Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T20:01:58.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Horizontal slug flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2013

Thomas J. Hanratty
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

Prologue

Chapter 2 gives considerable attention to slug flow because of its central role in understanding the configuration of the phases in horizontal and inclined pipes. Several criteria have been identified to define the boundaries of this regime: (1) viscous large-wavelength instability of a stratified flow; (2) Kelvin–Helmholtz instability of a stratified flow; (3) stability of a slug; (4) coalescence of large-amplitude waves. Bontozoglou & Hanratty (1990) suggested that a sub-critical non-linear Kelvin–Helmholtz instability could be an effective mechanism in pipes with very large diameters, but this analysis has not been tested. A consideration of the stability of a slug emerges as being particularly important. It explains the initiation of slugs for very viscous liquids, for high-density gases, for gas velocities where wave coalescence is important and for the evolution of pseudo-slugs into slugs. Chapter 2 (Section 2.2.5) outlines an analysis of slug stability which points out the importance of understanding the rate at which slugs shed liquid. Section 9.2 continues this discussion by developing a relation for Qsh and for the critical height of the liquid layer needed to support a stable slug. Section 9.3 develops a tentative model for horizontal slug flow. Section 9.4 considers the frequency of slugging.

Necessary conditions for the existence of slugs

Figure 9.1 presents simplified sketches of the front and the tail of a slug in a pipeline. The front has a velocity cF; the back has a velocity cB. The stratified liquid layer in front of the slug has a velocity and area designated by uL1, AL1. The mean velocity of the liquid in the slug is uL3. The slug is usually aerated; the mean volume fraction of gas in the slug is designated by α. The gas at station 1 is moving from left to right at a velocity uG1. The assumption is made that the velocity fields can be approximated as being uniform.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreussi, P. & Bendikson, K. 1989 Investigation of void fraction in liquid slugs for horizontal and inclined gas–liquid pipe flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 15, 937–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andritsos, N., Williams, L. & Hanratty, T. J. 1989 Effect of liquid viscosity on stratified-slug transition in horizontal pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18, 877–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnea, D. & Brauner, N. 1985 Holdup of the liquid in two-phase intermittent flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 10, 467–483.Google Scholar
Barnea, D. & Taitel, Y. 1993 A model for slug length distribution in gas–liquid slug flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 10, 467–483.Google Scholar
Barnea, D., Shoham, O., Taitel, Y. & Dukler, A. E. 1980 Flow pattern transition for gas–liquid flow in horizontal and inclined pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 6, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendiksen, K. H. 1984 Experimental investigation of the motion of long bubbles in inclined tubes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 10, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernicott, M. F. & Drouffe, J. M. 1991 A slug length distribution law for multiphase transportation systems. SPE Prod. Eng. 19, 829–838.Google Scholar
Bontozoglou, V. & Hanratty, T. J. 1990 Capillary-gravity Kelvin–Helmholtz waves close to resonance. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brill, J. P., Schmidt, Z., Coberly, W. A. & Moore, D. W. 1981 Analysis of two-phase tests in large diameter flow lines in Prudhoe Bay Field. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J.363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, C. J., Sam, R. G. & Rothe, P. H. 1986 Investigation of two-phase flow in horizontal and inclined pipes at large pipe sizes and high gas density. Report prepared for the American Gas Association by Creare Inc.
Dukler, A. E. & Hubbard, M. G. 1975 A model for gas–liquid slug flow in horizontal tubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 14, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukler, A. E., Maron, D. M. & Brauner, N. 1985 A physical model for predicting minimum slug length. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 40, 1379–1385.Google Scholar
Fan, Z., Jepson, W. P. & Hanratty, T. J. 1992 A model for stationary slugs. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Z., Lusseyran, F. & Hanratty, T. J. 1993a Initiation of slugs in horizontal gas–liquid flows. AIChE Jl 39, 1741–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Z., Ruder, Z. & Hanratty, T. J. 1993b Pressure profiles for slugs in horizontal pipelines. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 19, 3421–3437.Google Scholar
Ferre, D. 1979 Ecoulements diphasiques aporches en conduite horizontale. Rev. Ind. Fr. Pet. 34, 113–142.Google Scholar
Govier, G. W. & Aziz, K. 1972 The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes. New York: Van Nostrand Rheinhold.Google Scholar
Gregory, G. A. & Scott, D. S. 1969 Correlation of liquid slug velocity and frequency in concurrent gas–liquid slug flow. AIChE Jl 15, 833–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, G. A., Nicholson, M. K. & Aziz, K. 1978 Correlation for liquid volume fraction in the slug for gas–liquid flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 4, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenier, P., Fabre, J. & Fagundes Netto, J. R. 1997 Slug Flow in Pipelines: Recent Advances and Future Developments. Bedford: BHR Group, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
Heywood, N. I. & Richardson, J. F. 1979 Slug flow in air–water mixtures in a horizontal pipe; determination of liquid holdup by gamma ray absorption. Chem. Eng. Sci. 28, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlburt, E. T. & Hanratty, T. J. 2002 Prediction of the transition from stratified to slug and plug flow for long pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20, 707–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouba, G. K. & Jepson, W. P. 1990 The flow of slugs in horizontal two phase pipelines. Trans. ASME 112, 20–25.Google Scholar
Lin, P. Y. & Hanratty, T. J. 1986 Prediction of the initiation of slugs with linear stability theory. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 12, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicklin, D. J., Wilkes, J. O. & Davidson, J. F. 1962 Two phase flow in vertical pipes. Trans. Inst. Chem. Engs. 102, 61–68.Google Scholar
Nydal, O. J., Pintus, S. & Andreussi, P. 1992 Statistical characterization of slug flow in horizontal pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 18, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruder, Z. & Hanratty, T. J. 1990 A definition of gas–liquid plug flow in horizontal pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruder, Z., Hanratty, P. J. & Hanratty, T. J. 1989 Necessary conditions for the existence of stable slugs. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 15, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, G., Bendiksen, K., Muller, J. & Froland, E. 1990 The fractal statistics of liquid slug lengths. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 16, 1117–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S. L., Shoham, O. & Brill, J. P. 1987 Modeling slug growth in large diameter pipes. Paper presented at the Third International Joint Conference on Multiphase Flow, The Hague, Netherlands, May 1987, paper B2.
Singh, G. & Griffith, P. 1970 Determination of the pressure optimum pipe size for two-phase flow in an inclined pipe. TASME J. Eng. Ind. 92, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, J. J. 1957 Water Waves. New York: Interscience, pp. 313–333.Google Scholar
Taitel, Y., Barnea, D. & Dukler, A. E. 1980 Modelling of flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas–liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChE Jl 3, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, B. 1989 Ecoulements diphasiques instatationaires en conduite horizontale. Ph.D. thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse.
Woods, B. D. 1998 Slug formation and frequency of slugging in gas–liquid flows. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois.
Woods, B. D. & Hanratty, T. J. 1996 Relation of slug stability to shedding rate. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22, 809–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, B. D. & Hanratty, T. J. 1999 Influence of Froude number on physical processes determining frequency of slugging in horizontal gas–liquid flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25, 1195–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, B. D., Hurlburt, E. T. & Hanratty, T. J. 2000 Mechanism of slug formation in downwardly inclined pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 26, 977–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, B. D., Fan, Z. & Hanratty, T. J. 2006 Frequency and development of slugs in a horizontal pipe at large liquid flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 32, 902–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Horizontal slug flow
  • Thomas J. Hanratty, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Physics of Gas-Liquid Flows
  • Online publication: 05 November 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649421.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Horizontal slug flow
  • Thomas J. Hanratty, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Physics of Gas-Liquid Flows
  • Online publication: 05 November 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649421.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Horizontal slug flow
  • Thomas J. Hanratty, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Physics of Gas-Liquid Flows
  • Online publication: 05 November 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649421.011
Available formats
×