992), 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fear, J. “Cartels,” in Jones, G. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 268–92.Google Scholar

Fenby, J.The International News Services. New York: Schocken Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Ferguson, N.The World’s Banker: The History of the House of Rothschild. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998.Google Scholar

Field, A.J. “Communications,” in Such, R. and Carter, S.B. (eds.), Historical Statistics of the United States, Vol. 4: Economic Sectors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 977–98.Google Scholar

Foreman-Peck, J. “Competition, Co-operation, and Nationalisation in the Nineteenth-century Telegraph System,” Business History, 31 (1989), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foreman-Peck, J. and Millward, R., Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freyer, T.A.Regulating Big Business: Antitrust in Great Britain and America, 1880–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Freyer, T.A. “Business Law and American Economic History,” in Engerman, S.L. and Gallman, R.E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Vol. 2: The Long Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 435–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, W.E. “The Populists and the Post Office,” Agricultural History, 65 (1991), 1–16.Google Scholar

Gabel, D. “Private Telecommunications Networks: an Historical Perspective,” in Noam, E. and NiShuilleabhain, A. (eds.), Private Networks Public Objectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996, 35–49.Google Scholar

Gabler, E.The American Telegrapher: A Social History, 1860–1900. London: Rutgers University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Galambos, L. “The Triumph of Oligopoly,” in Schaefer, D. and Weiss, T.J. (eds.), American Economic Development in Historical Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994, 244–53.Google Scholar

Gramling, O.AP: The Story of News. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Gray, K. “Property in Thin Air,” Cambridge Law Journal, 50 (1991), 252–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Grazia, V.Irresistible Empire: America’s Advance through Twentieth-Century Europe. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Greenwood, J.Newspapers and the Post Office, 1635–1834. Reigate: Postal History Society, 1971.Google Scholar

Griffen-Foley, B. “The Fairfax, Murdoch and Packer Dynasties in Twentieth-Century Australia,” Media History, 8 (2002), 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallock, W.H.Life of Gerard Hallock: Editor of the New York Journal of Commerce. New York: Oakley, Mason & Co., 1869.Google Scholar

Hamilton, M.W.The Country Printer: New York State, 1785–1830. New York: Columbia University Press, 1936.Google Scholar

Hannah, L. “Managerial Innovation and the Rise of the Large-Scale Company in Interwar Britain,” The Economic History Review, 27 (1974a), 252–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannah, L. “Mergers in British Manufacturing Industry, 1880–1918,” Oxford Economic Papers, 26 (1974b), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannah, L. “Mergers, Cartels and Concentration: Legal Factors in the U.S. and European Experience,” in Horn, N. and Kocka, J. (eds.), Recht und Entwicklung der Großunternehmen im 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979, 306–16.Google Scholar

Hannah, L.The Rise of the Corporate Economy, 2nd ed. London: Methuen, 1983.Google Scholar

Hannah, L. “A Failed Experiment: the State Ownership of Industry,” in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Vol. 3: Structural Change and Growth, 1939–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 81–111.Google Scholar

Hannis, G. “The New Zealand Press Association 1880–2006: The Rise and Fall of a Cooperative Model for News-Gathering,” Australian Economic History Review, 48 (2008), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, A.F.Old Wires and New Waves: The History of the Telegraph, Telephone, and Wireless. London: D. Appleton-Century Co., 1936.Google Scholar

Harvey, R. “Bringing the News to New Zealand: The Supply and Control of Overseas News in the Nineteenth Century,” Media History, 8 (2002), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

He, J.Die Nachrichtenagenturen in Deutschland: Geschichte und Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar

Headrick, D.R.The Invisible Weapon: Telecommunications and International Politics, 1851–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Headrick, D.R. and Griset, P. “Submarine Telegraph Cables: Business and Politics, 1838–1939,” The Business History Review, 75 (2001), 543–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemmeon, J.C.The History of the British Post Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

Herd, H.The March of Journalism: The Story of the British Press from 1622 to the Present Day. London: Allen & Unwin, 1952.Google Scholar

Hill, R.Post Office Reform: Its Importance and Practicability, 3rd ed. London: Charles Knight & Co., 1837.Google Scholar

Hills, J.Struggle for Global Control of Communication: The Formative Century. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hills, J.Telecommunications and Empire. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hilton, B.A Mad, Bad, and Dangerous People? England, 1783–1846. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hochfelder, D. “A Comparison of the Postal Telegraph Movement in Great Britain and the United States, 1866–1900,” Enterprise & Society, 1 (2000), 739–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, H.Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937. London: Harvard University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, F.Journalism in the United States, from 1690 to 1872. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1873, reprinted London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Hugill, P.J.Global Communications since 1844: Geopolitics and Technology. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Huntzicker, W.The Popular Press, 1833–1865. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hyde, F.E.Cunard and the North Atlantic, 1840–1973: A History of Shipping and Financial Management. London: The Macmillan Company, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglis, K.S. “The Imperial Connection: Telegraphic Communication between England and Australia, 1872–1902,” in Madden, A.F. and Morris-Jones, W.H. (eds.) Australia and Britain: Studies in a Changing Relationship. London: University of London, 1980, 21–38.Google Scholar

Innis, H. “Technology and Public Opinion in the United States,” The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 17 (1951), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Israel, M.Communications and Power: Propaganda and the Press in the Indian Nationalist Struggle, 1920–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iwanaga, S.Story of Japanese News Agencies. Tokyo: Shinbun Tsushin Chosa-kai, 1980.Google Scholar

James, H.The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression. London: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Jevons, W.S.Methods of Social Reform. London: Macmillan, 1883.Google Scholar

John, R.R.Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1995.Google Scholar

John, R.R. “Elaborations, Revisions, Dissents: Alfred D. Chandler Jr.’s, ‘The Visible Hand’ after Twenty Years,” The Business History Review, 71 (1997), 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, R.R.Network Nation: Inventing American Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2010a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, R.R. “The Political Economy of Postal Reform in the Victorian Age,” Smithsonian Contributions to History and Technology, 55 (2010b), 3–12.Google Scholar

Jones, G.The Evolution of International Business: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Jones, G. “British Trading Companies and Industrial Development,” in Amatori, F., A. Colli and N. Crepas (eds.), Deindustrialization and Reindustrialization in 20th Century Europe. Milan: Franco Angeli, 1999, 354–71.Google Scholar

Jones, G.Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, G.G. “The British Government and the Oil Companies 1912–1924: The Search for an Oil Policy,” The Historical Journal, 20 (1977), 647–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R.A Life in Reuters. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1951.Google Scholar

Kaldor, N. and Silverman, R.A Statistical Analysis of Advertising Expenditure and the Revenue of the Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Karjala, D.S. “The Board of Directors in English and American Companies through 1920,” in Horn, N. and Kocka, J. (eds.), Recht und Entwicklung der Großunternehmen im 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1979, 204–26.Google Scholar

Kaul, C. “Popular Press and Empire: Northcliffe, India and the Daily Mail,” in Catterall, P., C. Seymour-Ure, and A. Smith (eds.), Northcliffe’s Legacy: Aspects of the British Popular Press, 1896–1996. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 45–70.Google Scholar

Kaul, C.Reporting the Raj: The British Press in India, c. 1880–1922. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kawamura, N. “Wilsonian Idealism and Japanese Claims at the Paris Peace Conference,” Pacific Historical Review, 66 (1997), 503–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, M. “Regulation of Larger Enterprise: The United States Experience in Comparative Perspective,” in Chandler, A. and Daems, H. (eds.), Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise. London: Harvard University Press, 1980, 161–81.Google Scholar

Keller, M. “The Pluralist State: American Economic Regulation in Comparative Perspective,” in McGraw, T. (ed.), Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays. London: Harvard University Press, 1981, 56–94.Google Scholar

Kennedy, P.M. “Imperial Cable Communications and Strategy, 1870–1914,” The English Historical Review, 86 (1971), 728–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keyes, W.N. “Exclusive Foreign Distributor Agreements. Are They Illegal?” California Law Review, 41 (1953), 439–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kielbowicz, R. “News Gathering by Mail in the Age of the Telegraph: Adapting to a New Technology,” Technology and Culture, 28 (1987), 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kielbowicz, R.News in the Mail: The Press, Post Office and Public Information, 1700–1860s. New York: Greenwood, 1989.Google Scholar

Kieve, J.L.The Electric Telegraph. Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1973.Google Scholar

Klein, M.Unfinished Business: The Railroad in American Life. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1994.Google Scholar

Klein, M.The Life and Legend of Jay Gould. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Knight, O.I Protest: Selected Disquisitions of E. W. Scripps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Knights, P.R. “The Press Association War of 1866–1867,” Journalism Monographs, 6 (1967), 1–57.Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, N.The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. “An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1989), 325–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrenson, J. and Barber, L.The Price of Truth: The Story of Reuters Millions. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar

Lee, A.J. “The Management of a Victorian Local Newspaper: the Manchester City News, 1864–1900,” Business History, 15 (1973), 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, A.J.The Origins of the Popular Press in England: 1855–1914. London: Croom Helm, 1976.Google Scholar

Lee, A.J. “The Structure, Ownership and Control of the Press, 1855–1914,” in Boyce, G., J. Curran, and P. Wingate (eds.), Newspaper History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present Day. London: Constable, 1978, 117–29.Google Scholar

Lee, A.M. “Recent Developments in the Daily Newspaper Industry,” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 2 (1938), 126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, A.M.The Daily Newspaper in America: The Evolution of a Social Instrument. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1973.Google Scholar

Lee, J.M.History of American Journalism. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1923.Google Scholar

LeMahieu, D.L. “John Reith (1889–1971),” in Pedersen, S. and Mandler, P. (eds.), After the Victorians. London: Routledge, 1994, 189–206.Google Scholar

Lewin, J.H. “The Associated Press Decision: an Extension of the Sherman Act,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 13 (1946), 247–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livingston, K.T.The Wired Nation Continent: The Communication Revolution and Federating Australia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lurie, J.The Chicago Board of Trade, 1859–1905. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Mayer, H.The Press in Australia. Melbourne: Lansdowne, 1964.Google Scholar

McCabe, C.Damned Old Crank: a Self-Portrait of E. W. Scripps. New York: Harper, 1951.Google Scholar

McCormick, M.Terre Haute: Queen City of the Wabash. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar

McCraw, T.K. “Regulation in America: a Review Article,” The Business History Review, 49 (1975), 159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCraw, T.K. “Rethinking the Trust Question,” in McCraw, T.K. and Keller, M. (eds.), Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays. London: Harvard University Press, 1981, 1–55.Google Scholar

McEwen, J.M.The Riddell Diaries 1908–1923. London: Athlone Press, 1986.Google Scholar

McKibbin, R.Ideologies of Class: Social Relations in Britain, 1880–1950. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McRae, M.A.Forty Years in Newspaperdom: The Autobiography of a Newspaper Man. New York: Brentano’s, 1925.Google Scholar

Meinig, D.W.The Shaping of America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 years of History. London: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Mercer, H.Constructing a Competitive Order: The Hidden History of British Antitrust Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michie, R.C.The London and New York Stock Exchanges, 1850–1914. London: Allen & Unwin, 1987.Google Scholar

Miller, W.I Found no Peace. Garden City, NY: Garden City Publishing, 1938.Google Scholar

Millward, R.Private and Public Enterprise in Europe: Energy, Telecommunications and Transport, 1830–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misra, M.Business, Race, and Politics in British India c. 1850–1960. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moncrieff, C.Living on a Deadline: A History of the Press Association. London: Virgin, 2001.Google Scholar

Morris, J.A.Deadline Every Minute: The Story of the United Press. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1957.Google Scholar

Morrison, E. “Newspapers,” in Davison, G., J. Hirst, and S. Macintyre (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Australian History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, 470–72.Google Scholar

Mott, F.L.American Journalism: A History of Newspapers in the United States through 260 Years, 1690 to 1950. New York: Macmillan, 1947.Google Scholar

Mott, F.L.The News in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moyal, A. “The History of Telecommunication in Australia, 1854–1930,” in Reingold, N. and Rothenberg, M. (eds.), Scientific Colonialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987, 23–41.Google Scholar

Murdock, G. and Golding, P. “The Structure, Ownership and Control of the Press, 1914–76,” in Boyce, G., Curran, J., and Wingate, P. (eds.), Newspaper History from the Seventeenth Century to the Present Day. London: Constable, 1978, 130–48.Google Scholar

Nalbach, A. “‘Poisoned at the Source’? Telegraphic News Services and Big Business in the Nineteenth Century,” The Business History Review, 77 (2003a), 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nalbach, A. “‘The Software of Empire’: Telegraphic News Agencies and Imperial Publicity, 1865–1914,” in Codell, J.F. (ed.), Imperial Co-histories: National Identities and the British and Colonial Press. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2003b, 68–94.Google Scholar

Newspaper Society. The Newspaper Society, 1836–1936; a Centenary Retrospect. Birmingham: Silk & Terry, Ltd., 1936.Google Scholar

Nicholas, T. “Enterprise and Management,” in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Vol. 2: Economic Maturity, 1860–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 227–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nixon, R.B. “Trends in U.S. Newspaper Ownership: Concentration with Competition,” International Communication Gazette, 14 (1968), 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noam, E. “The Tragedy of the Common Network: Theory for the Formation and Breakdown of Public Telecommunications,” in Noam, E. and NiShuilleabhain, A. (eds.), Private Networks Public Objectives. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1996, 51–64.Google Scholar

, N.W.H. “Recent Legislative Proposals to Classify Newspapers and Magazines as Public Utilities and to Regulate them Accordingly,” Virginia Law Review, 17 (1931), 705–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E.Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, M.Des Petits Journaux aux Grandes Agences: Naissance du Journalisme Moderne, 1863–1914. Paris: Aubier, 1983.Google Scholar

Peritz, R.J.R.Competition Policy in America, 1888–1992. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Perkin, H. “Individualism Versus Collectivism in Nineteenth Century Britain: a False Antithesis,” The Journal of British Studies, 17 (1977), 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, C.R. “Frank Ives Scudamore and the Post Office Telegraphs,” Albion, 12 (1980), 305–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, C.R.The Victorian Post Office: the Growth of a Bureaucracy. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Pike, R. and Winseck, D. “The Politics of Global Media Reform, 1907–23,” Media, Culture & Society, 26 (2004), 350–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilgrim, T.A. “Newspapers as Natural Monopolies: Some Historical Considerations,” Journalism History 18 (1992), 3–10.Google Scholar

Political and Economic Planning (PEP). The State of the Press, No. 58. London: PEP, 1935.Google Scholar

Political and Economic Planning. Report of the British Press. London: PEP, 1938.Google Scholar

Pollard, S.The Development of the British Economy 1914–1990, 4th ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.Google Scholar

Porter, R.English Society in the Eighteenth Century. London: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Porter, R.Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Allen Lane, 2000.Google Scholar

Potter, E.The Press as Opposition: The Political Role of South African Newspapers. London: Chatto and Windus, 1975.Google Scholar

Potter, S.J. “Communication and Integration: the British Dominion Press and the British World, c. 1876–1914,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 31 (2003), 190–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, S.J.News and the British World: The Emergence of an Imperial Press System, 1876–1922. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, S.J.Newspapers and Empire in Ireland and Britain. Dublin: Four Courts, 2004.Google Scholar

Potter, S.J. “Webs, Networks, and Systems: Globalization and the Mass Media in the Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century British Empire,” Journal of British Studies, 46 (2007), 621–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnis, P. “Reuters in Australia: the Supply and Exchange of News, 1859–1877,” Media History, 10 (2004), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnis, P. “How the International News Agency Business Model Failed – Reuters in Australia, 1877–1895,” Media History, 12 (2006), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnis, P. “Share 999. British government control of Reuters during World War I,” Media History, 14 (2008), 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnis, P. “Reuters and the British Government – Re-visited,” Media History, 16 (2010), 295–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rantanen, T. “Mr. Howard goes to South America. The United Press Associations and Foreign Expansion,” Roy W. Howard Monographs in Journalism and Mass Communication Research, 2 (1992).Google Scholar

Rantanen, T. “The Globalization of Electronic News in the 19th Century,” Media, Culture & Society, 19 (1997), 605–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rantanen, T. “The Struggle for Control of Domestic News Markets (1),” in Boyd-Barrett, O. and Rantanen, T. (eds.), The Globalization of News. London: Sage, 1998a, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rantanen, T. “After Five O’clock Friends,” Roy W. Howard Monographs in Journalism and Mass Communication Research, 4 (1998b), 1–35.Google Scholar

Rantanen, T. “Foreign Dependence and Domestic Monopoly: the European news Cartel and U.S. Associated Presses, 1861–1932,” Media History, 12 (2006), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rantanen, T. “The End of the Electronic News Cartel, 1927–1934,” in Putnis, P., Wilke, J., and Kaul, C. (eds.), International Communication and Global News Networks: Historical Perspectives. Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2011, 167–88.Google Scholar

Read, D. “Sir Roderick Jones and Reuters: Rise and Fall of a News Emperor,” in Fraser, D. (ed.), Cities, Class and Communication: Essays in Honour of Asa Briggs. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990, 175–99.Google Scholar

Read, D. “Reuters: News Agency of the British Empire,” Contemporary Record, 8 (1994), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, D. “Truth in News: Reuters and the Manchester Guardian, 1858–1964,” Northern History, 31 (1995), 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, D. “Reuters and South Africa: ‘South Africa Is a Country of Monopolies’,” The South African Journal of Economic History, 11 (1996), 106–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, D.The Power of News: The History of Reuters, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, D. “The Relationship of Reuters and Other News Agencies with the British Press 1858–1984: Service at Cost or Business for Profit?” in Catterall, P., C. Seymour-Ure, and A. Smith (eds.), Northcliffe’s Legacy: Aspects of the British Popular Press, 1896–1996. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000, 149–68.Google Scholar

Regan, J.W. “The Inception of the Associated Press: The Pony Express That in 1849 Forwarded European News from Halifax to Digby, to Be Conveyed by Vessel to St. John, and Thence Telegraphed to New York,” Transactions of the Nova Scotia Historical Society, 19 (1912).Google Scholar

Rens, J.The Invisible Empire: A History of the Telecommunications Industry in Canada. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Roberts, K. “Antitrust Problems in the Newspaper Industry,” Harvard Law Review, 82 (1968), 319–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, H.The British Post Office: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Robinson, H.Britain’s Post Office. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Rosewater, V.History of Cooperative News-Gathering in the United States. London: D. Appleton and Co., 1930.Google Scholar

Schmanske, S. “News as a Public Good: Cooperative Ownership, Price Commitments, and the Success of the Associated Press,”The Business History Review, 60 (1986), 55–80.Google Scholar

Schudson, M.Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Schudson, M. “Toward a Troubleshooting Manual for Journalism History,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74 (1997), 463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarzlose, R.A. “Harbor News Association: The Formal Origin of the AP,” Journalism Quarterly, 45 (1968), 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarzlose, R.A. “The Nation’s First Wire Service: Evidence Supporting a Footnote,” Journalism Quarterly, 57 (1980), 555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarzlose, R.A.The Nation’s Newsbrokers, vol. 1–2. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Scott, G.Reporter Anonymous: The Story of the Press Association. London: Hutchinson, 1968.Google Scholar

Scott, J.M.Extel 100: The Centenary History of the Exchange Telegraph Company. London: Benn, 1972.Google Scholar

Sherover, M.Fakes in American Journalism, 3rd ed. Brooklyn, NY: Buffalo Publishing Co., 1916.Google Scholar

Silberstein-Loeb, J. “The structure of the News Market in Britain, 1870–1914,” Business History Review, 83 (2009), 759–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silberstein-Loeb, J. “Foreign Office control of Reuters during the First World War,” Media History, 16 (2010), 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silberstein-Loeb, J. “Exclusivity and Cooperation in the supply of News: The Example of the associated press, 1893–1945,” Journal of Policy History, 24 (2012), 466–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, U.The Brass Check: A Study of American Journalism. Pasadena, CA, 1920.Google Scholar

Sklar, M.The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skowronek, S.Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacity, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sola Pool, I de, Technologies without Boundaries, ed. Noam, E.. London: Harvard University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stamm, M.Sound Business: Newspapers, Radio, and the Politics of New Media. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Starr, P.The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York: Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Stern, F.R.Gold and Iron: Bismarck, Bleichröder and the Building of the German Empire. London: Allen and Unwin, 1977.Google Scholar

Stevens, J.D. and Garcia, H.D.Communication History. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1980.Google Scholar

Stone, C.Dana and the Sun. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1938.Google Scholar

Stone, M.E.Fifty Years a Journalist. London: Heinemann, 1922.Google Scholar

Storey, G.Reuters’ Century, 1851–1951. London: Max Parish, 1951.Google Scholar

Swindler, W.F. “The AP Anti-trust Case in Historical Perspective,” Journalism Quarterly, 23 (1946), 40–57.Google Scholar

Tarbell, I.The Nationalizing of Business, 1878–1898. New York: Macmillan, 1936.Google Scholar

Tegg, W.Post and Telegraphs, Past and Present: With an Account of the Telephone and Phonograph. London: William Tegg & Co., 1878.Google Scholar

Thompson, E.P.The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Trimble, V.The Astonishing Mr. Scripps: The Turbulent Life of America’s Penny Press Lord. Ames: Iowa State Press, 1992.Google Scholar

UNESCO. News Agencies, Their Structure and Operation. Paris: UNESCO, 1953.Google Scholar

Vietor, R.H.K.Contrived Competition: Regulation and Deregulation in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vietor, R.H.K. “Government Regulation of Business,” in Engerman, S.L. and Gallman, R.E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Vol. 3: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 969–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villard, O.G.Some Newspapers and Newspaper-Men. New York: Alfred M. Knopf, 1923.Google Scholar

Wadsworth, A.P.Newspaper Circulations, 1800–1954. Manchester: Norbury, Lockwood, & Co., 1955.Google Scholar

Walker, M.Powers of the Press: The World’s Great Newspapers. London: Quartet Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Walsten, S. “Returning to Victorian Competition, Ownership, and Regulation: an Empirical study of European Telecommunications at the Turn of the Twentieth Century,” The Journal of Economic History, 65 (2005), 693–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westley, B. “How a Narrow Application of ‘Hot News’ Misappropriation Can Help Save Journalism,”American University Law Review, 60 (2011), 691–730.Google Scholar

Wilson, C.First with the News: The History of W.H. Smith, 1792–1972. London: Cape, 1985.Google Scholar

Winseck, D.R. and Pike, R.M.Communication and Empire: Media, Markets, and Globalization, 1860–1930. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woods, O. and Bishop, J.The Story of The Times. London: Michael Joseph, 1985.Google Scholar

Wu, T. “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination,” Journal On Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 2 (2003), 141–79.Google Scholar

Yates, J.Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar