Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T11:31:23.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2017

Zdenek P. Bazant
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Jia-Liang Le
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

Without realistic failure mechanics, probabilistic analysis of structural safety is a fiction.

The Problem of Tail of Probability Distribution

Like most things in life, we must accept that the occurrence probability of any future event cannot be exactly zero. We must be contented with a structural failure probability that is negligible compared to other risks that people willingly take, such as car accidents. It is generally agreed that adequate safety of engineering structures is achieved by specifying a failure probability of 10−6 per lifetime as the maximum admissible in design [Nordic Committee for Building Structures (NKB) 1978; Melchers 1987; Duckett 2005; Ellingwood 2006]. This probability limit is generally accepted for engineering structures, whether bridges or aircraft (Duckett 2005; Department of National Defense of Canada 2007), although for some nuclear plant structures an even smaller limit is required.

The smallness of this probability limit is a source of great difficulty. To check the design merely by an experimental histogram, at least 108 tests of identical structures or specimens would be required. Even a direct computational verification would necessitate about 108 repetitions of Monte Carlo simulations with a fully realistic material model. Therefore, estimations of loads of such a small failure probability must rely on a model that is justified by a sound theory and is validated by experiments other than histogram testing.

For many years, realistic theoretical models have been available for the probability of ductile and brittle failures. The Gaussian and Weibull distributions, respectively, fit this purpose. Failures of structures made of quasibrittle materials are more difficult to predict and have been researched only recently. The difficulty is that the quasibrittle failures are transitional in nature between ductile and plastic failures.

Quasibrittle materials are heterogeneous materials with brittle constituents. At the scale of normal laboratory testing, they include concretes as the archetypical case, fiberpolymer composites, fiber-reinforced concretes, toughened ceramics, many rocks, coal, sea ice, wood, consolidated snow, particle board, rigid foams, particulate nanocomposites, biological shells, mortar, masonry, fiber-reinforced concrete, asphalt concrete (at low temperatures), stiff clays, silts, cemented sands, grouted soils, particle board, various refractories, bone, cartilage, dentine, dental ceramics, paper, carton, and cast iron.

Type
Chapter
Information
Probabilistic Mechanics of Quasibrittle Structures
Strength, Lifetime, and Size Effect
, pp. 1 - 21
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Zdenek P. Bazant, Northwestern University, Illinois, Jia-Liang Le, University of Minnesota
  • Book: Probabilistic Mechanics of Quasibrittle Structures
  • Online publication: 14 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585146.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Zdenek P. Bazant, Northwestern University, Illinois, Jia-Liang Le, University of Minnesota
  • Book: Probabilistic Mechanics of Quasibrittle Structures
  • Online publication: 14 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585146.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Zdenek P. Bazant, Northwestern University, Illinois, Jia-Liang Le, University of Minnesota
  • Book: Probabilistic Mechanics of Quasibrittle Structures
  • Online publication: 14 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585146.003
Available formats
×