Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on sources
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: the politics of crown finance in England
- 1 Jacobean crown finance
- 2 Kingship and the making of fiscal policy
- 3 Crown finance and the new regime, 1603–1608
- 4 The refoundation of the monarchy, 1609–1610
- 5 The failure of Jacobean kingship, 1611–1617
- 6 Crown finance and the renewal of Jacobean kingship, 1617–1621
- 7 The incomplete reformation of finance and politics, 1621–1624
- Conclusion: the failure of kingship and governance
- Bibliography
- Index
4 - The refoundation of the monarchy, 1609–1610
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on sources
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: the politics of crown finance in England
- 1 Jacobean crown finance
- 2 Kingship and the making of fiscal policy
- 3 Crown finance and the new regime, 1603–1608
- 4 The refoundation of the monarchy, 1609–1610
- 5 The failure of Jacobean kingship, 1611–1617
- 6 Crown finance and the renewal of Jacobean kingship, 1617–1621
- 7 The incomplete reformation of finance and politics, 1621–1624
- Conclusion: the failure of kingship and governance
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The search for a financial settlement took a decisive turn when Salisbury persuaded James to reconvene parliament and make it the venue for an ambitious ‘refoundation’ of the monarchy. Salisbury presented James with the most comprehensive blueprint for his estate in the reign, but it was a decidedly political assessment. The argument was simple: James's estate could not subsist without further burden to his subjects and it was politically inadvisable to impose that burden outside a parliamentary settlement. Salisbury wanted to attempt what Henry Knyvett proposed in 1593, the creation of an annual tax to support the crown's necessities. This was a revolutionary idea. Jean Beaulieu recognised the enormity of the suggestion, writing that parliament
according to the common opinion and hope, is like to bring forth very great alteration and reformation in the State …it being in question not onely to eradicatt the strongest and most inveteratt Diseases of the State, but also to admitt new Seeds of temperature or distemperature in that bodie, you may think with what caution, wariness and slowness they will proceed in so important a Worke …of so high Nature and of so great Consequence both to the King and to the State.
Beaulieu was astute. What began as a financial settlement developed into a far-reaching examination of kingship, governance and finance at the levels of political thought and practice. It was at precisely this intersection that refoundation collapsed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kingship and Crown Finance under James VI and I, 1603–1625 , pp. 89 - 116Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2002