4 results
The Role of COVID-19 Pandemic Anxiety and Perceptions in COVID-19 Vaccination
- E. R. Semenova, J. Konyukhovskaya, S. Sviridova, E. Pervichko, O. Stepanova, O. Mitina, I. Shishkova
-
- Journal:
- European Psychiatry / Volume 66 / Issue S1 / March 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2023, p. S789
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Since stress and anxiety are significant manifestations of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, we studied their role in making a decision about vaccination.
ObjectivesTo study the relationship between the intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19 with health anxiety and stress levels.
MethodsThe methodological complex includes the author’s socio-demographic questionnaire (Pervichko, 2020, 2021, 2022); the questionnaire “Scale of perceived stress-10” (Ababkov, 2016); the questionnaire “Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic” (Pervichko et al., 2020), developed on the basis of the Russian-language version of the E. Broadbent’s short questionnaire about the perception of disease (Broadbent, 2006); the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Spielberger, 2002) and the “Short Health Anxiety Inventory” (Pervichko et al., 2020).
The study involved 232 respondents who did not have COVID-19 (average age – 29.1 ± 13.7 years). Among the respondents, 68.5% have already been vaccinated, 23.3% do not plan to be vaccinated and 8.2% plan to perform the procedure.
ResultsThe methodological complex includes the author’s socio-demographic questionnaire (Pervichko, 2020, 2021, 2022); the questionnaire “Scale of perceived stress-10” (Ababkov, 2016); the questionnaire “Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic” (Pervichko et al., 2020), developed on the basis of the Russian-language version of the E. Broadbent’s short questionnaire about the perception of disease (Broadbent, 2006); the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Spielberger, 2002) and the “Short Health Anxiety Inventory” (Pervichko et al., 2020).
The study involved 232 respondents who did not have COVID-19 (average age – 29.1 ± 13.7 years). Among the respondents, 68.5% have already been vaccinated, 23.3% do not plan to be vaccinated and 8.2% plan to perform the procedure.
ConclusionsHigher health anxiety, situational anxiety, perceived stress, and greater perceived life threat due to coronavirus contribute to COVID-19 immunization procedures, which is accompanied by perceptions of greater control of the pandemic.
Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
Health Locus of Control and Health Anxiety in Patients with COVID-19
- E. R. Semenova, E. Deshchenko, E. Pervichko, J. Konyukhovskaya
-
- Journal:
- European Psychiatry / Volume 66 / Issue S1 / March 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2023, pp. S788-S789
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
Perceived sense of control over one’s health contributes to determining health-related behaviors and an individual’s health status. Therefore, it may enhance vulnerability to health anxiety in response to COVID-19 and influence implementation of preventive strategies and adherence to them. Health anxiety may serve as one of the factors that increase the perception of COVID-19 as dangerous and life-threatening. We hypothesized that external health locus of control may demonstrate a connection with higher levels of health anxiety, whereas internal health locus of control may be considered a protective factor alongside some personality traits due to its role in determination of coping strategies.
ObjectivesTo assess health locus of control (HLC) in patients with COVID-19 and evaluate its connection with the levels of health anxiety.
MethodsThe study has involved 62 participants, average age is 23,4±8,2, with 36 of them being diagnosed with COVID-19 one or more times, average age is 24,5±8,9, whereas 26 of them were healthy, average age is 21,8±7,1. The following methods were used: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (modified for COVID-19), Perceived Stress Scale, the state scale from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Short Health Anxiety Inventory, Illness- and Treatment-Related Locus of Control Scale, HEXACO-24 Personality Inventory, Self-Government Test.
ResultsCOVID-19 patients differed from healthy participants by the following parameters: perceived danger of COVID-19 (31,53±9,51 vs 33,92±11,5; p>0,05); perceived stress (28±8,68 vs 26,5±7,3; p>0,05); state anxiety level (23,3±11,1 vs 25,1±12,5; p>0,05); health anxiety (14,3±6,76 vs 13,8±5,7; p>0,05); internal HLC (18,8±3,24 vs 17,8±4,67; p>0,05); external HLC (5,97±1,89 vs 5,81±1,92; p>0,05); extraversion (11,8±3,36 vs 13,10±3,71; p>0,05).
Correlation analysis has revealed mild positive correlations between health anxiety level and both external HLC (0,32; p<0,05) and chance HLC (0,25; p<0,05), mild negative correlation between health anxiety and internal HLC (-0,18; p>0,05). Analysis of COVID-19 related variables found that health anxiety levels were positively correlated with perceived danger of coronavirus disease (0,37; p<0,01), perceived stress (0,59; p<0,001) in the whole sample. Negative correlation was observed between extraversion and health anxiety (-0,49; p<0,05) in the group of COVID-19 patients.
ConclusionsThe results obtained in our study demonstrate the connection of the higher levels of health anxiety in COVID-19 patients with more external orientation of HLC. The connection between extraversion and health anxiety is also observed. Our study indicates that participants diagnosed with COVID-19 one or more times tend to have higher health anxiety levels in comparison to healthy participants.
Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
Dynamic of Covid-19 representations: time, cultural and social factors
- E. R. Semenova, O. Mitina, E. Pervichko, J. Konyukhovskaya, O. Stepanova
-
- Journal:
- European Psychiatry / Volume 66 / Issue S1 / March 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2023, pp. S213-S214
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
We have already noted in our studies (Pervichko et. al., 2020, 2021) that collective representations about Covid-19 disease, based on its totality, the catholicity of its impact on all spheres of people’s lives, are socially and culturally conditioned: they have their own specifics in different countries, associated with many social, economic, political factors. Moreover, these perceptions change over time.
ObjectivesTo identify the differences in the Covid-19 representations in residents of different countries and at different stages of the pandemic.
MethodsModified questionnaire of the internal picture of the disease (Broadbent, 2006), consisting of 8 questions about COVID-19 pandemic. All the items were rated using a 0-to-10 response scale. 1-5 items assess cognitive illness representations. Items 6 and 8 assess emotional representations. Item 7 assesses illness comprehensibility.
ResultsTo test of the research hypothesis, we used the data accumulated on our platform since April 2020. We selected subsamples: Russian respondents who took the survey in April-May 2020 (1st wave) (1), June-September 2020 (decline) (2), October - December 2020 (3) (2nd wave), 1st half of 2021 (4). At the same time as sample 4, respondents from Azerbaijan (5) and Uzbekistan (6) were surveyed. Finally, there was another sample of Uzbekistan respondents surveyed in the 1st half of 2022 (7). Respondents of both sexes and different ages participated in each sample, with a total of 2908 people. The table 1 shows the sample means for all items in all samples.
In all seven samples, women are characterized by responses indicating their greater tension, stress, and psychological fatigue caused by life in a pandemic. In almost all samples, younger respondents demonstrate greater involvement in the disease and its experiences. Perhaps this is due to the fact that social restrictions affected young respondents to a greater extent.
It was shown that with each new wave, the indicators for the 2, 5, 8 grow, and 3, 4, 7 decreases. At the same time, since no one canceled the pandemic, this year, along with a decrease in indicators for all items corresponding to stress and anxiety, ideas about the possible duration of the pandemic are growing.
Image:
ConclusionsWe can say that people have adapted to coexist with this disease and are ready for its continued presence in the world. The average indicators of Azerbaijani respondents indicate a more tense attitude towards the pandemic compared to Russia and Uzbekistan. It can be assumed that this is due to longer and more extensive state anti-epidemiological measures in Azerbaijan.
Disclosure of InterestNone Declared
TIME PERSPECTIVE OF THE PERSONALITY OF PATIENTS WHO HAD SEVERE AND MEDIUM COVID-19
- E. R. Semenova, E. Pervichko, A. Kulikova, I. Shishkova, J. Konyukhovskaya
-
- Journal:
- European Psychiatry / Volume 66 / Issue S1 / March 2023
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 19 July 2023, p. S789
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- Open access
- Export citation
-
Introduction
In connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, the question of how personal time constructs are modified becomes highly relevant. In particular, it is important to understand the specifics of the personality’s time perspective in patients who have undergone COVID-19 in varying degrees of severity.
ObjectivesTo study the time perspective of personality in patients who have undergone COVID-19 in medium and severe forms.
MethodsThe study was conducted from February to April 2022. The first group of the sample (the medium form with hospitalization) consisted of 52 respondents (46.2% - men, 53.8% - women, M age =31.2 years; S=6.7). The second group (severe form with hospitalization) consisted of 48 patients (60% - men and 40% - women, M age =33.0 years; S=7.8). We used: “The questionnaire of the time perspective of the personality of F. Zimbardo (Short version)”; (Zimbardo, Boyd, 1997; Syrtsova, 2008), the “Scale of Time experience” questionnaire (Golovakha, Kronik, 2008) and the descriptive analysis.
ResultsRespondents with a medium form of the disease have more developed hedonistic present (3.2±0.6), future (3.8±0.4) and positive past (3.7±0.6). The negative past (2.6±0.7) and fatalistic present (2.4±0.6) are the least represented in their lives. Respondents with a severe form have a more developed negative past (3.4±0.7), hedonistic present (3.4±0.4), future (3.7±0.5) and positive past (3.6±0.7). The fatalistic present is the least represented in their life (3.0±0.5). When analyzing the factors of time experiencing, it was revealed that respondents with a medium form perceive time as moderately continuous (3.4± 0.8), moderately tense (3.4± 0.8) due to pronounced emptiness and compactness, and also treat time on average not very positively (3.2± 1.0). Respondents with a severe form also perceive time as moderately continuous (3.4± 0.7), rather tense (4.1±1.1) due to pronounced saturation, compactness and rapidity, while they treat time on average moderately positively (2.5± 0.9).
ConclusionsThe time perspective in patients with medium form is characterized by planning and achieving future goals, and these respondents also show a fairly high degree of acceptance of their own past, in which any experience is an experience that contributes to development and led to today’s state. In respondents with a severe form, along with normative scores on the positive past scale, there is also an increase in negative perception of the past, which is reflected in an increased degree of rejection of their own past, causing disgust, full of pain and frustration, as well as a hedonistic, risky attitude to time and life, while an orientation towards pleasure, excitement, excitement, enjoyment in the present and lack of concern for future consequences or sacrifices in favor of future rewards. Assistance and help to such respondents should be in the focus of specialists of the relevant profile.
Disclosure of InterestNone Declared