Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T23:51:55.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Chemical pollution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Nathaniel L. Scholz
Affiliation:
Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Jenifer K. McIntyre
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Gerard P. Closs
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Martin Krkosek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Chemical forms of water pollution are a major cause of freshwater habitat degradation worldwide. There are many sources of toxic contaminants, and these reflect past and present human activities and land uses. Toxics can have adverse health impacts on all components of aquatic ecosystems, including threatened fish species and the biological communities they rely on, particularly for food. Toxics can also interact in complex ways with other non-chemical habitat stressors such as water temperature, disease vectors and non-native species (Chapter 2). Therefore, chemical pollution poses important challenges for the conservation of freshwater fish and their habitats. The pollution problem scales roughly in proportion to the global human population, and is therefore expected to grow in significance throughout many parts of the world in the first half of the twenty-first century.

This chapter provides an introduction to freshwater pollution science, with an emphasis on current and emerging threats to vulnerable fish populations. There are now more than 80,000 individual chemicals in societal use, derived from commercial product manufacturing, drug development, pest control practices and many other processes that underpin modern economies. A large fraction of these chemicals eventually ends up in aquatic habitats via direct discharges, land-based run-off and atmospheric deposition. An overview of water quality threats on a chemical-by-chemical basis is impracticable. Rather, we will focus on central themes in freshwater ecotoxicology and common challenges for the conservation and recovery of threatened fish. Additional important categories of water pollution are beyond the scope of this chapter. For more information on these other topic areas, the reader is referred to reviews on nutrients and sediments (Bouwman et al., 2013), acid rain (Schindler, 1981), microbial pathogens (Ferguson et al., 2003) and natural toxins produced by biological organisms (e.g. microcystins from cyanobacteria; Landsberg, 2002).

Several core concepts in aquatic ecotoxicology are provided in Table 5.1. These terms are generally used to draw distinctions between contaminants that: (1) are historical use (legacy) vs. modern use, (2) are released from focal vs. diffuse sources, (3) are short-lived vs. persistent in the environment, (4) are metabolised and eliminated by organisms vs. passed through food webs to higher trophic levels, (5) impact fish directly vs. indirectly via loss of prey, (6) are acutely lethal (i.e. cause fish kills) vs. causing more nuanced sublethal toxicity, and (7) have effects on fish at the individual vs. the population scale.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. & Simmons, D. (1999). Ecological effects of fire fighting foams and retardants: a summary. Australian Forestry, 62, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahiablame, L. M., Engel, B. A. & Chaubey, I. (2012). Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 223, 4253–4273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, S. & Hristovski, K. (2013). Novel solutions to water pollution. ACS Symposium Series. Washington, DC: ACS Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, J. D. (2004). Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 257–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J., et al. (2010). Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 29, 730–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, K. (2012). Water security: research challenges and opportunities. Science, 337, 914–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, D. H., Spromberg, J. A., Collier, T. K. & Scholz, N. L. (2009). A fish of many scales: extrapolating sublethal pesticide exposures to the productivity of wild salmon populations. Ecological Applications, 19, 2004–2015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beketov, M. A., Kefford, B. J., Shäfer, R. B. & Liess, M. (2013). Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 11039–11043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, E. S. & Palmer, M. A. (2007). Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology, 52, 738–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, A. F., Bierkens, M. F. P., Griffioe, J., et al. (2013). Nutrient dynamics, transfer and retention along the aquatic continuum from land to ocean: towards integration of ecological and biogeochemical models. Biogeosciences, 10, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, B. W., Chambliss, C. K., Stanley, J. K., et al. (2005). Determination of select antidepressants in fish from an effluent-dominated stream. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 464–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capel, P. D., Giger, W., Reichert, P. & Wanner, O. (1988). Accidental input of pesticides into the Rhine River. Environmental Science and Technology, 22, 992–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castilhos, Z. C., Rodrigues-Filho, S., Rodrigues, A. P. C., et al. (2006). Mercury contamination in fish from gold mining areas in Indonesia and human health risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 368, 320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, C. & Horner, R. R. (2010). Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system. Water Environment Research, 82, 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, P. M., Robbins, J. A., Endicott, D. D., et al. (2003). Effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated early life stage toxicity on lake trout populations in Lake Ontario during the twentieth century. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 3864–3877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G. & Clar, M. (2009). Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering – ASCE, 135, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLorenzo, M. E., Scott, G. I. & Ross, P. E. (2001). Toxicity of pesticides to aquatic microorganisms: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Wit, C. A. (2002). An overview of brominated flame retardants in the environment. Chemosphere, 46, 583–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiBlasi, C. J., Li, H., Davis, A. P. & Ghosh, U. (2009). Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in an urban stormwater bioretention facility. Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, M. E. (2007). Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 186, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmore, A. J. & Kaushal, S. S. (2008). Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 308–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eng, Y. Y., Sharma, V. K. & Ray, A. K. (2006). Ferrate(VI): green chemistry oxidant for degradation of cationic surfactant. Chemosphere, 63, 1785–1790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, B. E., Buhle, E. R., Arnold, P., Davis, J. W. & Scholz, N. L. (2011). Landscape ecotoxicology of salmon spawner mortality in urban streams. PLoS ONE, 6, e23424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, C., de Roda Husman, A., Altavilla, N., Deere, D. & Ashbolt, N. (2003). Fate and transport of surface water pathogens in watersheds. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 299–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, M. P., Ikonomou, M. G., Courtenay, S. C. & Wirgin, I. I. (2004). Spatial variation in hepatic levels and patterns of PCBs and PCDD/Fs among young-of-the-year and adult Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod) in the Hudson River estuary. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 976–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Reyero, N. & Perkins, E. J. (2011). Systems biology: leading the revolution in ecotoxicology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 30, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grannas, A. M., Bogdal, C., Hageman, K. J., et al. (2013). The role of the global cryosphere in the fate of organic contaminants. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13, 3271–3305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimalt, J. O., Ferrer, M. & Macpherson, E. (1999). The mine tailing accident in Aznalcollar. Science of the Total Environment, 242, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, S. J. (2004). Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Science of the Total Environment, 326, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. A., Hamilton, P. B., Runnalls, T. J., et al. (2011). The consequence of feminization in breeding groups of wild fish. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, 306–311.Google Scholar
Hartig, J. H. (2010). Burning Rivers: Revival of Four Urban-Industrial Rivers that Caught on Fire. Hickley: Multi-Science Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hicken, C. L., Linbo, T. L., Baldwin, D. W., et al. (2011). Sublethal exposure to crude oil during embryonic development alters cardiac morphology and reduces aerobic capacity in adult fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 7086–7090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikediashi, C., Billington, S. & Stevens, J. R. (2012). The origins of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) recolonizing the River Mersey in northwest England. Ecology and Evolution, 2, 2537–2548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Incardona, J. P., Collier, T. K. & Scholz, N. L. (2011). Oil spills and fish health: exposing the heart of the matter. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 21, 3–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, J. Q., Yin, Q., Zhou, J. L. & Pearce, P. (2005). Occurrence and treatment trials of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in wastewaters. Chemosphere, 61, 544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobling, S., Nolan, M., Tyler, C. R., Brighty, G. & Sumpter, J. P. (1998). Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 2498–2506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E. N., Schindler, D. W., Hodson, P. V., et al. (2010). Oil sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16178–16183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesler, M., Kangur, M. & Vetemaa, M. (2011). Natural re-establishment of Atlantic salmon reproduction and the fish community in the previously heavily polluted River Purtse, Baltic Sea. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 20, 472–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, K. A., Blanchfield, P. J., Mills, K. H., et al. (2007). Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8897–8901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, R. (2000). Wildlife deaths are a grim wake-up call in Eastern Europe. Science, 287, 1737–1738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laetz, C. A., Baldwin, D. H., Collier, T. K., et al. (2009). The synergistic toxicity of pesticide mixtures: implications for ecological risk assessment and the conservation of threatened Pacific salmon. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laetz, C. A., Baldwin, D. H., Hebert, V. R., Stark, J. D. & Scholz, N. L. (2013). The interactive neurobehavioral toxicity of diazinon, malathion, and ethoprop to juvenile coho salmon. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 2925–2931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landsberg, J. H. (2002). The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 10, 113–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeFevre, G. H., Hozalski, R. M. & Novak, P. J. (2012). The role of biodegradation in limiting the accumulation of petroleum hydrocarbons in raingarden soils. Water Research, 46, 6753–6762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lokhande, R. S., Singare, P. U. & Pimple, D. S. (2011). Pollution in water of Kasardi River flowing along Taloja industrial area of Mumbai, India. World Environment, 1, 6–13.Google Scholar
Lundgen, J. G. & Duan, J. J. (2013). RNAi-based insecticidal crops: potential effects on nontarget species. BioScience, 63, 657–665.Google Scholar
Ma, J., Hung, H., Tian, C. & Kallenborn, R. (2011). Revolatilization of persistent organic pollutants in the Arctic induced by climate change. Nature Climate Change, 1, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macneale, K. H., Kiffney, P. M. & Scholz, N. L. (2010). Pesticides, aquatic food webs, and the conservation of Pacific salmonids. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 475–482.Google Scholar
Malm, O. (1998). Gold mining as a source of mercury exposure in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research, 77, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, J. K., Baldwin, D. H., Beauchamp, D. A. & Scholz, N. L. (2012). Low-level copper exposures increase the visibility and vulnerability of juvenile coho salmon to cutthroat trout predators. Ecological Applications, 22, 1460–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, J. K., Davis, J. W., Incardona, J. P., et al. (2014). Zebrafish and clean water technology: assessing the protective effects of bioinfiltration as a treatment for toxic urban runoff. Science of the Total Environment, 500, 173–180.Google Scholar
McIntyre, J. K., Davis, J. W., Hinman, C., et al. (2015). Soil bioretention protects juvenile salmon and their prey from the toxic impacts of urban stormwater runoff. Chemosphere, 132, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehinto, A. C., Martyniuk, C. J., Spade, D. J. & Denslow, N. D. (2012). Applications for next-generation sequencing in fish ecotoxicogenomics. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, Article 62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozaffarian, D. & Rimm, E. B. (2006). Fish intake, contaminants, and human health – evaluating the risks and the benefits. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1885–1899.Google ScholarPubMed
Myers, M. S., Johnson, L. L. & Collier, T. K. (2003). Establishing the causal relationship between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure and hepatic neoplasms and neoplasia-related liver lesions in English sole (Pleuronectes vetulus). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 9, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, R. J., Alldredge, J. R., Beauchamp, D. A., et al. (2012). Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 21201–21207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. C., Palmer, M. A., Pizzuto, J. E., et al. (2008). Forecasting the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on stream ecosystems: from impacts to management options. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 154–163.Google Scholar
Palmer, M. A., Bernhardt, E. S., Schlesinger, W. H., et al. (2010). Mountaintop mining consequences. Science, 327, 148–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, M. E., Keller, W. & Yan, N. D. (2013). Gauging recovery of zooplankton from historical acid and metal contamination: the influence of temporal changes in restoration targets. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrier, C., Evanno, G., Belliard, J., Guyomard, R. & Baglinière, J. L. (2010). Natural recolonization of the Seine River by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) of multiple origins. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdom, C. E., Hardiman, P. A., Bye, V. J., et al. (1994). Estrogenic effects of effluents from sewage treatment works. Chemistry and Ecology, 8, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, J. & Fan, M. (2010). The current state of water quality and and technology development for water pollution control in China. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 519–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, T. P. (2005). The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society and University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Rahel, F. J. (2010). Homogenization, differentiation, and the widespread alteration of fish faunas. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 73, 311–326.Google Scholar
Reynaud, S. & Deschaux, P. (2006). The effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the immune system of fish: a review. Aquatic Toxicology, 77, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohr, J. R., Schotthoefer, A. M., Raffel, T. R., et al. (2008). Agrochemicals increase trematode infections in a declining amphibian species. Nature, 455, 1235–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampaio Da Silva, D., Lucotte, M., Roulet, M., et al. (2005). Trophic structure and bioaccumulation of mercury in fish of three natural lakes of the Brazilian Amazon. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 165, 77–94.Google Scholar
Sandahl, J. F., Baldwin, D. H., Jenkins, J. J. & Scholz, N. L. (2005). Comparative thresholds for acetylcholinesterase inhibition and behavioral impairment in coho salmon exposed to chlorpyrifos. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 136–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santella, N., Steinberg, L. J. & Sengul, H. (2010). Petroleum and hazardous material releases from industrial facilities associated with Hurricane Katrina. Risk Analysis, 30, 635–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schindler, D. W. (1981). Effects of acid rain on freshwater ecosystems. Science, 239, 149–157.Google Scholar
Scholz, N. L., Truelove, N., French, B., et al. (2000). Diazinon disrupts antipredator and homing behaviors in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 1911–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, N. L., Myers, M. S., McCarthy, S. G., et al. (2011). Recurrent die-offs of adult coho salmon returning to spawn in Puget Sound lowland urban streams. PLoS ONE, 6, e28013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, N. L., Fleishman, E., Brooks, M. L., et al. (2012). A perspective on modern pesticides, pelagic fish declines, and unknown ecological resiliency in highly managed ecosystems. BioScience, 62, 428–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. M, Furlong, E. T., Kolpin, D. W., et al. (2010). Antidepressant pharmaceuticals in two US effluent-impacted streams: occurrence and fate in water and sediment, and selective uptake in fish neural tissue. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 1918–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, V. K. (2002). Potassium ferrate(VI): an environmentally friendly oxidant. Advances in Environmental Research, 6, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, V. K. & Mishra, S. K. (2006). Ferrate(VI) oxidation of ibuprofen: a kinetic study. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 3, 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, V. K., Mishra, S. K. & Ray, A. K. (2006). Kinetic assessment of the potassium ferrate(VI) oxidation of antibacterial drug sulfamethoxazole. Chemosphere, 62, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, R. N. & Veiga, M. M. (2009). Using performance indicators to evaluate an environmental education program in artisanal gold mining communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Ambio, 38, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spier, C. R., Vadas, G. G., Kaattari, S. L. & Unger, M. A. (2011). Near real-time, on-site, quantitative analysis of PAHs in the aqueous environment using an antibody-based biosensor. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 30, 1557–1563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spromberg, J. A. & Scholz, N. L. (2011). Estimating the decline of wild coho salmon populations due to premature spawner mortality in urbanizing watersheds of the Pacific Northwest. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 4, 648–656.Google Scholar
Stehr, C. M., Linbo, T. L., Scholz, N. L. & Incardona, J. P. (2009). Evaluating effects of forestry herbicides on fish development using zebrafish rapid phenotypic screens. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 29, 975–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumpter, J. P. (2005). Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: An overview. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 33, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. A. & Klaper, R. C. (2012). Psychoactive pharmaceuticals induce gene expression profiles associated with human idiopathic autism. PLoS ONE, 7, e32917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uryu, Y., Malm, O., Thornton, I., Payne, I. & Cleary, D. (2001). Mercury contamination of fish and its implications for other wildlife of the Tapajós Basin, Brazilian Amazon. Conservation Biology, 15, 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenti, T. W., Gould, G. G., Berninger, J. P., et al. (2012). Human therapeutic plasma levels of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline decrease serotonin reuptake transporter binding and shelter-seeking behavior in adult male fathead minnows. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 2427–2435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virtue, W. A. & Clayton, J. W. (1997). Sheep dip chemicals and water pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 194, 207–217.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, M. K., Spitsbergen, J. M., Olson, J. R. & Peterson, R. E. (1991). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para- dioxin (TCDD) toxicity during early life stage development of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. K., Cook, P. M., Batterman, A. R., et al. (1994). Translocation of 2,3,7,8-tetra- chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin from adult female lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to oocytes – effects on early life stage development and sac fry survival. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 51, 1410–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., et al. (2005). The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernersson, A. S. (2004). Aquatic ecotoxicity due to oil pollution in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 7, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirgin, I., Roy, N. K., Loftus, M., et al. (2011). Mechanistic basis of resistance to PCBs in Atlantic tomcod from the Hudson River. Science, 331, 1322–1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woody, C. A., Hughes, R. M., Wagner, E. J., et al. (2010). The Mining Law of 1872: change is overdue. Fisheries, 35, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Liu, Y. & Wu, L. S. (2013). Sorption and degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 4261–4267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, Z. P., Courtenay, S., Chambers, R. C. & Wirgin, I. (2006). Evidence of spatially extensive resistance to PCBs in an anadromous fish of the Hudson River. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×