Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T11:07:47.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Sophismata

from II - Logic and language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Paul Vincent Spade
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Robert Pasnau
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Christina van Dyke
Affiliation:
Calvin College, Michigan
Get access

Summary

The medieval sophismata literature is a genre of academic argument that began to take shape by the early twelfth century, grew in importance in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, and lasted to the end of the Middle Ages. This chapter offers only the briefest overview of that literature. Although some overall patterns can be discerned, the boundaries of the genre are ill-defined and seem to have been so even in the Middle Ages. Still, it is clear that sophisms were the occasion for drawing many subtle distinctions and pursuing theoretical issues in a variety of fields.

BACKGROUND

Sophismata is the plural of the Greek singular noun sophisma. Originally, the words did not have the derogatory sense of the modern English ‘sophism’ or ‘sophistry.’ Instead they referred to whatever a sophistēs or “sophist” produced. A “sophist” was anyone who dealt in “wisdom” (sophia) in a very broad sense of the term. The word was applied, for example, to Homer and to the Seven Sages of ancient Greece. By the time of Socrates, however, ‘sophist’ had come to be used especially to refer to those who used debate and rhetoric to defend their views and who offered to train others in these skills. Because they accepted payment for their services, and because some of them employed their skill to pursue unjust cases in courts of law, the term acquired the connotation of someone who uses ambiguous, deceitful and fallacious reasoning to argue a point.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kerferd, G. B., The Sophistic Movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)
Cicero, , Academica Priora II.24.75, who explains “for that is what [Stilpo, Diodorus and Alexinus] call fallacious little conclusions”; Seneca, Epist. 45.8 and 111.1
Grabmann, Martin, Die Sophismataliteratur des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts mit Textausgabe eines Sophisma des Boethius von Dacien (Münster: Aschendorff, 1940)
de Rijk, L. M., Logica modernorum: A Contribution to the History of Early Terminist Logic (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1962–7)
Kretzmann, Norman, “Socrates Is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White,” Noûs 11 (1977) p. 12 n. 9Google Scholar
Buridan, John, Sophismata VIII. 1–3
Read, Stephen, Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar: Acts of the Ninth European Symposium for Medieval Logic and Semantics (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993) p. xii.
Dod, Bernard, “Aristoteles Latinus,” in Kretzmann, N. et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982) pp. 46, 53–5
Spade, P. V., Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994) pp. 20–5
Weisheipl, James, “Curriculum of the Faculty of Arts at Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century,” Mediaeval Studies 26 (1964) pp. 177f Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, Lorenzo, “The ‘Ars disserendi’ of Adam of Balsham ‘Parvipontanus’,” Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 3 (1954) 116–69Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G., Die 13de Eeuwse Tractaten over Syncategorematische Termen (Meppel: Krips Repro, 1979)
de Rijk, L. M., Some Earlier Parisian Tracts on Distinctiones Sophismatum (Nijmegen: Ingenium, 1988)
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, “Expositio as a Method of Solving Sophisms,” in Read, Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar, 202–16. On the theory of exposition, see P. V. Spade, “Ockham, Adams and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham,” Philosophical Review 99 (1990) pp. 608–12
Ashworth, E. J. and Spade, P. V., “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford” in Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992) pp. 43–4
Bäck, Allan, On Reduplication: Logical Theories of Qualification (Leiden: Brill, 1996)
Streveler, Paul, “Richard the Sophister,” in Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (, spring 2005). For Bacon, see n. 11 above
Sinkler, Georgette, “Medieval Theories of Composition and Division” (Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1985)
Sylla, Edith, “William Heytesbury on the Sophism ‘Infinita sunt finita’,” in Beckmann, J. P. and Kluxen, W. (eds.) Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981) II: 628–36
Boehner, Philotheus, Medieval Logic: An Outline of its Development from 1250–c. 1400 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1952) pp. 103–14
Spade, P. V., The Mediaeval Liar: A Catalogue of the Insolubilia-Literature (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1975)
Klima, Gyula, “‘Debeo tibi equum’: A Reconstruction of the Theoretical Framework of Buridan’s Treatment of the Sophisma,” in Read, Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar, 333–47
Burge, Tyler, “Buridan and Epistemic Paradox,” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978) 21–35Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Sophismata
  • Edited by Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Edited in association with Christina van Dyke, Calvin College, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107446953.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Sophismata
  • Edited by Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Edited in association with Christina van Dyke, Calvin College, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107446953.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Sophismata
  • Edited by Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Edited in association with Christina van Dyke, Calvin College, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781107446953.018
Available formats
×