1. Mantle, P.J., “Air Cushion Craft Development”, published by US Navy in 1980 (GPO Stock No. 008-047-00291-2)Google Scholar

2. ibid

3. Havelock, Thomas H., “The Effect of Shallow Water on Wave Resistance”, Proceedings Royal Society, Series A, Vol 100, No. A706, 1922

4. Lamb, Horace, “Hydrodynamics”, published by Dover Publications, Edition, 1932. First edition 1879.Google Scholar

5. Crewe, Peter R. and Eggington, Wilfred J., “The Hovercraft – A New Concept in Maritime Transport,” RINA Lecture, 19 Nov 1959. See also Transactions of Royal Institute of Naval Architects, 1960Google Scholar

6. Newman, J.N. and Poole, F.A.P., “The Wave Resistance of a Moving Pressure Distribution in a Canal”, DTMB Report 1619, March 1962

7. Barratt, M.J., “The Wave Drag of Hovercraft”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol 22, Part 1, pp39–47, 1965CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Doctors, L.J., “The Wave Resistance of An Air Cushion Vehicle”, University of Michigan, December 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Everest, J.T. and Hogben, N., “Research on Hovercraft Over Calm Water”, Transactions of Royal Institute of Naval Architects, Vol 109, pp311–326, 1967Google Scholar

10. Mantle, P.J., “Air Cushion Craft Development”, published by US Navy in 1980 (ISBN 008-047-00291-2)Google Scholar

11. Beardsley, Mel W., “Wave Pumping and Its Effects on the Design and Operation of Air Cushion Ships”, US Navy Marine Engineering Laboratory, MEL Tech memo 48/67, March 1967Google Scholar

12. ibid

13. Mantle, P.J., “Air Cushion Craft Development”, published by US Navy in 1980 (ISBN 008-047-00291-2)Google Scholar

14. “Parametric Design Analysis and Concept Exploration”, Arctic Surface Effect Vehicle Program, Bell Aerospace Final Report 7416–950001, Vol 1, February 1973

15. Chaplin, John B., “Amphibious Surface Effect Vehicle Technology – Past, Present and Future”, AIAA/SNAME Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, Paper No. 74–318, San Diego, CA, 25–27 February 1974

16. Waldo, Robert D., “Some Special Problems in Surface Effect Ships”, Journal of Hydronautics 2, Vol 3, July 1968Google Scholar

17. Handler, Eugene (US Navy Project Office), “Major Test Facilities Used in Development of the Large Surface Effect Ship”, Hovering Craft & Hydrofoil, Volume 17, No. 3, December 1977Google Scholar

18. Wilson, Robert A., “Design Parameters Affecting Turn Stability of Captured Air Bubble Vehicles”, NSRDC Report No. 2965, 1968

19. Hydronautics, , Final Technical Task Report on Improved SES Performance, Volume II by Blaes, V., Witte, J., Barr, R., Scherer, O., Wiggett, D., Report No. 834–1, 1967

20. Wilson, R.A., “Captured Air Bubble Vehicle Stability Tests”, AIAA/SNAME Conference on Advanced Marine Vehicles, Paper No. 67–349, Norfolk, Virginia, May 1967

21. Lanchester, F.W., “Aerodynamics”, Constable and Co., pp139–178, London, 1907Google Scholar

22. Prandtl, Ludwig, “Flüssigkeitsbewegung”, Handworterbuch der Naturwissenschaften, Vol 4, pp101–140, Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany, 1913

23. Jones, R.T., “Correction of the Lifting Line Theory For the Effect of Chord”, NACA TN No. 817, July 1941Google Scholar

24. Korvin-Kroukovsky, B.V., “Lift of Planing Surfaces”, Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, Readers Forum, pp597–599, September 1950

25. Wagner, von Herbert, “Hauplaufsätze Uber Stoss– und Gleitvorgünge an der Oberfläche von Flussigkeiten”, ZAMM, pp193–215, August 1932Google Scholar

26. Korvin-Kroukovsky, B.V.; Savitsky, Daniel; Lehman, William F., “Wetted Area and Center of Pressure of Planing Surfaces”, Experimental Towing Tank, Stevens Institute of Technology Report 360, August 1949

27. Sottorf, W., “Versuche mit Gleitflächen” (Experiments with Planing Surfaces), Werft-Reederei-Hafen, 1932 & 1933. Re-issued under translation by Vanier, J. as a NACA Tech Memo No.739, March 1934Google Scholar

28. Sambraus, A., “Gleitflächenversuche bei grossen Froudeschen Zahlen und Tragflügelvergleich”, Luftfahrtforschung, Vol 13 No. 8, pp269–280, 20 August 1936. Translated by Vanier, J. and re-issued as “Planing-Surface Tests at Large Froude Numbers—Airfoil Comparison”, NACA TM No. 848, February 1938Google Scholar

29. Shoemaker, James M., “Tank Tests of Flat and V-Bottom Planing Surfaces”, NACA Tech Note No. 509, November 1934Google Scholar

30. Locke, Fred W.S. Jr., “An Empirical Study of Low Aspect Ratio Lifting Surfaces with Particular Regard to Planing Craft”, Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, March 1949, pp184–188

31. Bollay, W., “A Contribution to the Theory of Planing Surfaces”, Proceedings of Fifth International Congress of Applied Mechanics, p474, 1938

32. Weinstein, Irving, and Kapryan, Walter J., “The High Speed Planing Characteristics of a Rectangular Flat Plate Over a Wide Range of Trim and Wetted Length”, NACA Tech Note 2981, 1953Google Scholar

33. Shuford, Charles L., “A Review of Planing Theory and Experiment with a Theoretical Study of Pure-Planing Lift of Rectangular Flat Plates”, NACA Tech Note 3233, August 1954Google Scholar

34. Springston, George B. Jr., and Sayre, Clifford L. Jr., “The Planing Characteristics of a V-Shaped Prismatic Surface with 50 degrees Deadrise”, US Navy DTMB Report 920, February 1955

35. Mantle, P.J., and Hall, A.M., “Multiple Hull Vehicle with Air Cushion Support”, US Patent 3,476,069 filed 24 January 1967, patented 4 November 1969

36. Payne, Peter, “Contributions to Planing Theory”, Ocean Engineering, Vol 21, No. 3, pp257–309, 1994Google Scholar

37. Schultz-Grunow, , “New Skin Friction Drag Law”, Lufo 1940, p239; Translation NACA Tech memo 986Google Scholar

38. Hoerner, Sighard, “Fluid Dynamic Drag”, pub by author, Library of Congress Card No. 64–19666, 1965Google Scholar

39. Weinblum, George P., Kendrick, Janet J. and Todd, M. Allison, “ Investigation of Wave Effects Produced by a Thin Body, TMB Model 4125”, DTMB Report 840, November 1952

40. Gabrielli, T.G., and Von Karman, Th., “What Price Speed?”, Mechanical Engineering, pp.775–781, October 1950

41. Mantle, Peter J., “Some Design Aspects of Air Cushion Craft”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol 154, Article 2, pp924–952, November 1968. Previously presented at the International Congress of Subsonic Aeronautics, New York, N.Y., 3–6 April 1967

42. Hoerner, Sighard, “Fluid Dynamic Drag”, pub by author, Library of Congress Card No. 64–19666, 1965Google Scholar

43. Havelock, Thomas H., “Propagation of Waves Produced by a Travelling Disturbance” (Short form of title), Proceedings of Royal Society Series A, LXXXI, pp398–430, London 1908

44. Wigley, W.G.S., “Calculated and Measured Wave Resistance of a Series of Forms” (Short form of title), Transactions of Royal Institute of Naval Architects (RINA), Vol 84, pp52–74, 1942Google Scholar

45. Raley, F. Carl and Wilson, Fred W., “Test and Evaluation of US Navy 100-Ton Surface Effect Ships”, Paper No. 76–860, AIAA/SNAME Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, Arlington, Virginia, 20–22 September 1976

46. Pierson, W.J., and Moskowitz, L., “A Proposed Spectral Form for Fully Developed Seas Based on the Similarity Theory of S. A. Kitaigorodskii”, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol 69, No. 24, pp5181–5190, 1964Google Scholar

47. Raley, F. Carl and Wilson, Fred W., “Test and Evaluation of US Navy 100-Ton Surface Effect Ships”, Paper No. 76–860, AIAA/SNAME Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, Arlington, Virginia, 20–22 September 1976

48. Wilson, R.A., Wells, S.M. and Heber, C.E., “Powering Prediction for Surface Effect Ships Based on Model Results”, AIAA/SNAME Advanced Marine Vehicles Conference, Paper No. 78–744, San Diego, California, 17–19 April 1978

49. Mantle, P.J., “On the Dynamic Heave Motion of Single Peripheral Jet GEMs Over an Undulating Surface”, Vehicle Research Corporation Paper No. 9 (May 1962)

50. Tinajero, A.A. and Fresh, J.N., “Aerodynamic Response of a Seven Foot Ground Effect Machine Flying Over Uneven Surfaces”, DTMB Report 1436 (1960)

51. Uyeda, S.T., “Study of Loads and Motions of Two Types of Ground Effect Machines”, General Dynamics Convair Report ZH-150 (1961)

52. Wheatley, J.H.W., “Heave Suspension Characteristics and Power Requirements for a Plenum Air Cushion”, National Physical Laboratory Hovercraft Report No.9, December 1969

53. Breslin, J., “The Dependence of Surface Effect Ship Heave Response on Model Scaling Parameters as Deduced from a Simplified Linear Analysis”, Surface Effect Vehicle Summer Study Report for Institute of Defense Analyses”, October 1968

54. Mantle, P.J., “ Some Design Aspects of Air Cushion Craft, ” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol 154, Article 2, pp924–952, November 22, 1968. (Paper also presented at the International Congress of Subsonic Aeronautics, New York, N.Y. 3–6 April 1967

55. Meeks, Capt T.L., and Mantle, P.J., “The Advanced Naval Vehicle Concepts Evaluation”, AIAA/SNAME Advance Marine Vehicles Conference, Arlington, Virginia, Paper 76–846, 20 September 1976