Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:31:44.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Aggregate-level biographical outcomes for gay and lesbian movements

from Part I - People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

Nancy Whittier
Affiliation:
Smith College
Lorenzo Bosi
Affiliation:
Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa
Marco Giugni
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Katrin Uba
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Summary

As social change occurs, individuals’ lives are altered. Whether produced by social movements or other forces, social change can affect the demography, life-course, and life chances of participants or of populations as a whole (Goldstone and McAdam 2001). Most empirical and conceptual work on how social movements affect biography focuses on effects on movement participants, who experience a range of lasting effects, as the introduction to this section describes. Movements can also shape biographical outcomes for the larger population, or for certain cohorts or demographics, what Guigni and McAdam (Goldstone and McAdam 2001; Guigni 2004; McAdam 1999) term “aggregate biographical outcomes.” There has been little research on aggregate-level biographical outcomes. Existing work suggests that they vary according to cohort location, spreading from activists to the general population over time, as activists develop “alternative conceptions of the life-course and related behavioral norms,” which then spread to subcultural locations such as college campuses, and finally diffuse to youth in general (Goldstone and McAdam 2001). Such life-course outcomes are generational; cohorts that have already begun trajectories of education, occupation, marriage, or childbearing are less likely to be affected by new norms. Factors such as gender and class also likely shape aggregate biographical outcomes; that is, social movements affect the life-course of different segments of the population in different ways (Hagan and Hansford-Bowles 2005; Van Dyke et al. 2000). As Guigni (2004) points out, such aggregate biographical outcomes are often unintentional.

In contrast to the previous focus on unintended effects on the general population, I focus on how social movements affect the life-course and biography of movement beneficiaries, the group on whose behalf the movement seeks change. Such effects can be intentional, although unintended effects also occur. Many social movements hope to change individuals’ lives by opening up education, job, and housing opportunities, and changing how people identify, feel, and interact (Whittier 2009). These effects can occur despite the fact that most members of beneficiary groups (such as women, African Americans, or lesbian/gay/bisexual (LGB) people) do not participate in activism on their behalf and need not agree or identify with the relevant movement. Beneficiaries are affected in different ways and through different mechanisms than activists themselves. Participants’ biographies are shaped by their immersion in activism and movement networks, collective identities, and ideological commitments; beneficiaries’ biographies are shaped by movement outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

References

Armstrong, Elizabeth A. 2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994 / Elizabeth A. Armstrong. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, Mikaila M.L. 2009. “Thinking Outside the Master's House: New Knowledge Movements and the Emergence of Academic Disciplines.” Social Movement Studies, 8: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badgett, Mary V.L. 2001. Money, Myths, and Change: The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men / M.V. Lee Badgett. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Badgett, M. V. L. 2008. “Bringing all Families to Work Today.” In Marcus-Newhall, Amy, Halpern, Diane F., and Tan, Sherylle J. (eds.), The Changing Realities of Work and Family : A Multidisciplinary Approach. Malden, MA; Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Pub, 140–153.Google Scholar
Badgett, M.V.L. and Frank, Jeff. 2007. Sexual Orientation Discrimination: An International Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Badgett, M.V.L. and King, Mary C., 1997. “Occupational Strategies of Lesbians and Gay Men.” In Gluckman, Amy and Reed, Betsy (eds.), Homo Economics: Capitalism, Community, & Lesbian & Gay Life. New York: Routlege, 73–86.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary. 1997. “Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement.” American Journal of Sociology, 103: 531–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Paul R. 2003. “The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights.” Journal of Politics, 65: 1208–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Crosby and Harris, Burns. 2012. “Infographic: Marriage Equality is Now a Mainstream Value.” Center for American Progress, Retrieved July 11, 2012 (www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/07/marriage_equality).
D'Emilio, John. 1998. Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities : The Making of a Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2009. “Access to Fertility Treatment by Gays, Lesbians, and Unmarried Persons.” Fertility and Sterility, 92: 1190–1193, Retrieved May 21, 2013 (www.asrm.org/uploadedFiles/ASRM_Content/News_and_Publications/Ethics_Committee_Reports_and_Statements/fertility_gaylesunmarried.pdf).
Fetner, Tina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, Joshua. 1995. “Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma.” Social Problems, 42: 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Gary J. 2007. Geographic Trends among Same-Sex Couples in the U.S. Census and the American Community Survey. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute, Retrieved August 7, 2012.Google Scholar
Gates, Gary. 2011. “Family Formation and Raising Children among Same-Sex Couples.” NCFR Report FF51: 1, 1–4.Google Scholar
Gates, Gary, Badgett, M.V.L., Macomber, Jennifer, and Chambers, Kate. 2007. Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. Los Angeles, CA: Williams Institute, Retrieved August 13, 2012 (http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/parenting/adoption-and-foster-care-by-gay-and-lesbian-parents-in-the-united-states/).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Gary J. and Ost, Jason. 2004. The Gay & Lesbian Atlas / Gary J. Gates & Jason Ost. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, Kathleen. 2004. “Understanding Work and Family through a Gender Lens.” Community, Work & Family, 7: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaziani, Amin. 2008. The Dividends of Dissent: How Conflict and Culture Work in Lesbian and Gay Marches on Washington. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ghaziani, Amin. 2010. “There Goes the Gayborhood?Contexts, 9: 64–66.Google Scholar
Ghaziani, Amin. 2011. “Post-Gay Collective Identity Construction.” Social Problems, 58: 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Jack and McAdam, Doug. 2001. “Contention in Demographic and Life-Course Context.” In Aminzade, Ronald, Goldstone, Jack, McAdam, Doug, Perry, Elizabeth, Sewell, William H. Jr., Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles (eds.), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 195, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottler, Janet M. 1984. “Cultural Pioneers: The New Lesbian Families : A Project Based upon an Independent Investigation / Janet M. Gottler.” Master's Thesis, Smith College School of Social Work, Northampton, MA,
Guigni, Marco. 2004. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” In Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspieter (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 489–507.Google Scholar
Hagan, John and Hansford-Bowles, Suzanne. 2005. “From Resistance to Activism: The Emergence and Persistence of Activism among American Vietnam War Resisters in Canada.” Social Movement Studies, 231–259.
Kennedy, Kelli. 2011. “Adoptions Spiked among Gay Couples in Past Decade.” (www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/10/20/adoptions_spiked_among_gay_couples_in_past_decade/ [accessed August 14, 2015]).
Klawitter, M.M. and Flatt, V.. 1998. “The Effects of State and Local Antidiscrimination Policies on Earnings for Gays and Lesbians.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17: 658–686.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivickas, Kristy M. and Lofquist, Daphne. 2011. “Demographics of Same-Sex Couple Households with Children, SEHSD Working Paper Number 2011–11.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Retrieved July 6, 2012 (www.census.gov/hhes/samesex/files/Krivickas-Lofquist%20PAA%202011.pdf).
Lemm, Kristi M. 2006. “Positive Associations among Interpersonal Contact, Motivation, and Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Gay Men.” Journal of Homosexuality, 51: 79–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lofquist, Daphne. 2011. “Same-Sex Couple Households: American Community Survey Briefs.” Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau, Retrieved August 7, 2012 (www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-03.pdf).
McAdam, Doug. 1999. “The Biographical Impact of Social Movements.” In Guigni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles (eds.), How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 117–146.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Martin and Feliz, Sarah. 2011. “Same-Sex Couple Households Statistics from the 2010 Census. SEHSD Working Paper Number 2011–26.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved August 7, 2012 (www.census.gov/hhes/samesex/files/ss-report.doc).
“Polling Report, Same-Sex Marriage, Gay Rights.” 2012. Retrieved August 6, 2012 (http://pollingreport.com/civil.htm).
Ragins, Belle and Cornwell, John. 2007. “We Are Family: The Influence of Gay Family-Friendly Policies on Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Employees.” In Badgett, M. V. L. and Frank, Jefferson (eds.), Sexual Orientation Discrimination. London and New York: Routledge, 105–117.Google Scholar
Riggle, Ellen D.B. and Ellis, Alan L.. 1996. “The Impact of ‘Media Contact’ on Attitudes Toward Gay Men.” Journal of Homosexuality, 31: 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas. 1998. Culture Moves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 2002. Beyond the Closet: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Life Steven Seidman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom. 2011. “Public Attitudes Toward Homosexuality.” Chicago: NORC, Retrieved August 2, 2012 (www.norc.org/PDFs/2011%20GSS%20Reports/GSS_Public%20Attitudes%20Toward%20Homosexuality_Sept2011.pdf).
Stone, Amy L. 2009a. “Like Sexual Orientation? Like Gender? Transgender Inclusion in Non-Discrimination Ordinances.” In Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna (eds.), Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law. New York: New York University Press, 142–157.Google Scholar
Stone, Amy L. 2009b. “More than Adding a T: American Lesbian and Gay Activists’ Attitudes towards Transgender Inclusion.” Sexualities, 12: 334–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Amy L. 2012. Gay Rights at the Ballot Box. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swarns, Rachel. 2012. “Male Couples Face Pressure to Fill Cradles.” The New York Times.
Taylor, Verta, Kimport, Katrina, Dyke, Nella Van, and Andersen, Ellen A.. 2009. “Culture and Mobilization: Tactical Repertoires, Same-Sex Weddings, and the Impact on Gay Activism.” American Sociological Review, 74: 865–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Verta and Whittier, Nancy. 1992. “Collective Identity in Social Movement Communities: Lesbian Feminist Mobilization.” In Morris, Aldon and Mueller, Carol (eds.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 104–129.Google Scholar
Dyke, Nella Van, McAdam, Doug and Wilhelm, Brenda. 2000. “Gendered Outcomes: Gender Differences in the Biographical Consequences of Activism.” Mobilization, 5: 161, 161–177.Google Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 1995. Feminist Generations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 1997. “Political Generations, Micro-Cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements.” American Sociological Review, 62: 760–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 2009. The Politics of Child Sexual Abuse: Emotion, Social Movements, and the State. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittier, Nancy. 2012. “The Politics of Visibility: Coming Out and Individual and Collective Identity In Goodwin, Jeff, Kutz-Flamenbaum, Rachel, Maney, Greg, and Rohlinger, Deana (eds.), Making History: Movements, Strategy, and Social Change. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 145–169.Google Scholar
Yang, Alan S. 1997. “The Polls-Trends.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 61: 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×