Abadeer, W.W., Bagramian, A., Conkie, D. M., Griffin, C.W., Langlois, E., Lloyd, B. F., Mallette, R. P., Massucco, J. E., Mckenna, J. M., Mittl, S. W., & Noel, P. H. (1999). Key measurements of ultrathin gate dielectric reliability and in-line monitoring. IBM J. Res. Dev. 43(3), 407– 416.Google Scholar

Abraham, F. F., Broughton, J. Q., Bernstein, N., & Kaxiras, E. (1998). Spanning the continuum to quantum length scales in a dynamical simulation of brittle fracture. Europhys. Lett. 44(6), 783– 787.Google Scholar

Aifantis, E. C. (1984). On the microstructural origin of certain inelastic models. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME 106, 326–330.Google Scholar

Akisanya, A. R., & Fleck, N. A. (1997). Interfacial cracking from the free-edge of a long bimaterial strip. Int. J. Solids Struct. 34(13), 1645–1665.Google Scholar

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2010). Standard method of test for performance graded asphalt binder, AASHTO M320-10-UL, Washington, D.C.

American Concrete Institute Committee 318 (2011). ACI318-11 Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete and Commentary, Farmington Hills, MI.

American Institute of Steel Construction (2011). Steel Construction Manual.

Andersons, J., Hojo, M., & Ochiai, S. (2004). Empirical model for stress ratio effect on fatigue delamination growth rate in composite laminates. Int. J. Fatigue 26, 597–604.Google Scholar

Ang, A. H. S., & Tang, W. H. (1984). Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design. Vol II: Decision, Risk and Reliability. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Apte, P. P., & Saraswat, K. C. (1994). Correlation of trap generation to charge-to-breakdown (qbd): A physical-damage model of dielectric breakdown. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 41, 1595– 1602.Google Scholar

Atkinson, B. K. (1984). Subcritical crack growth in geological materials. J. Geophys. Res. 89(B6), 4077–4114.Google Scholar

Award, M. E., & Hilsdorf, H. K. (1972). Strength and deformation characteristics of plain concrete subjected to high repeated and sustained loads. In Proceedings of Abeles Symposium: Fatigue of Concrete, Hollywood, FL and Atlantic City, NJ, pp. 1–13.

Ayyub, B. M., & Haldar, A. (1984). Practical structural reliability techniques. J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE 110(8), 1707–1724.Google Scholar

Aziz, M. J., Sabin, P. C., & Lu, G. Q. (1991). The activation strain tensor: Nonhydrostatic stress effects on crystal growth kinetics. Phys. Rev. B 41, 9812–9816.Google Scholar

Bao, G., & Suo, Z. (1992). Remarks on crack-bridging concepts. Appl. Mech. Rev. 45, 355–366.Google Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I. (1959). The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture, general ideas and hypothesis, axially symmetric cracks. Prikl. Mat. Mech. 23(3), 434–444.Google Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I. (1962). The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv. Appl. Mech. 7, 55–129.Google Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I. (1979). Similarity, Self-Similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics. Consultants Bureau, New York.

Barenblatt, G. I. (1987). Dimensional Analysis. Gordon and Breach, New York.

Barenblatt, G. I. (1996). Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Barenblatt, G. I. (2003). Scaling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Barenblatt, G. I. (2014). Flow, Deformation and Fracture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Barenblatt, G. I., & Botvina, L. R. (1981). Incomplete self-similarity of fatigue in the linear range of crack growth. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 3, 193–212.Google Scholar

Barsoum, R. S. (2003). The best of both worlds: Hybrid ship hulls use composites & steel. AMPTIAC Q. 7(3), 55–61.Google Scholar

Bartle, A. (1985). Four major dam failures re-examined. Int. Water Power Dam Constr. 37(11), 33–36, 41–46.Google Scholar

Basquin, O. H. (1910). The exponential law of endurance tests. Proc. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTE 10, 625–630.Google Scholar

Batdorf, S. B. (1982). Tensile strength of unidirectionally reinforced composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 1, 153–164.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1976). Instability, ductility, and size effect in strain-softening concrete. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 102, EM2, 331–344.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1982). Crack band model for fracture of geomaterials. In Z., Eisenstein (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 3. Edmonton, Alberta, pp. 1137–1152.

Bažant, Z. P. (1984a). Imbricate continuum and progressive fracturing of concrete and geomaterials. Meccanica 19, 86–93.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1984b). Size effect in blunt fracture: Concrete, rock, metal. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 110(4), 518–535.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1992a). Large-scale thermal bending fracture of sea ice plates. J. Geophys. Res. (Oceans) 97(C11), 17739–17751.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., ed. (1992b). Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the First International Conference, Elsevier, London.

Bažant, Z. P. (1993). Scaling laws in mechanics of fracture. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 119(9), 1828– 1844.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1996). Size effect aspects of measurement of fracture characteristics of quasibrittle material. Adv. Cem. Based Mater. 4(3/4), 128–137.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (1997). Scaling of quasibrittle fracture: Asymptotic analysis. Int. J. Fract. 83(1), 19–40.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (2001). Size effects in quasibrittle fracture: Apercu of recent results. In R., de Borst, J., Mazars, G., Pijaudier-Cabot, & J. G. M., van Mier (eds.), Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (Proceedings of FraMCos-4 International Conference). A. A. Balkema, Lisse, pp. 651–658.

Bažant, Z. P. (2002a). Scaling of sea ice fracture – Part I: Vertical penetration. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 69, 11–18.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (2002b). Scaling of sea ice fracture – Part II: Horizontal load from moving ice. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 69, 19–24.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (2004a). Probability distribution of energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle fracture. Prob. Eng. Mech. 19(4), 307–319.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (2004b). Scaling theory of quaisbrittle structural failure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101(37), 13400–13407.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P. (2005). Scaling of Structural Strength. 2nd edition. Elsevier, London.

Bažant, Z. P., & Becq-Giraudon, E. (2002). Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard. Cem. Concr. Res. 32(4), 529–556.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Belytschko, T., & Chang, T.-P. (1984). Continuum model for strain softening. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 110(12), 1666–1692.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Cedolin, L. (1979). Blunt crack band propagation in finite element analysis. J. Eng.Mech. Div. ASCE 105, 297–315.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Cedolin, L. (1980). Fracture mechanics of reinforced concrete. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 106, 1257–1306.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Cedolin, L. (1991). Stability of Structures: Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture and Damage Theories. Oxford University Press, New York.

Bažant, Z. P., & Chen, E.-P. (1997). Scaling of structural failure. Appl. Mech. Rev. ASME 50(10), 593–627.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Daniel, I. M., & Li, Z. (1996). Size effect and fracture characteristics of composite laminates. J. Eng. Mater. Technol, ASME 118(3), 317–324.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Frangopol, D. M. (2002). Size effect hidden in excessive load factor. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 128(1), 80–86.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Gettu, R., & Kazemi, M. T. (1991). Identification of nonlinear fracture properties from size effect tests and structural analysis based on geometry-dependent R-curves. Int. J. Rock Mech. Miner. Sci. 28(1), 43–51.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Hubler, M. H. (2014). Theory of cyclic creep of concrete based on paris law for fatigue growth of subcritical microcracks. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 63, 187–200.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Jirásek, M. (2002). Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: Survey of progress. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 128(11), 1119–1149.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Kazemi, M. T. (1990a). Determination of fracture energy, process zone length and brittleness number from size effect, with application to rock and concrete. Int. J. Fract. 44, 111–131.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Kazemi, M. T. (1990b). Size effect in fracture of ceramics and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length. J. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 73(7), 1841– 1853.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Kazemi, M. T. (1991). Size effect on diagonal shear failure of beams without stirrups. ACI Struct. J. 88, 268–276.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Kim, J.-J. (1998a). Size effect in penetration of sea ice plate with part-through cracks. I. Theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 124(12), 1310–1315.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Kim, J.-J. (1998b). Size effect in penetration of sea ice plate with part-through cracks. II. Results. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 124(12), 1316–1324.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Kim, J.-J. II., Daniel, I. M., Becq-Giraudon, E., & Zi, G. (1999). Size effect on compression strength of fiber composites failing by kink band propagation. Int. J. Fract. 95, 103– 141.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Kim, K. T., & Yu, Q. (2013). Non-uniqueness of cohesive-crack stress-separation law of human and bovine bones and remedy by size effect tests. Int. J. Fract. 181, 67–81.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Le, J.-L. (2009). Nano-mechanics based modeling of lifetime distribution of quasibrittle structures. J. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16, 2521–2529.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Le, J.-L., & Bazant, M. Z. (2009). Scaling of strength and lifetime distributions of quasibrittle structures based on atomistic fracture mechanics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11484–11489.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Le, J.-L., & Hoover, C. G. (2010). Nonlocal boundary layer model: Overcoming boundary condition problems in strength statistics and fracture analysis of quasibrittle materials. In Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures – Recent Advances in Fracture Mechanics of Concrete. Jeju, Korea, pp. 135–143.

Bažant, Z. P., & Li, Y.-N. (1994). Penetration fracture of sea ice plate: Simplified analysis and size effect. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 120(6), 1304–1321.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Li, Y.-N. (1995a). Penetration fracture of sea ice plate. Int. J. Solids Struct. 32(3/4), 303–313.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Li, Y.-N. (1997). Cohesive crack with rate-dependent opening and viscoelasticity: I. mathematical model and scaling. Int. J. Fract. 86(3), 247–265.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Li, Z. (1995b). Modulus of rupture: Size effect due to fracture initiation in boundary layer. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 121(4), 739–746.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Li, Z. (1996). Zero-brittleness size-effect method for one-size fracture test of concrete. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 122(5), 458–468.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Lin, F.-B. (1988a). Nonlocal smeared cracking model for concrete fracture. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 114(11), 2493–2510.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Lin, F.-B. (1988b). Nonlocal yield limit degradation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 26, 1805–1823.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Lin, F.-B., & Lippmann, H. (1993). Fracture energy release and size effect in borehole breakout. Int. J. Num. Anal. Methods Geomech. 17, 1–14.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Novák, D. (2000a). Energetic-statistical size effect in quasibrittle failure at crack initiation. ACI Mater. J. 97(3), 381–392.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Novák, D. (2000b). Probabilistic nonlocal theory for quasibrittle fracture initiation and size effect. I. theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 126(2), 166–174.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Novák, D. (2000c). Probabilistic nonlocal theory for quasibrittle fracture initiation and size effect. II. application. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 126(2), 175–185.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Oh, B.-H. (1983). Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater. Struct. 16, 155–177.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Ožbolt, J. (1990). Nonlocal microplane model for fracture, damage, and size effect in structures. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 116(11), 2485–2505.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Pang, S. D. (2006). Mechanics based statistics of failure risk of quasibrittle structures and size effect on safety factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9434–9439.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Pang, S. D. (2007). Activation energy based extreme value statistics and size effect in brittle and quasibrittle fracture. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 91–134.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Pang, S.-D., Vořrechovský, M., Novák, D., & Pukl, R. (2004). Statistical size effect in quasibrittle materials: Computation and extreme value theory. In V. C., Li, K., Leung, K. J., Willam, & S., Billington (eds.), Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (Proceedings of FraMCoS-5, 5th International Conference), pp. 153–162.

Bažant, Z. P., & Pfeiffer, P. A. (1987). Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number. ACI Mater. J. 84, 463–480.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1988). Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 55, 287–293.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1989). Measurement of characteristic length of nonlocal continuum. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 115(4), 755–767.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Planas, J. (1998). Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Bažant, Z. P., & Prat, P. C. (1988). Effect of temperature and humidity on fracture energy of concrete. ACI Mater. J. 85-M32, 262–271.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Schell, W. F. (1993). Fatigue fracture of high-strength concrete and size effect. ACI Mater. J. 90(5), 472–478.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Tabbara, M. R., Kazemi, M. T., & Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1990). Random particle model for fracture of aggregate or fiber composites. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 116(8), 1686–1705.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P.,Vořrechovský, M., & Novák, D. (2007). Asymptotic prediction of energetic-statistical size effect from deterministic finite element solutions. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 128, 153–162.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Xi, Y. (1991). Statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures: II. Nonlocal theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 117(7), 2623–2640.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P.,& Xu, K. (1991). Size effect in fatigue fracture of concrete. ACIMater. J. 88(4), 390– 399.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Yavari, A. (2005). Is the cause of size effect on structural strength fractal or energetic-statisticalř Eng. Fract. Mech. 72, 1–31.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Yavari, A. (2007). Response to A. Carpinteri, B. Chiaia, P. Cornetti and S. Puzzi's comments on “Is the cause of size effect on structural strength fractal or energetic-statisticalř” Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 2897–2910.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2004). Size effect in concrete specimens and structures: New problems and progress. In V. C., Li, K. Y., Leung, K. J., Willam, & S. L., Billington (eds.), Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Proceedings of FraMCoS-5, 5th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures, pp. 153–162.

Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2006). Reliability, brittleness and fringe formulas in concrete design codes. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 132(1), 3–12.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2009). Universal size effect law and effect of crack depth on quasi-brittle structure strength. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 135(2), 78–84.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2011). Size effect testing of cohesive fracture parameters and nonuniqueness of work-of-fracture method. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 137(8), 580–588.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Zhou, Y., Daniel, I. M., Caner, F. C., & Yu, Q. (2006). Size effect on strength of laminate-foam sandwich plates. J. Eng. Mater. Tech. ASME. 128(3), 366–374.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Zhou, Y., Novák, D., & Daniel, I. M. (2004). Size effect on flexural strength of fiber-composite laminate. J. Eng. Mater. Tech. ASME 126(1), 29–37.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Zhou, Y., Zi, G., & Daniel, I. M. (2003). Size effect and asymptotic matching analysis of fracture of closed-cell polymeric foam. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 7197–7217.Google Scholar

Bažant, Z. P., Zi, G., & McClung, D. (2003). Size effect law and fracture mechanics of the triggering of dry snow slab avalanches. J. Geophy. Res. 108(B2), 2119–2129.Google Scholar

Bazant, M. Z. (2000). The largest cluster in subcritical percolation. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1160–1669.Google Scholar

Bazant, M. Z. (2002). Stochastic renormalization group in percolation. Physica A 316, 451–477.Google Scholar

Bazant, M. Z., Choi, J., & Davidovitch, B. (2003). Dynamics of conformal maps for a class of non-Laplacian growth phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 045503.Google Scholar

Beale, P. D., & Duxbury, P. M. (1988). Theory of dielectric breakdown in metal-loaded dielectrics. Phys. Rev. B 40, 4641.Google Scholar

Becq-Giraudon, E. (2000). Size Effect on Fracture and Ductility of Concrete and Fiber Composites. PhD thesis, Northwestern University.

Bender, M. C., & Orszag, S. A. (1978). Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Benjamin, J. R., & Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, Statistics, and Decisions for Civil Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Beremin, F. M. (1983). A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metall. Trans. 114A, 2277–2287.Google Scholar

Bigleya, R. F., Gibelingb, J. C., Stoverc, S. M., Hazelwooda, S. J., Fyhriea, D. P., & Martin, R. B. (2007). Volume effects on fatigue life of equine cortical bone. J. Biomech. 40, 3548–3554.Google Scholar

Bogy, D. B. (1971). Two edge-bonded elastic wedges of different materials and wedge angles under surface tractions. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 38, 377–385.Google Scholar

Bolander, J. E., Hong, G. S., & Yoshitake, K. (2000). Structural concrete analysis using rigidbody- spring networks. J. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 15, 120–133.Google Scholar

Bolander, J. E., & Saito, S. (1998). Fracture analysis using spring network with random geometry. Eng. Fract. Mech. 61(5–6), 569–591.Google Scholar

Bolotin, V. V. (1969). Statistical Methods in Structural Mechanics. Holden-Day, San Francisco.

Borden, M. J., Hughes, T. J. R., Landis, C. M., & Verhoosel, C. V. (2014). A higher-order phasefield model for brittle fracture: Formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 273, 100–118.Google Scholar

Borden, M. J., Verhoosel, C. V., Scott, M. A., Hughes, T. J. R., & Landis, C. M. (2012). A phasefield description of dynamic brittle fracture. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 217-220, 77–95.Google Scholar

Borino, G., Failla, B., & Parrinello, F. (2003). A symmetric nonlocal damage theory. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 3621–3645.Google Scholar

Bouchaud, J.-P., & Potters, M. (2000). Theory of Financial Risks: From Statistical Physics to Risk Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bowman, D. R., & Stroud, D. (1989). Model for dielectric breakdown in metal-insulator composites. Phys. Rev. B 40, 4641.Google Scholar

Breysse, D., & Fokwa, D. (1992). Influence of disorder of the fracture process of mortar, In Proceedings of the International Conference, Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures. London, pp. 536–541.

Broberg, K. B. (1999). Cracks and Fracture. Academic Press.

Broughton, J. Q., Abraham, F. F., Bernstein, N., & Kaxiras, E. (1999). Concurrent coupling of length scales: Methodology and application. Phys. Rev. B 60, 2391–2403.Google Scholar

Buckingham, E. (1914). On physically linear systems; illustration of the use of dimensional equations. Phys. Rev. Ser. 2 IV(4), 345–376.Google Scholar

Buckingham, E. (1915). Model experiments and the form of empirical equations. Trans. ASME 37, 263–296.Google Scholar

Bulmer, M. G. (1979). Principles of Statistics. Dover, New York.

Caner, F. C., & Bažant, Z. P. (2013). Microplane model M7 for plain concrete: I. Formulation. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE 139(12), 1712–1723.Google Scholar

Caner, F. C., Bažant, Z. P., Hoover, C. G., Waas, A. M., & Shahwan, K. (2011). Microplane model for fracturing damage of triaxially braided fiber-polymer composites. J. Eng. Mater. Tech. ASME 133, 021024–1 – 021024–12.Google Scholar

Cannone Falchetto, A., Le, J.-L., Turos, M. I., & Marasteanu, M. O. (2014). Indirect determination of size effect on strength of asphalt mixture at low temperatures. Mater. Struct. 47(1–2), 157– 169.Google Scholar

Carmeliet, J., & de Borst, R. (1995). Stochastic approaches for damage evolution in standard and non-standard continua. Int. J. Solids Struct. 32, 1149–1160.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. C. (1984). Mode I and mode II stress intensities for plates with cracks of finite opening. Int. J. Fract. 26, 201–214.Google Scholar

Carpinteri, A. (1986). Mechanical Damage and Crack Growth in Concrete. Martinus Nijhoff– Kluwer, Dordrecht Boston.

Carpinteri, A. (1987). Stress-singularity and generalized fracture toughness at the vertex of reentrant corners. Eng. Fract. Mech. 26, 143–155.Google Scholar

Carpinteri, A. (1989). Decrease of apprent tensile and bending strength with specimen size: Two different explanations based on fracture mechanics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 25, 407–429.Google Scholar

Carpinteri, A. (1994). Fractal nature of materials microstructure and size effects on apparent material properties. Mech. Mater. 18, 89–101.Google Scholar

Carpinteri, A., Chiaia, B., & Ferro, G. (1995a). Multifractal scaling law: An extensive application to nominal strength size effect of concrete structures. Technical Report 50, Atti del Dipartimento di Ingegneria Strutturale, Politecnico de Torino.

Carpinteri, A., Chiaia, B., & Ferro, G. (1995b). Size effect on nominal tensile strength of concrete structures: Multifractality of material ligament and dimensional transition from order to disorder. Mater. Struct. 28, 311–317.Google Scholar

Castillo, E. (1988). Extreme Value Theory in Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego.

Červenka, J. (1998). Applied brittle analysis of concrete structures. In H., Mihashi & K., Rokugo (eds.), 3rd International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures. Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 1–15.

Červenka, J., Bažant, Z. P., & Wierer, M. (2005). Equivalent localization element for crack band approach to mesh-sensitivity in microplane model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 62, 700–726.Google Scholar

Chakraborti, B. K., & Benguigui, L. G. (1997). Statistical Physics of Fracture and Breakdown in Disordered Solids. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Charles, R. J. (1958a). Static fatigue of glass I. J. Appl. Phys. 29(11), 1549–1553.Google Scholar

Charles, R. J. (1958b). Static fatigue of glass II. J. Appl. Phys. 29(11), 1554–1560.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, S., Kuo, Y., Lu, J., Tewg, J.-Y., & Majhi, P. (2006). Electrical reliability aspects of HfO2 high-k gate dieletrics with TaN metal gate electrodes under constant voltage stress. Microelectron. Reliabil. 46, 69–76.Google Scholar

Chiao, C. C., Sherry, R. J., & Hetherington, N. W. (1977). Experimental verification of an accelerated test for predicting the lifetime of organic fiber composites. J. Comp. Mater. 11, 79–91.Google Scholar

Ciavarella, M., Paggi, M., & Carpinteri, A. (2008). One, no one, and one hundred thousand crack propagation laws: A generalized Barenblatt and Botvina dimensional analysis approach to fatigue crack growth. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 3461–3432.Google Scholar

Coffin, L. F. (1962). Low cycle fatigue–a review. Appl. Mater. Res. 1(3), 129–141.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. D. (1958a). On the strength of classical fibers and fiber bundles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 7, 60–70.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. D. (1958b). The statistics and time dependent of mechanical breakdown in fibers. J. Appl. Phys. 29(6), 968–983.Google Scholar

Coleman, T. F., & Li., Y. (1994). On the convergence of reflective Newton methods for large-scale nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. Math. Program. 67(2), 189–224.Google Scholar

Coleman, T. F., & Li., Y. (1996). An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM J. Optim. 6, 418–445.Google Scholar

Cornell, C. A. (1969). A probability-based structural code. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 66(12), 974–985.Google Scholar

Cundall, P. A. (1971). A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movements in blocky rock systems. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Rock Fracture, Vol. 1, Nancy, France, paper no. II–8.

Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. (1979). A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1), 47–65.Google Scholar

Cusatis, G., Bažant, Z. P., & Cedolin, L. (2003a). Confinement-shear lattice model for concrete damage in tension and compression: I. Theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 129(12), 1439– 1448.Google Scholar

Cusatis, G., Bažant, Z. P., & Cedolin, L. (2003b). Confinement-shear lattice model for concrete damage in tension and compression: II. Computation and validation. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 129(12), 1449–1458.Google Scholar

Cusatis, G., Pelessone, D., & Mencarelli, A. (2011). Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I. Theory. Cem. Concr. Comp. 22, 881–890.Google Scholar

Cusatis, G., & Schauffert, E. A. (2009). Cohesive crack analysis of size effect. Eng. Fract. Mech. 76, 2163–2173.Google Scholar

Daniels, H. E. (1945). The statistical theory of the strength of bundles and threads. Proc. R. Soc. London A 183, 405–435.Google Scholar

Danzer, R., Lube, T., Supancic, P., & Damani, R. (2008). Fracture of ceramics. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10(4), 275–298.Google Scholar

Danzer, R., Supancic, P., Pascual, J., & Lube, T. (2007). Fractue statistics of ceramics – Weibull statistics and deviations from Weibull statistics. Eng. Fract. Mech. 74, 2919–2932.Google Scholar

da Vinci, L. (1500s). The Notebook of Leonardo da Vinci (1945), Edward McCurdy, London (p. 546); and Les Manuscrits de Léonard de Vinci, transl. in French by C., Ravaisson-Mollien, Institut de France (1881-91), Vol. 3.

Degraeve, R., Groeseneken, G., Bellens, R., Ogier, J. L., Depas, M., Roussel, P. J., & Maes, H. E. (1998). New insights in the relation between electron trap generation and the statistical properties of oxide breakdown. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 45(4), 904–911.Google Scholar

De Moivre, A. (1733). Paper reproduced in D. E., Smith: Source Book in Mathematics. McGraw- Hill, New York, 1929.

Dempsey, J. P., Adamson, R. M., & Mulmule, S. V. (1995). Large-scale in-situ fracture of ice. In F. H., Wittmann (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (FraMCoS-2), Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, pp. 575–684.

Dempsey, J. P., Adamson, R. M., & Mulmule, S. V. (1999). Scale effect on the insitu tensile strength and failure of first-year sea ice at resolute, NWR. Int. J. Fract. 95, 347–366.Google Scholar

Department of National Defense of Canada (2007). Technical Airworthiness Manual (TAM). Technical Report Document no. C-05-005-001/AG-001, 530 pp.

Desmorat, R., & Leckie, F. A. (1998). Singularities in bimaterials: Parametric study of an isotropic/anisotropic joint. Eur. J. Mech. A: Solids 17, 33–52.Google Scholar

Diao, X., Mai, L. Y., & Mai, Y.-W. (1995). A statistical model of residual strength and fatigue life of composite laminates. Comp. Sci. Technol. 54, 329–336.Google Scholar

Dimov, I. T. (2008). Monte Carlo Methods for Applied Scientists. World Scientific, Singapore.

Dos Santos, C., Strecker, K., Piorino Neto, F., de Macedo Silva, O. M., Baldacum, S. A., & da Silva., C. R. M. (2003). Evaluation of the reliability of Si3N4-Al2O3-CTR2O3 ceramics through Weibull analysis. Mater. Res. 6(4), 463–467.Google Scholar

Duckett, K. (2005). Risk analysis and the acceptable probability of failure. Struct. Eng. 83(15), 25–26.Google Scholar

Duffaut, P. (2013). The traps behind the failure of Malpasset arch dam, France, in 1959. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 5, 335–341.

Duffy, S. F., Janosik, L. A., Wereszczak, A. A., Suzuki, A., Lamon, J., & Thomas, D. J. (2003). Life prediction of structural components. In Progress in Ceramic Gas Turbine Development, Vol. 2. ASME Press, New York, pp. 553–607.

Dugdale, D. S. (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8, 100–108.Google Scholar

Dumin, D. J., Maddux, J. R., Scott, R. S., & Subramoniam, R. (1994). A model relating wearout to breakdown in thin oxides. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 41(9), 1570–1579.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. L., Hui, C. Y., Labossiere, P. E. W., & Lin, Y. Y. (2001). Small scale geometric and material features at geometric discontinuities and their role in fracture analysis. Int. J. Fract. 110(2), 101–121.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. L., Suwito, W., & Cunningham, S. J. (1996). Stress intensities at notch singularities. Eng. Fract. Mech. 57(4), 417–430.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. L., Suwito, W., & Cunningham, S. J. (1997). Fracture initiation at sharp notches: Correlation using critical stress intensities. Int. J. Solids Struct. 34(29), 3873–3883.Google Scholar

Eliáš, J., Vořrechovský, M., Skořcek, J., & Bažant, Z. P. (2015). Stochastic discrete meso-scale simulations of concrete fracture: Comparison to experimental data. Eng. Fract. Mech. 135(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Elishakoff, I. (1983). Probabilistic Methods in the Theory of Structures. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada.

Ellingwood, B. R. (2006).Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse. J. Perfor. Constr. Fact. 20(4), 315–323.Google Scholar

Eringen, A. C. (1966). A unified theory of thermomechanical materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 4, 179–202.Google Scholar

Eringen, A. C. (1972). Linear theory of nonlocal elasticity and dispersion of plane waves. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10, 425–425.Google Scholar

Eringen, A. C., & Edelen, D. G. B. (1972). On nonlocal elasticity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 10, 233–248.Google Scholar

Evans, A. G. (1972). A method for evaluating the time-dependent failure characteristics of brittle materials – and its application to polycrystalline alumina. J. Mater. Sci. 7, 1173–1146.Google Scholar

Evans, A. G. (1974). Analysis of strength degradation after sustained loading. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57(9), 410–411.Google Scholar

Evans, A. G., & Fu, Y. (1984). The mechanical behavior of alumina. In Fracture in Ceramic Materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 56–88.

Evans, R. H., & Marathe, M. S. (1968). Microcracking and stress-strain curves in concrete for tension. Mater. Struct. 1, 61–64.Google Scholar

Eyring, H. (1936). Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as examples of absolute reaction rates. J. Chem. Phys. 4, 283–291.Google Scholar

Feller, W. (1957). Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 2nd edition, JohnWiley & Sons, New York.

Fett, T. (1991). A fracture-mechanical theory of subcritical crack growth in ceramics. Int. J. Fract. 54, 117–130.Google Scholar

Fett, T., & Munz, D. (1991). Static and cyclic fatigue of ceramic materials. In Ceramics Today – Tomorrow's Ceramics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1827–1835.

Fett, T., & Munz, D. (1993). Difference between static and cyclic fatigue effects in alumina. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 12, 352–354.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A., & Tippett, L. H. C. (1928). Limiting form of the frequency distribution the largest and smallest number of a sample. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 24, 180–190.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. (1927). Sur la loi de probailité de l'écart maximum. Ann. Soc. Polon. Math. (Cracow) 6, 93.Google Scholar

Freed, Y., & Banks-Sills, K. (2008). A new cohesive zone model for mixed mode interface fracture in bimaterials. Eng. Fract. Mech. 75, 4583–4593.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, A. M. (1956). Safety and probability of structural failure. ASCE Trans. 121, 1337–1397.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, A. M. (1968). Statistical approach to brittle fracture. In Fracture: An Advanced Treatise, Vol. 2. Academic Press. New York, pp. 591–619.

Freudenthal, A. M. (1981). Selected Papers by Alfred M. Freudenthal: Civil Engineering Classics. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.

Freudenthal, A. M., Garrelts, J. M., & Shinozuka, M. (1966). The analysis of structural safety. J. Struct. Eng. Div. ASCE 92(ST1), 267–324.Google Scholar

Galilei, G. (1638). Discorsi e Dimostrazioni Matematiche Intorno a Due Nuove Scienze. Elsevirii, Leiden.

Gauss, C. F. (1809). The Heavenly Bodies Moving about the Sun in Conic Sections. Reprint, Dover, New York, 1963.

Geers, M. G. D., Peerlings, R. H. J., Brekelmans, W. A.M., & de Borst, R. (2000). Phenomenological nonlocal approaches based on implicit gradient-enhanced damage. Acta Mechan. 144(1– 2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Gettu, R., Bažant, Z. P., & Karr, M. E. (1990). Fracture properties and brittleness of high-strength concrete. ACI Mater. J. 87, 608–618.Google Scholar

Ghidini, G., Brazzelli, D., Clementi, C., & Pellizzer, F. (1999). Charge trapping mechanism under dynamic stress and its effect on failure time. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Reliability Physics Symposium. IEEE, San Diego.

Ghoniem, N.M., Busso, E. P., Kioussis, N., & Huang, H. (2003).Multiscale modeling of nanomechanics and micromechanics: An overview. Philos. Mag. 83(31–34), 3475–3528.Google Scholar

Glasstone, S., Laidler, K. J., & Eyring, H. (1941). The Theory of Rate Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Gnedenko, B. V. (1943). Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une série aléatoire. Ann. Math. 44, 423–453.Google Scholar

Gomez, F. J., & Elices, M. (2003). A fracture criterion for sharp V-notched samples. Int. J. Fract. 123(3–4), 163–175.Google Scholar

Graham-Brady, L. L., Arwade, S. R., Corr, D. J., Gutiérrez, M. A., Breysse, D., Grigoriu, M., & Zabara, N. (2006). Probability and materials: From nano- to macro-scale: A summary. Prob. Eng. Mech. 21, 193–199.Google Scholar

Grassl, P., & Bažant, Z. P. (2009). Random lattice-particle simulation of statistical size effect in quasi-brittle structures failing at crack initiation. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 135(2), 85–92.Google Scholar

Grenestedt, J. L., & Hallstrom, S. (1997). Crack initiation from homogeneous and bimaterial corners. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 64, 811–818.Google Scholar

Griffith, A. A. (1921). The phenomenon of rupture in solids. Philos. Trans. 221A, 582–593.Google Scholar

Gross, B. (1996). Least squares best fit method for the three parameterWeibull distribution: Analysis of tensile and bend specimens with volume or surface flaw failure. NASA Technical Report TM-4721, 1–21.

Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of Extremes. Columbia University Press, New York.

Györgyi, G., Moloney, N. R., Ozogány, K., & Rácz, Z. (2008). Finite-size scaling in extreme statistics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210601.Google Scholar

Hahn, H. T., & Kim, R. Y. (1975). Proof testing of composite materials. J. Comp. Mater. 9, 297–311.Google Scholar

Haldar, A., & Mahadevan, S. (2000a). Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Haldar, A., & Mahadevan, S. (2000b). Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Halpin, J. C., Johnson, T. A., & Waddoups, M. E. (1972). Kinetic fracture models and structural reliability. Int. J. Fract. Mech. 8, 465–466.Google Scholar

Harlow, D. G., & Phoenix, S. L. (1978a). The chain-of-bundles probability model for the strength of fibrous materials I: Analysis and conjectures. J. Comp. Mater. 12, 195–214.Google Scholar

Harlow, D. G., & Phoenix, S. L. (1978b). The chain-of-bundles probability model for the strength of fibrous materials II: A numerical study of convergence. J. Comp. Mater. 12, 314–334.Google Scholar

Harlow, D. G., Smith, R. L., & Taylor, H. M. (1983). Lower tail analysis of the distribution of the strength of load-sharing systems. J. Appl. Prob. 20, 358–367.Google Scholar

Hasofer, A. M., & Lind, N. C. (1974). Exact and invariant second moment code format. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE 100(EM1), 111–121.Google Scholar

Hastings, M. B. (2001). Fractal to nonfractal phase transition in the dielectric breakdown model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 175502.Google Scholar

Heilmann, H., Hilsdorf, H., & Finsterwalder, K. (1969). Festigkeit und Verformung von Beton unter Zugspannungen. Heft 203, Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlabeton.

Hill, R. (1963). Elastic properties of reinforced solids: Some theoretical principles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 357–362.Google Scholar

Hillerborg, A., Modéer, M., & Petersson, P. E. (1976). Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem. Concr. Res. 6, 773–782.Google Scholar

Hillig, W. B., & Charles, R. J. (1964). Surfaces, stress-dependent surface reaction, and strength. In V. F., Zackay (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley International Materials Conference. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Hoover, C. G., & Bažant, Z. P. (2013). Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Size effects of types 1 & 2, crack length effect and postpeak. Eng. Fract. Mech. 110, 281–289.Google Scholar

Hoover, C. G., & Bažant, Z. P. (2014a). Cohesive crack, size effect, crack band and work-offracture models compared to comprehensive concrete fracture tests. Int. J. Fract. 187(1), 133– 143.Google Scholar

Hoover, C. G., & Bažant, Z. P. (2014b). Comparison of the Hu-Duan boundary effect model to size-shape effect law for quasi-brittle fracture based on new comprehensive fracture tests. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 140(3), 480–486.Google Scholar

Hoover, C. G., & Bažant, Z. P. (2014c). Universal size-shape effect law based on comprehensive concrete fracture tests. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 140(3), 473–479.Google Scholar

Hoover, C. G., Bažant, Z. P., Vorel, J., Wendner, R., & Hubler, M. H. (2013). Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Description and results. Eng. Fract. Mech. 114, 92–103.Google Scholar

Hoshide, T. (1995). Proof testing and subsequent fatigue characteristics in ceramics. In H., Kishimoto, T., Hoshide, & N., Okabe (eds.), Cyclic Fatigue in Ceramics. Elsevier and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp. 207–232.

Hrennikoff, A. (1941). Solution of problems of elasticity by the framework method. J. Appl.Mech. 12, 169–175.Google Scholar

Hudson, J. A., Brown, E. T., & Fairhurst, C. (1971). Optimizing the control of rock failure in servo-controlled laboratory tests. Rock Mech. 3, 217–224.Google Scholar

Hughes, B. P., & Chapman, G. P. (1966). The complete stress-strain curve for concrete in direct tension. RILEM Bull. (Paris) 30, 95–97.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J.W., & Suo, Z. (1992).Mixed-mode cracking in layered materials. Adv. Appl. Mech. 29, 63–191.Google Scholar

Ibnabdeljalil, M., & Phoenix, S. L. (1995). Creep rupture of brittle matrix composite reinforced with time dependent fibers: scalings and Monte Carlo simulations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43(6), 897–931.Google Scholar

Iguro, M., Shioya, T., Nojiri|Y., & Akiyama|H. (1985). Experimental studies on shear strength of large reinforced concrete beams under uniformly distributed load. Conc. Lib. Int. 5, 137–154.Google Scholar

Ironside, J. G., & Swain, M. V. (1998). Ceramics in dental restorations – A review and critical issues. J. Austral. Ceram. Soc. 34(2), 78–91.Google Scholar

Irwin, G. R. (1958). Fracture. In W., Flügge (ed.), Handbuch der Physik, Vol. VI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 551–590.

Jirásek, M., & Bažant, Z. P. (1995a). Macroscopic fracture characteristics of random particle systems. Int. J. Fract. 69, 201–228.Google Scholar

Jirásek, M., & Bažant, Z. P. (1995b). Particle model for quasibrittle fracture and application to sea ice. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 121, 1016–1025.Google Scholar

Kanninen, M. F., & Popelar, C. H. (1985). Advanced fracture mechanics. Oxford University Press, New York.

Kaplan, M. F. (1961). Crack propagation and the fracture concrete. ACI J. 58(11), 591–610.Google Scholar

Karihaloo, B. L., Abdalla, H. M., & Xiao, Q. Z. (2003). Size effect in concrete beams. Eng. Fract. Mech. 70(7–8), 979–993.Google Scholar

Kausch, H. H. (1978). Polymer Fracture, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York.

Kawai, T. (1978). New discrete element models and their application to seismic response analysis of structures. Nucl. Eng. Des. 48, 207–229.Google Scholar

Kawakubo, T. (1995). Fatigue crack growth mechanics in ceramics. In H., Kishimoto, T., Hoshide, & N., Okabe (eds.) Cyclic Fatigue in Ceramics. Elsevier and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp. 123–137.

Kaxiras, E. (2003). Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kesler, C. E., Naus, D. J., & Lott, J. L. (1972). Fracture mechanics – Its applicability to concrete. In Proceedings of International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 113–124.

Kfouri, A. P., & Rice, J. R. (1977). Elastic-plastic separation energy rate for crack advance in finite growth steps. In D. M. R., Taplin (ed.), Fracture 1977 (Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fracture, ICF4), Vol. 1, University of Waterloo, Canada, pp. 43–59.

Khare, R., Mielke, S. L., Paci, J. T., Zhang, S. L., Ballarini, R., Schatz, G. C., & Belytschko, T. (2007). Coupled quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical modeling of the fracture of defective carbon nanotubes and graphene sheets. Phys. Rev. B 75(7), 075412.Google Scholar

Khare, R., Mielke, S. L., Schatz, G. C., & Belytschko, T. (2008). Multiscale coupling schemes spanning the quantum mechanical, atomistic forcefield, and continuum regimes. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197, 3190–3202.Google Scholar

Kim, Y.-H., & Lee, J. C. (2004). Reliability characteristics of high-k dielectrics. Microelectron. Reliabil. 44, 183–193.Google Scholar

Kirane, K., & Bažant, Z. P. (2015a). Microplane damage model for fatigue of quasibrittle materials: Subcritical crack growth, lifetime and residual strength. Int. J. Fatigue 70, 93–105.Google Scholar

Kirane, K., & Bažant, Z. P. (2015b). Size effect in Paris law for quasibrittle materials analyzed by the microplane constitutive model M7.Mech. Res. Commune. 68, 627–631.Google Scholar

Kirchner, H. P., & Walker, R. E. (1971). Delayed fracture of alumina ceramics with compressive surface layers. Mater. Sci. Eng. 8, 301–309.Google Scholar

Kittl, P., & Diaz, G. (1988). Weibull's fracure statistics, or probabilistic strength of materials: State of the art. Res. Mechan. 24, 99–207.Google Scholar

Kittl, P., & Diaz, G. (1989). Some engineering applications of the probabilistic strength of materials. Appl. Mech. Rev. 42, 108–112.Google Scholar

Kittl, P., & Diaz, G. (1990). Size effect on fracture strength in the probabilistic strength of materials. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Saf. 28, 9–21.Google Scholar

Knauss, W. C. (1973). On the steady propagation of a crack in a viscoelastc sheet; Experiment and analysis. In H. H., Kausch (ed.), The Deformation in Fracture of High Polymers. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 501–541.

Knauss, W. C. (1974). On the steady propagation of a crack in a viscoelastc plastic sold. J. Appl. Mechan. ASME 41, 234–248.Google Scholar

Knott, J. F. (1973). Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics. Butterworth, London.

Kramers, H. A. (1941). Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reaction. Physica 7, 284–304.Google Scholar

Krausz, A. S., & Krausz, K. (1988). Fracture Kinetics of Crack Growth. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

Krayani, A., Pijaudier-Cabot, G., & Dufour, F. (2009). Boundary effect on weight function in nonlocal damage model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 76(14), 2217–2231.Google Scholar

Kröner, E. (1966). Continuum mechanics and range of atomic cohesion forces. In T., Yokobori, T., Kawasaki, & J., Swedlow (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fracture. Japanese Society for Strength and Fracture of Materials. Sendai, Japan, p. 27.

Kröner, E. (1967). Elasticity theory of materials with long range cohesive forces. Int. J. Solids Struct. 3, 731–742.Google Scholar

Labossiere, P. E.W., Dunn, M. L., & Cunningham, S. J. (2002). Application of bimaterial interface corner failure mechanics to silicon/glass anodic bonds. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 50, 405–433.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L. (2011). General size effect on strength of bi-material quasibrittle structures. Int. J. Fract. 172, 151–160.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L. (2012). A finite weakest link model of lifetime distribution of high-k gate dielectrics under unipolar AC voltage stress. Microelectron. Reliabil. 52, 100–106.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L. (2015). Size effect on reliability indices and safety factors of quasibrittle structures. Struct. Saf. 52, 20–28.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Ballarini, R., & Zhu, Z. (2015). Modeling of probabilistic failure of polycrystalline silicon MEMS structures. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98(6), 1685–1697.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., & Bažant, Z. P. (2009). Strength distribution of dental restorative ceramics: Finite weakest link model with zero threshold. Dent. Mater. 25(5), 641–648.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., & Bažant, Z. P. (2011). Unified nano-mechanics based probabilistic theory of quasibrittle and brittle structures: II. Fatigue crack growth, lifetime and scaling. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 1322–1337.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., & Bažant, Z. P. (2012). Scaling of static fracture of quasibrittle structures: Strength, lifetime and fracture kinetics. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 79, 031006.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L.,& Bažant, Z. P. (2014). A finite weakest-link model of lifetime distribution of quasibrittle structures under fatigue loading. J. Math. Mech. Solids 19, 56–70.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Bažant, Z. P., & Bazant, M. Z. (2009). Crack growth law and its consequences on lifetime distributions of quasibrittle structures. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 214008.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Bažant, Z. P., & Bazant, M. Z. (2011). Unified nano-mechanics based probabilistic theory of quasibrittle and brittle structures: I. Strength, crack growth, lifetime and scaling. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 59, 1291–1321.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Bažant, Z. P., & Yu, Q. (2010). Scaling of strength of metal-composite joints: II. Interface fracture analysis. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 77, 011012.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Cannone Falchetto, A., & Marasteanu, M. O. (2013). Determination of strength distribution of quasibrittle structures from mean size effect analysis. Mech. Mater. 66, 79–87.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., & Eliáš, J. (2016). A probabilistic crack band model for quasibrittle fracture. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 83(5), 051005.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Eliáš, J., & Bažant, Z. P. (2012). Computation of probability distribution of strength of quasibrittle structures failing at macro-crack initiation. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 138(7), 888–899.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L.,Manning, J., & Labuz, J. F. (2014). Scaling of fatigue crack growth in a rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Miner Sci. 72, 71–79.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., Pieuchot, M., & Ballarini, R. (2014). Effect of stress singularity magnitude on scaling of strength of quasibrittle structures. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 140(5), 04014011.Google Scholar

Le, J.-L., & Xue, B. (2013). Energetic-statistical size effect in fracture of bimaterial hybrid structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 111, 106–115.Google Scholar

Lee, H. L., Park, S. E., & Hahn, B. S. (1995). Modeling of cyclic fatigue stress for life prediction of structural ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 2521–2525.Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Fenves, G. L. (1998). Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 124(8), 892–900.Google Scholar

Lee, S. G., Ma, Y., Thimm, G. L., & Verstraeten, J. (2008). Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul. Comput. Indust. 59, 296–303.Google Scholar

Leguillon, D. (2002). Strength or toughnessř A criterion for crack onset at a notch. Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids 21, 61–72.Google Scholar

Leicester, R. H. (1969). The size effect of notches. In Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Conference on Mechanics of Structural Materials. Melbourne, pp. 4.1–4.20.

Lekhnitskii, S. G. (1963). Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Body. Holden-Day, San Francisco.

Lemaire, M. (2009). Structural Reliability. ISTE and John Wiley & Sons, London and Hokoken.

Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1924). On the determination of molecular fields II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc. R. Soc. London A 106(738), 463–477.Google Scholar

Levy, M., & Salvadori, M. (1992). Why Buildings Fall Down. W. W. Norton, New York.

Li, X., & Marasteanu, M. O. (2006). Investigation of low temperature cracking in asphalt mixtures by acoustic emission. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 7/4, 491–512.Google Scholar

Li, Y.-N., & Bažant, Z. P. (1994). Penetration fracture of ice plate: 2D analysis and size effect. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 120(7), 1481–1498.Google Scholar

Li, Y.-N., & Bažant, Z. P. (1997). Cohesive crack with rate-dependent opening and viscoelasticity: II. Numerical algorithm, behavior and size effect. Int. J. Fract. 86(3), 267–288.Google Scholar

Lin, Q., & Labuz, J. F. (2013). Fracture of sandstone characterized by digital image correlation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Miner Sci. 60, 235–245.Google Scholar

Liu, D., & Fleck, N. A. (1999). Scale effect in the initiation of cracking of a scarf joint. Int. J. Fract. 95, 66–88.Google Scholar

Liu, W. K., Karpov, E. G., & Park, H. S. (2005). Nano Mechanics and Materials: Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.

Liu, X. H., Suo, Z., & Ma, Q. (1999). Split singularities: Stress field near the edge of silicon die on polymer substrate. Acta Mater. 47, 67–76.Google Scholar

Lohbauer, U., Petchelt, A., & Greil, P. (2002). Lifetime prediction of CAD/CAM dental ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 63(6), 780–785.Google Scholar

Mahesh, S., & Phoenix, S. L. (2004). Lifetime distributions for unidirectional fibrous composites under creep-rupture loading. Int. J. Fract. 127, 303–360.Google Scholar

Malvar, J. L., & Warren, G. E. (1988). Fracture energy for three-point-bend tests on single-edgenotched beams. Exp. Mech. 28(3), 266–272.Google Scholar

Marder, M. (2004). Effect of atoms on brittle fracture. Int. J. Fract. 130, 517–555.Google Scholar

Mariotte, E. (1686). Traité du mouvement des eaux, posthumously edited by M. de la, Hire; Eng. transl. by J. T., Desvaguliers, London (1718), p. 249; also Marriotte's Collected Works, 2nd ed., The Hague (1740).

Marti, P. (1989). Size effect in double-punch tests on concrete cylinders. ACI Mater. J. 86, 597–601.Google Scholar

McKinney, K. R., & Rice, R. W. (1981). Specimen size effects in fracture toughness testing of heterogeous ceramics by the notch beam test. In S. W., Freiman, & S. R., Fuller (eds.), Fracture Mechanics Methods for Ceramics, Rocks and Concrete. ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 745. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 118–126.

McPherson, J. W., Khamankar, R. B., & Shanware, A. (2000). Complementary model for intrinsic time-dependent dielectric breakdown in SiO2 dielectrics. J. Appl. Phys. 88, 5351– 5359.Google Scholar

Melchers, R. E. (1987). Structural Reliability, Analysis & Prediction. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Mihashi, H. (1983). Stochastic theory for fracture of concrete. In F. H., Wittmann (ed.), Fracture Mechanics of Concrete. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 301–339.

Mihashi, H., & Izumi, M. (1977). Stochastic theory for concrete fracture. Cem. Concr. Res. 7, 411–422.Google Scholar

Mihashi, H., & Zaitsev, J. W. (1981). Statistical nature of crack propagation. In F. H., Wittmann (ed.), Report to RILEM TC50-FMC, Vol. Section 4-2.

Miyakawa, T., Ichiki, T., Mitsuhashi, J., Miyamoto, K., Tada, T., & Koyama, T. (2007). Study of time dependent dielectric breakdown distribution in ultrathin gate oxide. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46(28), 691–692.Google Scholar

Morse, P. M. (1929). Diatomic molecules according to the wave mechanics. II. Vibrational levels. Phys. Rev. 34, 57–64.Google Scholar

Mulmule, S. V., Dempsey, J. P., & Adamson, R. M. (1995). Large-scale in-situ ice fracture experiments–part II: Modeling efforts. In Ice Mechanics – 1995 (ASME Joint AppliedMechanics and Materials Summer Conference). ASME, New York.

Munz, D., & Fett, T. (1999). Ceramics:Mechanical Properties, Failure Behavior, Materials Selection. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Nallathambi, P. (1986). Fracture Behaviour of Plain Concretes. PhD thesis, University of New Castle, Callaghan, Australia.

Nielsen, L. F. (1996). Lifetime and residual strength of wood subjected to static and variable load. Technical Report R-6, Department of Structural Engineering and Materials, Technical University of Denmark.

Niemeyer, L., Pietronero, L., & Wiesmann, H. J. (1984). Fractal dimension of dielectric breakdown. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1033–1036.Google Scholar

Nordic Committee for Building Structures (NKB) (1978). Recommendation for loading and safety regulations for structural design. Technical Report 36.

Ogawa, T. (1995). Fatigue crack growth of monolithic and composite ceramics. In H., Kishimoto, T., Hoshide, & N., Okabe (eds.), Cyclic Fatigue in Ceramics. Elsevier and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp. 167–188.

Okabe, N., & Hirata, H. (1995). High temperature fatigue properties for some types of SiC and Si3N4 and the unified strength estimation method. In H., Kishimoto, T., Hoshide, & N., Okabe (eds.), Cyclic Fatigue in Ceramics. Elsevier and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp. 245–276.

Omeltchenko, A., Yu, J., Kalia, R. K., & Vashishta, P. (1997). Crack front propagation and fracture in a graphite sheet: A molecular dynamics study on parallel computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78(11), 2148–2151.Google Scholar

Ortiz, M., & Pandolfi, A. (1999). Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for threedimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 44(9), 1267–1282.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. C., & Rice, J. R. (1973). The growth of slip surfaces on the progressive failure of over-consolidates clay. Proc. R. Soc. London A. 332(527–548).Google Scholar

Pang, S.-D., Bažant, Z. P., & Le, J.-L. (2008). Statistics of strength of ceramics: Finite weakest link model and necessity of zero threshold. Int. J. Fract. 154, 131–145.Google Scholar

Paris, P. C., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation law. J. Basic Eng. 85, 528–534.Google Scholar

Park, K., Paulino, G. H., & Roesler, J. R. (2009). A unified potential-based cohesive crack model for mixed-mode fracture. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 57(6), 891–908.Google Scholar

Park, S. E., & Lee, H. L. (1997). Prediction of static fatigue life of ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16, 1352–1353.Google Scholar

Peerlings, R. H. J., de Borst, R., Brekelmans, W. A. M., & de Vree, J. H. P. (1996). Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 39(19), 3391– 3403.Google Scholar

Peerlings, R. H. J., Geers, M. G. D., de Borst, R., & Brekelmans, W. A. M. (2001). A critical comparison of nonlocal and gradient-enhanced softening continua. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38(44– 45), 7723–7746.Google Scholar

Peirce, F. T. (1926). Tensile tests of cotton yarns – V. The weakest link. J. Textile Inst. 17, 355– 368.Google Scholar

Petch, N. J. (1954). The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25–28.Google Scholar

Petersson, P. E. (1981). Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials. Report TVBM-1006, Division of Building Materials, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.

Phillips, R. (2001). Crystals, Defects and Microstructures: Modeling Across Scales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Phoenix, S. L. (1978a). The asymptotic time to failure of a mechanical system of parallel members. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 34(2), 227–246.Google Scholar

Phoenix, S. L. (1978b). Stochastic strength and fatigue of fiber bundles. Int. J. Fract. 14(3), 327– 344.Google Scholar

Phoenix, S. L., Ibnabdeljalil, M., & Hui, C.-Y. (1997). Size effects in the distribution for strength of brittle matrix fibrous composites. Int. J. Solids Struct. 34(5), 545–568.Google Scholar

Phoenix, S. L., & Tierney, L.-J. (1983). A statistical model for the time dependent failure of unidirectional composite materials under local elastic load-sharing among fibers. Eng. Fract. Mech. 18(1), 193–215.Google Scholar

Pietronero, L., & Wiesmann, H. J. (1988). From physical dielectric breakdown to the stochastic fractal model. Z. Phys. B: Condensed Matter 70, 87–93.Google Scholar

Pietruszczak, S., & Mróz, Z. (1981). Finite element analysis of deformation of strain-softening materials. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 17, 327–334.Google Scholar

Pijaudier-Cabot, G., & Bažant, Z. P. (1987). Nonlocal damage theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 113(10), 1512–1533.Google Scholar

Planas, J., & Elices, M. (1988). Conceptual and experimental problems in the determination of the fracture energy of concrete. In Proceedings of International Workshop on “Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy, Test Methods for Concrete and Rock.” Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, pp. 203–212.

Planas, J., & Elices, M. (1989). Size effect in concrete structures: Mathematical approximation and experimental validation, In J., Mazars & Z. P., Bažant (eds.), Cracking and Damage, Strain Localization and Size Effect (Proceedings of France–U.S. Workshop). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 462–476.

Qian, Z., & Akisanya, A. R. (1998). An experimental investigation of failure initiation in bonded joints. Acta Mater. 46, 4895–4904.Google Scholar

Rackwitz, R. (1976). Practical probabilistic approach to design. Bulletin No. 112, Comité European du Béton.

Rackwitz, R., & Fiessler, B. (1976). Note on discrete safety checking when using nonnormal stochastic models for basic variables. In Load Project Working Session, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Rackwitz, R., & Fiessler, B. (1978). Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comp. Struct. 9(5), 484–494.Google Scholar

Redner, S. (2001). A Guide to First-Passage Processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Reedy, E. D., Jr. (2000). Comparison between interface corner and interfacial fracture analysis of an adhesively-bonded butt joint. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 2429–2442.Google Scholar

Rezakhani, R., & Cusatis, G. (2016). Asymptotic expansion homogenization of discrete fine-scale models with rotational degrees of freedom for the simulation of quasi-brittle materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 88, 320–345.Google Scholar

Rice, J. R. (1967). Mechanics of crack tip deformation and extension by fatigue. In Fatigue Crack Propagation. Special Technical Publication 415. ASTM, Philadelphia, pp. 247–309.

Rice, J. R. (1968a). In Fracture, Mathematical analysis of the mechanics of fracture H., Liebowitz, ed., Vol. 2, Academic Press, 192–308.

Rice, J. R. (1968B). Path independent integral and approximate analysis of strain concentrations by notches and cracks. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 35, 379–386.Google Scholar

Rice, J. R. (1988). Elastic fracture mechanics concepts for interface cracks. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 55, 98–103.Google Scholar

RILEM TC 89-FMT (1990). Size effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone of concrete. Mater. Struct. 23, 461–465.

RILEM TC QFS (2005). Quasibrittle fracture scaling and size effect – Final report. Mater. Struct. 37, 547–568.

Rinne, H. (2009). The Weibull Distribution. A Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, London/ New York.

Risken, H. (1989). The Fokker-Planck Equation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Ritchie, R. O. (2005). Incomplete self-similarity and fatigue crack growth. Int. J. Fract. 132, 197– 203.Google Scholar

Ritchie, R. O., Knott, J. F., & Rice, J. R. (1973). On the relation between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 21, 395–410.Google Scholar

Rocco, C. G. (1995). Size Dependence and Fracture Mechanisms in the Diagonal Compression Splitting Test. PhD thesis, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.

Rüsch, H., & Hilsdorf, H. (1963). Deformation characteristics of concrete under axial tension. Voruntersuchungen bericht (preliminary report), Munich.

Sabnis, G. M., & Mirza, S. M. (1979). Size effect in model concretes. J. Struct. Eng. Div. ASCE 105(6), 1007–1020.Google Scholar

Sakai, T., & Fujitani, K. (1989). A statistical aspect on fatigue behavior of alumina ceramics in rotating bending. Eng. Fract. Mech. 32(4), 653–664.Google Scholar

Sakai, T., & Hoshide, T. (1995). Statistical aspect on fatigue fracture of structural ceramics under cyclic loads. In H., Kishimoto, T., Hoshide, & N., Okabe (eds.), Cyclic Fatigue in Ceramics. Elsevier and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, pp. 189–206.

Salem, J. A., Nemeth, N. N., Powers, L. P., & Choi, S. R. (1996). Reliability analysis of uniaxially ground brittle materials. J. Eng. Gas Turbines & Power 118, 863–871.Google Scholar

Salviato, M., Chau, V. T., Li, W., Bažant, Z. P., & Cusatis, G. (2016). Direct testing of gradual postpeak softening of fracture specimens of fiber composites stabilized by enhanced grip stiffness and mass. J. Appl. Mech. ASME, 83, 11103 (16 pp.).Google Scholar

Salviato, M., Kirane, K., & Bažant, Z. P. (2014). Statistical distribution and size effect of residual strength after a period of constant load. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 64, 440–454.Google Scholar

Schauffert, E. A., & Cusatis, G. (2011). Lattice discrete particle model for fiber-reinforced concrete. I: Theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 138(7), 826–833.Google Scholar

Schauffert, E. A., Cusatis, G., Pelessone, D., O'Daniel, J. L., & Baylot, J. T. (2011). Lattice discrete particle model for fiber-reinforced concrete. II: Tensile fracture and multiaxial loading behavior. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 138(7), 834–841.Google Scholar

Schlangen, E., & van Mier, J. G. M. (1992). Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites. Cem. Concr. Res. 14, 105–118.Google Scholar

Sedov, L. I. (1959). Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics. Academic Press, New York.

Seweryn, A. (1994). Brittle fracture criterion for structures with sharp notches. Eng. Fract. Mech. 47, 673–681.Google Scholar

Sglavo, V. M., & Green, D. J. (1995). Threshold stress intensity factor in soda-lime silicate glass by interrupted static fatigue test. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 16, 645–651.Google Scholar

Sglavo, V.M., & Renzi, S. (1999). Fatigue limit in borosilicate glasses by interrupted static fatigue test. Phys. Chem. Glasses 40(2), 79–84.Google Scholar

Shioya, T., & Akiyama, H. (1994). Application to design of size effect in reinforced concrete structures. In H., Mihashi, H., Okamura, & Z. P., Bažant (eds.), Size Effect in Concrete Structures. E & FN Spon, London, pp. 409–416.

Sinclair, G. B., Okajima, M., & Griffin, J. H. (1984). Path independent integrals for computing stress intensity factors at sharp notches in elastic plates. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 20(6), 999–1008.Google Scholar

Smith, J., Cusatis, G., Pelessone, D., Landis, E., O'Daniel, J. L., & Baylot, J. (2014). Discrete modeling of ultra-high-performance concrete with application to projectile penetration. Int. J. Impact Eng. 65, 13–32.Google Scholar

Smith, R. L. (1982). The asymptotic distribution of the strength of a series-parallel system with equal load sharing. Ann. Probab. 10(1), 137–171.Google Scholar

Soong, T. T. (2004). Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.

Stanley, P., & Inanc, E. Y. (1985). Assessment of surface strength and bulk strength of a typical brittle material. In S., Eggwertz & N., Lind (eds.), Probabilistic Methods. I. The Mechanics of Solids and Structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 231–251.

Stathis, J. H. (1999). Percolation models for gate oxide breakdown. J. Appl. Phys. 86(10), 5757–5766.Google Scholar

Stillinger, F. H., & Weber, T. A. (1985). Computer simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon. Phys. Rev. B 31, 5256–5271.Google Scholar

Stroh, A. N. (1958). Dislocations and cracks in anisotropic elasticity. Philos. Mag. 3, 625–646.Google Scholar

Studarta, A. R., Filser, F., Kochera, P., & Gauckler, L. J. (2007). Fatigue of zirconia under cyclic loading in water and its implications for the design of dental bridges. Dent.Mater. 23, 106–114.Google Scholar

Studarta, A. R., Filser, F., Kochera, P., Lüthy, H., & Gauckler, L. J. (2007). Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. Dent. Mater. 23, 177–185.Google Scholar

Suné, J. (2001). New physics-based analytic approach to the thin-oxide breakdown statistics. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. Lett. 22(6), 296–298.Google Scholar

Suné, J., Placencia, I., Barniol, N., Farrés, E., Martín, F., & Aymerich, X. (1990). On the breakdown statistics of very thin sio2 films. Thin Solid Films 185, 347–362.Google Scholar

Suné, J., Tous, S., & Wu, E. Y. (2009). Analytical cell-based model for the breakdown statistics of multilayer insulator stacks. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. Lett. 30(12), 1359–1361.Google Scholar

Suresh, S. (1998). Fatigue of Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Syroka-Korol, E., & Tejchman, J. (2014). Experimental investigation of size effect in reinforced concrete beams failing by shear. Eng. Struct. 58, 63–78.Google Scholar

Tadmor, E. B., & Miller, R. E. (2011). Modeling Materials: Continuum, Atomistic and Multiscale Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Tadmor, E. B., Ortiz, M., & Phillips, R. (1996). Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. Philos. Mag. 73, 1529–1563.Google Scholar

Tang, T., Bažant, Z. P., Yang, S., & Zollinger, D. (1996). Variable-notch one-size test method for fracture energy and process zone length. Eng. Fract. Mech. 55(3), 383–404.Google Scholar

Tersoff, J. (1988). New empirical approach for the structure and energy of covalent systems. Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991.Google Scholar

Thomas, D. J., Verrilli, M., & Calomino, A. (2002). Stress-life behavior of a C/SiC composite in a low partial pressure of oxygen environment part III: Life prediction using probabilistic residual strength rupture model. In H.-T., Lin and M., Singh (eds.), Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Vol. 23(3), pp. 453–460.

Thouless, M. D., Hsueh, C. H., & Evans, A. G. (1983). A damage model of creep crack growth in polycrystals. Acta Metall. 31(10), 1675–1687.Google Scholar

Timoshenko, S. P., & Goodier, J. N. (1951). Theory of Elasticity.McGraw-Hill, New York Toronto London.

Tinschert, J., Zwez, D., Marx, R., & Ausavice, K. J. (2000). Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J. Dent. 28, 529–535.Google Scholar

Tippett, L. H. C. (1925). On the extreme individuals and the range of samples. Biometrika p. 364.

Tobolsky, A., & Erying, H. (1943). Mechanical properties of polymeric materials. J. Chem. Phys. 11, 125–134.Google Scholar

Turner, C. H., Wang, T., & Burr, D. B. (2001). Shear strength and fatigue properties of human cortical bone determined from pure shear tests. Calcif. Tissue Int. 69, 373–378.

Turos, M. I., Cannone Falchetto, A., Tebaldi, G., & Marasteanu, M. O. (2012). Determining the flexural strength of asphalt mixtures using the bending beam rheometer. In A., Scarpas, N., Kringos, I., Al-Qadi, & A., Loizos (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th RILEM Conference on Cracking in Pavements. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 11–20.

van der Hofstad, R., & Redig, F. (2006). Maximal clusters in non-critical percolation and related models. J. Stat. Physics 122(4), 671–703.Google Scholar

Vanmarcke, E. (2010). Random Fields Analysis and Synthesis. World Scientific, Singapore.

var der Hofstad, R., & Redig, F. (2006). Maximal clusters in non-critical percolation and related models. J. Stat. Phys. 122, 671–703.Google Scholar

van Vliet, M. R., & van Mier, J. G. (2000). Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 65(2–3): 165–188.Google Scholar

Vashy, A. (1892). Sur les lois de similitude en physique. Annales Telégraphiques. 19, 25–28.Google Scholar

von Mises, R. (1936). La distribution de la plus grande de n valeurs. Rev. Math. Union Interbalcanique 1, 1.Google Scholar

Vořrechovský, M., & Sadílek, V. (2008). Computational modeling of size effects in concrete specimens under uniaxial tension. Int. J. Fract. 154, 27–49.Google Scholar

Wagner, H. D. (1989). Stochastic concepts in the study of size effects in the mechanical strength of highly oriented polymeric materials. J. Polym. Sci. 27, 115–149.Google Scholar

Wagner, H. D., Schwartz, P., & Phoenix, S. L. (1986). Lifetime statistics for single Kevlar 49 filaments in creep-rupture. J. Polym. Sci. 21, 1868–1878.Google Scholar

Walraven, J. (1995). Size effects: Their nature and their recognition in building codes. Studi Ricerche (Politecnico di Milano) 16, 113–134.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. F. (1972). Fracture of plain concrete. Indian Concrete J. 46(11), 469–470, 476.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. F. (1976). Crack initiation in plain concrete. Mag. Concr. Res. 28, 37–41.Google Scholar

Wanger, H. D., Phoenix, S. L., & Schwartz, P. (1984). A study of statistical variability in the strength of single aramid filaments. J. Comp. Mater. 18, 312–338.Google Scholar

Wawersik, W., & Fairhurst, C. (1970). A study of brittle rock fracture in laboratory compression experiments. Int. J. Rock Mech. Miner. Sci. 7(5), 561–575.Google Scholar

Weertman, J. (1966). Rate of growth of fatigue cracks calculated from the theory of infinitesimal dislocation distributed on a crack plane. Int. J. Fract. 2, 460–467.Google Scholar

Weibull, W. (1939). The phenomenon of rupture in solids. Proc. R. Sweden Inst. Engrg. Res. 153, 1–55.Google Scholar

Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech. ASME 153(18), 293–297.Google Scholar