3 results
The lifestyle of lichens in soil crusts
- T. G. Allan GREEN, Ana PINTADO, Jose RAGGIO, Leopoldo Garcia SANCHO
-
- Journal:
- The Lichenologist / Volume 50 / Issue 3 / May 2018
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 08 May 2018, pp. 397-410
- Print publication:
- May 2018
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
Lichens are one of the common dominant biota in biological soil crusts (biocrusts), a community that is one of the largest in extent in the world. Here we present a summary of the main features of the lifestyle of soil crust lichens, emphasizing their habitat, ecophysiology and versatility. The soil crust is exposed to full light, often to high temperatures and has an additional water source, the soil beneath the lichens. However, despite the open nature of the habitat the lichens are active under shady and cooler conditions and avoid climate extremes of high temperature and light. In temperate and alpine habitats they can also be active for long periods, several months in some cases. They show a mixture of physiological constancy (e.g. similar activity periods and net photosynthetic rates) but also adaptations to the habitat (e.g. the response of net photosynthesis to thallus water content can differ for the same lichen species in Europe and the USA and some species show extensive rhizomorph development). Despite recent increased research, aspects of soil crust ecology, for example under snow, remain little understood.
Bond Strength of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cements is Affected by Tubular Density and Location in Dentin?
- Tamara K. Tedesco, Ana Flávia B. Calvo, Gabrielle G. Domingues, Fausto M. Mendes, Daniela P. Raggio
-
- Journal:
- Microscopy and Microanalysis / Volume 21 / Issue 4 / August 2015
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 03 July 2015, pp. 849-854
- Print publication:
- August 2015
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
This study evaluated the influence of tubular density of different dentin depths and location on the bond strength of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements (GIC). A total of 20 molars were selected and assigned into six experimental groups, considering two different high-viscosity GICs—Fuji IX (FIX) or Ketac Molar (KM), and dentin location—proximal, occlusal superficial, or occlusal deep dentin (n=10). Teeth were cut and a topographical analysis of four sections per group was performed to obtain data about the tubular density of each different dentin location and depths by laser scanning confocal microscopy (100×). Polyethylene tubes were placed over the pretreated surfaces and filled with one of the GICs. Microshear bond strength (µSBS) test was performed after storage in distilled water (24 h at 37°C). Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (400×). Multilevel regression analysis was performed to compare the results at a significance level set at 5%. The tubule density was inversely proportional to the bond strength for both GICs (p<0.05). Adhesive/mixed failure prevailed in all experimental groups. Proximal (30036.5±3433.3) and occlusal superficial 29665.3±1434.04 dentin shows lower tubule density, resulting in a better GIC bonding performance (proximal: FIX–3.61±1.05; KM–3.40±1.62; occlusal superficial: FIX–4.70±1.85; KM–4.97±1.25). Thus, we can concluded that the lowest tubule density in proximal and occlusal superficial dentin results in a better GIC bond strength performance.
The route of absorbed nitrogen into milk protein
- H. Lapierre, R. Berthiaume, G. Raggio, M. C. Thivierge, L. Doepel, D. Pacheco, P. Dubreuil, G. E. Lobley
-
- Journal:
- Animal Science / Volume 80 / Issue 1 / February 2005
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 09 March 2007, pp. 11-22
- Print publication:
- February 2005
-
- Article
- Export citation
-
A database reviewing the metabolism of nitrogen (N) compounds from absorption to milk has been compiled from 14 published and unpublished studies (33 treatments) that measured the net flux of N compounds across the splanchnic tissues in dairy cows. Apparent N digestibility averaged 0·65, with this then partitioned between 0·34 excreted in urine and 0·31 secreted as milk.
Nitrogen metabolites are absorbed from the lumen of the gut into the portal vein, mainly as free amino acids (AA) and ammonia; these represented 0·58 and 0·57 of digested N, respectively. All of the ammonia absorbed was removed by the liver with, as a result, a net splanchnic flux of zero. Detoxification of ammonia by the liver and catabolism of AA results in production of urea as an end-product. Hepatic ureagenesis is a major cross-road in terms of whole body N exchange, being the equivalent of 0·81 of digested N. Therefore, salvage of a considerable part of this ureagenesis is needed to support milk protein synthesis. This salvage occurs via transfer of urea from the blood circulation into the lumen of the gut. On average, 0·47 of hepatic ureagenesis was returned to the gut via the portal-drained viscera (equivalent to 0·34 of digested N) with 0·56 of this then used for anabolic purposes e.g. as precursor N for microbial protein synthesis. On average, 0·65 of estimated digestible AA was recovered in the portal vein. This loss (0·35) is due to oxidation of certain AA across the gut wall and non-absorption of endogenous secretions. The magnitude of this loss is not uniform among AA and varies between less than 0·05 for histidine to more than 0·90 for some non-essential AA, such as glutamine.
A second database (six studies, 14 treatments) was constructed to further examine the subsequent fate of absorbed essential AA. When all AA are aggregated, the liver removed, on average, 0·45 of portal absorption but this value hides the considerable variation between individual AA. Simplistically, the AA behave as two major groups: one group undergoes very little hepatic removal and includes the branched-chain AA and lysine. For the second group, removal varies between 0·35 and 0·50 of portal absorption, and includes histidine, methionine and phenylalanine. For both groups, however, the efficiency of transfer of absorbed AA into milk protein decreases with increasing supply of protein. This loss of efficiency is linked directly with increased hepatic removal of AA from the second group and, probably, increased catabolism by peripheral tissues, including the mammary gland, of AA from the first group. Therefore, we must stop using fixed factors of conversion of digestible AA to milk in our predictive schemes and acknowledge that metabolism of AA between delivery from the duodenum and conversion to milk protein will vary with nutrient supply. New information evolving from re-analysis of the literature and recent studies will allow better models to be devised for the prediction of nutrient-based responses by the lactating cow. Consideration of biological efficiency, rather than maximal milk yield, will lead to systems that are economically more sensible for the farmer and that have better environmental impacts.