Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures and Table
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 The Rise of Sectarianism
- 2 The Influence of the Orange Order
- 3 Explaining the Decline of Orangeism
- 4 Sectarian Dividing Lines and Post-War Slum Clearance
- 5 The Diminishing Politics of Sectarianism: How Class Politics Displaced Identity Politics
- 6 Ecumenism: ‘The Great Mersey Miracle’ and a Decline in Religious Observance
- 7 The Transfer of Racism: Did Liverpool's Black and Chinese Communities Become ‘New Aliens’?
- 8 The Emergence of a Common Identity: The Integration of the Irish and the Harmony of ‘Merseybeat’
- 9 Everton and Liverpool Football Clubs: New Gods
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Appendices
- Index
7 - The Transfer of Racism: Did Liverpool's Black and Chinese Communities Become ‘New Aliens’?
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures and Table
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Miscellaneous Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 The Rise of Sectarianism
- 2 The Influence of the Orange Order
- 3 Explaining the Decline of Orangeism
- 4 Sectarian Dividing Lines and Post-War Slum Clearance
- 5 The Diminishing Politics of Sectarianism: How Class Politics Displaced Identity Politics
- 6 Ecumenism: ‘The Great Mersey Miracle’ and a Decline in Religious Observance
- 7 The Transfer of Racism: Did Liverpool's Black and Chinese Communities Become ‘New Aliens’?
- 8 The Emergence of a Common Identity: The Integration of the Irish and the Harmony of ‘Merseybeat’
- 9 Everton and Liverpool Football Clubs: New Gods
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Appendices
- Index
Summary
Sectarianism and anti-Irish racism were never Liverpool's only problems. During the nineteenth century, a wide variety of immigrant groups came to Liverpool: Irish, Eastern European Jews, Chinese, Asians, and Africans, the arrival of each grouping triggering some reaction. As Herson states, ‘Liverpool's very cosmopolitanism contributed to its propensity to racism’ as ‘the city's society … negatively marked out ethnic and racial differences and in so doing encouraged conflictual inter-ethnic relations’. In the latter part of the nineteenth century, at least, the dominance of the conflict between Liverpool's native white community and the immigrant white Irish community, led to conflict between whites and other minority groups becoming overlooked amid the omnipresent main Protestant versus Catholic sectarian fracture. Herson acknowledges:
It is questionable whether, in the nineteenth century, the mixture of immigrants in Liverpool actually created a cosmopolitan culture. Rather, the city was dominated by a fractured white majority from Britain and Ireland amongst whom various continental and overseas minorities inserted themselves.
Prejudice and discrimination against Liverpool's other minority communities were a sideshow. This chapter concentrates on Liverpool's black and Chinese communities, primarily due to their position as the largest two minority groups in Liverpool throughout the latter stages of the twentieth century. Moreover, although the port has the ‘oldest sizeable, settled African, South Asian and Chinese community in the country’, the black and Chinese communities have very different experiences due to the varying degrees of racist intensity they have experienced in Liverpool.
Liverpool's main social problem may have been sectarianism before its ostensible replacement by anti-black racism in the latter half of the twentieth century. However, Murray Steele highlights how Liverpool's main division may have added to an increasingly racist perception of black people:
Liverpool evolved a distinctly imperial culture moulded by a local environment that made it unique amongst English cities. The religious sectarianism … divided its working class and had the effect of giving the Conservative/ Unionist cause, traditionally the party of empire, a control over local politics that lasted until the mid-1950s.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Liverpool SectarianismThe Rise and Demise, pp. 186 - 219Publisher: Liverpool University PressPrint publication year: 2017