Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:44:04.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Examining the intergenerational outcomes of social movements: the case of feminist activists and their children

from Part I - People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Camille Masclet
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne
Lorenzo Bosi
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa
Marco Giugni
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Katrin Uba
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Research on the outcomes of social movements has tended to focus on institutional and political impacts as opposed to individual impacts. Indeed, scholars have generally emphasized the intended consequences of protest activities while leaving the unintended effects, such as biographical consequences, relatively unexamined. However, despite this general trend, several studies conducted since the 1970s have dealt with the impact of activism on the life-course of those who participated in social movements (for a review, see Fillieule 2009; Giugni 2004; Leclercq and Pagis 2011; McAdam 1989, 1999). These studies are characterized by the consistency of their findings, which all point to a “powerful and enduring impact of participation in movement activities on the biographies of participants” (Giugni 2004: 494). Using different methods, the studies show the existence of long-term effects of activism not only on the core participants (McAdam 1988; Whalen & Flacks 1989) but also on the less strongly committed participants (Sherkat & Blocker 1997; Wilhem 1998). More precisely, they demonstrate that three aspects of activists’ lives are durably affected by contentious activities: political participation, professional career, and family life. Concerning the last area, various studies highlight that former activists are more likely than their age peers to have married late in life, divorced, or remained single. Yet despite these findings – which are an incentive to investigate the personal and family spheres of former activists – the issue of activists’ children is mostly absent in the majority of studies, or else limited to indicators such as child-bearing rates. Only a few studies have gone further in an analysis of activists’ family lives and showed that the education of the activists’ children could constitute a way by which former activists could keep working for social change (Whittier 1995). However, the question of the effects on children is generally not tackled. The same can be said about research on political socialization. Although intergenerational transmission within the family lies at the core of investigations on political socialization (Abendschön 2013; Jennings 2007; Jennings et al. 2009), few inquiries have been dedicated to the specific question of the influence of political commitment on activists’ children. Thus, we observe that on the whole, intergenerational transmission within the activists’ families remains an understudied issue in the field of political socialization as well as in research on the biographical consequences of activism.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abendschön, S. 2013. Growing into Politics: Contexts and Timing of Political Socialisation. Colchester, UK: European Consortium for Political Research Press.Google Scholar
Achin, C. and Naudier, D.. 2010. “Trajectoires de femmes ordinaires dans les années 1970. La fabrique de la puissance d'agir féministe.” Sociologie, 1(1): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albenga, V., Jacquemart, A., and Bereni, L. (eds.). 2015. “Appropriations ordinaires des idées féministes.” Politix, 109.
Bachmann, L. 2014. “Female Friendship and Gender Transformation.” European Journal of Women's Studies, 21(2): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S.L. 1993. The Lenses of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bereni, L. 2013. “Women's Movements in Europe.” In Snow, D. et al. (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bessin, M. and Dorlin, E.. 2005. “Les renouvellements générationnels du féminisme: mais pour quel sujet politique?L'Homme et la société, 158(4): 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court, M. 2010. Corps de filles, corps de garçons : une construction sociale. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
Darmon, M. 2006. La socialisation. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Delphy, C. 2011. Un troussage de domestique. Paris: Editions Syllepses.Google Scholar
Earl, J. 2000. “Methods, Movements, and Outcomes. Methodological Difficulties in the Study of Extra-Movement Outcomes.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 22: 3–25.Google Scholar
Fillieule, O. 2009. “Conséquences biographiques de l'engagement.” In Fillieule, O., Mathieu, L., and Pechu, C. (eds.), Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 131–139.Google Scholar
Fillieule, O. 2010. “Some Elements of an Interactionist Approach to Political Disengagement.” Social Movements Studies, 9(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Gillis, S., Howie, G., and Munford, R.. 2007. Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giugni, M.G. 2004. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” In Snow, D. A., Soule, S.A., and Kriesi, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell, 489–507.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1977. “The Arrangement between the Sexes.” Theory and Society, 4(3): 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, J., and McAdam, D.. 2001. “Contention in Demographic and Life-Course Context.” In Aminzade, R., Goldstone, J., McAdam, D., Perry, E., Sewell, W.H., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. (eds.), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–221.Google Scholar
Jacquemart, A. 2015. Les hommes dans les mouvements féministes. Socio-histoire d'un engagement improbable. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Jennings, M.K. 2007. “Political Socialization.” In Dalton, R. J. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29–44.Google Scholar
Jennings, M.K., Stoker, L., and Bowers, J.. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics, 71: 782–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahire, B. 1998. L'Homme pluriel. Les ressorts de l'action. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Lahire, B. 2002. Portraits sociologiques. Dispositions et variations individuelles. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Leclercq, C. and Pagis, J.. 2011. “Les incidences biographiques de l'engagement.” Sociétés contemporaines, 84, (4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masclet, C. 2009. Les trajectoires personnelles des militantes du Mouvement de libération des femmes sont-elles politiques? Analyse des effets biographiques d'un engagement féministe. Master thesis.
Masclet, C. 2014. “La quête des féministes. Techniques et enjeux de reconstruction d'un mouvement social.” Genèses, 95(2): 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, S. 2000. “École, famille et politique : socialisations politiques et apprentissage de la citoyenneté. Bilan des recherches en science politique.” Dossier d’étude, 15, Paris: CNAF.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. 1988. Freedom Summer : The Idealists Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. 1989. “The Biographical Consequences of Activism.” American Sociological Review, 54: 744–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D. 1999. “The Biographical Impacts of Social Movements.” In Giugni, M., McAdam, D., and Tilly, C. (eds.), How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 117–146.Google Scholar
Muxel, A. 2008. Toi, moi et la politique: Amour et convictions. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Nengeh Mensah, M. (ed.). 2005. Dialogues sur la troisième vague féministe. Montréal: Les éditions du remue-ménage.Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G. 1973. “Collecting Information about the Family: A Problem in Survey Methodology.” In Dennis, J. (ed.), Socialization to Politics: A Reader. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 464–490.Google Scholar
Pagis, J. 2009. Les incidences biographiques du militantisme en Mai 68. Une enquête sur deux générations familiales: des « soixante-huitards » et leurs enfants scolarisés dans deux écoles expérimentales. PhD in social sciences, ENS-EHESS.
Pagis, J. 2014. Mai 68, un pavé dans leur histoire. Paris: Sciences Po, Les Presses.Google Scholar
Pavard, B. 2009. “Genre et militantisme dans le mouvement pour la liberté de l'avortement et de la contraception. Pratique des avortements (1973–1979).” Clio, 1 (29): 79–96.Google Scholar
Pavard, B. 2012. Si je veux, quand je veux. Contraception et avortement dans la société française (1956–1979). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Percheron, A. 1993. La socialisation politique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Percheron, A. and Jennings, M.K.. 1981. “Political Continuities in French Families: A New Perspective on an Old Controversy.” Comparative Politics, 13(4), July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picq, F. 1993. Libération des femmes. Les années-mouvement. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Quéniart, A., Charpentier, M., and Chanez, A.. 2008. “La transmission des valeurs d'engagement des aînées à leur descendance: une étude de cas de deux lignées familiales.” Recherches féministes, 21(2): 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risman, B. and Myers, K.. 1997. “As the Twig is Bent: Children Reared in Feminist Households.” Qualitative Sociology, 20(2): 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherkat, D.E. and Blocker, J.T.. 1997. “Explaining the Political and Personal Consequences of Protest.” Social Forces, 75: 1049–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, V. and Whittier, N.. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” In Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 104–129.Google Scholar
Terrail, J.P. 2004. “Transmissions intergénérationnelles.” In Hirata, H., Laborie, F., Doaré, H. Le, and Senotier, D. (eds.), Dictionnaire critique du féminisme. Paris: PUF, 239–243.Google Scholar
Whalen, J. and Flacks, R.. 1989. Beyond the Barricades. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Whittier, N. 1995. Feminist Generations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Whittier, N. 1997. “Political Generations, Micro-Cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements.” American Sociological Review, 62(5): 760–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittier, N. 2015.“Aggregate level biographical outcomes for gay and lesbian movements” in Bosi, Lorenzo, Giugni, Marco and Uba, Katrin (eds.) The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, B. 1998. “Changes in Cohabitation across Cohorts: The Influence of Political Activism.” Social Forces, 77: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×